Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


numnuts
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Fluke said:

There is certainly a religious aspect to this Macnamara. I think my grandparents generation in particular have a great fondness for the nhs. Despite all of them being treated quite bad I may add by the nhs over the years. 

 

And of course peasants like me will always get the condescending response if we dared question the lunacy. "You have a science degree then?" So they have become a sort of priestly class. 

 

i've heard a couple of doctors say that they only spend 1 day at medical school on vaccines

 

and what is the classic line people throw at you if you question vaccine safety? 'you should listen to the doctors they are the experts'

 

wow how nice to be an 'expert' on something after only one day of study! And there was me thinking that to be an expert at something you needed to have invested 10,000 hours into it

Edited by Macnamara
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I have to read another post like this I'm going to scream....

'My wife and I have caught covid, I'm glad we are both fully vaccinated because the likelihood of death or hospitalization is basically zero' 

 

What, you mean zero or the terrifying 99.7% chance if you weren't vaxxed? Dick. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

i've heard a couple of doctors say that they only spend 1 day at medical school on vaccines

And zero days on studying nutrition. Once I'd read Roy Porter's excellent book, 'The Greatest Benefit to Mankind' my views on Western allopathic medicine make a 180 degree turn. Porter's original title had a question mark at the end but his publisher refused to countenance that.

 

Look into the history of American medicine and how that nice old Mr. Rockefeller founded what we know today as 'big pharma' as an offshoot of his petroleum holdings. How natural medicine was booted out of the schools, how chiropractors were demonized as quacks, and how the drug companies fund medical training and research. Watch daytime television in the USA and you'll be bombarded with drug ads. It is insidious.

 

 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Dazzer said:

If I have to read another post like this I'm going to scream....

'My wife and I have caught covid, I'm glad we are both fully vaccinated because the likelihood of death or hospitalization is basically zero' 

 

What, you mean zero or the terrifying 99.7% chance if you weren't vaxxed? Dick. 

Remember Event 201?  Flood the zone with the same message. These 'random' tweets showing gratitude to the mass murderers is either Stockholm Syndrome writ large, or they are bogus, or they are written by narcissists looking for a pat on the back from their overlords. take your pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, skitzorat said:

Oh.My.Goodness.

 

my favourites the break away to the anchor.. fucking hell hahahahaha

 

Do they actually think they're still fooling the Americans who haven't got the shot and/or aren't worried sick over the Delta scaryent..

 

 

 

I wonder how many takes they had to do. They should have done more

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Nemuri Kyoshiro said:

Remember Event 201?  Flood the zone with the same message. These 'random' tweets showing gratitude to the mass murderers is either Stockholm Syndrome writ large, or they are bogus, or they are written by narcissists looking for a pat on the back from their overlords. take your pick.

 

Even with all their faults, the Germans understood how the propagandists could mess with people by repeating lies over and over. The irony is that whole "big lie" thing is now said to be their problem even though they were clearly talking about the other side and the press.

 

That has now set a dangerous precedent because saying "lying press" now gets you some funny looks, but it's totally true.

Edited by EnigmaticWorld
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Nemuri Kyoshiro said:

And zero days on studying nutrition. Once I'd read Roy Porter's excellent book, 'The Greatest Benefit to Mankind' my views on Western allopathic medicine make a 180 degree turn. Porter's original title had a question mark at the end but his publisher refused to countenance that.

 

typical! In this climate of fear people are afraid to slay the sacred cows

 

i have seen paediatricians lie about a childs weight

 

Now if i tried to use a machine and then cheated about the maths to justify carrying out more work in my industry that would be FRAUD plain and simple

 

The NHS is harbouring fraudsters who if they had their way would carry out completely unnecessary work that would likely lead to complications. I keep hearing about or reading in the papers about people having problems with their children in hospitals after their birth (most recently tyson fury) and i always wonder whether what has happened to them is as a result of unnecessary medical interventions

Edited by Macnamara
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

regerge.jpg

 

Jabs, masks, 

23 minutes ago, skitzorat said:

Oh.My.Goodness.

 

my favourites the break away to the anchor.. fucking hell hahahahaha

 

Do they actually think they're still fooling the Americans who haven't got the shot and/or aren't worried sick over the Delta scaryent..

 

 

 

'Clearly overcome with emotion' LOL. Clearly overcome with the giggles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Nemuri Kyoshiro said:

Remember Event 201?  Flood the zone with the same message. These 'random' tweets showing gratitude to the mass murderers is either Stockholm Syndrome writ large, or they are bogus, or they are written by narcissists looking for a pat on the back from their overlords. take your pick.

Like I've said on here before mate, it's from a footy forum where the posters have been on for years, like me. Defiantly not bogus, just idiots. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Nemuri Kyoshiro said:

Look into the history of American medicine and how that nice old Mr. Rockefeller founded what we know today as 'big pharma' as an offshoot of his petroleum holdings. How natural medicine was booted out of the schools, how chiropractors were demonized as quacks, and how the drug companies fund medical training and research. Watch daytime television in the USA and you'll be bombarded with drug ads. It is insidious.

 

 

His father William Avery "Devil Bill" was a con-artist and the literal "snake oil" salesman who went from town to town ripping people off of the time!

 

In James Corbett's "Who is Bill Gates" he notes:

https://www.corbettreport.com/gates/

 

The process by which this reinvention of Gates’ public image took place is not mysterious. It’s the same process by which every billionaire has revived their public image since John D. Rockefeller hired Ivy Ledbetter Lee to transform him from the head of the Standard Oil hydra into the kind old man handing out dimes to strangers.

MAN OFF CAMERA: Don’t you give dimes, Mr. Rockefeller? Please, go ahead.

WOMAN: Thank you, sir.

MAN: Thank you very much.

ROCKEFELLER: Thank you for the ride!

MAN: I consider myself more than amply paid.

ROCKEFELLER: Bless you! Bless you! Bless you!

SOURCE: John D. Rockefeller – Standard Oil

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sfWZeeGeLTc&feature=youtu.be&t=918

 

 

Widely considered the Wealthiest American of ALL TIME and here he is giving out fkn dimes.

John D. Rockefeller, the wealthiest man in the world, handing a dime to a  toddler in 1920. (Giving a dime when meeting someone was his trademark.):  OldSchoolCool

 

I believe their initial idea for pharmaceuticals was to find a way to make even more money out of the oil by-products; the actual petrochemical waste.

 

They had a significant role in centralising State-run schools and dumbing down of America too not to mention their wealth 'gifted' humanity the real estate for the United Nations in NYC

 

When David talks about Reptilian and demonic forces which run through Bloodlines..

Elderly John D. Rockefeller by Bettmann

 

 

His spawn is actually Satan's

Legendary banker David Rockefeller dies at 101 | News | DW | 20.03.2017

 

Edited by skitzorat
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Fluke said:

I will tell you what common sense is supposed to be. Its supposed to be seeing the nonsense of if you wear a mask but allowed to take it down because you are eating. Or if the government are locking you down next monday why not today? Or if the government has downgraded the virus to a non highly infectious disease on march 19th why go into lockdown? 

 

If you actually bothered to read my post instead of snarky replies you would see that I think it is much deeper than common sense. 

 

I did read your post.  

 

The Common Man can't have much common sense.

Edited by Ergo Storm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a programme on BBC Radio 4 at 10pm, Tuesday nights called 'Simon Evans Goes to Market'.

 

This chap is a comedian who gives presentations on economics, which isn't the bore that it sounds like. He's very astute and witty. 

 

I mention it because he's the only performer I've heard to date who is making relevant observations on a mainstream platform about the state of events. For example, a couple of weeks back his show was all about how the very wealthy have raked in mega-bucks as a direct result of Covid.

 

And last night I only heard a bit but he made some crack refering to AstraZenica causing blood clots. 

 

Makes a refreshing change 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Saved said:

Another one - sceptic begs people to get the jab from hospital bed.

https://bbc.in/3jNQGOu

 

Seems to be a prerequisite

Screenshot_20210811_161627.jpg

 

"And as soon as I can get it, I am definitely getting it." Rather silly because he will have already recovered from it and would have the antibodies / T cells ready to prevent a reoccurence. Stll all to his own, I guess. Oh wait, it's to prevent him transmitting it to others 🤨. That's besides him being a stooge

Edited by Anders
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"German authorities have appealed for thousands of people to get another dose of their Covid vaccine, after a police investigation found that a Red Cross nurse may have injected them with saline solution instead.

Around 8,600 may have been affected by the nurse's actions at a vaccination centre in Friesland, northern Germany.

Officials said dud jabs were administered in spring this year and would have had no adverse health impact on anyone affected.

“I am totally shocked by this episode,” said Sven Ambrosy, a local councillor, in a post on Facebook. "The most important thing for us is to inform these people, answer their questions and offer further vaccination."

It is not clear if the suspect has been arrested or charged over the incident. Local broadcaster NDR said the case had been handed to a special police unit that investigates politically-motivated crimes."

--------------------

How odd. I thought the saline jabs were just for the celebrities, politicians, the rich and other members of the 'elite'

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Dazzer said:

How's about this for a good idea you daft bint... Go and have a look at the suicide rate in your own country and see what's going on, because according to your twitter your work for mindframemedia which deals with amongst other things teenage suicides. 

What you'll find might shock you into doing something rather than posting 'look at me videos' with a stupid expression plastered on your face.   

(good info on the last page thanks to @skitzorat)

 

She done fucked up.

 

E8f6gOTWUAAKQMU?format=jpg&name=900x900

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bombshell: FDA knew all along there would be many COVID cases among the fully vaccinated---and buried that knowledge

 

by Jon Rappoport

 

(To read about Jon's mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)

 

First of all, I have to re-emphasize a point I’ve made many times: SARS-CoV-2 doesn’t exist. I’ve been proving that for over a year.

 

BUT I don’t stop there. I temporarily enter the official world where people assume the virus does exist, and I reveal many internal contradictions and lies and cover-ups within that world.

 

Some readers, who possess sub-standard literacy, believe I’m contradicting MYSELF. They think I’m saying the virus doesn’t exist and does exist.

 

Wrong.

 

Analogy: People sitting inside a theater are watching a movie, and they believe it’s a real world. They react in all sorts of strange ways, based on that assumption. You’re standing outside the theater, looking through the window. You can just say, “They’re all crazy,” and leave it at that, or you can say, “They’re all crazy,” and THEN walk inside the theater and get a good look at what they’re up to as well. That’s what I do.

 

That’s what I’m doing in this article, which is about the FDA and their emergency authorization of the COVID vaccine, despite knowing the vaccine didn’t pass muster, didn’t even vaguely rank as effective in the clinical trials.

 

Because lots of people in the clinical trial became COVID cases after being vaccinated.

 

In other words, the FDA knew, right from the get-go, that many so-called breakthrough cases would develop. They knew many vaccinated people would become COVID cases.

 

This knowledge should have prevented the FDA from granting emergency use authorization for the vaccine---but it didn’t.

 

(Reminder: We’re in the crazy fake theater now, where the virus is real, the PCR test is meaningful and accurate, the vaccine is necessary.)

 

Here we go.

 

The document, posted on the FDA website, is titled, “Vaccines and Related Biological Products; Advisory Committee Meeting; FDA Briefing Document Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine.” [1]

 

It is dated December 10, 2020. The date tells us that all the information in the document is taken from the Pfizer clinical trial, based on which the FDA authorized the vaccine for public use.

 

A key quote is buried on page 42: “Among 3410 total cases of suspected but unconfirmed COVID-19 in the overall study population, 1594 occurred in the vaccine group vs. 1816 in the placebo group [who received a saltwater shot].”

 

Those shocking numbers have never seen the light of day in news media.

 

The comparative numbers reveal that the vaccine was not effective at preventing COVID-19. It was certainly not 50% more effective than a placebo shot---the standard for FDA Emergency Use Authorization.

 

To make all this clear, I need to back up and explain the theory of the vaccine clinical trial.

 

The researchers assumed the SARS-CoV-2 virus was spreading everywhere in the world, and during the clinical trial, it would descend on some volunteers.

 

The billion-dollar question was: how many people receiving the vaccine would become infected, vs. how many people in the placebo group?

 

If it turned out that FAR FEWER people getting the vaccine became infected with SARS-CoV-2, the vaccine would be hailed as a success. It protected people against the virus.

 

But as you can see from the numbers above, that wasn’t the case at all.

 

So now we come to the vital weasel-phrase in the FDA document I just quoted: “suspected but unconfirmed COVID-19 [cases].”

 

“Well, you see, we can’t say these were ACTUAL COVID-19 cases. Maybe they were, maybe they weren’t. They’re in limbo. We want to keep them in limbo. Otherwise, our clinical trial is dead in the water, and we’ll never get approval for the vaccine.”

 

What does “suspected cases” mean? It can only mean these people all displayed symptoms consistent with the definition of COVID-19, but they’re unconfirmed cases because…their PCR tests were negative, not positive.

 

However, if their tests were negative, why would they be called “suspected cases” instead of “NOT CASES”?

 

Something is wrong here. The FDA is hedging its bets, muddying the waters, obscuring facts.

 

By FDA/CDC rules, a case of COVID-19 means: a person has tested positive, period.

 

That’s the way cases are counted.

 

These thousand-plus volunteers in the Pfizer clinical trial were either COVID-19 cases or they weren’t. Which is it?

 

The official response to that question is obvious: the FDA decided to throw the data from all those “suspected cases” in the garbage and ignore them. Poof. Gone.

 

Why do I say that?

 

Because if the FDA had paid serious attention to the “suspected cases,” they never would have authorized the vaccine for public use. They would have stopped the clinical trial and undertaken a very deep and extensive investigation.

 

Which they didn’t.

 

This is called a crime.

 

“But…but it’s not that simple. This is a complex situation. It’s a gray area.”

 

“No. It isn’t. If you were running a clinical trial of a new drug, and a few thousand people in the trial, who were given the drug, nevertheless came down with the disease symptoms the drug was supposed to cure, wouldn’t you cancel the trial and go back to the drawing board?”

 

“You mean if we were being honest? That’s a joke, right? We’re not honest. Don’t you get it?”

 

Yes. I get it. You’re criminals. Killers.

 

But wait. There’s more. The FDA document also states: “Suspected COVID-19 cases that occurred within 7 days after any vaccination were 409 in the vaccine group vs. 287 in the placebo group.”

 

That’s explosive. Right after vaccination, 409 people who received the shots became “suspected COVID cases.” This alone should have been enough to stop the clinical trial altogether. But it wasn’t.

 

In fact, the FDA document tries to excuse those 409 cases with a slippery comment: “It is possible that the imbalance in suspected COVID-19 cases occurring in the 7 days post vaccination represents vaccine reactogenicity with symptoms that overlap with those of COVID-19.”

 

Translation: You see, a number of clinical symptoms of COVID-19 and adverse effects from the vaccine are the same. Therefore, we have no idea whether the vaccinated people developed COVID or were just reacting to the vaccine. So we’re going to ignore this whole mess and pretend it’s of no importance.

 

Back in April of 2020, I predicted the vaccine manufacturers would use this strategy to explain away COVID cases occurring in the vaccine groups of their clinical trials.

 

It’s called cooking the data. It’s a way of writing off and ignoring COVID symptoms in the vaccine group.

 

And the FDA document, as I stated above, just puts an impenetrable cloud over all the volunteers in the Pfizer clinical trial by inventing a category called “suspected but unconfirmed COVID-19 cases,” and throwing those crucial data away, never to be spoken of again.

 

I’m speaking about them now. Any sensible person, looking at them, would conclude that the vaccine should never have been authorized.

 

Unless fraud, deception, profits, and destruction of human life via the vaccine were and are the true goals.

 

Finally: When you have “suspected cases,” and their ultimate status depends on doing a test, you do the test. You do it as many times as you need to, until it registers positive or negative. Then each “suspected case” becomes an actual case or no case at all.

 

Perhaps these “suspected cases” in the clinical trial were tested, and many of them came up positive, revealing they were actual COVID cases---but the researchers lied and covered up the fact that they were tested.

 

Or if you really don’t want to know whether “suspected cases” are actual cases, you don’t test them. You leave them in a convenient limbo and park them, never to be seen again.

 

Either way, the situation is patently absurd. By official standards, the PCR test decides whether a person is a case or not a case. Just do the test. Saying “we don’t know” is nothing more than a con and a hustle.

 

I’d love to hear the researchers try to talk their way out of this one. Here is how the conversation might go:

 

“So you’re saying these several thousand suspected COVID cases couldn’t be adjudicated one way or another?”

 

“That’s right. Their PCR tests were ‘indeterminate’.”

 

“That says something devastating about the test itself.”

 

“Well, sometimes you just can’t tell whether it’s positive or negative.”

 

“I see. And this ‘indeterminate’ result occurred in more than a THOUSAND suspected cases.”

 

“I guess so, yes.”

 

“You know, you could have done something else with these suspected cases. A different test. You could have taken tissue samples and looked for the virus itself in a more direct way.”

 

“No. That wouldn’t work.”

 

“Why not?”

 

“Because…the actual virus…”

 

“Because no one has been able to come up with a specimen of the actual SARS-CoV-2 virus.”

 

“Right.”

 

“So tell me---what does that indicate? I’ll tell you what it indicates. You can’t prove the SARS-CoV-2 virus exists. It doesn’t exist.”

 

“I have to go. I’m late for a meeting.”

 

“You’re late for more than just a meeting. Is it true a person becomes a virologist by cutting out a coupon from the back of a comic book and mailing it to a PO Box in Maryland?’

 

“Absolutely not. That’s outrageous.”

 

“What then?”

 

“The PO Box is in Virginia.”

 

~~~

 

(The link to this article posted on my blog is here -- with sources.)

 

(Follow me on Gab at @jonrappoport)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, oddsnsods said:

 

She done fucked up.

 

E8f6gOTWUAAKQMU?format=jpg&name=900x900

 

''the jab is a ticket to freedom, so come and jump on that ride''

 

nah you're alright luv i'd rather take a ride on the truth train

 

after all if a state has to coerce you into taking a medical intervention by imposing prison terms like 'lockdown' on you until you comply then maybe its time to develop some backbone so that your kids don't have to live in a tyranny

 

but you carry on and catch the coward coach if you must

Edited by Macnamara
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Anders said:

"German authorities have appealed for thousands of people to get another dose of their Covid vaccine, after a police investigation found that a Red Cross nurse may have injected them with saline solution instead.

 

i was reading the comments after this story in the paper and some folk were saying this nurse removed those peoples choice

 

its a tricky one because in principle i agree with peoples right to choose and if they choose to inject themself with a toxic substance then that is their choice but on the other hand i also understand that these people are not making an informed choice because they have been conned into this

 

so i guess when you try and assess someones culpability in a crime you have to consider intent and her intent might be to save people from something she believes is a bioweapon in which case her intent is actually honourable

Edited by Macnamara
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • lake locked this topic
  • lake unlocked this topic
  • Beaujangles featured this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...