Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


numnuts
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, Fluke said:

I saw this the other day. It has no reference or author but wondered how much value something of this would have in employment if you chose to go down the legal route.

E7Fkqz2WQAg63bj.png

 

A link to the template letter if anyone finds it? LOL

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BruiseL said:

So the moment I've been waiting for came today. Manager of the care home said she'd had a memo from head office to make sure anyone who refuses the jab knows they can't work in healthcare after Nov 11th. She asked me and I said no and that after 11th of Nov I wouldn't be working in healthcare then. I told her that it was against my beliefs and asked for any further correspondence to be put in writing stating the consequences of refusing so I could pass it onto my Union (I did say to her though that I didn't think that would help but I have to try and fight it). She's against forced jabs herself and asked if I could be exempt, I'm not. So let the games begin. 

Whos gonna be finger pointed when the residents start getting ill?

Better to be out of the way so the only ones they can blame are the vaxxed

 

i remember a phrase called 'constructive unfair dismissal' #

 

If your employer has done something that seriously breaches your contract, you might be able to resign and make a claim to an employment tribunal. This is called constructive dismissal.

To be successful you'll need to prove your employer seriously breached your contract and that you resigned in response to it.

 

granted its the .gov who is responsible but same principle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, SimonTV said:

It all goes back to this idea that we don't get natural immunity and only find immunity through vaccines. How they managed to pull that lie off? 

But, "vaccines are mankinds greatest invention, ever" 😂

 

I've heard so many imbeciles say that shit 🤦‍♂️

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, zArk said:

QUESTION:

does '33' resonant with the social unconscious and individual psyche ?

or

is it a simple message to Masons to 'await' or 'act' ?

 

my ego likes the idea that the media/masons are having the 'craic' with me , just a little nod and wink to the knowledgable but realistically its for others

 

^ Both.

 

12 hours ago, Mr H said:

Remember when they said the vaccines were 90-95% effective? What happened to that narrative?😂

 

Obviously they can't have it both ways....

 

They can. They were hoping nobody would notice it by now. But obviously did. 😂

 

Edited by elongated1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, whatthefoxhat said:

When does the one great saviour appear ?

 

If such a figure appeared again, the world would probably turn on him and persecute him for calling out the evil doers.

 

You know what Plato said about those that tell the truth being hated.

Edited by EnigmaticWorld
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

I such a figure appeared again, the world would probably turn on him and persecute him for calling out the evil doers.

When God turns up, they're not coming as some wimpy human. He's coming to kick ass. Lightening bolt in your ass. 

Edited by Morpheus
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, elongated1 said:

You should have told people who were waiting in the queue to note down the jabber's full name and inform them that they will be liable in case of injury or death by handing out this letter. She would have been bullistic by then. If you gonna die, you might as well have fun while you can. lol

 

I came to a conclusion that there is nothing I can do about graphene/shedding.

I just make sure I am outta here for good. Glad I now have the key.

The sad thing is the one person (I would say a boy) 

 in the queue didn't look old enough to drive never mind anything else.  I desperately wanted to say/do something but I just didn't know what.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fabian Delph, of Everton, has just posted an anti-vaccine message on his Instagram story.

 

The Daily Mail reported that English Premiership clubs are in a ‘scramble’ to get players vaccinated, following Boris’ recent announcement that it’ll be a requirement to compete in the new season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, ar55 said:

Fabian Delph, of Everton, has just posted an anti-vaccine message on his Instagram story.

 

The Daily Mail reported that English Premiership clubs are in a ‘scramble’ to get players vaccinated, following Boris’ recent announcement that it’ll be a requirement to compete in the new season.

 

The rich can just pay off docs to not give them the shots. There's no way to really tell if you've had it (as the shot still get the Rona and pass it on, if you believe that bs). 

I think it's an extra layer of bullshido in this whole Rona balls ... Get the jab..you still get the Rona and you get to suffer the side effects too. L

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, ar55 said:

Fabian Delph, of Everton, has just posted an anti-vaccine message on his Instagram story.

 

The Daily Mail reported that English Premiership clubs are in a ‘scramble’ to get players vaccinated, following Boris’ recent announcement that it’ll be a requirement to compete in the new season.

Good for him, he's got less to lose now that the Red Tops and online idiots falsely named him in that recent story about Everton. He's probably old enough to think about retiring or playing abroad if he wants to.

 

More need to follow his stance.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Frankieboy said:

As a Hammers fan i‘ m very disappointed with the jab rollout at the London stadium

West ham don't own the London stadium..they are footy season tenants. It's still owned by that legacy corp thingy . Come on if any stadium was going to be used for shots it's the Olympic stadium after all that illuminati symbolism Olympics shenanigans 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, sarbloh said:

West ham don't own the London stadium..they are footy season tenants. It's still owned by that legacy corp thingy . Come on if any stadium was going to be used for shots it's the Olympic stadium after all that illuminati symbolism Olympics shenanigans 

They should have never left the Boleyn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Morpheus said:

Hi BruiseL, I hope you don't mind me responding to your post. May I kindly advise that you're not refusing, but you are respectfully declining on the basis on informed consent. Remember, this gene therapy only has emergency powers, it is not and has never been given full license and remains in trial stages. Grounds for suing any dismissal by your employer. Plenty of material on this site for sending letters of response like here:

 

https://www.workersofengland.co.uk/latest-news/fact-sheet-for-employees-who-are-facing-employer-action-regarding-mandatory-vaccination-refusal/

 

Someone posted this not so long ago and it's very good information. Good luck and don't let the bastards grind you down. Sorry for the swear @Ergo Storm 😉 it was a well timed use of language that adequately expresses mamd conveys my thoughts at this time. 👍

 

Thank you for your reply. I joined that union a month ago when they were offering to help from day one. I followed the written advice on the website to state belief first and they say they'll take it from there, we'll see. I know unison will be hopeless, been in them for yrs but have kept subs going for this battle, just in case! I'm not going to crumble. It'll hurt financially but me and my Husband will work something out. Nothing, nothing is worth that jab!! 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, zArk said:

Whos gonna be finger pointed when the residents start getting ill?

Better to be out of the way so the only ones they can blame are the vaxxed

 

i remember a phrase called 'constructive unfair dismissal' #

 

If your employer has done something that seriously breaches your contract, you might be able to resign and make a claim to an employment tribunal. This is called constructive dismissal.

To be successful you'll need to prove your employer seriously breached your contract and that you resigned in response to it.

 

granted its the .gov who is responsible but same principle

It's hopefully the outcome that will happen but I very much doubt it but hey we gotta try n ya never know something might happen. I've never been one for being pushed around. Got a copy of my contract, nothing in there about medical interventions. Thank you for your reply, appreciated 🙂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heard a real horror story on talk radio this afternoon. A woman phoned in to tell of her experience with the jab. Despite serious misgivings she had her first vaccine because of being told by her employer "No jabs no job" and she wanted to be able to do things with her partner and Mother the same before the covid. After receiving her first jab she was in a wheel chair within ten minutes. Anaphylactic shock, lost feeling in hands and fingers, rash on neck, swollen tongue and fighting to breathe. She thought she was going to die. She was wheeled away quickly and a doctor was called who treated her as if he thought she was wasting his time.  One of the nurse told her to report it to the yellow card scheme. "I wouldn't do that if I were you" was the doctor's response. Understandably she now faces the dilemma of not  having the second jab and losing her job or risk serious health consequences. 

     We on this forum would say get another job, but with out knowing her full story, maybe it isn't that easy for her. The point is this she is being dictated too by people who are living in fear due to the constant bombardment of government propaganda for the last 18 months. They are obsessed with all of us getting the jab. They remind me of a used car sales man who has been told by his boss on Monday morning to sell one particular car by Friday or lose his job. Also heard a chap tell of being banned from face book for sharing some thing from the C.D.C which stated the P.C.R test is not adequate for testing for covid. A brilliant clip on todays U.K column where a woman in a café is phoned by a nurse, asking her why she hasn't been vaccinated. The women's reply was awesome. When she spoke of the yellow card reporting scheme she was quite surprised to hear the nurse say she had never heard of it but would have a look. A friend of ours who works for the N.H.S in an admin  role was jabbed a few months ago. She had 3 days off work afterwards due to a minor adverse reaction. When my wife asked her if she had reported it on the M.H.R.A website. Again our friend had never heard of it. When N.H.S employees don't know of the yellow card reporting scheme it goes some way to explaining why only ten percent or less of the general population report any adverse reactions. I'm very disappointed by the number of masks where I live still being worn.

    Cant help but wonder if we stand any chance at all of ending this and any one being brought to account for their actions.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • lake locked this topic
  • lake unlocked this topic
  • Beaujangles featured this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...