Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


numnuts

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, skitzorat said:

 

Yeah. Antifa propaganda... give them a little while longer and they'll be plastered on a vending machine near you 😉

 

 

It's like people have been trained to assume propaganda just means lies, but there is truthful and deceitful propaganda. Without getting into a rant about memetics, we would do well to master the art of positive propaganda that builds people up instead of destroying them.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, elongated1 said:

@DarianF

The answer is simple. Once the government mandated the vaccine for careworkers, everyone must participate in the clinical trial. It wouldn't have been so bad if it was a real medical therapy. They have coerced workers into human experiment. Still, no lawyer will challenge this. It's clear as black and white. They don't disclose the ingredients and we can't ask them. Do as your told.


It’s not an experiment though that’s what they want you to think, they want you to focus on the fact they have said it is experimental so when the time comes that they say it no longer is, they just say it’s passed safety and you’re injecting the same vaccine into yourself. You’re basically asking for it, simply under a different label.

 

Covid and the jab we’re patented over 15 years ago or something? Flu just disappeared? No more deaths on average? There never was any danger, the only danger is what you’re being forced to take

 

I’m beginning to think these 100 year pandemics are just to scare us into thinking viruses and bacteria are so dangerous we need vaccines and medicine to intervene.
 

In reality they purposefully feed us so much crap just so that we actually fall ill, then they can sell us their miracle cure which just makes people more ill and die younger, it’s a vicious and inefficient cycle which serves to manipulate and control people. I know for a fact that’s their game, otherwise they would be getting us to address our diets first, the proper, risk free way to PREVENT illness. 
 

I can tell even in yeadons recent short video, he knows virology and the whole medical industry is a big cash cow, they will corrupt anything and everything for money, and always have done.
 

Fact is no one should be being forced to put anything in their body, much less being restricted for not doing so. We’re being desensitised to coercion. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, skitzorat said:

Quote "checking in for an indefinite stay"🤨

 

Orwellian Language creep......

 

(PS. Im aware its staged AF - but its the 'normalisation' (as Yuri would say) of it one the news)

 

 

so if you self test.. the goon squad arrive and cart you off to a 'health hotel'

 

whereas, dont self test .... ????

 

wankers

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Sanityisgone said:


It’s not an experiment though that’s what they want you to think, they want you to focus on the fact they have said it is experimental so when the time comes that they say it no longer is, they just say it’s passed safety and you’re injecting the same vaccine into yourself. You’re basically asking for it, simply under a different label.

 

Covid and the jab we’re patented over 15 years ago or something? Flu just disappeared? No more deaths on average? There never was any danger, the only danger is what you’re being forced to take

 

I’m beginning to think these 100 year pandemics are just to scare us into thinking viruses and bacteria are so dangerous we need vaccines and medicine to intervene.
 

In reality they purposefully feed us so much crap just so that we actually fall ill, then they can sell us their miracle cure which just makes people more ill and die younger, it’s a vicious and inefficient cycle which serves to manipulate and control people. I know for a fact that’s their game, otherwise they would be getting us to address our diets first, the proper, risk free way to PREVENT illness. 
 

I can tell even in yeadons recent short video, he knows virology and the whole medical industry is a big cash cow, they will corrupt anything and everything for money, and always have done.
 

Fact is no one should be being forced to put anything in their body, much less being restricted for not doing so. We’re being desensitised to coercion. 

When the time comes to say the jab is safe it will just be another lie on top of the mountain of lies.

Historic court case reveals that NO safety studies were conducted on any vaccine over thirty-two years, as was required by law

https://www.vaccinedeaths.com/2021-03-25-court-case-reveals-no-vaccine-safety-studies-over-32-years.html#

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, zArk said:

Just in process of telling Asda to shove their turnips up their own self checkout and saw this IMG_20210817_154408.jpg.447f05278125c2ffa67ad011c7f82ac0.jpg

 

 

Almost there

 

deaglefigures.jpg.adc58cb21f0e4f294322d983b3ab0c36.jpg.21f298e1c3013b1a05396f9690c428b8.jpg

I don't get these numbers... Is colour a prognosis? Why China don't change? They have 24% vaccinated. Russia has sputnik which is not better... Saudi Arabia fully vaccinated 33% and I'm sure it will hit 60%... It doesn't look as it was only correlated with vaccination status. Are they going to nuke some countries or starve them? 😒

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was sent this by third party:

🛡 Hippocrates oath (-460 // 377): ′′ I will not give anyone poison, if asked, nor take the initiative of such a suggestion. ′′

🛡 Code of Medical Conduct, Article 36:
Article R4127- 36 of the Public Health Code: ′′ The consent of the person examined or treated must be sought in all cases. When the patient, in a state of expressing his will, refuses the investigation or treatment proposed, the doctor must respect this refusal after informing the patient of his consequences ′′

🛡 Nuremberg Code (1947): ′′ The consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights resumed this ban against unintentional experimentation, in its 1966 text, which states: no one may be subjected without his consent to medical or scientific experiment

🛡 Geneva statement for doctors (1948): ′′ I will respect the autonomy and dignity of my patient. I will not use my medical knowledge to infringe human rights and civil liberties, even under force. I will keep absolute respect for human life, from conception. I will consider my patient's health as my first concern ′′

🛡 Helsinki Declaration (1996) signed by 45 countries including France:
Article 25: ′′ The participation of persons capable of giving informed consent to medical research must be a voluntary act. No person capable of giving their informed consent can be involved in a search without giving their free and informed consent ′′

🛡 Oviedo Convention (1997) signed by 29 countries including France):
Article 5: ′′ An intervention in the health field may only be carried out after the data subject has given free and informed consent. This person is given prior adequate information about the purpose and nature of the intervention, as well as its consequences and risks. The data subject may, at any time, freely withdraw his consent ′′

🛡 Loi Kouchner (March 4, 2002):
Article 111-4: ′′ Every person shall make decisions concerning his health with the healthcare professional and taking into account the information he provides him / her. The doctor must respect the will of the person after informing them of the consequences of their choices. If the person's willingness to refuse or discontinue treatment puts his or her life at risk, the doctor must do everything to convince him or her to accept the much needed care. No medical or treatment can be practiced without the free and informed consent of the person and this consent can be withdrawn at any time

🛡 Salvetti stop (2002): No medical treatment is mandatory in the European Union: ′′ As a non-voluntary medical treatment, mandatory vaccination is an interference with the right to privacy, guaranteed by Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ′′ (Salvetti v Italy-ECHR decision of 9 July 2002; No. 42197/98)

🛡 French Civil Code:
Article 16-1: ′′ Everyone has the right to respect their own bodies. The body is inviolable ′′

🛡 Council of Europe resolution 2361 (28 January 2021): advisory opinion: the Assembly urges member states and the European Union:
Article 731: ′′ To ensure that citizens are informed that vaccination is not mandatory and that no one is under political, social or other pressure to get vaccinated, if he or she does not wish to do so personally ′′
Article 732: ′′ To ensure that no one is discriminated against for not being vaccinated, because of potential health risk or for not wanting to get vaccinated

  • Like 6
  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, SimonTV said:

Was sent this by third party:

🛡 Hippocrates oath (-460 // 377): ′′ I will not give anyone poison, if asked, nor take the initiative of such a suggestion. ′′

🛡 Code of Medical Conduct, Article 36:
Article R4127- 36 of the Public Health Code: ′′ The consent of the person examined or treated must be sought in all cases. When the patient, in a state of expressing his will, refuses the investigation or treatment proposed, the doctor must respect this refusal after informing the patient of his consequences ′′

🛡 Nuremberg Code (1947): ′′ The consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights resumed this ban against unintentional experimentation, in its 1966 text, which states: no one may be subjected without his consent to medical or scientific experiment

🛡 Geneva statement for doctors (1948): ′′ I will respect the autonomy and dignity of my patient. I will not use my medical knowledge to infringe human rights and civil liberties, even under force. I will keep absolute respect for human life, from conception. I will consider my patient's health as my first concern ′′

🛡 Helsinki Declaration (1996) signed by 45 countries including France:
Article 25: ′′ The participation of persons capable of giving informed consent to medical research must be a voluntary act. No person capable of giving their informed consent can be involved in a search without giving their free and informed consent ′′

🛡 Oviedo Convention (1997) signed by 29 countries including France):
Article 5: ′′ An intervention in the health field may only be carried out after the data subject has given free and informed consent. This person is given prior adequate information about the purpose and nature of the intervention, as well as its consequences and risks. The data subject may, at any time, freely withdraw his consent ′′

🛡 Loi Kouchner (March 4, 2002):
Article 111-4: ′′ Every person shall make decisions concerning his health with the healthcare professional and taking into account the information he provides him / her. The doctor must respect the will of the person after informing them of the consequences of their choices. If the person's willingness to refuse or discontinue treatment puts his or her life at risk, the doctor must do everything to convince him or her to accept the much needed care. No medical or treatment can be practiced without the free and informed consent of the person and this consent can be withdrawn at any time

🛡 Salvetti stop (2002): No medical treatment is mandatory in the European Union: ′′ As a non-voluntary medical treatment, mandatory vaccination is an interference with the right to privacy, guaranteed by Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ′′ (Salvetti v Italy-ECHR decision of 9 July 2002; No. 42197/98)

🛡 French Civil Code:
Article 16-1: ′′ Everyone has the right to respect their own bodies. The body is inviolable ′′

🛡 Council of Europe resolution 2361 (28 January 2021): advisory opinion: the Assembly urges member states and the European Union:
Article 731: ′′ To ensure that citizens are informed that vaccination is not mandatory and that no one is under political, social or other pressure to get vaccinated, if he or she does not wish to do so personally ′′
Article 732: ′′ To ensure that no one is discriminated against for not being vaccinated, because of potential health risk or for not wanting to get vaccinated

This is really amazing compilation. TY 🙏

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, SimonTV said:

Was sent this by third party:

🛡 Hippocrates oath (-460 // 377): ′′ I will not give anyone poison, if asked, nor take the initiative of such a suggestion. ′′

🛡 Code of Medical Conduct, Article 36:
Article R4127- 36 of the Public Health Code: ′′ The consent of the person examined or treated must be sought in all cases. When the patient, in a state of expressing his will, refuses the investigation or treatment proposed, the doctor must respect this refusal after informing the patient of his consequences ′′

🛡 Nuremberg Code (1947): ′′ The consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights resumed this ban against unintentional experimentation, in its 1966 text, which states: no one may be subjected without his consent to medical or scientific experiment

🛡 Geneva statement for doctors (1948): ′′ I will respect the autonomy and dignity of my patient. I will not use my medical knowledge to infringe human rights and civil liberties, even under force. I will keep absolute respect for human life, from conception. I will consider my patient's health as my first concern ′′

🛡 Helsinki Declaration (1996) signed by 45 countries including France:
Article 25: ′′ The participation of persons capable of giving informed consent to medical research must be a voluntary act. No person capable of giving their informed consent can be involved in a search without giving their free and informed consent ′′

🛡 Oviedo Convention (1997) signed by 29 countries including France):
Article 5: ′′ An intervention in the health field may only be carried out after the data subject has given free and informed consent. This person is given prior adequate information about the purpose and nature of the intervention, as well as its consequences and risks. The data subject may, at any time, freely withdraw his consent ′′

🛡 Loi Kouchner (March 4, 2002):
Article 111-4: ′′ Every person shall make decisions concerning his health with the healthcare professional and taking into account the information he provides him / her. The doctor must respect the will of the person after informing them of the consequences of their choices. If the person's willingness to refuse or discontinue treatment puts his or her life at risk, the doctor must do everything to convince him or her to accept the much needed care. No medical or treatment can be practiced without the free and informed consent of the person and this consent can be withdrawn at any time

🛡 Salvetti stop (2002): No medical treatment is mandatory in the European Union: ′′ As a non-voluntary medical treatment, mandatory vaccination is an interference with the right to privacy, guaranteed by Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ′′ (Salvetti v Italy-ECHR decision of 9 July 2002; No. 42197/98)

🛡 French Civil Code:
Article 16-1: ′′ Everyone has the right to respect their own bodies. The body is inviolable ′′

🛡 Council of Europe resolution 2361 (28 January 2021): advisory opinion: the Assembly urges member states and the European Union:
Article 731: ′′ To ensure that citizens are informed that vaccination is not mandatory and that no one is under political, social or other pressure to get vaccinated, if he or she does not wish to do so personally ′′
Article 732: ′′ To ensure that no one is discriminated against for not being vaccinated, because of potential health risk or for not wanting to get vaccinated

Thanks for this, it's good to know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Human10 said:

I don't get these numbers... Is colour a prognosis? Why China don't change? They have 24% vaccinated. Russia has sputnik which is not better... Saudi Arabia fully vaccinated 33% and I'm sure it will hit 60%... It doesn't look as it was only correlated with vaccination status. Are they going to nuke some countries or starve them? 😒

Maybe your right. Alot can change in 4 years

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SimonTV said:

Was sent this by third party:

🛡 Hippocrates oath (-460 // 377): ′′ I will not give anyone poison, if asked, nor take the initiative of such a suggestion. ′′

🛡 Code of Medical Conduct, Article 36:
Article R4127- 36 of the Public Health Code: ′′ The consent of the person examined or treated must be sought in all cases. When the patient, in a state of expressing his will, refuses the investigation or treatment proposed, the doctor must respect this refusal after informing the patient of his consequences ′′

🛡 Nuremberg Code (1947): ′′ The consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights resumed this ban against unintentional experimentation, in its 1966 text, which states: no one may be subjected without his consent to medical or scientific experiment

🛡 Geneva statement for doctors (1948): ′′ I will respect the autonomy and dignity of my patient. I will not use my medical knowledge to infringe human rights and civil liberties, even under force. I will keep absolute respect for human life, from conception. I will consider my patient's health as my first concern ′′

🛡 Helsinki Declaration (1996) signed by 45 countries including France:
Article 25: ′′ The participation of persons capable of giving informed consent to medical research must be a voluntary act. No person capable of giving their informed consent can be involved in a search without giving their free and informed consent ′′

🛡 Oviedo Convention (1997) signed by 29 countries including France):
Article 5: ′′ An intervention in the health field may only be carried out after the data subject has given free and informed consent. This person is given prior adequate information about the purpose and nature of the intervention, as well as its consequences and risks. The data subject may, at any time, freely withdraw his consent ′′

🛡 Loi Kouchner (March 4, 2002):
Article 111-4: ′′ Every person shall make decisions concerning his health with the healthcare professional and taking into account the information he provides him / her. The doctor must respect the will of the person after informing them of the consequences of their choices. If the person's willingness to refuse or discontinue treatment puts his or her life at risk, the doctor must do everything to convince him or her to accept the much needed care. No medical or treatment can be practiced without the free and informed consent of the person and this consent can be withdrawn at any time

🛡 Salvetti stop (2002): No medical treatment is mandatory in the European Union: ′′ As a non-voluntary medical treatment, mandatory vaccination is an interference with the right to privacy, guaranteed by Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ′′ (Salvetti v Italy-ECHR decision of 9 July 2002; No. 42197/98)

🛡 French Civil Code:
Article 16-1: ′′ Everyone has the right to respect their own bodies. The body is inviolable ′′

🛡 Council of Europe resolution 2361 (28 January 2021): advisory opinion: the Assembly urges member states and the European Union:
Article 731: ′′ To ensure that citizens are informed that vaccination is not mandatory and that no one is under political, social or other pressure to get vaccinated, if he or she does not wish to do so personally ′′
Article 732: ′′ To ensure that no one is discriminated against for not being vaccinated, because of potential health risk or for not wanting to get vaccinated

Excellent list. But it just goes to show, oaths, treaties and laws don't really mean anything.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, alexa said:

 

Cell Towers Disguised as Skyscrapers? August 15 - 2021

https://153news.net/watch_video.php?v=NA6XD4653O5S

 

image_2021-08-17_085117.png.47214a45c0fb84fec18e277cb54625ed.png

Interesting. Definitely resembles cell towers in some ways. I'd be surprised if they did this for purely aesthetic reasons anyway. Some people were commenting it was to let wind through, but I don't see why it would be necessary when the lower part of building looks solid.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

 

I hear you, it's just easy for us to have a laugh at it all, but they often outnumber people, and pick on the vulnerable, like old people crossing the street and shit.

 

Even with their riot gear and weapons, they do get humiliated sometimes though.

 

sdfw.gif

 

Not advocating turning up to these stupid glow ops to fight like an idiot in the street, just a funny observation.

It wasn't a criticism of your post, it was just an observation. I hear you though, I've seen previous clips of their antics. They're bullies and clearly ill-trained pussies. 

Edited by Morpheus
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • lake locked this topic
  • lake unlocked this topic
  • Beaujangles featured this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...