Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


numnuts
 Share

Message added by Grumpy Owl,

This topic is for all general discussion regarding the current COVID-19 pandemic. There are of course numerous other related topics for discussing specific aspects of this pandemic in more detail. And there are other parts of this forum for more 'off-topic' discussions.

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Nobby Noboddy said:

Nah, really 'GOD' or the creator as I like to put it made this place.

 

He (and don't get gender off on me) made it all.

 

He made the intricate, interdependent complexity of everything. Sublime beyond belief.

 

If He wants to 'shake the sheets', he will.

 

AND I don't think our creator is worried about your parking needs. That's just luck or timing.

 

Thats good for you that that is your belief 👍😊

Edited by blowonthepie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, blowonthepie said:

 

I dont ‘know’ this at all; no sadness here.

 

Im pleased you and the others here like you have your beliefs; I think it’s part of the human condition to have to have something to ‘believe’ in; otherwise the world would be a truly desperate place lol.

 

Viva la differénce 👍😁

SERIOUSLY:

'Im pleased you and the others here like you have your beliefs; I think it’s part of the human condition to have to have something to ‘believe’ in; otherwise the world would be a truly desperate place lol."

 

Are you a fucking AI bot? Because that does not sound human.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Nobby Noboddy said:

SERIOUSLY:

'Im pleased you and the others here like you have your beliefs; I think it’s part of the human condition to have to have something to ‘believe’ in; otherwise the world would be a truly desperate place lol."

 

Are you a fucking AI bot? Because that does not sound human.

 

 

Geez, sorry 😬; sometimes I’m not sure what I am, which leads to serious partaking of alcohol, and contemplation of the id; I’m still none the wiser 🤯😁

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Thewoodsman said:

You see, God gave man free will. He realised that man was hopeless but he still loved us and longed for us to worship him and be good.

So he sent his son, himself in the flesh who we viciously murdered. That was the deal breaker, when we killed christ we inherited this world,  thr age of man came into play. God would no longer interfere in mans affairs. God went away to prepare his kingdom for those who could accept this truth, that without christ's blood we are hopeless and deserve an eternity away from oit creator. He however did leave a part of himself in the form of his holy spirit to guide us and to be a connection to the one true God whom used to in days of old be more present.

 

When man betrayed God and built the tower of Babel, ,God came personally and scattered those people. The bible explicitly says that God became the God of Israel and left the other lands to other gods or to fallen angels as it were.

Israel deserted God too and on that day christ was crucified mans day began and everything since has been out doing.

 

This is no game to God. We have no right to wonder where he is or why he does not intervene. We deserted him and crucified him in the flesh sealing our fate.

 

Not at all preaching here. We must all find our own paths and come to terms with what we are and how despicable this world is. I know what I believe and I long for this reality to be brought to an end . It is my belief it shall be. I'm a sinner as is everyone else and I deserve hell fire but I can rejoice because through Jesus Christ my lord and saviour I am saved

Not because I'm good at all but because I recognise how utterly hopeless I am and it's only with the blood of Christ and the holy spirit that I am able to refrain from all the wicked things my flesh cries out for me to do.

 

Their is a redeemer friend and its Christ Gods only son.

 

Man as with all else turned a simple truth into something it is not and along came religion and dogma. Yes we perversed Gods own word to us, complicated the most simple teaching so that man yet again would bicker and allow arrogance to get in the way of the fact that we suck and cannot be without sin but it's ok because Christ took it all away and that with this truth we can resist our fallen nature

 

God bless everyone and Goodnight. 

 

In these dark hours I pray for Jesus return but I accept that nothing man can do to me can compare to what awaits those who look past that arrogance and ego and accept the simple truth that is God in the flesh Christ Jesus

 

May the world know that I am yours.
I will never be silenced.
I will resist my sin to the point of blood,
And I will wear my scars like badges of honor.
But let my hope cry out that my God is greater than the pain of persecution.
My God is greater than this world.
There will never be another chance to live today for God.
There will never be another name that can save us from ourselves.
And so, steadfast and undeterred, I will proclaim the name of Christ to a dead and dying world.
I am not ashamed!
We will resist our sin to the point of blood,
And we will wear our scars like badges of honor.
But let our hope cry out that our God is greater than the pain of persecution.
Blinded, I saw that Christ is Lord.
Now, may the world see you through open eyes. God, my Father, reign

 

You may want to retract your ‘like’ of my post my friend; your interpretation of ‘god’ and mine are not alike; but all power to you 👍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That study that showed vaccines were more harmful than covid was removed by the journal and the authors of the study have hit back. 

 

Should public health authorities scrutinize deaths attributed to COVID-19 as closely as they scrutinize deaths attributed to COVID-19 vaccines?

Defenders of a controversial study on the risk-benefit ratio of COVID-19 vaccines are calling hypocrisy on a medical journal for retracting the paper a week after publishing it, following the resignations of several journal editors in protest.

In a Friday retraction notice in the journal Vaccines, the editor in chief and "several" editorial board members said the paper's authors were not able to "satisfactorily" answer claims that they conflated correlation with causation.

Analyzing data from the Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre, known as LAREB, the paper's authors estimated COVID-19 vaccines take two lives for every three they save. The country leads Europe in vaccine adverse-reaction reporting.

Authors Harald Walach, Rainer Klement and Wouter Aukema challenged criticism from Eugene van Puijenbroek, who leads LAREB's scientific department, that they had misused its data.

"This starts a long-overdue debate on how to gauge the safety of COVID-19 vaccines," they wrote in a statement provided to Retraction Watch Thursday.

"Currently we only have association, we agree, and we never said anything else. But the same is true with fatalities as consequences of SARS-CoV2-infections [sic]," which are "rarely vetted by autopsy or second opinion" to confirm they were caused by the novel coronavirus, rather than incidental to infection.

Brown University epidemiologist Andrew Bostom wasn't impressed by the journal's "baloney" explanation for the retraction, either. "The [vaccine] deaths are as causally related as C19 deaths which allow for any positive test within 30-60 days of a death from any cause to be tallied as a C19 death," he wrote in a Twitter message to Just the News.

Bostom pointed to a June study, not yet peer-reviewed, of a sample of deaths in the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System reported through April. The sample was limited to people who got early vaccinations, primarily elderly or those with "significant health conditions."

Researchers at the University of London and New Zealand's Massey University found that they could rule out "vaccine reaction" as a contributing factor in just 14% of deaths. "Contrary to claims that most of these reports are made by lay-people and are hence clinically unreliable, we identified health service employees as the reporter in at least 67%," they wrote

Correlation versus causation is also an ongoing issue in research on the effectiveness of masks in mitigating the spread of COVID-19. Commenters immediately challenged a Thursday report in MedPage Today on a study that purported to find masks effective in stopping in-school transmission, but had no control group of mask-optional schools.

 

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/coronavirus/retraction-paper-vaccine-deaths-spurs-demand-more-scrutiny-reported

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

'we' didn't crucify Jesus - or at least I didn't! Not unless it was in some previous incarnation that I have zero recollection of and in which my behaviour was contrary to my nature as I understand it to be currently.

 

Just like I didn't sell black people into slavery.

 

I'm sick if being expected to carry guilt and expect doom for other people's shitty actions 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, blowonthepie said:

Look out Yanks (am I allowed to call Americans that?), they’ll be knocking on your door.

 

DC AG subpoenas Facebook for data on ALL users that have spread “COVID-19 misinformation”

 

https://www.infowars.com/posts/dc-ag-subpoenas-facebook-for-data-on-all-users-that-have-spread-covid-19-misinformation/

 

Trust the science they say. If they don't like your science they retract your study and label it misinformation. Amaazing science. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SimonTV said:

 

Trust the science they say. If they don't like your science they retract your study and label it misinformation. Amaazing science. 

 

Yeah, they can say anything they like; but when it comes to us peons 🙄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

 

Because of Noahide masons?

 

1271126897_masonicrainbow1.jpg.74dde9d9dbf74aa9100ad67dfd7f1b76.jpg

Mary Poppins springs to mind some where over the rainbow climbing high.

preprogramming the kids far back just a thought and also Teletubbies kid form robots etc.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Mr Chinnery said:

 

 

The mascot is a lizard 🤣 🦖

 

image.png.c3070d3005d04429347baa2de25fc33f.png

 

What I don't quite understand is how are they keeping tabs on who has had the vaccine and who hasn't if they are using all these mobile drop-in centres and casual sites.  Couldn't a desperate person just say: 'Oh, I had my vaccine in the tent they set up down at Glastonbury'.  How do you prove or disprove it (two different problems, arising in different situations)? 

 

Surely to make this work they need a paper trail.  But what if they aren't interested in it working or not working, and it's just a placebo and mass social observation experiment, perhaps with the intention of delivering something worse now that enough people have been softened up?

 

I'm keeping tabs on the official BBC page that shows vaccine take-up and is updated every day or so:

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-55274833

 

If there's no proper paper trail, the figures given must be invented.

 

 

 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, k_j_evans said:

But surely a dangling lanyard is a safety risk around power tools, like ties, rings and long hair

 

You would think so, yes.  But the people who mandate these things have never been in a joinery shop.

 

In reality what I expect to happen is that I will have to wear the lanyard for the first few days, and then people will gradually forget and nobody will notice or care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Outsider said:

Unfortunately (and with respect to your beliefs) God has never intervened in anything in my opinion. If he exists he is quite content to watch rather than act....if this is a terrible game, he is sat in the directors box impassively watching us trying to fathom out the rules.

This seems like an anthropomorphic view of God. 

5 hours ago, Outsider said:

Agree, and lots of Christians it would appear are blind to the true nature of those that lead their faith. What use is faith when it doesn't give you the ability to see the true nature of things? 

 

Everyone is at a different stage of awakening, including Christians, Muslims, Buddhists and bus drivers! 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, Outsider said:

Agree, and lots of Christians it would appear are blind to the true nature of those that lead their faith.

 

True, they need to wake up to the fact that those that lead them often aren't Christians and the fact that they hate them. They have been infiltrated and subverted big time.

Edited by EnigmaticWorld
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
14 hours ago, BossCrow said:

Here are some pics;

8a98ea7731d5baf8f27e5c88948070d8-1.jpeg.41caf3750493bc1203009d3ca945b0d8.jpeg

 

37390964-9097535-image-a-38_1609292696546-1.jpg.2d52ca4cd11eca72aefa14fbc17c2aa7.jpg

 

Would be more useful without the fingers holding them ...lol

 

I saw you found some perfect examples a few posts back...:-) Lots of triangles on that card!

Edited by Beaujangles
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Athenry04 said:

Latest NHS propaganda advert is another disgrace, with all the usual suspects such as Walliams and other non-entities. Jim Broadbent also sold his soul doing this crap. Hugo Talks breaks it down pretty well.

 

https://hugotalks.com/2021/07/03/nhs-jab-propaganda-advert-analysis-crawl-to-daddy-hugo-talks-lockdown/#comments

 

 

Why this now? Thought the vaccination campaign was drawing to a close? Do they really believe that vax refuseniks (their term not mine) would be influenced watching this junk? Embarrassing to think people like us would be influenced by David Walliams...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Ergo Storm said:

 

What I don't quite understand is how are they keeping tabs on who has had the vaccine and who hasn't if they are using all these mobile drop-in centres and casual sites.  Couldn't a desperate person just say: 'Oh, I had my vaccine in the tent they set up down at Glastonbury'.  How do you prove or disprove it (two different problems, arising in different situations)? 

 

Surely to make this work they need a paper trail.  But what if they aren't interested in it working or not working, and it's just a placebo and mass social observation experiment, perhaps with the intention of delivering something worse now that enough people have been softened up?

 

I'm keeping tabs on the official BBC page that shows vaccine take-up and is updated every day or so:

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-55274833

 

If there's no proper paper trail, the figures given must be invented.

 

 

 

I'm pretty sure all they need is your name and D O.B and you will be logged onto their system.  

Pretty sure they aren't just injecting random people walking into these places. It may seem casual and less formal now but they for sure know who is getting what. This is a scientific experiment so accurate records must be kept.

 

In fact our names and date of birth now seem like our usernames and passwords. Once we hand that information over they can access our entire medical history. 

Edited by Outsider
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, SimonTV said:

Trust the science they say. If they don't like your science they retract your study and label it misinformation. Amaazing science. 

 

What they mean is trust their science.

I've never trusted their science, from Darwinism to Einstein, they are so full of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...