Coronavirus Mega-Thread.

[Shake]

1 hour ago, Sensiblejoe said:

The London walks for me are not doing much, I just think we need to get more creative to grab the media's attention. None of my sleepy colleagues actually know about these protests in London. 

I appreciate the fact that a lot of kind souls went there yesterday.

 

 

Why didn't they target the beeb?!

 

 

Psychological warfare is happening. 

 

 

Anyway god bless 

[TwopackShugar]

50 minutes ago, whatthefoxhat said:

Thats US info i'm guessing due to FDA in the link,i'm more interested in whats happening in the UK,ie is it deliberate witholding of the data ? are the jab givers totally uninformed? (i think this IS the case) or do the bastards know whats in store for the recipient and they are witholding on purpose thus being absolutely implicit in genocide ?

 

So many of these people will be blissfully ignorant and doling it out believing they are helping humanity (they may be in a lot of cases ! ) but ignornace is no defence as the courts like to say

I cant remember where i heard but somewhere i heard that pharamcy's had to type out there own Incerts for these vaccines as they were coming in blank.

Im cant confirm this though I think it may have been either one of dr tenpennies, alex jones or sayer ji's podcast 

[Shy Talk]

14 minutes ago, Shake said:

I appreciate the fact that a lot of kind souls went there yesterday.

 

 

Why didn't they target the beeb?!

 

 

Psychological warfare is happening. 

 

 

Anyway god bless 

 

I tend to agree. As we passed Downing St, there was a temporary halt as people became more vocal and a few more flares were lit, but it was no more than handbags at ten paces, even though there were only a few police on duty. If a future demo set up shop outside Downing St or in front of the BBC for several hours, not moving anywhere, it would surely have some kind of impact given the numbers.

[DarianF]

1 hour ago, whatthefoxhat said:

Thats US info i'm guessing due to FDA in the link,i'm more interested in whats happening in the UK,ie is it deliberate witholding of the data ? are the jab givers totally uninformed? (i think this IS the case) or do the bastards know whats in store for the recipient and they are witholding on purpose thus being absolutely implicit in genocide ?

 

So many of these people will be blissfully ignorant and doling it out believing they are helping humanity (they may be in a lot of cases ! ) but ignornace is no defence as the courts like to say

 

Go to your UK equivalent of the FDA, and search for Vaccine Product Information. It's all pretty much the same. Plus the principles of informed consent are the same across the western world.

[Grumpy Owl]

2 hours ago, Frankieboy said:

Is any truth in this?

 

 

 

 

You tell us. Its a screenshot, but from where did you get it?

[Saved]

21 hours ago, Liberty said:

Did you read the back of the letter?  On there it says which jab you’re being offered. Mine was Pfizer or Moderna. 
 

fish it out if you can and tell us what jab they were offering. 

Sorry - the bin was a disgrace and so I decided against fishing through porridge, soup remnants, curry etc. I'm sure they will send another one, so will keep it and report back.

[anomie]

1 hour ago, whatthefoxhat said:

Thats US info i'm guessing due to FDA in the link,i'm more interested in whats happening in the UK,ie is it deliberate witholding of the data ? are the jab givers totally uninformed? (i think this IS the case) or do the bastards know whats in store for the recipient and they are witholding on purpose thus being absolutely implicit in genocide ?

 

So many of these people will be blissfully ignorant and doling it out believing they are helping humanity (they may be in a lot of cases ! ) but ignornace is no defence as the courts like to say

my brother in law got the Pfizer jab the other week, I enquired and you get given a leaflet. It goes as far as saying it’s MRNA , also states the ingredients but it’s very limited info. I wished it would actually go into some decent scientific info about mRNA but all you get is it “protects you against the disease” lol how is that good enough for people? 
 

Funny how they have reams of data when justifying lockdown extensions but for the vaccines we just get mmmm vaccine goood 

[DarianF]

1 hour ago, Frankieboy said:

 

 

Awesome.

[Saved]

1 hour ago, soulalways said:

FANTASTIC TURNOUT YESTERDAY-LETS ALL WELCOME THE VIETNAMESE VARIANT!!!-NHS STAFF MANDATORY JABS!!

 

Great turnout yesterday guys..well done to all who attended..shame on you to the ones who didnt have the Balls to go..noticed the police were filming me and others..well fuck em!..lol

i,d like to take this occasion to welcome the vietnamese variant to the Circus..you will be welcomed by the cult..

and here in the UK the cult wants ALL NHS STAFF to have Manadory jabs!!!

..well as loius armstrong said  "What A Wonderful World"..WOULD BE IF WE COULD Annihilate The Cult and all the scum that goes with these creatures!!!

It will be interesting to see how many in the NHS - who know it's all wrong but have a career to think about - will take the vaccine/s.

 

Career versus other people dying = bit of guilt but what can I do? I have a mortgage to pay.

 

Career versus self dying - ?

 

I would expect to see a mass exodus within the NHS.

 

[DarianF]

2 minutes ago, anomie said:

my brother in law got the Pfizer jab the other week, I enquired and you get given a leaflet. It goes as far as saying it’s MRNA , also states the ingredients but it’s very limited info. I wished it would actually go into some decent scientific info about mRNA but all you get is it “protects you against the disease” lol how is that good enough for people? 
 

Funny how they have reams of data when justifying lockdown extensions but for the vaccines we just get mmmm vaccine goood 

 

• Information for Healthcare Professionals on Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine
• Information for UK recipients on Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine
• https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/regulatory-approval-of-pfizer-biontech-vaccine-for-covid-19

And here is some extra information from other countries (the UK one is piss poor - check US, Canada, Australia, etc too):

 

https://forum.davidicke.com/index.php?/topic/5503-coronavirus-mega-thread/&do=findComment&comment=257911

 

[Saved]

8 minutes ago, anomie said:

my brother in law got the Pfizer jab the other week, I enquired and you get given a leaflet. It goes as far as saying it’s MRNA , also states the ingredients but it’s very limited info. I wished it would actually go into some decent scientific info about mRNA but all you get is it “protects you against the disease” lol how is that good enough for people? 
 

Funny how they have reams of data when justifying lockdown extensions but for the vaccines we just get mmmm vaccine goood 

Yep, we've been deluged for 15 months with hundreds of millions of pounds worth of advertisements offering untold amounts of information.

 

Sod all information at the very sharp end of the story.

[whatthefoxhat]

46 minutes ago, TwopackShugar said:

I cant remember where i heard but somewhere i heard that pharamcy's had to type out there own Incerts for these vaccines as they were coming in blank.

Im cant confirm this though I think it may have been either one of dr tenpennies, alex jones or sayer ji's podcast 

Just done a quick ddgo and come up this insult

 

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/covid-19-vaccination-easy-read-resources

 

Patient information for the terminally bewildered,i cant even be bothered to open them,i can hazard a guess that its complete disinfo central

 

Moderna

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/975784/PIL_Moderna_01.04.2021.pdf

 

BNT162b2 (Pfizer)

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/987587/Temporary_Authorisation_Patient_Information_BNT162_9_0_UK_Clean.pdf

 

AstraZeneca

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/regulatory-approval-of-covid-19-vaccine-astrazeneca/information-for-uk-recipients-on-covid-19-vaccine-astrazeneca

 

There are others but they all are nothing like the product information leafglets i remember from some of the genuine vaccines i've had in the past when i travelled overseas regularly

 

Dumbed down for the masses and omissions galore i would guess

[whatthefoxhat]

3 minutes ago, DarianF said:

 

• Information for Healthcare Professionals on Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine
• Information for UK recipients on Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine
• https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/regulatory-approval-of-pfizer-biontech-vaccine-for-covid-19

And here is some extra information from other countries (the UK one is piss poor - check US, Canada, Australia, etc too):

 

https://forum.davidicke.com/index.php?/topic/5503-coronavirus-mega-thread/&do=findComment&comment=257911

 

We must have been searching at the same time !

[Frankieboy]

12 minutes ago, Grumpy Owl said:

 

You tell us. Its a screenshot, but from where did you get it?

Friend of wife sent it to her via telegram original from twitter

[DarianF]

@anomie PS. Remember, the Pfizer 'vaccine' also goes under a different name: COMIRNATY. See:

 

– https://www.tga.gov.au/covid-19-vaccine-pfizer-australia-comirnaty-bnt162b2-mrna

 

Here is the product info: https://www.ebs.tga.gov.au/ebs/picmi/picmirepository.nsf/pdf?OpenAgent&id=CP-2021-PI-01092-1&d=202105301016933

[oddsnsods]

 

Dr Lee Merrit interview

https://odysee.com/@science.nikipress.com:4/Dr-Lee-Merrit-Interview:0

Edited May 30, 2021 by oddsnsods

[Grumpy Owl]

9 minutes ago, anomie said:

I wished it would actually go into some decent scientific info about mRNA but all you get is it “protects you against the disease” lol how is that good enough for people? 

 

They have to 'keep it simple, stupid', or the KISS principle.

 

People have already been told to "trust the science", and for most people thats good enough, they won't take the time to read all the small print anyway.

 

Its the same mindset as when people sign up to some website or online service and they have to 'tick' the box to say that they agree to 'terms and conditions', very few people actually read through them, they just 'trust' that this particular website/service isn't going to sell on their personal data.

 

 

[DarianF]

6 minutes ago, whatthefoxhat said:

We must have been searching at the same time !

 

I am shocked how many people roll up their sleeve without reading any of this shit. It's not like it's bloody hard to find. 10 minutes maximum. 3 minutes if you are familiar with all this kind of crap. One minute if you know what you are looking for.

 

"COMIRNATY  (BNT162b2[mRNA])  COVID-19  Vaccine  has provisional  approval"

 

All these idiots need to do is pull out a dictionary and find the definition for 'provisional'. All these wanks going around exclaiming "it's government approved." lol yeah right.

Edited May 30, 2021 by DarianF

[Grumpy Owl]

6 minutes ago, Frankieboy said:

Friend of wife sent it to her via telegram original from twitter

 

Screenshots without links have to be seen as 'suspect'.

 

As I've stated elsewhere here, this is how easily misinformation can be spread.

[DarianF]

@whatthefoxhat back to my point about informed consent principles, I posted this a few weeks ago with some links. May help:

 

 

[whatthefoxhat]

1 minute ago, DarianF said:

 

I am shocked how many people roll up their sleeve without reading any of this shit. It's not like it's bloody hard to find. 10 minutes maximum. 3 minutes if you are familiar with all this kind of crap. One minute if you know what you are looking for.

The reason i'm asking is that once upon a time i was involved in a class action lawsuit against the mmanufacturers of mefloquine,an effective anti malarial albeit with HORRENDOUS side effects and the whole basis of the legal action was that the patient information leaflet had omissions regarding side effects

 

I'm aware of the judiciary in almost every country being bought and paid for and the legal system in the UK is not in any way shape or form geared towards class action lawsuits especially when pharmaco's are involved and the one i was involved in fell on its arse in the UK .

I'm thinking post 'covid' (i know, i'm a dreamer) and looking at the shite they 'think' is sufficient for the masses they are going to have to explain to a lot of people how and why they thought everyone having the jab had the mental age of a turnip

[DarianF]

1 minute ago, whatthefoxhat said:

The reason i'm asking is that once upon a time i was involved in a class action lawsuit against the mmanufacturers of mefloquine,an effective anti malarial albeit with HORRENDOUS side effects and the whole basis of the legal action was that the patient information leaflet had omissions regarding side effects

 

I'm aware of the judiciary in almost every country being bought and paid for and the legal system in the UK is not in any way shape or form geared towards class action lawsuits especially when pharmaco's are involved and the one i was involved in fell on its arse in the UK .

I'm thinking post 'covid' (i know, i'm a dreamer) and looking at the shite they 'think' is sufficient for the masses they are going to have to explain to a lot of people how and why they thought everyone having the jab had the mental age of a turnip

 

That's why the bastards changed the human medicines regulations in advance. That should have set off red flags to anyone:

 

Civil liability and immunity

https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/distributing-vaccines-and-treatments-for-covid-19-and-flu/consultation-document-changes-to-human-medicine-regulations-to-support-the-rollout-of-covid-19-vaccines#civil-liability-and-immunity

 

Extending immunity from civil liability

https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/distributing-vaccines-and-treatments-for-covid-19-and-flu/outcome/government-response-consultation-on-changes-to-the-human-medicines-regulations-to-support-the-rollout-of-covid-19-vaccines#extending-immunity-from-civil-liability

 

This is pure evil.

[oddsnsods]

The mRNA-LNP platform’s lipid nanoparticle component used in preclinical vaccine studies is highly inflammatory

 

Quote

Vaccines based on mRNA-containing lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are a promising new platform used by two leading vaccines against coronavirus disease in 2019 (COVID-19). Clinical trials and ongoing vaccinations present with very high protection levels and varying degrees of side effects. However, the nature of the reported side effects remains poorly defined. Here we present evidence that LNPs used in many preclinical studies are highly inflammatory in mice. Intradermal injection of these LNPs led to rapid and robust inflammatory responses, characterized by massive neutrophil infiltration, activation of diverse inflammatory pathways, and production of various inflammatory cytokines and chemokines. The same dose of LNP delivered intranasally led to similar inflammatory responses in the lung and resulted in a high mortality rate.

In summary, here we show that the LNPs used for many preclinical studies are highly inflammatory. Thus, their potent adjuvant activity and reported superiority comparing to other adjuvants in supporting the induction of adaptive immune responses could stem from their inflammatory nature. Furthermore, the preclinical LNPs are similar to the ones used for human vaccines, which could also explain the observed side effects in humans using this platform.

 

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.03.04.430128v1

[blowonthepie]

5 hours ago, Shake said:

Out of likes. What the hell did cats and dogs do to deserve that?!

 

They’re pretty transparent really; trying to get to the people through the mistreatment of our furry friends; I can’t see that going down well; probably less well than the way they’re treating us; a great number of humans love their pets more than people.

[oddsnsods]

 

They are shitting it.