Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


numnuts
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Kala Namak said:

Can't see what exactly?

I don't think that video clip demonstrated anything in particular. There are a lot of people who are believers in "safe" vaccines.....

 

I'm with you Kala ...People here are too quick to jump on anyone and accuse them of being paid disinfo agents .....

 

This is the first time I've come across this woman , but at first glance she appears to be doing good work , the more people covering this issue  the better .... 

 

Same with Rose , he came and went , there were suspicions , but his net effect was to promote David....

 

So If anyone can see any malevolent agenda being pushed by this woman spell it out with links to videos , otherwise these constant accusations and suspicions do not help our cause .  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Kala Namak said:

So good you posted it twice.

 

lol @ "a biography", what nonsense.

 

I don't think I've spent as much time in her defence as some have spent in attack. 

 

So because "it's all over the internet" it's obviously true then. :classic_rolleyes:

 

Yes I've also seen her call DI a nutter and I obviously disagree with that, but I also understand why some people believe that, and there are others that he has shared a platform with that also are uncomfortable with some of the things that DI has said. Hopefully in time she will come around, as she has with other subjects in the past. DI has also been called a shill and many have said that his involvement is putting off "normies" from joining the resistance. I also disagree with that. However on both counts I don't discount the possibility that I could be wrong.

 

Of course DI and Anna are different people but they are both working towards exposing the pandemic lies in their own ways. (imo) 

 

So yeah, I won't be joining in the character assassination if that's ok with you. It's easy to hide behind internet anonymity and attack people based on snippets here and there. I'd rather support people who don't "hide in the shadows"  sniping, and are willing to put their reputation and livelihoods on the line to support just causes, and in that regard, yes I'm happy to include her with DI, and Piers Corbyn, and Carl Vernon, and Heiko and Gareth, Dolores, and all those who went to Trafalgar Sq despite the despotic "rule of 6". 

 

 

You have made some incorrect inferences 

i  pointed out that i have seen her called a shill many times today 

you made a false conclusion i wasn't really attacking you for defending her i was surprised at your lengthy defense of her when i have

seen her ridiculed all day 

 

i was pointing out that YOU are the first person today to defend Anna so you must be special for being so different to the crowd 

interesting that your reply is rather snappy it made me chuckle 

 

Why is it obvious you disagree with her when she is calling david icke a nutter?

i dont know you so there is no reason for me to assume you disagree 

 

you seem to dismiss anna brees nutter insult very easy and in the next sentence you make an excuse

by saying you can understand why people think David is a nutter you appear to be defending her 

 

i am happy to announce i think david icke is great if people think i am a nutter too i don't care

so i don't understand why someone would support davids work but try to hide it because it doesn't fit in with mainstream 

thats silly and hypocritical and perhaps for self serving motives 

 

the people who say david shouldn't speak at events because he isn't mainstream enough are idiots 

david is one of the most credible and popular speakers at these events 

 

the events of that day follow on from when david didn't speak to her during the live stream its quite plausible to suggest she made those comments because she felt snubbed

 

anna remarked she didn't think David icke likes her 

david icke seemed to avoid her 

 

in your opinion anna and david are working to the same ends for the same cause i am not so certain 

Anna says she wants to interview the regular people she then avoids and snubs regular people and ;looks for famous people to interview

Anna asked if she should only look for people in suits and to avoid people that look like conspiracy theorists

she said she can't wear masks because of severe distress but she can be seen wearing masks in various videos

 

Anna constantly contradicts herself she plays to the camera from video to video contradiction and hypocrisy and false sincerity

she is making claims of fame when she is virtually unknown she is trying to build a name for herself and her brand

i don't think she is doing a good job

 

if you are suggesting this is some kind of witch hunt that i am part of you are wrong i have come to my own individual conclusions about Anna

and i am sure the other members of this forum have too

 

it would interesting to hear from others who want to defend Anna as i said I've heard her called out as a shill all day

 

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

University demands freshers remove 'send drink' and 'f*** Boris' signs from their windows - as lawyers question whether keeping students locked in their flats is legal and culture secretary Oliver Dowden says they SHOULD be allowed home for Christmas

 

33679890-8777829-image-a-11_160120754550

 

 

33662970-8776427-Students_display_humoro

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8777829/University-demands-freshers-remove-send-drink-f-Boris-signs-windows.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

I'm not sure if she is a shill or just a grifter tbh.

 

ig.jpg.abd73ff70d8b4c465a4a44e6005b3fd9.jpg

 

anna.jpg.03727876fcbf92c2ead3ef88a9f25c32.jpg

 

 

 

i think she mostly wants to make her brand and name more famous she is selling classes and a book etc

she said she doesn't care about money and appearance (style over substance like those other BBC women)

she isn't one of those anymore she saw the error of her MSM ways and left to be a crusader of truth for the common people 

 

 ‘I was offered a full-time job back at the BBC but decided to turn it down, because I believe journalism is about the pursuit of truth. Now we have the technology and the platforms on which to broadcast, my new purpose in life was to mobilise many voices not just front a few.’ ‘Having trained to become a psychotherapist, I became far more aware of my ego and agenda. With that introspection, I decided it was wrong to go back into TV news, while I could empower others instead.’

 

she is all heart really 

 

Edited by oneantisworthtenofyou
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, oneantisworthtenofyou said:

 

i think she wants to make her band and name more famous she is selling classes and a book etc

 

 ‘I was offered a full-time job back at the BBC but decided to turn it down, because I believe journalism is about the pursuit of truth. Now we have the technology and the platforms on which to broadcast, my new purpose in life was to mobilise many voices not just front a few.’ ‘Having trained to become a psychotherapist, I became far more aware of my ego and agenda. With that introspection, I decided it was wrong to go back into TV news, while I could empower others instead.’

 

she is all heart really 

 

 

Yeah, looks like she is in it for the dough to me too. I hope I'm wrong though.

 

I can't actually find much info on her besides the BBC stuff and her ties to folks like Jon Wedger. Some say she is an ex Rothschild banker, not sure how true that is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

 

Yeah, looks like she is in it for the dough to me too. I hope I'm wrong though.

 

I can't actually find much info on her besides the BBC stuff and her ties to folks like Jon Wedger. Some say she is an ex Rothschild banker, not sure how true that is.

 

in this video she states that she worked for the rothschilds as a banker 

she made very rich people even more rich she said

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Golden Retriever said:

 

Eh?

 

Have you bothered to look at the links regarding Brees on the previous 2 or 3 pages?

 

I notice you quoted her as saying she worked for a rothschild bank , I checked and she did indeed say that .... Most banks ARE rothchild , or linked in some way . She needn't have told us that , I doubt it would have been discovered .... it does ring alarm bells but is not conclusive ....

 

Is that the worst there is , perhaps she did call DI a nutter , I don't know ...

 

So lay out your evidence , if she says she's  is sure vaccines are good , then I'll agree with you ... I suspect she's fairly new to all this and is still stumbling around .

 

EDIT ...looking more on this thread she says "ignoring the government and not trusting their judgment is not a good sign" ...lol that is very funny , She may either be naive and new to this , or is indeed a shill ... I have not looked deeply into her

Edited by oz93666
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, oz93666 said:

 

I notice you quoted her as saying she worked for a rothschild bank , I checked and she did indeed say that .... Most banks ARE rothchild , or linked in some way . She needn't have told us that , I doubt it would have been discovered ....

 

Don't underestimate weaponized autism. If the info is out there, some anon would probably find it eventually.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, oz93666 said:

 

She also said that's why she left because she saw through it .... DI also worked for the BBC! 

 

she also said she was going to speak to regular folk did you see her ignore the welsh chap?

this offended a few people here and on other threads have mentioned her rudeness towards the welsh guy

point is she says a lot of things that seem or are proven contradictory

 

why is she wearing masks in several pictures and videos even alone in her car

but she says she can't wear masks because of severe distress in another video 

 

i think she has an opinion that she tailors to suit her audience she is making good on an opportunity

do i believe she was offered a job and she turned it down?

i think perhaps that is a lie she has started her own company because MS rejected her

 

why does she think she is very famous when she has a tiny following 

i am not suggesting she is a major player in the grand plot to overthrow humanity

but i do think she comes across badly and will say anything to get where she wants she is a player

or a "grifter" as has been mentioned  

 

‘Having trained to become a psychotherapist" would help with manipulation 

i don't trust her perhaps she needs some work on her presentation ironic that she sells classes on being a presenter

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, oneantisworthtenofyou said:

 

she also said she was going to speak to regular folk did you see her ignore the welsh chap?

this offended a few people here and on other threads have mentioned her rudeness towards the welsh guy

point is she says a lot of things that seem or are proven contradictory

 

why is she wearing masks in several pictures and videos even alone in her car

but she says she can't wear masks because of severe distress in another video 

 

i think she has an opinion that she tailors to suit her audience she is making good on an opportunity

do i believe she was offered a job and she turned it down?

i think perhaps that is a lie she has started her own company because MS rejected her

 

All this maybe true ... But I think the issue is ... is she paid by the controllers to knowingly infiltrate and misdirect the movement?? I think that's what the term "Shill" implies .

 

Or is she a young woman , with here own interest in making a career and name for herself , just blundering around? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, oz93666 said:

 

All this maybe true ... But I think the issue is ... is she paid by the controllers to knowingly infiltrate and misdirect the movement?? I think that's what the term "Shill" implies .

 

Or is she a young woman , with here own interest in making a career and name for herself , just blundering around? 

 

well i am still open on the first one i'm not so sure if she is a major agent of mosad or the cia maybe?

i think a shill is someone who pretends to have a view or an opinion they don't actually hold in order to sway others into that same opinion

or to receive some other kind of gain

 

i don't think it is for you to decide what the issue is every individual is free to make up their own minds on what the "issue is"

 

but i am happy for that to be open i am not the authority on what a shill is or degrees of shilling?

perhaps anna is only a yellow belt level shill rather than a black belt level 10 shill 

 

i can tell you she isn't young she is nearly 50 thats pretty old 

i haven't made my mind up completely i am happy to give her plenty more rope to see what she does with it

 

 

Edited by oneantisworthtenofyou
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, oneantisworthtenofyou said:

 

well i am still open on the first one i'm not so sure if she is a major agent of mosad or the cia maybe?

i think a shill is someone who pretends to have a view or an opinion they don't actually hold

 

i can tell you she isn't young she is nearly 50 thats pretty old 

i haven't made my mind up completely i am happy to give her plenty more rope to see what she does with it

 

 

 

If she is that old I think it increases the chances of her being up to something knowingly deceptive ....

 

Dictionary deffinition ....

 

shill
INFORMALNORTH AMERICAN
noun
  1. an accomplice of a hawker, gambler, or swindler who acts as an enthusiastic customer to entice or encourage others.
     
    So the original meaning was of someone being knowingly involved in a fraud or swindle , and being paid for their work.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, oz93666 said:

 

If she is that old I think it increases the chances of her being up to something knowingly deceptive ....

 

Dictionary deffinition ....

 

shill
INFORMALNORTH AMERICAN
noun
  1. an accomplice of a hawker, gambler, or swindler who acts as an enthusiastic customer to entice or encourage others.
     
    So the original meaning was of someone being knowingly involved in a fraud or swindle , and being paid for their work.

 

when i said she is nearly 50 i was rounding it off she is around 45

she is younger than me so i was not trying to insult her age

i don't think she is young enough to be inexperienced or bumbling around as a presenter

like you suggested 

 

Anna sells courses for £9.99 in media presenting it would be rather disingenuous if she wasn't a professional

this could also be yellow belt level shilling or fraud but i think she just needs the money 

 

by the dictionary definition you posted Anna was shilling for the bbc and ITV by her own admission

anna was a professional MSM shill

she was paid for her work and she told lies to the public which is also fraud

and also hid the truth which she said didn't sit right with her ethics 

 

perhaps she was shilling for the bankers too?

 

she was telling lies back then on the payroll of the BBC and ITV 

maybe she changed?

 

she doesn't come across as competent enough to be trusted with anything spectacular imo

i am not impressed so far 

 

how long does a shill label last

if she was shilling in her 20s for bankers and shilling for the bbc in her 30s

and shilling for itv in her 40s

if she gives it up for a year or two does this wipe the shill slate clean?

 

or did she start shilling again when she was talking about vaccines in 2019 

 

what are the rules as far as statute of limitations on shilling should be 20 years at least?

 

on a scale of 1 to 10 how much do you trust anna brees?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

 

Yeah, looks like she is in it for the dough to me too. I hope I'm wrong though.

 

I can't actually find much info on her besides the BBC stuff and her ties to folks like Jon Wedger. Some say she is an ex Rothschild banker, not sure how true that is.

she supports goverment,it would be enough for me...just saying

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Golden Retriever said:

 

I disagree strongly.

 

If you can't see it, you need to visit Specsavers!

 

Why was she predicting a pandemic last November and saying if people didn't take the vaccine, then that would be the end of humanity!

 

 

Ha-Ha! Busted!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt anybody here will be shocked by this but, judging by the comments, the normies are furious.

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8779373/Parliaments-bars-NOT-subject-10pm-curfew.html#

Parliament's bars are NOT subject to 10pm curfew and MPs don't have to give their contact details to get a drink

  • Bars inside Parliament are exempt from the Government's new 10pm curfew 
  • Facilities serving inside Palace of Westminster are as a 'workplace canteen'  
  • Comes after a curfew was imposed on on pubs, bars and restaurants in England
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Golden Retriever said:

University demands freshers remove 'send drink' and 'f*** Boris' signs from their windows - as lawyers question whether keeping students locked in their flats is legal and culture secretary Oliver Dowden says they SHOULD be allowed home for Christmas

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8777829/University-demands-freshers-remove-send-drink-f-Boris-signs-windows.html

 

Oliver Bowden is a slimey Tory who said IF we stick to the rules, the students will get home for Christmas (blackmail) and he also said it was right they should be paying their exorbitant tuition fees accordingly for an online education.

 

https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-follow-the-rules-if-you-want-students-home-for-christmas-says-culture-secretary-12083205

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-54315585

Edited by Velma
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Mitochondrial Eve said:

I doubt anybody here will be shocked by this but, judging by the comments, the normies are furious.

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8779373/Parliaments-bars-NOT-subject-10pm-curfew.html#

Parliament's bars are NOT subject to 10pm curfew and MPs don't have to give their contact details to get a drink

  • Bars inside Parliament are exempt from the Government's new 10pm curfew 
  • Facilities serving inside Palace of Westminster are as a 'workplace canteen'  
  • Comes after a curfew was imposed on on pubs, bars and restaurants in England

 

Let's all head to the Parliament Bar at 10:00pm! Partaaay!

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And meanwhile, after copious amounts of posts arguing about on this women, we forget to look at the bigger picture. Lockdowns increasing in Wales, soldiers to help in streets etc. I’m not saying this has not been mentioned before, but while we argue about one persons motivations, the real agenda is continuing to be rolled out. Personally I think we need to be helping each other more positively to try and finds solutions to these problems.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...