Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.

numnuts

By numnuts
in Covid-19 & NWO

 Share

Recommended Posts

Velma

Velma

Posted
Posted
A beauty salon that banned coronavirus talk and said Covid-19 does not exist is being investigated by police.
 
Skin Kerr salon in Bootle put posters in its window and posted online stating masks weren't being worn by staff as "you can't catch what doesn't exist".
Merseyside Police said officers would visit the salon on Aintree Road to "remind" the owner and staff of their responsibilities around Covid-19.
The shop window posters and social media posts have now been taken down.
Sefton Council said its environmental health team will also visit and the owners are due to meet with the council on Wednesday.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kala Namak

Kala Namak

Posted
Posted

Looks like satire and sarcasm are one of the better ways of confusing the youtube ban bots. 

 

Six months later, this pre lockdown video is still right on the money....

 

 

"Additionally, though we recommend taking all the previously recommended precautions, our estimates show there's a 100% chance you will be killed by the corona virus. You're definitely going to die.

 

The only thing left to do is buy a casket now and to get 20% off premium caskets at your local casket dealer, just use the discount code DeadAF. "

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
sickofallthebollocks

sickofallthebollocks

Posted
Posted (edited)
37 minutes ago, Velma said:
A beauty salon that banned coronavirus talk and said Covid-19 does not exist is being investigated by police.
 
Skin Kerr salon in Bootle put posters in its window and posted online stating masks weren't being worn by staff as "you can't catch what doesn't exist".
Merseyside Police said officers would visit the salon on Aintree Road to "remind" the owner and staff of their responsibilities around Covid-19.
The shop window posters and social media posts have now been taken down.
Sefton Council said its environmental health team will also visit and the owners are due to meet with the council on Wednesday.

Shit, sorry Velma, I didn't realise you posted this one too (you did it before me, just 4 minutes))  I posted it over on 'petition to stop mandatory face masks'

Edited by sickofallthebollocks
add 4 mins
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Velma

Velma

Posted
Posted
48 minutes ago, sickofallthebollocks said:

Shit, sorry Velma, I didn't realise you posted this one too (you did it before me, just 4 minutes))  I posted it over on 'petition to stop mandatory face masks'

 

Great minds think in sync! 😀

 

But this response to free speech in Buttle, is real 'thought police' stuff, like in Australia, where it is virtually a crime to say you don't believe in the Rona, or to "incite" others, which "costs lives."

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Messenger

Messenger

Posted
Posted (edited)

A man in Australia died from a shark attack a few hours ago. 😞

 

I was hoping that someone would follow up on this to see if the coroner cites cause of death as corona "virus".

 

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2020/sep/08/man-dies-after-being-attacked-by-shark-off-queensland-beach

 

Hey at least he didn't live out his old days in a hospital and die in a hospital bed. I cannot imagine a shark attack, nor do I want to, but at least he was in the ocean and was doing what he loved surfing.

Edited by Messenger
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Grumpy Owl

Grumpy Owl

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

 

 

I don't want to piss on Ian Brown's chips here, but I think he is on the right track.

 

Bill Gates didn't sell computers, but he was behind Microsoft which gave the computer world MS-DOS (pirated from IBM-DOS) and Microsoft Windows.

 

Microsoft Windows was of course an operating system that was so full of holes (security wise) that it was susceptible to 'computer viruses' that could damage your computer files if the system got 'infected'.

 

Microsoft of course couldn't patch these 'vulnerabilities', so they relied on third-party software companies (Norton, Avast, BullGuard etc) to come up with 'anti-virus' software which users had to pay for in order to 'protect' their computers from these nasty viruses.

 

It's never been proven (I don't believe and am happy to be corrected on this) but over the years there have been allegations made that the 'antivirus' software developers were encouraging people to develop 'computer viruses' so they could sell their 'antivirus' software solutions to unsuspecting buyers.

 

Does this sound at all familiar to anybody?

 

Computer viruses.

 

"Antivirus software" = vaccine (for computers / Microsoft Windows)

 

Anti-virus software has to be regularly 'updated' (and paid-for with 'subscriptions') in order to keep your Windows PC 'safe' from 'computer viruses' (developed by anti-virus software manufacturers in order to keep their software model 'viable')

 

Sounding any more familiar?

 

 

So yeah, if it comes to a fight between Ian Brown of The Stone Roses or Bill Gates of Microsoft about who is more medically qualified, neither wins really. But who do you trust more?

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
EnigmaticWorld

EnigmaticWorld

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Grumpy Owl said:

 

I don't want to piss on Ian Brown's chips here, but I think he is on the right track.

 

Bill Gates didn't sell computers, but he was behind Microsoft which gave the computer world MS-DOS (pirated from IBM-DOS) and Microsoft Windows.

 

Microsoft Windows was of course an operating system that was so full of holes (security wise) that it was susceptible to 'computer viruses' that could damage your computer files if the system got 'infected'.

 

Microsoft of course couldn't patch these 'vulnerabilities', so they relied on third-party software companies (Norton, Avast, BullGuard etc) to come up with 'anti-virus' software which users had to pay for in order to 'protect' their computers from these nasty viruses.

 

It's never been proven (I don't believe and am happy to be corrected on this) but over the years there have been allegations made that the 'antivirus' software developers were encouraging people to develop 'computer viruses' so they could sell their 'antivirus' software solutions to unsuspecting buyers.

 

Does this sound at all familiar to anybody?

 

Computer viruses.

 

"Antivirus software" = vaccine (for computers / Microsoft Windows)

 

Anti-virus software has to be regularly 'updated' (and paid-for with 'subscriptions') in order to keep your Windows PC 'safe' from 'computer viruses' (developed by anti-virus software manufacturers in order to keep their software model 'viable')

 

Sounding any more familiar?

 

 

So yeah, if it comes to a fight between Ian Brown of The Stone Roses or Bill Gates of Microsoft about who is more medically qualified, neither wins really. But who do you trust more?

 

 

 

It's okay, you're right, besides consoles and tablets they're just an OS developer.

 

I wonder what Richard Stallman makes of this coronavirus and the surveillance state that is being ushered in off the back of it.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
andy1033

andy1033

Posted
Posted
30 minutes ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

 

 

Yep, why is bill gates somehow an expert on covid19, and the vaccine?

 

He has been mostly wrong since the start of this covid19, and people are still listening to his words on this?

 

Why?????

 

Just because he sends money to something, does not make him some sort of expert.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
karmaxxxx

karmaxxxx

Posted
Posted (edited)

well it seems like the WIRRAL is under threat of lock down, ooh how thoughtful of these parasites.

and i can tell you only reason is people are waking up to the crap.

we had a counselor last week emailing the general public basically full on fear mongering .

And now this week the lock down over peoples heads and you all saw the guy on the train with the over zealous police officer.

they are ramping up the fear here no end. it will end in tears as compliant as people are it will pop but i feel thats  exactly what these cretins want. full on civil disturbances.

i honestly hope it doesn't happen ,but hope they start taking to the streets peacefully  in a large number and show enough is enough.

but we will see.

Edited by karmaxxxx
missed word
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Messenger

Messenger

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Grumpy Owl said:

 

I don't want to piss on Ian Brown's chips here, but I think he is on the right track.

 

Bill Gates didn't sell computers, but he was behind Microsoft which gave the computer world MS-DOS (pirated from IBM-DOS) and Microsoft Windows.

 

Microsoft Windows was of course an operating system that was so full of holes (security wise) that it was susceptible to 'computer viruses' that could damage your computer files if the system got 'infected'.

 

Microsoft of course couldn't patch these 'vulnerabilities', so they relied on third-party software companies (Norton, Avast, BullGuard etc) to come up with 'anti-virus' software which users had to pay for in order to 'protect' their computers from these nasty viruses.

 

It's never been proven (I don't believe and am happy to be corrected on this) but over the years there have been allegations made that the 'antivirus' software developers were encouraging people to develop 'computer viruses' so they could sell their 'antivirus' software solutions to unsuspecting buyers.

 

Does this sound at all familiar to anybody?

 

Computer viruses.

 

"Antivirus software" = vaccine (for computers / Microsoft Windows)

 

Anti-virus software has to be regularly 'updated' (and paid-for with 'subscriptions') in order to keep your Windows PC 'safe' from 'computer viruses' (developed by anti-virus software manufacturers in order to keep their software model 'viable')

 

Sounding any more familiar?

 

 

So yeah, if it comes to a fight between Ian Brown of The Stone Roses or Bill Gates of Microsoft about who is more medically qualified, neither wins really. But who do you trust more?

 

 

Exactly, Owl. Yes, this does sound all too familiar. And now that the world allegedly has a "virus", or in other words, the world is raising consciousness and waking up to the atrocities committed by the pedo's, suddenly there is a rapid push to lock everyone down using the far of a "virus" to which third parties will offer a "solution" that being a vaccine.

 

Yes, we have seen this before. Not only in the analogy of Gates' microsoft but also with previous plandemics such as the swine flu of 2010 and then the original swine flu all the way back in 1976 that many young people are not even aware of. That was when david sencer was head of the CDC and during a 60 Minutes interview he admitted that the vaccine released and administered on the naive public was never tested. The result for the population were cases of paralysis and even death.

 

Microsoft couldn't patch the viruses, or wouldn't. They could have offered a program that the user could install that would patch the virus, but they didn't want to spend the money.

 

I also found it very odd how Steve Jobs suddenly died and he was only in his 50's or 60's. I wonder if he knew something and or if he was being stonewalled by gates and other's in the NWO faction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Illmatic

Illmatic

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Grumpy Owl said:

 

I don't want to piss on Ian Brown's chips here, but I think he is on the right track.

 

Bill Gates didn't sell computers, but he was behind Microsoft which gave the computer world MS-DOS (pirated from IBM-DOS) and Microsoft Windows.

 

Microsoft Windows was of course an operating system that was so full of holes (security wise) that it was susceptible to 'computer viruses' that could damage your computer files if the system got 'infected'.

 

Microsoft of course couldn't patch these 'vulnerabilities', so they relied on third-party software companies (Norton, Avast, BullGuard etc) to come up with 'anti-virus' software which users had to pay for in order to 'protect' their computers from these nasty viruses.

 

It's never been proven (I don't believe and am happy to be corrected on this) but over the years there have been allegations made that the 'antivirus' software developers were encouraging people to develop 'computer viruses' so they could sell their 'antivirus' software solutions to unsuspecting buyers.

 

Does this sound at all familiar to anybody?

 

Computer viruses.

 

"Antivirus software" = vaccine (for computers / Microsoft Windows)

 

Anti-virus software has to be regularly 'updated' (and paid-for with 'subscriptions') in order to keep your Windows PC 'safe' from 'computer viruses' (developed by anti-virus software manufacturers in order to keep their software model 'viable')

 

Sounding any more familiar?

 

 

So yeah, if it comes to a fight between Ian Brown of The Stone Roses or Bill Gates of Microsoft about who is more medically qualified, neither wins really. But who do you trust more?

 

 

 

I worked in a computer store. Its well known, John McAfee even renounced the business ages ago. Bill Gates went the distance and became a cunt and a shill. 

 

One Love as the Stone Roses used to say. One heart one soul. There won't be another one. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Number6

Number6

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

Britain could be put under a CURFEW with businesses shuttered from 10pm in a bid to drive down cases after move worked in Belgium
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8712081/Britain-CURFEW-businesses-shuttered-10pm.html

 

Just another day upping the anti of tyranny. It's diabolical what they are doing and if people still can't see how ridiculous it all is then there is no hope. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Number6

Number6

Posted
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, bamboozooka said:

Oxford University vaccine trial paused after participant falls ill

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-54082192

 

Yeah read that story earlier, no surprise there really. Also as long as these trials keep failing the longer the lockdowns et-cetera goes on until people get so sick of this, they will run screaming for their dodgy vaccine. 

Edited by Number6
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Number6

Number6

Posted
Posted

Coronavirus: Social gatherings of more than six people to be banned in England from Monday

The legal limit will be reduced from 30 in the prime minister's biggest coronavirus crackdown since lockdown rules were eased

 

A ban on groups of more than six people gathering in homes, parks, pubs and restaurants in England is being imposed by Boris Johnson in the biggest coronavirus crackdown since lockdown rules were eased.

First offenders will be fined £100, which will double on each further repeat offence up to £3,200, the prime minister will announce in a bid to stem an alarming surge in COVID-19 cases in the UK.

 

"We need to act now to stop the virus spreading," Mr Johnson will declare at a Downing Street news conference, coinciding with a new government advertising campaign entitled "Hands. Face. Space.".

"So we are simplifying and strengthening the rules on social contact, making them easier to understand and for the police to enforce," the PM will announce.

"It is absolutely critical that people now abide by these rules and remember the basics - washing your hands, covering your face, keeping space from others, and getting a test if you have symptoms

What are the new rules?

 
  • From next Monday, any gathering of more than six people in England will be illegal, unless it meets one of a limited list of exemptions
  • This applies to gatherings both indoors and outdoors
  • The new rule does not apply to households or bubbles of more than six, or gatherings for work or education
  • Weddings, funerals, and organised team sports carried out in a COVID-secure way are also exempt
  • People will at first be fined £100, but this will double on each further repeat offence up to £3,200

The full list of exemptions will be revealed by the government before the law changes on Monday.

 

I guess the lockdown protests were having an effect that they didn't like then  and word of mouth was spreading. It will be like whats going on in Australia soon in the UK. 

 

 

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Number6

Number6

Posted
Posted

UK’s MSM has slavishly obeyed the govt over Covid like the docile arm of a despotic state. I know, because I was part of it

Published: 9 Sep 2020 | 07:02 GMT

 

 

By Matt Drake, a British journalist covering news and film. Bylines include Spiked, The Spectator, The Telegraph, The Independent, Evening Standard, LBC, The Sun, and the Daily Express.

 

The pro-lockdown cheerleaders in the mainstream media have been following No.10’s orders and wrongly branding all lockdown sceptics as nutty conspiracy theorists – but the tide is turning.

More and more people are coming round to realise lockdown has been a major mistake. Yet newspapers and TV, here in the UK at least, are still loyally hounding down dissenters and tarring each one as some sort of lunatic who needs, well, locking up.

Those sceptics who it was hard to place in a loony bin, such as Lord Sumption, one of the most brilliant minds in Britain, were simply ignored. When the former Supreme Court head wrote in The Times on March 31 that the UK was “sliding into a police state” after Parliament was granted unprecedented powers in the Coronavirus Bill (which was rubber-stamped with no debate in the Commons), did this liberal-minded intellect get heaps of press attention? No, of course not. It was palpably quiet. The mainstream media was simply not interested in any other narrative than the official, exaggerated danger of the virus.

The media has failed to do its job properly, unless that job is to be the government’s cheerleader-in-chief. Other than a few brave exceptions, the job of their reporters has been to report every (literal) cough and scare as a grave threat to life and limb, all the better to generate online clicks. Every new death, any new medical scare story, was quickly written up and thrown online with sensationalist headlines. The warnings by the likes of Jonathan Sumption, whose profession is to actually think for a living, that this was all damaging “hysteria”, were buried.

The modern press does not have the mental wit to take on an intellect like Lord Sumption. The rest of us have been easier targets.

When there was a relatively large gathering of lockdown sceptics at Trafalgar Square late last month, the media was far from kind. Many of the headlines were along the same lines as the Evening Standard's: “Thousands gather in Trafalgar Square to promote coronavirus conspiracy theories at 'anti-lockdown' protest.”

 

Now, while there were some undoubted cranks in the crowd – including the keynote speaker David Icke, who believes that lizards control the world, and one man at the back briefly unfurling a fascist flag – was everyone there really a conspiracy theorist?

Conspiracy theorists are on the fringe of politics and mainstream society. But on the same day, over 30,000 protesters marched in Berlin – which the New York Times scoffed at as “bizarre.”

Does that mean conspiracy theories are becoming more popular? Or, more likely, maybe there were perfectly normal people attending these protests who are perturbed at the state of their country and who worry about such trifling matters as freedom and liberty. People who believe lizards are more likely to be found basking in the sun on heaths than sitting in Buckingham Palace or No.10.

People like Rose, who did not want to give me her last name but has attended all three anti-lockdown protests. She told me this week: “I'm very worried about the country and I am not a conspiracy theorist. I feel the government is abusing its power. Their actions don't make sense over a few Covid deaths a day.”

 

Most people who attended the anti-lockdown rallies are reluctant to give their names or even admit to attending, for fear they will be branded a conspiracy theorist – or worse, lose their jobs.

One man, who wished to remain anonymous, said: “I think David Icke made a lot of sense at the protest, but I don't actually believe what he says the rest of the time. But according to the BBC, we're all conspiracy theorists.”

Others admitted to not attending, despite wanting to, because they didn't want to be labelled as a crank. Kayleigh Barnes, 27, from south-east England, said she wanted to attend the protests but couldn't due to ongoing health issues.

She added: “I don't believe in the 5G conspiracy theorists or that the Queen is a lizard. Covid-19 is real but the world just massively overreacted.”

“The protesters either received no coverage at all or were painted as selfish conspiracy nuts. There was no neutrality.”

Perhaps the protests would seem more ridiculous if the UK didn't act like a police state. Piers Corbyn, brother of former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, was grabbed, arrested and fined £10,000 for organising a peaceful gathering. Meanwhile, several other protests took place that day and their organisers were not bothered by the police. Mr Corbyn believes the order for him to be arrested came from “up high,” and it is hard not to believe that it was politically motivated.

Perhaps the smearing of protesters is politically motivated. After all, if people reading the reports were shamed into thinking they too were some irrational tinfoil-hat-wearer, or a criminal liable to an extortionate fine, they will be less inclined to want to attend any future protests.

Australia is fast becoming the go-to state for such despotism, in a terrifying foreshadowing of what may lie in store for Britain. Cops in Melbourne are storming into people's homes to arrest those supporting protests, including a pregnant woman who broke down into tears in front of her children as she was arrested for “incitement” earlier this month.

 

Victoria Police said in a statement that anyone thinking of attending the protest she promoted could expect a “swift and firm response from the police,” in an obvious attempt to scare people into obedience.

Yet, The Guardian still focussed on the “conspiracy theorists,” who are now apparently “energised” by the lockdown restrictions. But why focus on them?

Like the folly of 2016, when the liberal media elite scoffed at Trump and Brexit supporters, they could very well be in for a rude awakening. How much more can people take being called stupid and mad by smug BBC, CNN and Sky News apparatchiks?

And yes, they are apparatchiks, because they are well and truly in the government's pocket. From personal experience, as well as reports from BBC journalists, the government has had an inordinate amount of influence over the media, “suggesting” stories for them to cover if they enthusiastically toe the government line and “go easy” on ministers while interviewing them.

 

While working for a certain mainstream publication in our scorching spring, when people were only allowed an hour’s exercise a day, my editors revealed they were asked by Downing Street to “hammer home the message” that people shouldn't be enjoying the sunshine on weekends.

All reporters were told they were on no account to publish anything which could go against the government line. This was coupled with self-censorship, an editorial decision to not report on anti-lockdown protests so as not to “legitimise” their platform – while giving plenty of reporting space to Extinction Rebellion and BLM.

It has all the hallmarks of the sort of un-free press found in a despotic state. After all, what does totalitarianism really look like? For most people, they will think of the USSR, Nazi Germany or North Korea. The kind of brutal regimes that inspired George Orwell's ‘1984’.

But another novel, ‘Brave New World’, written by Aldous Huxley many years before in 1932, foreshadowed a different kind of dystopia. A scientific dictatorship in which people blindly follow authority and actually love their servitude.

Like in the USSR, where dissenters were classed as mentally disturbed, today any dissenter is branded a conspiracy theorist. Their opinions are pathologies, not legitimate points of view to be taken seriously, about our de facto police state, or about the exaggerated threat of coronavirus, or about the appalling damage done to our economy and our health by lockdown. Instead, we are dangerous, eccentric heretics that only deserve to be jeered at, scorned, and pushed out of mainstream society, while the rest don their masks and applaud the police for cracking down on non-conformists. 

 

Good article although I did notice another dig at David in there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...