Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


numnuts
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 5/16/2020 at 12:31 PM, Tinfoil Hat said:

Out of curiosity, has anyone here been tested. I haven't (and have no desire to be) but am just wondering where they're getting these figures from - even if the tests themselves weren't flawed to start with.

I have jacked my job in a care home as i was told it was the jab or job . so got me a new job and told them to stuff it where the sun dont shine .

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

Whatever your views are on the nature of this planet, we can't afford to be bunched up with flat Earthers right now. The normie mind will see that and ridicule us more.

 

was told similar for years regarding 9/11 and the whole wtc plane hoax

 

tbh didnt make a difference to the zombies if i spoke about no planes or focused on the bombs going off or just focused upon Emad Salem .. they dont give a fig either way.

 

imo speak your own argument and dont let others control your speech.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, whatthefoxhat said:

A timely reminder of what to expect,here,there and everywhere

 

https://cryptome.org/2012/07/gent-forum-spies.htm

I have saved this and I recommended others do too. 

This is essential reading. A massive thankyou for posting this. 

Here is a snippet:

 

Seventeen Techniques for Truth Suppression

 

Strong, credible allegations of high-level criminal activity can bring down a government. When the government lacks an effective, fact-based defense, other techniques must be employed. The success of these techniques depends heavily upon a cooperative, compliant press and a mere token opposition party.

 

1. Dummy up. If it's not reported, if it's not news, it didn't happen.

 

2. Wax indignant. This is also known as the "How dare you?" gambit.

 

3. Characterize the charges as "rumors" or, better yet, "wild rumors." If, in spite of the news blackout, the public is still able to learn about the suspicious facts, it can only be through "rumors." (If they tend to believe the "rumors" it must be because they are simply "paranoid" or "hysterical.")

 

4. Knock down straw men. Deal only with the weakest aspects of the weakest charges. Even better, create your own straw men. Make up wild rumors (or plant false stories) and give them lead play when you appear to debunk all the charges, real and fanciful alike.

 

5. Call the skeptics names like "conspiracy theorist," "nutcase," "ranter," "kook," "crackpot," and, of course, "rumor monger." Be sure, too, to use heavily loaded verbs and adjectives when characterizing their charges and defending the "more reasonable" government and its defenders. You must then carefully avoid fair and open debate with any of the people you have thus maligned. For insurance, set up your own "skeptics" to shoot down.

 

6. Impugn motives. Attempt to marginalize the critics by suggesting strongly that they are not really interested in the truth but are simply pursuing a partisan political agenda or are out to make money (compared to over-compensated adherents to the government line who, presumably, are not).

 

7. Invoke authority. Here the controlled press and the sham opposition can be very useful.

 

8. Dismiss the charges as "old news."

 

9. Come half-clean. This is also known as "confession and avoidance" or "taking the limited hangout route." This way, you create the impression of candor and honesty while you admit only to relatively harmless, less-than-criminal "mistakes." This stratagem often requires the embrace of a fall-back position quite different from the one originally taken. With effective damage control, the fall-back position need only be peddled by stooge skeptics to carefully limited markets.

 

10. Characterize the crimes as impossibly complex and the truth as ultimately unknowable.

 

11. Reason backward, using the deductive method with a vengeance. With thoroughly rigorous deduction, troublesome evidence is irrelevant. E.g. We have a completely free press. If evidence exists that the Vince Foster "suicide" note was forged, they would have reported it. They haven't reported it so there is no such evidence. Another variation on this theme involves the likelihood of a conspiracy leaker and a press who would report the leak.

 

12. Require the skeptics to solve the crime completely. E.g. If Foster was murdered, who did it and why?

 

13. Change the subject. This technique includes creating and/or publicizing distractions.

 

14. Lightly report incriminating facts, and then make nothing of them. This is sometimes referred to as "bump and run" reporting.

 

15. Baldly and brazenly lie. A favorite way of doing this is to attribute the "facts" furnished the public to a plausible-sounding, but anonymous, source.

 

16. Expanding further on numbers 4 and 5, have your own stooges "expose" scandals and champion popular causes. Their job is to pre-empt real opponents and to play 99-yard football. A variation is to pay rich people for the job who will pretend to spend their own money.

 

17. Flood the Internet with agents. This is the answer to the question, "What could possibly motivate a person to spend hour upon hour on Internet news groups defending the government and/or the press and harassing genuine critics?" Don t the authorities have defenders enough in all the newspapers, magazines, radio, and television? One would think refusing to print critical letters and screening out serious callers or dumping them from radio talk shows would be control enough, but, obviously it is not. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, whatthefoxhat said:

A timely reminder of what to expect,here,there and everywhere

1 hour ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

The shape of our prison doesn't matter right now.

https://cryptome.org/2012/07/gent-forum-spies.htm

It matters a lot to the sun worshiping satanics, who see flat earthers as dangerous. 

 

They spent trillions promoting a fake space belief and misinformation campaign. And generations of lies. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, zArk said:

 

was told similar for years regarding 9/11 and the whole wtc plane hoax

 

tbh didnt make a difference to the zombies if i spoke about no planes or focused on the bombs going off or just focused upon Emad Salem .. they dont give a fig either way.

 

imo speak your own argument and dont let others control your speech.

 

You have a point, but that's another conspiracy within a conspiracy. I mean in the sense that people seem to want us talking about how the towers came down, but not who did it and why.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.thejournal.ie/indoor-dining-vote-5495675-Jul2021/

 

close-button.svg
No news is bad news 

Your contributions will help us continue to deliver the stories that are important to you

SUPPORT THE JOURNAL
Health Minister Stephan Donnelly
Health Minister Stephan Donnelly
Image: Oireachtas.ie

Government wins vote on indoor dining laws labelled as 'discriminatory' by opposition TDs

The Dáil is currently debating opposition amendments to the legislation.
 
2 hours ago 21,580 61
   

THE GOVERNMENT HAS won a crucial Dáil vote on legislation that would allow for indoor dining to resume for vaccinated or Covid-recovered persons.

The Dáil is currently debating opposition amendments to the legislation but the potential for the bill to be defeated has receded after the second reading of the bill was passed by 72 votes to 66.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, whatthefoxhat said:

A timely reminder of what to expect,here,there and everywhere

 

https://cryptome.org/2012/07/gent-forum-spies.htm

I've experienced most of these tactics first hand in 'real life' too by the way. Some fucking agent in my family set all the traps, and I fell into almost every single one of them. But God saved me nonetheless. And the precious forum I was in was 100% taken over by paid trolls. But in that forum I was aware of it, so I left.. Many times actually. Fought those bastards till the very end, but when all the mods admins and active members are in on it, then it gets almost boring and pointless. The forum was choked out, and hardly anybody visited anymore. I even had my favorite agent guy who was also from a satanic family, I figured out through his surprisingly honest comment on satanic whistle blower videos i posted, which revealed that to me. Here on this forum you can expect many. 

 

Anyway, from the text of this link, just listen to these words:

 

Quote:

 

"Vanish. If you are a key holder of secrets or otherwise overly illuminated and you think the heat is getting too hot, to avoid the issues, vacate the kitchen." 

 

How illuminati satanic is that? 

 

They're going down! 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Weedo said:

It matters a lot to the sun worshiping satanics, who see flat earthers as dangerous. 

 

They spent trillions promoting a fake space belief and misinformation campaign. And generations of lies. 

 

Im a sun worshipper guess this makes me Satanic.

 

  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

 

How do you wake people up from tribalism? Some people have low impulse control and hardly any ability for pattern recognition, so I doubt it will ever end.

 

As befuddled as ever over the sad state of consciousness. Man has all the tools necessary to make the discriminatory choices! but the cultural overlay keeps blunting the senses.

The head of the snake or hydra has to come off for that to occur imho in such a way as not to grow back. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, bamboozooka said:

lets not forget rio ferdinand.

crying about his late wife on good morning britain while the sun has him on the beach in monaco with new girlfriend happy as a pig in shit

Always got dodgy vibes off him.

 

And now I know why there was always so much coverage for Rapinoe, why she was placed on a pedastal by the media, and why she was freely allowed to slag off the POTUS without any comeback.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, oddsnsods said:

 

Im a sun worshipper guess this makes me Satanic.

 

Well, a low ranking one, who isn't aware that the guys above you know the sun isn't your god, but Satan. 

 

Usually the lower ranks worship sun, then the star Sirius, then Satan directly. But sun worshipers are on their way. It's more about the fire element, VS earth element. Like lucifer vs Adam. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Anti Facts Sir said:

Always got dodgy vibes off him.

 

And now I know why there was always so much coverage for Rapinoe, why she was placed on a pedastal by the media, and why she was freely allowed to slag off the POTUS without any comeback.

then i wonder why is maria bartiromo pro trump.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Weedo said:

Well, a low ranking one, who isn't aware that the guys above you know the sun isn't your god, but Satan. 

 

Usually the lower ranks worship sun, then the star Sirius, then Satan directly. But sun worshipers are on their way. It's more about the fire element, VS earth element. Like lucifer vs Adam. 

image.jpeg.2c91bc9dd67c349bdcce05e40ad6c7a3.jpeg

Just a polite reminder that the Sun and the rainbow are copyrighted by God. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Weedo said:

Well, a low ranking one, who isn't aware that the guys above you know the sun isn't your god, but Satan. 

 

Usually the lower ranks worship sun, then the star Sirius, then Satan directly. But sun worshipers are on their way. It's more about the fire element, VS earth element. Like lucifer vs Adam. 

 

Lower ranking sunbathers..LMAO

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, zArk said:

 

was told similar for years regarding 9/11 and the whole wtc plane hoax

 

tbh didnt make a difference to the zombies if i spoke about no planes or focused on the bombs going off or just focused upon Emad Salem .. they dont give a fig either way.

 

imo speak your own argument and dont let others control your speech.

Agreed

And why I refer to Larken Rose on occasion for any who would listen.

His standpoint is straight forward and from the perspective of natural law, the foundation of true principle.

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • lake locked this topic
  • lake unlocked this topic
  • Beaujangles featured this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...