Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


numnuts
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, HAARPING_On said:

CDC/FDA smoking gun of smoking guns

 

They confess: they had no virus when they concocted the test for the virus; they “contrived” a model by pretending to find what they wanted to find; it’s called a self-fulfilling prophecy 

This is the con and the crime that drove millions of lives, and economies, into ruin 

by Jon Rappoport 

(To read about Jon's mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)

 

The CDC has issued a document that bulges with devastating admissions.

 

The release is titled, “07/21/2021: Lab Alert: Changes to CDC RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 Testing.” It begins explosively:

 

“After December 31, 2021, CDC will withdraw the request to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, the assay first introduced in February 2020 for detection of SARS-CoV-2 only. CDC is providing this advance notice for clinical laboratories to have adequate time to select and implement one of the many FDA-authorized alternatives.”

 

Many people believe this means the CDC is giving up on the PCR test as a means of “detecting the virus.” The CDC isn’t saying that at all.

 

They’re saying the PCR technology will continue to be used, but they’re replacing what the test is looking FOR with a better “reference sample.” A better marker. A better target. A better piece of RNA supposedly derived from SARS-CoV-2.

 

CDC/FDA are confessing there has been a PROBLEM with the PCR test which has been used to detect the virus, starting in February of 2020---right up to this minute.

 

In other words, the millions and millions of “COVID cases” based on the PCR test in use are all suspect. Actually, that statement is too generous. Every test result of every PCR test should be thrown out.

 

To confirm this, the CDC document links to an FDA release titled, “SARS-CoV-2 Reference Panel Comparative Data.” Here is a killer quote:

 

“During the early months of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, clinical specimens [of the virus] were not readily available to developers of IVDs [in vitro diagnostics] to detect SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, the FDA authorized IVDs based on available data from contrived samples generated from a range of SARS-CoV-2 material sources (for example, gene specific RNA, synthetic RNA, or whole genome viral RNA) for analytical and clinical performance evaluation. While validation using these contrived specimens provided a measure of confidence in test performance at the beginning of the pandemic, it is not feasible to precisely compare the performance of various tests that used contrived specimens because each test validated performance using samples derived from different gene specific, synthetic, or genomic nucleic acid sources.”

 

Translation: We, at the CDC, did not have a specimen of the SARS-CoV-2 virus when we concocted the PCR test for SARS-CoV-2. Yes, it’s unbelievable, right? And that’s the test we’ve been using all along. So we CONTRIVED samples of the virus. We fabricated. We lied. We made up [invented] synthetic gene sequences and we SAID these sequences HAD TO BE close to the sequence of SARS-CoV-2, without having the faintest idea of what we were doing, because, again, we didn’t have an actual specimen of the virus. We had no proof THERE WAS something called SARS-CoV-2.

 

This amazing FDA document goes to say the Agency has granted emergency approval to 59 different PCR tests since the beginning of the (fake) pandemic. 59. And, “…it is not feasible to precisely compare the performance of various tests that used contrived specimens because each test validated performance using samples derived from different gene specific, synthetic, or genomic nucleic acid sources.”

 

Translation: Each of the 59 different PCR tests for SARS-CoV-2 told different lies and concocted different fabrications about the genetic makeup of the virus---the virus we didn’t have. Obviously, then, these tests would give unreliable results. THE PCR TESTS USED CONTRIVED SPECIMENS OF THE VIRUS WE DIDN’T HAVE.

 

BUT, don’t worry, be happy, because NOW, the CDC and the FDA say, they really do have actual virus samples of SARS-CoV-2 from patients; they have better targets for the PCR test, and labs should start gearing up for the new and improved tests.

 

In other words, they were lying THEN, but they’re not lying NOW. They were “contriving,” but now they’re telling the truth.

 

If you believe that, I have Fountain of Youth water for sale, extracted from the lead-contaminated system of Flint, Michigan.

 

Here, once again, I report virology’s version of “we isolated the virus”:

 

They have a soup they make in their labs.

 

This soup contains human and monkey cells, toxic chemicals and drugs, and all sorts of other random genetic material. Because the cells start to die, the researchers ASSUME a bit of mucus from a patient they dropped in the soup is doing the killing, and THE VIRUS must be the killer agent in the mucus.

 

This assumption is entirely unwarranted. The drugs and chemicals could be doing the cell-killing, and the researchers are also starving the cells of vital nutrients, and that starvation could kill the cells.

 

There is no proof that SARS-CoV-2 is in the soup, or that it is doing the cell-killing, or that it exists.

 

Yet the researchers call cell-death “isolation of the virus.”

 

To say this is a non-sequitur is a vast understatement. In their universe, “We assume, without proof, we have the virus buried in a soup in a dish in the lab” equals, “We’ve separated the virus from all surrounding material.”

 

Virology equals “how to spread bullshit for a living and scare the world.” Other than that, it’s perfect.

 

~~~

 

(The link to this article posted on my blog is here -- with sources.)

 

(Follow me on Gab at @jonrappoport)

Wow, another bombshell article. Thanks Jon, stellar work

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://babylonbee.com/news/costco-and-pfizer-announce-2-gallon-family-size-vaccine-booster-tub/

 

Satire

 

Quote

SEATTLE, WA—In a deal that probably has nothing to do with Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine showing disappointing long-term effectiveness, the pharmaceutical giant has announced an ambitious partnership with bulk wholesale giant Costco, and the unveiling of the new Pfizer-Kirkland Signature 5-Gallon Family Size Vaccine Booster Tub™.

 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Shy Talk said:

Just to add to today's nonsense about the Mu variant, the KLF had a hit in the early 90s with these lyrics:

 

All bound for Mu Mu Land
All bound for Mu Mu Land
(Hey)
All bound for Mu Mu Land (justified)
(Hey, hey)
All bound for Mu Mu Land
Mu Mu Land
Mu Mu Land
All bound for Mu Mu Land
 
Maybe they were ahead of their time.

Mu is Lemuria, the equivalent of Atlantis in the Pacific Ocean.

 

Get this -  sceptics have described Mu/Lemuria as 'a theoretical concept with no basis in reality'.

 

Just the same as the Mu variant then!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/31/2021 at 8:06 PM, Sharisteg said:

What's even more confusing for me is that the right to go unprotected and disrupt attempts to control a novel virus is being painted as an important human rights movement. I'm not a "sheep" who does what she's told. I don't know how many of you have been active in protest movements but I have, and I'm not talking about the recent BLM marches. I've been out there in places where it's only the fringe making noise for disadvantage persons, the environment, distribution of wealth, access to basic needs and animal welfare. To me, human rights worth fighting for involve safe housing, food, the right to vote, educational opportunities, a life without war or famine. Entitled people whining about vaccines - and getting vaxxed is not just about you, it's about safety for society as a whole - piss me off. It's selfish and childish. Learn what real  problems are.

 

 

The thing about a communist is...they dont know they are a communist. 

 

LOL


Covid isnt real you soppy woman

 

Now piss off to an Antifa forum or an Extinction rebellion protest.

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Shy Talk said:

Just to add to today's nonsense about the Mu variant, the KLF had a hit in the early 90s with these lyrics:

 

All bound for Mu Mu Land
All bound for Mu Mu Land
(Hey)
All bound for Mu Mu Land (justified)
(Hey, hey)
All bound for Mu Mu Land
Mu Mu Land
Mu Mu Land
All bound for Mu Mu Land
 
Maybe they were ahead of their time.

Jimmy Cauty and Bill Drummond (The KLF) released a book in 2018 called 2023.. 

 

 

I've read it. The world is owned by 5 big tech corporations. It's a prescient book for sure and well worth a read.

 

Jimmy Cauty now does massive dioramas. His latest one is called 'Aftermath Dislocation Priciple' and is a 40ft post apocalyptic diorama that tours Europe inside a 40 foot shipping container with peep holes on the sides. 

 

They must be awake..

 

 

 

downloadfile.jpg

downloadfile-1.jpg

2014.jpg

1448.jpg

Edited by Doc
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK... not sure this is going to be impactful to anyone...but I wanted to say about it.  I dont watch TV, however my friend allowed me to access her Netflix. Then another friend suggested I watch Manifest. So I did.

 

This show was filmed around 2016/17 and premiered 2018.

 

However, I noticed a few things in this show that jumped out at me. The following words/phrases were used often during this show:

 

"New normal".

"We're all in this together."

"Own your truth"

Networked brains

 

& references to AI.

& experiments on humans.

Still watching this but does anyone else find this weird?

 

 

Edited by Beaujangles
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Shy Talk said:

Just to add to today's nonsense about the Mu variant, the KLF had a hit in the early 90s with these lyrics:

 

All bound for Mu Mu Land
All bound for Mu Mu Land
(Hey)
All bound for Mu Mu Land (justified)
(Hey, hey)
All bound for Mu Mu Land
Mu Mu Land
Mu Mu Land
All bound for Mu Mu Land
 
Maybe they were ahead of their time.


Mu Mu Land 

 

Vaccination comes from vacca in spanish and portugese  meaning Cow 

The first vax cow pox to prevent small pox

 

moo moo land

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Beaujangles said:

OK... not sure this is going to be impactful to anyone...but I wanted to say about it.  I dont watch TV, however my friend allowed me to access her Netflix. The another friend suggested I watch Manifest. So I did.

 

This show was filmed around 2016/17 and premiered 2018.

 

However, I noticed a few things in this show that jumped out at me. The following words/phrases were used often during this show:

 

"New normal".

"We're all in this together."

"Own your truth"

Networked brains

 

& references to AI.

& experiments on humans.

Still watching this but does anyone else find this weird?

 

 

I'm sorry to hear you were subjected to Netflix content (the devils own channel).

It's good that your spiritual immune system seems to be working.

Don't do it again, it's not worth it.

Protect what enters your senses where you can.

Kill your TV.

 

We've been watching recently;

 

Blackbird parents rooting out juicy tidbits for their young one.

Canada Geese coming in to the field behind us for a rest on their journey south(?).

A young robin staking a hereditary claim on our garden.

A slow-worm rushing for cover upon being uncovered.

Our (psychotic, neurotic) cat munching down on a shrew.

Dozens of house sparrows treating my newly raked topsoil as a dust-lido.

 

All within the last two days. Wonderful.

 

T.V.? HA!

 

Edited by Nobby Noboddy
  • Like 5
  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Help please! My mother is due to be released from hospital (non-Covid ward) on Friday. However, before they will let her go, they want to do a Covid test. If it is 'positive', they will not release her. Can they (by law) do the test if she/I do not consent? Can they (by law) refuse to release her if it is positive? (I have health and welfare Lasting Power of Attorney.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • lake locked this topic
  • lake unlocked this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...