Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


numnuts
 Share

Recommended Posts

Bombshell: FDA knew all along there would be many COVID cases among the fully vaccinated---and buried that knowledge

 

by Jon Rappoport

 

(To read about Jon's mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)

 

First of all, I have to re-emphasize a point I’ve made many times: SARS-CoV-2 doesn’t exist. I’ve been proving that for over a year.

 

BUT I don’t stop there. I temporarily enter the official world where people assume the virus does exist, and I reveal many internal contradictions and lies and cover-ups within that world.

 

Some readers, who possess sub-standard literacy, believe I’m contradicting MYSELF. They think I’m saying the virus doesn’t exist and does exist.

 

Wrong.

 

Analogy: People sitting inside a theater are watching a movie, and they believe it’s a real world. They react in all sorts of strange ways, based on that assumption. You’re standing outside the theater, looking through the window. You can just say, “They’re all crazy,” and leave it at that, or you can say, “They’re all crazy,” and THEN walk inside the theater and get a good look at what they’re up to as well. That’s what I do.

 

That’s what I’m doing in this article, which is about the FDA and their emergency authorization of the COVID vaccine, despite knowing the vaccine didn’t pass muster, didn’t even vaguely rank as effective in the clinical trials.

 

Because lots of people in the clinical trial became COVID cases after being vaccinated.

 

In other words, the FDA knew, right from the get-go, that many so-called breakthrough cases would develop. They knew many vaccinated people would become COVID cases.

 

This knowledge should have prevented the FDA from granting emergency use authorization for the vaccine---but it didn’t.

 

(Reminder: We’re in the crazy fake theater now, where the virus is real, the PCR test is meaningful and accurate, the vaccine is necessary.)

 

Here we go.

 

The document, posted on the FDA website, is titled, “Vaccines and Related Biological Products; Advisory Committee Meeting; FDA Briefing Document Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine.” [1]

 

It is dated December 10, 2020. The date tells us that all the information in the document is taken from the Pfizer clinical trial, based on which the FDA authorized the vaccine for public use.

 

A key quote is buried on page 42: “Among 3410 total cases of suspected but unconfirmed COVID-19 in the overall study population, 1594 occurred in the vaccine group vs. 1816 in the placebo group [who received a saltwater shot].”

 

Those shocking numbers have never seen the light of day in news media.

 

The comparative numbers reveal that the vaccine was not effective at preventing COVID-19. It was certainly not 50% more effective than a placebo shot---the standard for FDA Emergency Use Authorization.

 

To make all this clear, I need to back up and explain the theory of the vaccine clinical trial.

 

The researchers assumed the SARS-CoV-2 virus was spreading everywhere in the world, and during the clinical trial, it would descend on some volunteers.

 

The billion-dollar question was: how many people receiving the vaccine would become infected, vs. how many people in the placebo group?

 

If it turned out that FAR FEWER people getting the vaccine became infected with SARS-CoV-2, the vaccine would be hailed as a success. It protected people against the virus.

 

But as you can see from the numbers above, that wasn’t the case at all.

 

So now we come to the vital weasel-phrase in the FDA document I just quoted: “suspected but unconfirmed COVID-19 [cases].”

 

“Well, you see, we can’t say these were ACTUAL COVID-19 cases. Maybe they were, maybe they weren’t. They’re in limbo. We want to keep them in limbo. Otherwise, our clinical trial is dead in the water, and we’ll never get approval for the vaccine.”

 

What does “suspected cases” mean? It can only mean these people all displayed symptoms consistent with the definition of COVID-19, but they’re unconfirmed cases because…their PCR tests were negative, not positive.

 

However, if their tests were negative, why would they be called “suspected cases” instead of “NOT CASES”?

 

Something is wrong here. The FDA is hedging its bets, muddying the waters, obscuring facts.

 

By FDA/CDC rules, a case of COVID-19 means: a person has tested positive, period.

 

That’s the way cases are counted.

 

These thousand-plus volunteers in the Pfizer clinical trial were either COVID-19 cases or they weren’t. Which is it?

 

The official response to that question is obvious: the FDA decided to throw the data from all those “suspected cases” in the garbage and ignore them. Poof. Gone.

 

Why do I say that?

 

Because if the FDA had paid serious attention to the “suspected cases,” they never would have authorized the vaccine for public use. They would have stopped the clinical trial and undertaken a very deep and extensive investigation.

 

Which they didn’t.

 

This is called a crime.

 

“But…but it’s not that simple. This is a complex situation. It’s a gray area.”

 

“No. It isn’t. If you were running a clinical trial of a new drug, and a few thousand people in the trial, who were given the drug, nevertheless came down with the disease symptoms the drug was supposed to cure, wouldn’t you cancel the trial and go back to the drawing board?”

 

“You mean if we were being honest? That’s a joke, right? We’re not honest. Don’t you get it?”

 

Yes. I get it. You’re criminals. Killers.

 

But wait. There’s more. The FDA document also states: “Suspected COVID-19 cases that occurred within 7 days after any vaccination were 409 in the vaccine group vs. 287 in the placebo group.”

 

That’s explosive. Right after vaccination, 409 people who received the shots became “suspected COVID cases.” This alone should have been enough to stop the clinical trial altogether. But it wasn’t.

 

In fact, the FDA document tries to excuse those 409 cases with a slippery comment: “It is possible that the imbalance in suspected COVID-19 cases occurring in the 7 days post vaccination represents vaccine reactogenicity with symptoms that overlap with those of COVID-19.”

 

Translation: You see, a number of clinical symptoms of COVID-19 and adverse effects from the vaccine are the same. Therefore, we have no idea whether the vaccinated people developed COVID or were just reacting to the vaccine. So we’re going to ignore this whole mess and pretend it’s of no importance.

 

Back in April of 2020, I predicted the vaccine manufacturers would use this strategy to explain away COVID cases occurring in the vaccine groups of their clinical trials.

 

It’s called cooking the data. It’s a way of writing off and ignoring COVID symptoms in the vaccine group.

 

And the FDA document, as I stated above, just puts an impenetrable cloud over all the volunteers in the Pfizer clinical trial by inventing a category called “suspected but unconfirmed COVID-19 cases,” and throwing those crucial data away, never to be spoken of again.

 

I’m speaking about them now. Any sensible person, looking at them, would conclude that the vaccine should never have been authorized.

 

Unless fraud, deception, profits, and destruction of human life via the vaccine were and are the true goals.

 

Finally: When you have “suspected cases,” and their ultimate status depends on doing a test, you do the test. You do it as many times as you need to, until it registers positive or negative. Then each “suspected case” becomes an actual case or no case at all.

 

Perhaps these “suspected cases” in the clinical trial were tested, and many of them came up positive, revealing they were actual COVID cases---but the researchers lied and covered up the fact that they were tested.

 

Or if you really don’t want to know whether “suspected cases” are actual cases, you don’t test them. You leave them in a convenient limbo and park them, never to be seen again.

 

Either way, the situation is patently absurd. By official standards, the PCR test decides whether a person is a case or not a case. Just do the test. Saying “we don’t know” is nothing more than a con and a hustle.

 

I’d love to hear the researchers try to talk their way out of this one. Here is how the conversation might go:

 

“So you’re saying these several thousand suspected COVID cases couldn’t be adjudicated one way or another?”

 

“That’s right. Their PCR tests were ‘indeterminate’.”

 

“That says something devastating about the test itself.”

 

“Well, sometimes you just can’t tell whether it’s positive or negative.”

 

“I see. And this ‘indeterminate’ result occurred in more than a THOUSAND suspected cases.”

 

“I guess so, yes.”

 

“You know, you could have done something else with these suspected cases. A different test. You could have taken tissue samples and looked for the virus itself in a more direct way.”

 

“No. That wouldn’t work.”

 

“Why not?”

 

“Because…the actual virus…”

 

“Because no one has been able to come up with a specimen of the actual SARS-CoV-2 virus.”

 

“Right.”

 

“So tell me---what does that indicate? I’ll tell you what it indicates. You can’t prove the SARS-CoV-2 virus exists. It doesn’t exist.”

 

“I have to go. I’m late for a meeting.”

 

“You’re late for more than just a meeting. Is it true a person becomes a virologist by cutting out a coupon from the back of a comic book and mailing it to a PO Box in Maryland?’

 

“Absolutely not. That’s outrageous.”

 

“What then?”

 

“The PO Box is in Virginia.”

 

~~~

 

(The link to this article posted on my blog is here -- with sources.)

 

(Follow me on Gab at @jonrappoport)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, oddsnsods said:

 

She done fucked up.

 

E8f6gOTWUAAKQMU?format=jpg&name=900x900

 

''the jab is a ticket to freedom, so come and jump on that ride''

 

nah you're alright luv i'd rather take a ride on the truth train

 

after all if a state has to coerce you into taking a medical intervention by imposing prison terms like 'lockdown' on you until you comply then maybe its time to develop some backbone so that your kids don't have to live in a tyranny

 

but you carry on and catch the coward coach if you must

Edited by Macnamara
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Anders said:

"German authorities have appealed for thousands of people to get another dose of their Covid vaccine, after a police investigation found that a Red Cross nurse may have injected them with saline solution instead.

 

i was reading the comments after this story in the paper and some folk were saying this nurse removed those peoples choice

 

its a tricky one because in principle i agree with peoples right to choose and if they choose to inject themself with a toxic substance then that is their choice but on the other hand i also understand that these people are not making an informed choice because they have been conned into this

 

so i guess when you try and assess someones culpability in a crime you have to consider intent and her intent might be to save people from something she believes is a bioweapon in which case her intent is actually honourable

Edited by Macnamara
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dazzer said:

Like I've said on here before mate, it's from a footy forum where the posters have been on for years, like me. Defiantly not bogus, just idiots. 

I joined a forum a number of years ago and drop in every now and then but don't really post because I am so out of touch with the modern game. Similar sentiments on there with people bragging about having received their second shot and what have you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

 

i was reading the comments after this story in the paper and some folk were saying this nurse removed those peoples choice

 

its a tricky one because in principle i agree with peoples right to choose and if they choose to inject themself with a toxic substance then that is their choice but on the other hand i also understand that these people are not making an informed choice because they have been conned into this

 

so i guess when you try and assess someones culpability in a crime you have to consider intent and her intent might be to save people from something she believes is a bioweapon in which case her intent is actually honourable

She could have saved quite a few lives by doing that either in the short or long term.

It's also possible it's a cover story and someone found out there's a control group being given a placebo like a lot of experiments and she's a scapegoat. I don't have any evidence for that though just a thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

 

Maybe people are just bored of repetitive capeshit movies, and arseholes preaching from their ivory towers at us common folk, but what do I know?

So true. Used to watch loads of films. Have about 2000 dvds. Now I find myself going back in time to an age when a story was told or a true life film of worth was filmed. 99% of all new tv/films are terribly woke or just terrible.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bombadil said:

So true. Used to watch loads of films. Have about 2000 dvds. Now I find myself going back in time to an age when a story was told or a true life film of worth was filmed. 99% of all new tv/films are terribly woke or just terrible.

 

I'm glad I haven't thrown away my physical copies of old stuff as I'm sure there will be a day when they stop broadcasting it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sitting here pondering and realising we (unjabbed,awake,blah) cant get our collective acts together to identify one common 'enemy' /cause

And therein lies our collective failing,the real enemy has the one weapon which is covid and everything else is a spin off from that

We on the other hand cant identify 1 single thing to protest against,children being jabbed,lockdowns,rights and freedoms removal,covid passes everybody wants to bang their own particular drum,even my dearest friend who i regard as fully awake is fast asleep once you scratch the surface ,she's very good at childrens rights but ask her about social credit score in china and get a blank stare

 

We are well and truly treading water until exhaustion leads to the inevitable and we collectively take that last breath

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, skitzorat said:

"Ladies and Gentlemen, this is a new pilot scheme.. this carriage is for the vaccinated only.. we will be asking.. please show your papers...."

 

 

 

 

That is the Social Experimentalist, Danny Shine with his megaphone, who often makes fun of the bizzare COVID rules, the rule following sheeple and its enforcers.😄

 

In another social experiment, Danny poses as a Covid Marshall and designates a carriage to vaccinated passengers only. Beware of the zombies....

 

 

 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Human10 said:

So almost half of society have A-grades? Smart people... 😂

 

But you need them to work at a fast food chain. Not dissing people who do but proportionately people with degrees and high exam grades must work mostly in low paid jobs. Not enough jobs exist for the degree brigade.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Itsa said:

She could have saved quite a few lives by doing that either in the short or long term.

It's also possible it's a cover story and someone found out there's a control group being given a placebo like a lot of experiments and she's a scapegoat. I don't have any evidence for that though just a thought.

 

nah i don't buy that they would have a control group

 

when your goal is to get something into the global population in order to control them why would you want to leave anyone out?

 

they don't even have proper control groups with non covid vaccines. When they have a control for example a measles vaccine the control group are not children who have never been vaccinated they are simply children who have not had the measles vaccine but who have had all the other vaccines

 

This is of course not really science because if it was real science then the control group would include children who have NEVER been vaccinated with anything

 

This is just one example of how they game the science

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Macnamara said:

i have seen paediatricians lie about a childs weight

Now if i tried to use a machine and then cheated about the maths to justify carrying out more work in my industry that would be FRAUD plain and simple

The NHS is harbouring fraudsters who if they had their way would carry out completely unnecessary work that would likely lead to complications. I keep hearing about or reading in the papers about people having problems with their children in hospitals after their birth (most recently tyson fury) and i always wonder whether what has happened to them is as a result of unnecessary medical interventions

 

well he isn't healthy now after your medical intervention is he? Still you managed to get the spiral of intervention rolling which will mean more work for you 'health experts' and more bumper profits for your masters in big pharma:

Baby boy is left with brain damage 'after NHS doctors stuck an electrode clip on his head while in the womb to check he was healthy'

  • Carson Murgatroyd was born on May 13 at Leeds General Infirmary hospital
  • Doctors used an electrode clip to measure his heartrate during labour 
  • The clip left an abscess on his brain which has since become infected 

By Joe Davies For Mailonline

Published: 16:38 BST, 11 August 2021 | Updated: 17:05 BST, 11 August 2021

A baby boy has been left with brain damage following a routine NHS procedure to check he was healthy, his family said.

Carson Murgatroyd, from Leeds, had an electrode clip fitted to his head during labour so doctors could measure his heart rate.

But his parents, Tiffany and Jordan, claim the procedure left him with a small mark on his forehead after he was born on May 13.

The lesion eventually turned green and the veins in his forehead became prominent, prompting his concerned family to take him to the GP.

Mr Murgatroyd, 29, said: 'We took him to the doctors and they referred us to a neurology unit straight away. We were admitted on July 9 and we have been here ever since.'

Doctors found Carson had an abscess on his brain, leaving the family fearing their son might die.

The build-up of pus caused his head to swell up, jumping 1.6in (4cm) in circumference at one point.

The three-month-old has had four rounds of brain surgery to help drain the liquid building in his skull because of the infection.

The family believe the clip — which can penetrate the baby’s scalp while in the womb — was to blame.

But medics are still unaware how the infection was caused and have been unable to tell his parents if and when he will recover.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-9884071/Baby-boy-left-brain-damage-NHS-doctors-stuck-electrode-clip-head.html

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Anders said:

"German authorities have appealed for thousands of people to get another dose of their Covid vaccine, after a police investigation found that a Red Cross nurse may have injected them with saline solution instead.

Around 8,600 may have been affected by the nurse's actions at a vaccination centre in Friesland, northern Germany.

Officials said dud jabs were administered in spring this year and would have had no adverse health impact on anyone affected.

“I am totally shocked by this episode,” said Sven Ambrosy, a local councillor, in a post on Facebook. "The most important thing for us is to inform these people, answer their questions and offer further vaccination."

It is not clear if the suspect has been arrested or charged over the incident. Local broadcaster NDR said the case had been handed to a special police unit that investigates politically-motivated crimes."

--------------------

How odd. I thought the saline jabs were just for the celebrities, politicians, the rich and other members of the 'elite'

Must have picked from the wrong box

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It kicked off down my doctors again today, seems they definitely dont like me down there & woman claimed I swore at her...doctor was meant to call me for a telephone appointment but never. Then they made some bullshit up saying they wanted me to call them at 8:30am.

Why would they want me to call them to arrange a telephone appointment time??

 

Now my hematoma massive lump ive had for over a year after an accident they claim I have to live with.

 

If I wanted a sex change they would bend over backwards & suck my knob while I wait for the fanny op.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

 

I'm glad I haven't thrown away my physical copies of old stuff as I'm sure there will be a day when they stop broadcasting it.

Same here. Almost too much choice though. Spend half my night looking through wallets. Need a more modern system or a way to put them all on my pc which doesn’t take ages.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • lake locked this topic
  • lake unlocked this topic
  • Beaujangles featured this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...