Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 13.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

I started a new job not so long ago and quit after three weeks, I refused to wear a stupid mask all day at all, laughed at the managers and their covid terror.. I could see it wasn't going to end well

I've already posted about this in the 'Come Together by Region?' thread in the Solutions forum.   But now here is the advert for the big event on the 29th August. It would be great if as ma

Summary meeting with MP.   Big sign on door saying have to wear a mask. Reptilian brain nearly kicked in and panicked - temptation to go to the store and buy one. Managed to keep it together

Posted Images

F^ck 'em all....Listen folks, the “system” is fu*ked, we know they are a Satanic paedophile ring, who prolong their lives with adrenochrome.

Look at Prince Philip, ffs, and his son wants a 'Martial Plan' to save the world? Gimme a break! Wakedafukup, please?

 

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Bombadil said:

Okay I’m starting a new movement to respond to people spewing the government bullshit. When anyone states the party line, say C**T

Ignore these people they are online trolls whom attack people whom actually research stuff. Also note government employ paid trolls - 77th brigade of the British Army work in hand with government to troll and discredit truthers. UK Column first exposed 77th Brigade some months back.

Edited by kestrel
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Beaujangles said:

 

Does it matter if she is  mercurial regardless?

 

It does matter ...You must be constantly asking such questions ...it makes you think ... solving these riddles  will lead you to a clearer understanding of how the cabal operates 

Link to post
Share on other sites

talkradio and a few sources have been rattling on about the low case numbers and how vallance /whitty prediction of 50,000 cases a day is scare mongering

 

+++++++++++++++++

you just watch the next months figures

 

if PCR tests were done in february march this year i reckon the case numbers would have been around 20million total

 

careful out there peeps, the faux arguments are flowing fast , sting operation style

Edited by zArk
Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Velma said:

F^ck 'em all....Listen folks, the “system” is fu*ked, we know they are a Satanic paedophile ring, who prolong their lives with adrenochrome.

Look at Prince Philip, ffs, and his son wants a 'Martial Plan' to save the world? Gimme a break! Wakedafukup, please?

 

Knew about harvesting from animals, my partner knew as well and she’s not reading the same stuff as me. If this is true it’s seriously f**ked up!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Richie Allen's guest's last night included Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, the very eminently qualified co-author of the book  Corona, False Alarm? 

 

https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/richieallen/episodes/2020-09-29T11_19_19-07_00

 

The discussion is laid out in an understandable way and an English prerelease copy of the book was lifted out of the pockets of Dr Heiko Schoning last weekend and not returned.

 

My advice is buy your own copy! :classic_smile:

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

This is something you can try to explain to people to open their eyes.

 

This is the total number of deaths that has occurred in the UK annually between 2000 and 2018:

 

annual_deaths_uk.png.ed2fdc2fb357fa79a5a557c0a8b49295.png

 

The peak number of deaths is 616,000, and the smallest number is 552,000. There have officially been approximately 40,000 deaths due to Covid-19. So the number of deaths from Covid is less than the difference between a year in which a lot of people die, and a year in which a relatively small number of people die.

 

In fact, if the coronavirus had occurred in any of the years between 2005 and 2014, and 40,000 additional deaths were added to the figures for those years, there would still have been less deaths than there were in 2018, when there was no coronavirus.

 

Also, 20,000 of the 40,000 deaths occurred in care homes. That's confirmed by the Office for National Statistics and the Lancet. Arguably this occurred due to...let's be generous and call them 'misguided' policies. Probably this number of people didn't need to die. But it's obviously a disproportionate number of elderly people, which should obviously tell us something significant, particularly when you also look at the government's own demographic figures:

 

covid_deaths_demographics.png.3accf241c2ced73d183bad56787ea027.png

 

To give one example of the response to this, a Scottish doctor is suing the government, because she believes that its ill-thought out policy literally caused thousands of deaths.

 

Furthermore, it's not even known why people with Covid have died, or if they even had the virus. There can be false positives, plus most people dying with Covid are indeed dying 'with' the virus, not 'due to' the virus, as is always officially asserted. For example, this BBC report notes that "the number of people worldwide who have died with Covid-19 has passed one million". There are thus definitely question marks about the 40,000 figure, which effectively represents the worst possible case scenario, and even then there have only been 20,000 deaths in the general population, which is approximately 3% of the overall annual deaths that would be expected.

 

By comparison, there are 165,000 cancer deaths in the UK annually, and 170,000 deaths due to heart disease. In fact, there are nearly 50% as many deaths from these conditions as there are confirmed Covid cases, not deaths! In order for Covid to be as deadly as cancer and heart disease, it would need to have a 50% death rate, whereas The Pharmaceutical Journal notes that the Covid-19 death rate is 0.66%. This research also illustrates the reality of Covid for most people, which is that they contract it, they don't know that they've contracted it, they never experience any symptoms, their body fights it off, and they continue with their lives in blissful ignorance of this reality. Indeed, many of the assertions made about how dangerous Covid are derived from confirmed cases, and don't take into account the many unreported cases which inevitably exist.

 

It has also been well-documented that hospitals and the healthcare system generally are less able to screen for and treat serious conditions, such as cancer and heart disease, due to the disproportionate focus on Covid. Again, if you take the example of the United States, the country that has dealt with Covid arguably the least capably, and which has the most cases, even if we take the worst case-scenario and attribute Covid to having caused every death with which it has been linked, if we ignore all underlying health conditions, all demographics, all other indicators, and just assume that Covid killed all of these people, and they all would have survived otherwise, the virus has still only killed 25% of the people that died from cancer and heart disease in the same period:

 

covid_deaths_US.png.2404f11446914042001ee86fdc185b97.png

 

 

Bear in mind that this is the scenario that would most benefit those that are tremulously terrified of Covid, and believe that it's the greatest threat to the human race ever. In reality, many of those people did die with underlying health conditions. Many died with the virus. Many would have died anyway.

 

Meanwhile, hospital admissions are currently around 10% of the level at the peak of the pandemic:

 

hospital_admissions.png.c4287d3a5e2a262a42401f22a5868617.png

 

I'm willing to support the first lockdown to some extent, but the doomsday scenarios didn't happen. The health system didn't collapse, there were a relatively trivial number of deaths in statistical terms, and the number of deaths would have been way lower had it not been for the existence of care homes, which were subjected to a thoroughly bungled policy. 

 

There is nothing contentious about any of this. Everything here is based on official figures, official documents, and mainstream reporting. Continuing to lockdown large parts of the country at this time is poorly founded. I don't want to write extensively about the deleterious impact of the government's measures, because that would be speculative, but there is no doubt it will have a generational impact on the country as a whole, and that this will be felt particularly harshly by young people. It is not going to be possible to just turn the tap back on, and for everything to go back to normal.

 

There has already been vast economic damage caused, the consequences of which will be felt, conservatively, for many years. Some of this has been outlined in this article. Japan, for example, had a 'lost decade' after an 'asset price bubble'. Even then its economy continued to grow. The UK economy slumped by 20% during the previous quarter, which is about ten times more than it fell during the 'global financial crisis':

 

global_financial_crisis.png.e31c95d370a77ee3fdbf32d70e9691a1.png

 

In short, Japan struggled massively for ten years after something considerably less serious than we're experiencing now.

 

The amount of UK debt has quadrupled since 2008, and the country now faces the prospect of attempting to service this debt with a massively reduced economy. Even entire industries could potentially disappear. Meanwhile, the authorities are still talking about locking regions down, or even the entire country, over a virus that has proved to be relatively trivial. This can be shown statistically, but even if this is not accepted, the consequences of continuing to neglect more serious health conditions, not to mention the ongoing economic damage, will cause far more suffering than the regrettable problems caused by Covid.

 

At this point, it has to be acknowledged that the policies related to Covid have profoundly failed. They haven't even prevented the spread of the virus because there are now officially more cases than at the peak of the lockdown! It has to similarly be acknowledged that these policies are doing more harm than good, and that simply isolating vulnerable people would have saved more lives than anything else. Simply by handling care homes better, more lives could have been saved than by all of the other onerous measures combined!

 

Yet we're still allowing the authority that made these decisions to impose further restrictions on our lives, to barricade students in their university dorms, not even allowing them to return home for Christmas seemingly, and to screw over the lives of everyone generally, and young people in particular. All decision-making should be made on a cost-benefit basis, and it's crystal clear that the cost of the lockdown, the restrictions, the mask wearing, and the general climate of fear has been significantly greater than any benefits gleaned from them.

 

Of course, it is sad when people die, but everybody dies. Risk cannot be eliminated from life. I would hope that young people in particular (not a term that applies to me any more, sadly!) would recognise that they're getting royally screwed over by these disastrous policies, and recognise that none of it is happening for their benefit.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

 

Musk is either a blatant mouthpiece, or he is blackpilled on AI and decided to join the dark side like Odds said.

 

Zuckerberg seems artificial though.

 

Musk not wanting to take the vaccine could be useful to help sheep begin to question the vaccine themselves

the fewer people that take it the better 

 

musk is seen as an authority hierarchical  figure by some sheeple because of his successful billionaire status

i believe the sheep are more influenced by status or the source of information than the actual information itself

so it's always going to be an uphill battle to convince them of anything outside the government narrative

it's possible musk could promote a healthy curiosity in them with his objection to the vaccine 

whatever i think of musk or Hollywood types the sheeple are more likely to listen to these people than anyone else

i have very little faith in the average persons ability to question authority and step outside the peer pressure to follow and comply

they have to be "guided" in the correct direction unfortunately 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, oneantisworthtenofyou said:

 

Musk not wanting to take the vaccine could be useful to help sheep begin to question the vaccine themselves

the fewer people that take it the better 

 

musk is seen as an authority hierarchical  figure by some sheeple because of his successful billionaire status

i believe the sheep are more influenced by status or the source of information than the actual information itself

so it's always going to be an uphill battle to convince them of anything outside the government narrative

it's possible musk could promote a healthy curiosity in them with his objection to the vaccine 

whatever i think of musk or Hollywood types the sheeple are more likely to listen to these people than anyone else

i have very little faith in the average persons ability to question authority and step outside the peer pressure to follow and comply

they have to be "guided" in the correct direction unfortunately

 

Agreed, assuming he doesn't do a u-turn or push digital ID or biometrics.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

Senator calls for army to take to streets as videos show hundreds of students flouting public-health guidelines in Galway
https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/senator-calls-for-army-to-take-to-streets-as-videos-show-hundreds-of-students-flouting-public-health-guidelines-in-galway-39572290.html


Students socialise and enjoy themselves - OUTRAGE! DEPLOY THE ARMY ASAP!!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Care home nurse who claimed the pandemic is a hoax while protesting in her uniform against lockdown reveals she's been FIRED from her job but still insists she's seen 'no evidence' of a killer virus
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-8785349/Care-home-nurse-sacked-claiming-pandemic-hoax-insists-shes-seen-no-evidence-cornavirus.html

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

Manchester bar calls for pubs to ban MPs as Cancel the Curfew campaign launches
https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/whats-on/food-drink-news/cancel-the-curfew-campaign-manchester-19016001

 

Parliament's bars are NOT subject to 10pm curfew and MPs don't have to give their contact details to get a drink

  • Bars inside Parliament are exempt from the Government's new 10pm curfew 
  • Facilities serving inside Palace of Westminster are as a 'workplace canteen'  
  • Comes after a curfew was imposed on on pubs, bars and restaurants in England

By Bhvishya Patel For Mailonline

Published: 01:55, 28 September 2020 | Updated: 10:14, 28 September 2020

Drinking establishments inside Parliament are exempt from the Government's newly imposed 10pm curfew, it has been revealed.

Facilities serving alcohol inside the Palace of Westminster are not required to abide by the coronavirus curfew which came into effect this week due to them being classified as a 'workplace canteen'.

It comes just a week after the Prime Minister set out a raft of measures designed to clampdown on Covid-19, including imposing a 10pm curfew on all pubs, bars and restaurants in England.

Despite the new measures, staff and visitors inside Parliament can still enter its handful of bars without being forced to leave at 10pm and are also not required to provide a name and contact number upon entry, The Times reported.

33698610-8779373-image-m-32_160125314765

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8779373/Parliaments-bars-NOT-subject-10pm-curfew.html

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

We need to mass produce badges that are yellow, six pointed stars with the word 'unvaccinated' on them

 

When the government rolls out the vaccines and persecutes those who have not accepted the vaccine we should all wear our yellow star 'unvaccinated' badges everywhere we go

Edited by Macnamara
  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

We need to mass produce badges that are yellow, six pointed stars with the word 'unvaccinated' on them

 

When the government rolls out the vaccines and persecutes those who have not accepted the vaccine we should all wear our yellow star 'unvaccinated' badges everywhere we go

 

Had a thought a while ago, not seen anyone else say it. I reckon if a vaccine eventually comes out the new law might initially be that anyone not vaccinated has to continue to wear a mask, thereby marking the "anti-vaxxers" and essentially serving the same purpose. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...