Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 14.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

I started a new job not so long ago and quit after three weeks, I refused to wear a stupid mask all day at all, laughed at the managers and their covid terror.. I could see it wasn't going to end well

I've already posted about this in the 'Come Together by Region?' thread in the Solutions forum.   But now here is the advert for the big event on the 29th August. It would be great if as ma

Summary meeting with MP.   Big sign on door saying have to wear a mask. Reptilian brain nearly kicked in and panicked - temptation to go to the store and buy one. Managed to keep it together

Posted Images

12 hours ago, lake said:

 

 

Almost two-thirds of people believe the Government's latest Covid-19 restrictions do not go far enough, a poll reveals.

A survey of more than 2,000 adults found that 63 per cent believed that the measures taken last week fell short of the action that should have been taken.

Some 51 per cent of respondents favoured closing gyms and beauty salons now to lower the rate of coronavirus infections.

The findings chime with internal polling that has led ministers to believe that the priority for many members of the public is to see the pandemic brought under control.

However, they contrast with concerns raised by many Conservative MPs about the extent of restrictions.

One senior Tory claimed that the public had been driven to backing "authoritarian" measures having been made "fearful" by government warnings about the threat posed by Covid-19.

Boris Johnson faces a rebellion over the Government's approach to the pandemic, with MPs expressing concern that ministers are introducing curbs to basic freedoms without Parliament having a sufficient say.

The ORB International survey was carried out after Boris Johnson announced a raft of new measures including a 10pm curfew on pubs and restaurants, a 15-person cap on weddings and a return to working at home for office workers, which are likely to remain in place until March, a year on from the start of lockdown.

 

1601136030779.png.b4943c29bc183ea3bdfc0613661c5e38.png

 

Of 2,087 people surveyed by ORB last week, 83 per cent said they were worried about a second wave of Covid-19 "hitting the UK hard".

Asked whether the measures taken last week went far enough, 63 per cent said they did not, while 24 per cent indicated that the restrictions were sufficient.

Some 51 per cent said that the Government should close gyms and beauty salons - some of the last venues to re-open following the lockdown - while 34 per cent disagreed.

Only 13 per cent of respondents said that they believed the spread of the virus in the UK was under control - a drop from 33 per cent in late May.

 

Meanwhile, fewer than a third (28 per cent) of respondents strongly agreed that their colleagues and friends were following the rules on wearing face coverings, while some 12 per cent suggested that their acquaintances were largely failing to abide by the rules.

Only 31 per cent of respondents said the Government was handling the pandemic "well" compared to 63 per cent who disagreed.

On Friday, Sadiq Khan, the London Mayor, raised the spectre of further potential restrictions in the capital, after the city was added to the national Covid "watch list".

Amid rising infections across the UK, 620 new cases were confirmed in London on Friday.

In a televised address on Tuesday night, the Prime Minister said the latest national measures were necessary to prevent a second national lockdown which would involve school closures, saying: “We must do all we can to avoid going down that road again.”

The ORB survey was carried out online on Wednesday and Thursday.

 

 

Most worrying to read, especially when you consider Boris only makes popularist decisions. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, kj35 said:

Maybe all the syudents who are having all their personal liberties removed will wise up and refuse tests...

-

That's the solution they are offering to students,.

 

Shadow education secretary Kate Green said mass testing is obviously what is needed," she told BBC Breakfast.

 

it would be "unthinkable" that they could be locked in their halls and unable to see families, although she said "public health considerations" should always come first.

Online learning and meeting up on Zoom, or going for a socially distanced walk is a great way to maintain a positive outlook, said an expert.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If a person deliberately traps someone in a domicile it's called False Imprisonment. A person could invoke so much precedence as an illegal action, including a contravening of human rights laws. The students should do their research, illustrate to the Universities how they are in fact liable for legal and civil action and then walk out.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Coldrum said:

Looks like the lady in green , went down on the ground twice , 

Interesting facebook comment https://t.co/OesuTQMpUR?amp=1

 

Covid world weirdness for sure.

 

If she was a provocateur, she sure likes to be thrown around & the pig that tried to pull the chair away from her could have easily broke her neck.

 

So much video of evidence of how the police deliberately sabotage these protests, purely for the media.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Athenry04 said:

Utter fucking cunts, the dibble don't yet realise they'll be thrown on the bonfire, same as the rest of us. FTP.

 

Absolutely, they are pussies (pardon my French) and I have no sympathy for them at all. Choose your side! Because it's their kids who are going to be deprived of anything resembling a normal life and they are enforcing it! I think this is all a set-up to make police look out of their depth and to create a demand for more “fire-power” to ensure the rules are obeyed, to protect public health, blah, blah, blah...but it's their jobs that are on the line if they are replaced by more force.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
 

Dave Gill

🚨🚨🚨SHARE WITH EVERYONE!🚨🚨🚨

KNOW THE TRUTH OF THE FAKE NEWS AND SEE EXACTLY HOW IT WORKS!

LAST VIDEO IMPORTANT TO SEE HOW THE POLICE AMBUSHED THE PEACEFUL PROTEST AND WERE THE MAIN CAUSE OF THE PROBLEMS SHOWN ON MAINSTREAM MEDIA WHERE THEY BLAME THE PROTESTERS!

Please read before sharing.

Same lady

2 separate incidents

1st incident (2 videos) - The police ambushed during the PEACEFUL protest for no particular reason, as no crimes had been committed. They then pulled an “old lady” off her chair while she was dancing, (making herself known to the police? Also, how did the man filming know that they were going to do something to her before they did? 🤔) The police officer then pulls the chair from under her. After being thrown off her chair she then decides to go towards the officers (why?) and you can clearly see the police officer leans from where he is and makes an effort to grab hold of her arm (as if he recognised her) and drags her towards him. She’s then punched and attacked and then thrown to the floor. 🤷🏽‍♂️

So why, after being attacked like she did would you then do this?

2nd Incident - After being “attacked” she then decides to push her way through a crowd of people (different incident than the other video of the chair) and charges towards a different officer (who also seems to recognise her 🤔) He doesn’t react straight away but then throws her to the floor when he does decide to react just like the other officers did, they then leave her there and act as if nothing happened, waiting for a reaction from the crowd.

This is the same lady in both incidents.

Why is she charging towards the police?

Because she is an actress used by the police to cause riots in situations where they need an excuse to enforce restrictions. (Like peaceful protests of truth tellers who “won’t do as they’re told” 😂)

Usually these actors run towards the police, the police treat them like they did in the videos, this then cause the people they are trying to control react out of anger, therefore giving the government a reason to enforce further restrictions.

It’s a tactic called;

Problem

Reaction

Solution

Problem - People talking truth and THE POWERS THAT BE don’t want YOU to hear, what the truth is, no socialising making sense?

Reaction - They then use a paid actress to charge towards the police so she can be attacked and causes a riot between THE PEOPLE and the police out of anger.

Solution - THE POWERS THAT BE can then enforce tighter restrictions on the people and blame THE PEOPLE for the reason for these restrictions.

These ACTORS are paid to cause a problem.

It’s also known as getting ORDER OUT OF CHAOS.

They create the CHAOS and that way they get ORDER they knew they’d get by causing it.

This will not be shown on the news.

This is used to manipulate what you are shown in the media.

Understand that the police will use these tactics to cause problems to enforce the laws they already wanted to begin with but didn’t have a reason to.

They use this “old lady” actress to manipulate your emotions to incite anger.

Don’t fall for their games anymore.

YOU KNOW THEIR TACTICS!

Last video shows how the police AMBUSHED the peaceful protest and caused the violence.

Don’t believe the FAKE NEWS who say it was the protesters!

videovideovideoImage may contain: one or more people and meme, text that says "1st incident UE Notice scarf"Image may contain: one or more people, text that says "1st incident"
 
 
 
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Velma said:

 

She'd look nice on a plate with some tatties and tart sauce.

LOL - out of likes - These discpicable characters deserve as much ridicule as we all can muster. Grilling and de-boning would be too good a treatment.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, zarkov said:

LOL - out of likes - These discpicable characters deserve as much ridicule as we all can muster. Grilling and de-boning would be too good a treatment.

 

😄 also out of likes!

Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, oddsnsods said:

 

Covid world weirdness for sure.

 

If she was a provocateur, she sure likes to be thrown around & the pig that tried to pull the chair away from her could have easily broke her neck.

 

So much video of evidence of how the police deliberately sabotage these protests, purely for the media.

 

Maybe she's a time-traveller from the 1950's but women of a certain age don't dress like that anymore; a two-piece, knee-length, green tweed suit, with wooly stockings, fur-trimmed ankle boots, a huge head-scarf, dark glasses and a stiff red wig!

Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Velma said:

 

Yeah, dodgy AF! Undercover officer in drag?

🙄🙄🙄 It is NOT an undercover officer. That was an older woman, and the police WERE being heavy handed. When they came and stormed the speeches at Trafalgar, they arrested the German doctor and then it all went a bit mad. The protestors went off to march through Central London and then to Hyde Park. When we were in Hyde Park, they started on a guy playing guitar and proceeded to kick him and taze him. I went up to the riot police and asked them wtf is going on and one of them shoved me backwards. They also attacked my brother for no reason and my cousin, who were trying to help from stopping protestors getting angry and attacking the police back! So don't believe the people crying crisis actor etc. The police ARE bullies and WILL attack you for NO reason.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Velma said:

 

Maybe she's a time-traveller from the 1950's but women of a certain age don't dress like that anymore; a two-piece, knee-length, green tweed suit, with wooly stockings, fur-trimmed ankle boots, a huge head-scarf, dark glasses and a stiff red wig!

And jumping up and down on a folding chair ...

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Velma said:

 

Maybe she's a time-traveller from the 1950's but women of a certain age don't dress like that anymore; a two-piece, knee-length, green tweed suit, with wooly stockings, fur-trimmed ankle boots, a huge head-scarf, dark glasses and a stiff red wig!

Wow are you really judging someone on what choice of clothes they are wearing? So that makes her an agent? Ridiculous. I saw loads of people there dressed oddly. That's just their style, who tf cares. A lot of eccentrics there, doesn't make them agents jeez. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Yasmina said:

Wow are you really judging someone on what choice of clothes they are wearing? So that makes her an agent? Ridiculous. I saw loads of people there dressed oddly. That's just their style, who tf cares. A lot of eccentrics there, doesn't make them agents jeez. 

If anything an agent is not going to stand out. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...