Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


numnuts
 Share

Message added by Grumpy Owl,

This topic is for all general discussion regarding the current COVID-19 pandemic. There are of course numerous other related topics for discussing specific aspects of this pandemic in more detail. And there are other parts of this forum for more 'off-topic' discussions.

Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, DaleP said:

 

Well OK, I'll try to be a breatharian like yogis when the opportunity arises.

As you raise your vibration you eat less.

Low vibrational = need to consume more due to lack of love = end result = obesity.

 

No need, still following the WWII script they will introduce rationing.

 

Australians are already restricted to six beers.

 

Then there will be blackouts to save the planet.

 

Conscripttion of the unemployed to fight a war.

 

Anyway, you know how it ends, in mass deaths...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know I'm sounding like a stuck record, but the JCVI ruled last week that the benefits of vaccines were only 'marginally greater' than the known risks of covid in children. However, the risk of myocarditis in children from vaccines is six times greater than any risk from the alleged virus. Therefore, getting covid is preferrable to getting the vaccine, in terms of health risks. Still, Chris Whitty wants it administered to children “to help them avoid worrying about the virus and learn to get on with their peers” after the government and the media put the fear of death into them in the first place. So, in a nutshell, SAGE want children to receive a treatment which may kill them, for a disease they don’t get. It boggles the mind.

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Velma said:

I know I'm sounding like a stuck record, but the JCVI ruled last week that the benefits of vaccines were only 'marginally greater' than the known risks of covid in children. However, the risk of myocarditis in children from vaccines is six times greater than any risk from the alleged virus. Therefore, getting covid is preferrable to getting the vaccine, in terms of health risks. Still, Chris Whitty wants it administered to children “to help them avoid worrying about the virus and learn to get on with their peers” after the government and the media put the fear of death into them in the first place. So, in a nutshell, SAGE want children to receive a treatment which may kill them, for a disease they don’t get. It boggles the mind.

The decision to ignore the JCVI ruling also makes the blacklisting/censorship of any qualified person speaking out against this seem even more sinister.

Edited by ar55
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, ar55 said:

The U-turn on passports just shows that there’s far less people jabbed than claimed.

 

Could be, but also to show the Scots the future they would face under Sturgeons SNP ruled independent Scotland? 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Velma said:

I know I'm sounding like a stuck record, but the JCVI ruled last week that the benefits of vaccines were only 'marginally greater' than the known risks of covid in children. However, the risk of myocarditis in children from vaccines is six times greater than any risk from the alleged virus. Therefore, getting covid is preferrable to getting the vaccine, in terms of health risks. Still, Chris Whitty wants it administered to children “to help them avoid worrying about the virus and learn to get on with their peers” after the government and the media put the fear of death into them in the first place. So, in a nutshell, SAGE want children to receive a treatment which may kill them, for a disease they don’t get. It boggles the mind.

I get the impression certain elements are backing off and letting the ev*l psychopaths  show themselves in the clear.

 

As for children's mental health, none of us here want to even try to imagine the mental health of a 14 y/o with an enlarged heart after being given the jab.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, campanar said:

Could be, but also to show the Scots the future they would face under Sturgeons SNP ruled independent Scotland? 

I tend to believe Scotland’s vaccination numbers.

 

People have always been a lot more compliant here, than in England.
 

If anything, it being binned by Boris and the Tories will only strengthen the demand for passports here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, campanar said:

I get the impression certain elements are backing off and letting the ev*l psychopaths  show themselves in the clear.

 

As for children's mental health, none of us here want to even try to imagine the mental health of a 14 y/o with an enlarged heart after being given the jab.

 

They can't play the 'mental health' card when they come for the infants and toddlers, because they have no cognitive awareness of how fucked-up our society is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From a longer article (link below) ...

 

Doe v. Rumsfeld proved in 2004 that investigational drugs could not be forced upon people unless there is a presidential waiver or informed consent. Well, here’s the kicker on presidential waiver, which is what they’re going to go to.

Anybody who takes an oath of office — the president of the United States, senators, representatives to Congress, governors, police officers, judges, lawyers, administrative officials — cannot violate the U.S. Constitution. If they do, they’ve committed treason, by definition.

In the U.S. Constitution, it states that Treaty Law and the Constitution and statutes are the supreme law of the land. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights specifically states that you cannot force people to take a drug; that they have to have informed consent, and that animal research has to have been done beforehand to prove it’s safe.

So, if a president, including this one, issues an order that this is a mandate and is required, then he is violating the U.S. Constitution by violating Treaty and therefore has committed treason.

It’s not only an impeachable offense, it is punishable by death because that’s [the punishment for] treason. You can’t force U.S. citizens to undergo forced experimentation.

And you can’t get around that by doing something cute like having the FDA say, ‘Whoa, well, we’ve now approved it, OK?’ Because the Supreme Court has already ruled that you cannot force people to take a treatment and the only party that can change that is the Supreme Court.”

https://tapnewswire.com/2021/09/warning-to-medical-professionals/

 

 

 

Edited by webtrekker
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

 

 

Looks like masks vs no masks.

 

Edit: Could be agent provocateurs too, it's hard to say in such a divided society.

 

Exactly what the Elites want, people fighting each other, distracted from who the 'real enemy' is.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, webtrekker said:

Boris Johnson scraps vaccine passports under Covid winter plan

 
The Prime Minister is set to announce the end of the emergency lockdown laws and axe plans to introduce vaccine passports under his new Covid Winter Plan. Instead, Mr Johnson will hand out booster jabs in an attempt to prevent the UK being plunged into yet another lockdown.
 
 
 
 

Wow some great positive news, but will believe it when I see it. Thx for sharing.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Anders said:

 

But back on the agenda for the Spring Covid Plan ?

 

I'm not sure they'll be worried about producing a Spring Covid Plan. If everything to be believed about these 'vaccines' is true then there will be very few people left alive after this winter to bother making a plan for.

 

As I said earlier, I believe they mean to relax vax passports so that as many people as possible attend superspreader events. Booster shots will further increase the risk of ADE’s due to the injection of billions of extra protein spikes into the host.This will allow ADE (Antibody Dependent Enhancement) to run riot in the jabbed population causing all manner of nasty side effects and death. They'll blame these deaths on the unvaxxed that also attended the events, saying that they caused the spread of the 'virus.'

 

Belive me, this is not good news. It's simply another step in the Master Plan.

 

Edited by webtrekker
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ar55 said:

The U-turn on passports just shows that there’s far less people jabbed than claimed.

 

Not sure if it is a u turn. Politicians in pockets do as there instructed to. This seems more likely a type of conditioning in a sense that it shows there thinking how there trying to keep you safe whilst reinforcing the fact convids real pantomine. There still rolling out be jabbed to go to work scenarios which is passport all but in name.schools also are about to be hit with be jabbed. If ever a u turn should be played it's that as it doesn't have medical backing.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...