Coronavirus Mega-Thread.

[Outsider]

5 minutes ago, Human10 said:

I think it could be sterilizing - and not necessary permanently. Just to keep the numbers they want.

Makes sense why they have targeted the over 40s to get the Oxford and those under (the breeding age range) get the mRNA.

Edited June 20, 2021 by Outsider

[ally_uk]

44 minutes ago, Outsider said:

Why would the government kill the majority of the population? This is the bit I'm not following surely they need us to finance them.......

 

If you view the world as a cold hearted business model it makes perfect sense...take for instance a car plant, 30 years ago you would need a large amount of manual labour to produce the product, now the same plant can be run more efficiently using a fraction of the labour. All you need is technical staff to maintain the robotic machinery. Technology across all sectors is making us redundant. 

 

It doesn't make sense to me infact it's a kind of paranoid skewered approach to life. 

 

Things such as the great reset or evolution of technology that was going to happen anyways things such as transhumanism again it's all down to progression. 

 

I like this forum but some of the theories on here are quite frankly a bit out there and are silly.

 

 

[ally_uk]

1 hour ago, Yoyo said:

……Compartmentalisation 

Then surely if this was the end goal they would do it in one fell swoop such as a nuke...... Why give the opposition a fighting chance to push back?

 

I disagree it's like that whole Qanon nonsense or that apparent new aking Richard silly theories without no frutition.

[Human10]

1 minute ago, Outsider said:

Makes sense why they have targeted the over 40s to get the Oxford and those under (the breeding age range) get the mRNA.

And it was easy to cover deaths from Zeneca in those above 50... Prove it was stroke from the vax ;)

[Ziggy Sawdust]

4 hours ago, CosmoGenesis said:

Am I the only one whos confused by this ally_uk poster?

 

If you click their profile you will see contradictory opinions. 

 

''So I'm now public enemy number one for refusing the jab. Ex is saying what about son don't you care? What if you get Covid My own family are the same Just feel like I'm becoming a outcast''

 

''4: the vaccines haven't been tested long enough.  Contrary to popular belief, most of the groundwork for this vaccine was already done in the last 20 years, as much work was done on a SARS vaccine, also a coronavirus, so it wasn't as rushed as people think.  Also people freak out about the DNA/RNA in the vaccine when this material is completely removed from your body within 48 hours of the injection.  All that remains are the antibodies your own body has created, there's nothing in the vaccine that can create long term side effects.  Conversely, we KNOW that covid causes long term neurological and cardiovascular damage, yet some people seem happy to risk getting covid. 
5: deaths and serious injury caused by vaccines- the deaths and illness in the vaccinated is no higher than the unvaccinated.  This is simply  incorrect. The occasional adverse reaction has happened, but no more than happens in people taking paracetamol or ibuprofen as prescribed.  The side effects on those common tablets list death/internal bleeding as a possible outcome but it doesn't stop people taking them, and there is no media attention in that, ask yourself why? It's because it is so rare.  The media focus is only on the vaccine which is as safe, or even safer than these common medicines
6: nobody is expected to get top up jabs, or any jab, it's a free choice 
7:vaccine passports do not actually exist.  There are only little cards that show you had the vaccine and if businesses are asking to see them, that's up to them, they can refuse entry to anyone they want, it's their business.  This hasn't been rolled out by the government, it's not a law but businesses can and will do what they want and have a right to protect their staff
8: The emergency lockdown thing has already started being reversed. Look outside, look at the pubs and restaurants open etc.  The extent/presence of lockdowns is proportional to the number of deaths/hospitalisations being caused by covid and that makes sense.  If they wanted us in perpetual lockdown they wouldn't have everything open right now.  Simple logic
And yes, the people who believe all that crap above believe in a conspiracy theory, and it's a load of rubbish''

 

WTF

The only conclusion I can draw is that between these posts ally_uk got the jab. 

 

Now you are desperately trying to justify to yourself that everything is fine.

 

He should be removed from this forum.

[Morpheus]

5 minutes ago, ally_uk said:

It doesn't make sense to me infact it's a kind of paranoid skewered approach to life. 

 

Things such as the great reset or evolution of technology that was going to happen anyways things such as transhumanism again it's all down to progression. 

 

I like this forum but some of the theories on here are quite frankly a bit out there and are silly.

 

 

Well then, what are you waiting for? If everything we say is out there and silly, why don't you crack on and get jabbered up to the eyeballs. Why are you here trying to force your point of view on the rest of us? I'm all for opposing views and discussing things openly, but your coming across as quite contrived and frankly it's no wonder everyone thinks you're not genuine. Ask yourself this, if there was a pandemic, why are the government using our money (£100's of millions) for a media campaign? 

 

Surely if there was a pandemic, there'd be no need to advertise it would there. As for our views, I'm not sure why you come here if you're so diametrically opposed. 

[Freedom Lane55]

Some of the crazy headlines in the Daily Telegraph here in Australia https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/coronavirus   in the Sunday paper today the headline is this  ..... Apparently the new variants "infect" people in seconds as the walk past each other . Cant believe people still this this rubbish is real .The paper should be held to account for fear mongering .

[Human10]

5 minutes ago, ally_uk said:

It doesn't make sense to me infact it's a kind of paranoid skewered approach to life. 

 

Things such as the great reset or evolution of technology that was going to happen anyways things such as transhumanism again it's all down to progression. 

 

I like this forum but some of the theories on here are quite frankly a bit out there and are silly.

 

 

People not necessary would give up on money payments or being chipped without a reason ;) I'm not saying chips are in vaccines - but it's near future. It mentioned this on gov sites but they probably removed this info. I'm not sure if it was 2030 or 2050 but by that then they planned almost everyone to be chipped. 'Almost' - because they expect some people will still resist... I don't think they changed they mind just need to prepare the masses. You can admit that people changed a bit during last two years. They have new unhealthy habits that they are not going to give up even jabbed two times.

[Ziggy Sawdust]

1 hour ago, alexa said:

She/he should be hung and dried!

 

Our story, by the brilliant women who created the Oxford vaccine: SARAH GILBERT and CATH GREEN reveal there were days they 'swore or cried with exhaustion' and 'at times it felt we had to save the world and get the central heating fixed' 

As the clock struck midnight on New Year's Eve, two women in different parts of Oxford celebrated the dawn of 2020 with little idea of what lay ahead.

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9704227/SARAH-GILBERT-CATH-GREEN-women-created-Oxford-vaccine.html

That picture is a man,....100%

[Human10]

2 minutes ago, Freedom Lane55 said:

Some of the crazy headlines in the Daily Telegraph here in Australia https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/coronavirus   in the Sunday paper today the headline is this  ..... Apparently the new variants "infect" people in seconds as the walk past each other . Cant believe people still this this rubbish is real .The paper should be held to account for fear mongering .

I thought worse was the one you could catch watching the telly.

[Morpheus]

Just now, Ziggy Sawdust said:

That picture is a man,....100%

We'll have to do the Dundee test.......

 

"It's a bloke!" 

[ally_uk]

5 minutes ago, Morpheus said:

Well then, what are you waiting for? If everything we say is out there and silly, why don't you crack on and get jabbered up to the eyeballs. Why are you here trying to force your point of view on the rest of us? I'm all for opposing views and discussing things openly, but your coming across as quite contrived and frankly it's no wonder everyone thinks you're not genuine. Ask yourself this, if there was a pandemic, why are the government using our money (£100's of millions) for a media campaign? 

 

Surely if there was a pandemic, there'd be no need to advertise it would there. As for our views, I'm not sure why you come here if you're so diametrically opposed. 

 

I am not forcing no views I am trying to understand and reach a conclusion as to why you are thinking this way?  What has essentially made you think the government want to kill everyone. 

 

I'm trying to see it from both sides of the story..... I'm not going to just immediately latch on to every theory being spouted that wouldn't be thinking critically would it.

 

So what do you think the end game is here? 

[Morpheus]

1 minute ago, ally_uk said:

 

I am not forcing no views I am trying to understand and reach a conclusion as to why you are thinking this way?  What has essentially made you think the government want to kill everyone. 

 

I'm trying to see it from both sides of the story..... I'm not going to just immediately latch on to every theory being spouted that wouldn't be thinking critically would it.

 

So what do you think the end game is here? 

Here's the truth, no one knows the truth! 

[ally_uk]

1 minute ago, Morpheus said:

Here's the truth, no one knows the truth! 

You make a good point no one knows the truth.

 

I just find it hard to fathom how the majority of professors,  viroligists and leading academics have all been hood winked? Surely they must know what they are talking about? 

[Tinfoil Hat]

3 minutes ago, ally_uk said:

 

I am not forcing no views I am trying to understand and reach a conclusion as to why you are thinking this way?  What has essentially made you think the government want to kill everyone. 

 

I'm trying to see it from both sides of the story..... I'm not going to just immediately latch on to every theory being spouted that wouldn't be thinking critically would it.

 

So what do you think the end game is here? 

 

You are trying to waste people's time. The answers to every one of your questions have been talked about and in many cases evidenced over and over again. 

 

Read it and you will see the answers, unless you're determined not to, as I suspect is the case, but put the some effort in yourself instead of expecting others to spoon-feed you.

[Morpheus]

11 minutes ago, ally_uk said:

You make a good point no one knows the truth.

 

I just find it hard to fathom how the majority of professors,  viroligists and leading academics have all been hood winked? Surely they must know what they are talking about? 

Do you know what, I've spent since 9/11 looking into this shit, so if you're not prepared to put the work in, read, read some more and read more after that, then I'm not prepared to tell you anything. 

 

As for your last point, they're masons, they're all fuckin masons and once you realise this and realise they're satanic paedos then everything becomes clear. Choice is yours, believe what you want, but you're wasting your time and ours with this hog wash. 

Edited June 20, 2021 by Morpheus

[ally_uk]

3 minutes ago, Tinfoil Hat said:

 

You are trying to waste people's time. The answers to every one of your questions have been talked about and in many cases evidenced over and over again. 

 

Read it and you will see the answers, unless you're determined not to, as I suspect is the case, but put the some effort in yourself instead of expecting others to spoon-feed you.

 

 

First and foremost I am not wasting time. All I am trying to understand is how you reach certain conclusions

 

I am not a enemy belive me I have been down alot of rabbit holes over the years looking into all sorts. 

 

I am not here to ridicule or cause hostility. A common pattern I have noticed is when you try and challenge somebody with a legitimate question or different thought process the recipient automatically becomes hostile or defensive and cannot debate properly. 

 

You do not have to spoon feed me I am well versed in said theories such as 5G, Great reset, Gates, 

 

As I said I look at point sides of the narrative with a open mind.......

[Yoyo]

6 minutes ago, ally_uk said:

You make a good point no one knows the truth.

 

I just find it hard to fathom how the majority of professors,  viroligists and leading academics have all been hood winked? Surely they must know what they are talking about? 

‘Virologists and leading academics’ haven’t been hoodwinked. Lots are speaking out. Dr Yeadon predicted the blood clotting in an open letter to the MHRA in December 2020 but was ignored. He is now portrayed in the MSM as a crackpot conspiracy theorist anti vaxxer. That’s what happens when you’re brave enough to speak out.

[ally_uk]

1 minute ago, Morpheus said:

Do you know what, I've spent since 9/11 looking into his shit, so of you're not prepared to put the work in, read, read some more and read more after that, then I'm not prepared to tell you anything. 

 

As for your last point, they're masons, they're all fuckin masons and once you realise this and realise they're satanic paedos then everything becomes clear. Choice is yours, believe what you want, but you're wasting your time and ours with this hog wash. 

 

I have also wasted alot of time going down  numerous rabbit holes. You made an assumption that I haven't looked into things?

 

I have looked into all sorts such as adrenochrome,  5G, Gates, Epstein.

 

Regarding the bit about Masons you just said I'm curious how have you reached said conclusions? Are you a member of a lodge? Have you been initiated into the brotherhood or did you watch a documentary on YouTube and used it as a basis? 

 

 

[ally_uk]

2 minutes ago, Yoyo said:

‘Virologists and leading academics’ haven’t been hoodwinked. Lots are speaking out. Dr Yeadon predicted the blood clotting in an open letter to the MHRA in December 2020 but was ignored. He is now portrayed in the MSM as a crackpot conspiracy theorist anti vaxxer. That’s what happens when you’re brave enough to speak out.

 

I don't mean to be harsh but look into Dr Yeadon properly he often got information wrong...... 

[Morpheus]

2 minutes ago, ally_uk said:

 

I have also wasted alot of time going down  numerous rabbit holes. You made an assumption that I haven't looked into things?

 

I have looked into all sorts such as adrenochrome,  5G, Gates, Epstein.

 

Regarding the bit about Masons you just said I'm curious how have you reached said conclusions? Are you a member of a lodge? Have you been initiated into the brotherhood or did you watch a documentary on YouTube and used it as a basis? 

 

 

Let me ask you a question, having seen all of that information, how have you not drawn the same conclusion? 

[Morpheus]

2 minutes ago, ally_uk said:

he often got information wrong...... 

Care to share this information you hold? 

[Yoyo]

Just now, ally_uk said:

 

I don't mean to be harsh but look into Dr Yeadon properly he often got information wrong...... 

Can you point me in the direction of this information he got wrong and are you not aware of the letter he sent to the MHRA he didn’t get the information within that wrong.

[ar55]

21 minutes ago, ally_uk said:

You make a good point no one knows the truth.

 

I just find it hard to fathom how the majority of professors,  viroligists and leading academics have all been hood winked? Surely they must know what they are talking about? 

A university lecturer can make themselves a household name by pushing this nonsense.

 

There’s also the government documents stating that the public must be made scared, so it is imperative that the ‘virus’ be exaggerated to spook the public into compliance. I believe the wording in the German documents literally translated to ‘fear porn’.

 

Besides all that, there’s still plenty of experts speaking out against this - problem is, they don’t get airtime and secondly get threatened. Professor Byram Bridle, of the University of Guelph, is an example of this.

 

And really, actions speak louder than words - the bulk of those pushing the virus narrative have been caught breaking the rules themselves. 

Edited June 20, 2021 by ar55

[SiliconPsychosis]

From the BBC today..... Sage telling us to expect a fourth wave this winter.

 

 

Other respiratory viruses will mean a 'miserable winter' for UK - Sage member

Getty ImagesCopyright: Getty Images

An emergence of new respiratory diseases other than coronavirus means a "pretty miserable winter" is ahead for the UK, a scientist has warned.

Professor Calum Semple, member of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage), which advises the Government, has said that children and elderly people will be vulnerable to endemic viruses at the end of the year.

He told Times Radio: "I suspect we'll have a pretty miserable winter because the other respiratory viruses are going to come back and bite us quite hard. But after that, I think we'll be seeing business as normal next year.

"There's a sting in the tail after every pandemic, because social distancing will have reduced exposure, particularly of pregnant women and their newborn babies, they will have not been exposed to the usual endemic respiratory viruses.

He says we will see a rise in a disease called bronchiolitis, community acquired pneumonia in children and the frail elderly as well as other respiratory viruses for which we don't have vaccines.

"So that's why we're predicting a rough July, August and then a rough winter period," he says.

Professor Semple called it the "fourth wave winter" but added it would be much milder than the previous ones.