Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


numnuts

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, skitzorat said:

I noticed that too... correct me if I'm wrong, but there's nothing in those Biblical passages that specifically state the MARK [on the forehead and right hand] have to be physical ie; tattoo... the Bible always speaks in metaphors....

That's right skitzorat, it doesn't have to be a visible mark which we can all see

Rev 14-9

A third angel followed them and said in a loud voice: "If anyone worships the beast and its image and receives its mark on their forehead or on their hand,

 

10 minutes ago, skitzorat said:

it's my understanding the contents of these injections will eventually cross the blood/brain barrier and there is already reports of people being in altered states of mind afterwards.. and least we forget the next tranche of injections will no doubt come with added luciferase..

 

Exactly these vaccines will end up not only messing with your head  but with your DNA also, trust me these vaccines are the MARK OF THE BEAST, the beast being the system, and we are nearing that final day.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Snip-it_1621747954590.jpg.ba37e19df99ebc80c7e3ce718510aea1.jpg

 

All the investigative tools to resolve the unlawful use of the PCR test in 24 hours yet over a year later they have stood down in the face of a deadly plot. They are paid to resolve issues like these felonies. Obtaining a public salary under false pretenses. Imposters using public funds to shield pedophiles from scrutiny. A facade institution swarming with Mormons and jews. Big salary, big reputation, worthless for investigating connected criminals.

Edited by Avoiceinthecrowd
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, eddy64 said:

 

 

well here you go plenty of sites were the genome is mentioned :-  https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-72533-2

 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sars-cov-2/

 

id be wary of this forum some posters have a habit of taking things out of context and twisting them, do your own research.

 

 

 

 

 

Dr Andrew Kaufman – All Viruses Are Fake

https://davidicke.com/2021/05/23/dr-andrew-kaufman-all-viruses-are-fake/

 

The Contagion Myth by Thomas S Cowan and Sally Fallon Morell

 

https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/archivos_pdf/contagion-myth.pdf

 


Is Germ Theory True? – A Starter Kit To Debunk Coronavirus

 

https://joedubs.com/is-germ-theory-true-a-starter-kit-to-debunk-coronavirus/

 

“Covid-19 Does Not Exist”

 

https://thenewabnormal513330780.wordpress.com/2020/06/22/covid-19-does-not-exist/

 

 

1.Covid-19 still has not been proven to exist.

 

•Scientists have not isolated and identified enough unique genetic material to claim its a new virus.

 

•The procedures used to identify the genetic material they claim is “covid,” was acquired using extremely questionable methods. To clarify, any other study would have been thrown out if these same methods were used.

 

• The genetic material supplied has an 80% similarity rate with sars-cov-1. That is why the government called it sars-cov-2. However, that is not enough commonality to classify it as such. To compare, humans are more related to cats and cows, than covid is to sars-cov-1.

 

•According to Koch’s postulates, a virus must meet all these criteria:

 

•The virus must be present in every case of the disease. (NEGATIVE)

 

•The virus must be isolated from the host with the disease and grown in pure culture. (NEGATIVE)

 

•The specific disease must be reproduced when a pure culture of the bacteria is inoculated into a healthy susceptible host. (NEGATIVE)

 

•The virus must be recoverable from the experimentally infected host. (NEGATIVE)

 

There are many insinuations by the mainstream media that this is being done, but I charge anyone to prove that it is.

 

2. There is no test for covid-19

 

•The PCR test is the test used widely to test for covid-19. However, according to the FDA, the PCR test cannot distinguish between bacteria, exosomes, other viruses, or any other levels of random DNA.

 

•The PCR test replicates DNA and if the amount exceeds a preset within a threshold, it gives a binary result. The threshold can be set to any number. If there is a desired result, you can set a threshold to produce that result. It cannot see specifics. The creator of this test says it cannot be used to test for covid. (This is why you can test goats, fruit, and birds and they will test “positive for covid.” This is why you can be negative, then positive, then negative, then positive over the span of  a few days.)

 

•There have been claims that other tests have been developed for covid. Almost all of them are a variation of the PCR test. PCR is by far the most widely used test for covid.

 

•Categorizing patients as covid positive.

 

•How are you supposed to count someone as positive if they cannot even test for it?

 

•How are you supposed to attribute covid as the cause of death if it has not been proven to exist?

 

•The CDC sent every doctor in the U.S. a document. It is an operating procedure instructing them on how to categorize covid. In this document it states that the doctor does not have to test for covid and can use their best judgement. This include living patients and deceased patients

 

And on and on and on......

 

Statement On Virus Isolation (SOVI)

 

https://drtomcowan.com/sovi

 

 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Porton Down claims their data proves that Pfizer and AZ vaccines are effective against the 'Indian Variant' but it must be two shots.

 

How could they possibly ascertain this is in just three weeks?

 

0ne dose is only 33% effective in preventing symptomatic infection, meaning there is a "scramble" to deliver doses more quickly.

 

This is simply to scare people who may have developed "hesitancy" after the first jab into getting another one, or more...

 

Many of the editorials welcome the encouraging vaccine data.

 

"Great jab job" is the message from the Sunday Mirror. It says that in the struggle against the virus "science has triumphed again".

 

But the paper warns there can be "no let up" in the delivery of the vaccination programme.

 

There's a similar message from the Sun on Sunday. Its editorial says that so long as everyone gets their jabs, there should be no need for any wobbling over the lifting of all restrictions next month.

Edited by Velma
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Velma said:

Porton Down claims their data proves that Pfizer and AZ vaccines are effective against the 'Indian Variant' but it must be two shots.

 

How could they possibly ascertain this is in just three weeks?

 

0ne dose is only 33% effective in preventing symptomatic infection, meaning there is a "scramble" to deliver doses more quickly.

 

This is simply to scare people who may have developed "hesitancy" after the first jab into getting another one, or more...

 

Many of the editorials welcome the encouraging vaccine data.

 

"Great jab job" is the message from the Sunday Mirror. It says that in the struggle against the virus "science has triumphed again".

 

But the paper warns there can be "no let up" in the delivery of the vaccination programme.

 

There's a similar message from the Sun on Sunday. Its editorial says that so long as everyone gets their jabs, there should be no need for any wobbling over the lifting of all restrictions next month.

 

Well in short, because they lie and if they aren't lying they are under mind control from the Rockefeller medical cartel. Or they are paid a huge amount of money to promote certain agendas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, alexa said:

55 seconds of truth.

Pfizer leak, Too Late To Save Anyone Injected With The Vaccines

https://153news.net/watch_video.php?v=K2UX86391NHN

 

image_2021-05-23_072147.png.77ab3afdcb3dd7948ca700301a0bfa55.png

 

 

 

I honestly can't see this happening, I think we need to be careful of propaganda stories both sides of the spectrum for and against vaccines. I think we should just gather as much evidence locally and decide for ourselves. At the moment the worst story I have heard locally is one guy in hospital with blood clot, but then who knows if the vaccine caused it because this guy has numerous health problems. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, alexa said:

That's right skitzorat, it doesn't have to be a visible mark which we can all see

Rev 14-9

A third angel followed them and said in a loud voice: "If anyone worships the beast and its image and receives its mark on their forehead or on their hand,

 

 

Exactly these vaccines will end up not only messing with your head  but with your DNA also, trust me these vaccines are the MARK OF THE BEAST, the beast being the system, and we are nearing that final day.

 

A final day means a new beginning. Revelations is a masonic symbolic text and anything happening in any generation since it has been written, the words can be applied to. Or another way of looking at it, is remember the Elite in those times wrote and put these books together, so no doubt they could follow Revelations as a blueprint for their control.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Outsider said:

I will certainly be going back now the ice has been broken and in the knowledge that there is some sanity remaining in my local pub!

 

I'm trying not to be judgemental but it feels like you have been programmed into the new normal in a subtle way and you don't seem to disturbed or troubled by it. I suppose we all have to live and tolerate it to a degree otherwise we'd starve to death. Its just that my soul screams at me to reject, reject reject at every opportunity. I can't imagine being comfortable and at ease in the environment you describe.

quote-work-is-only-justified-by-leisure-time-to-admit-the-emptiness-of-leisure-time-is-to-guy-debord-70-34-95.jpg

 

I had been somewhat reluctant to go as I thought that it would be far worse than it actually was. Given some of the reports about pubs and businesses going to extreme measures, some of which I may have read on here, I had a far worse image in mind.

 

I didn't feel uncomfortable as the pub was how I remembered it with the only exceptions being the taped off sink in the ladies, table service and the staff having to wear masks. In fact, I felt like the staff made a point of not making its customers feel uncomfortable. Things like the QR code and the hand sanitiser were clearly only just for show, with no actual enforcement or checking, and therefore easily avoided. A dog was walking around and nobody cared, people were stood around chatting and it was pretty busy too - presumably because the pub has remained popular by not becoming jobsworths. And I think the pub would drop any measures in a heart-beat if they felt that they could get away with it.

 

Whilst I can see your point about not engaging with any aspects of the way society is going, I also think small businesses like local pubs need supporting, especially those which still appear to have a good attitude. Didn't we want them to re-open? In fact, I hope it is those businesses trying to remain as non-restrictive as possible that will stay afloat and collect more custom whilst people walk away from those truly endorsing "Covid-secure" measures.

 

I was therefore somewhat encouraged by my visit and thought it was worth sharing as sometimes things can be made out to be far worse than they actually are. I am not saying that it makes everything OK and that we are going back to normal, but I think there are some glimmers of hope to be seen in that, at least in my locality, many people don't truly endorse what is going on. And I think it is those people who need to be reached.

 

It has been said here that pubs have been especially targeted because it is a place where people gather and talk. So should we not be trying to recover that and interact with others in our local communities including in pubs? What are your suggestions for the way forward if you feel that going to the pub, and perhaps other businesses within the community, is such a bad idea? Should we just sit at home forever and post our complaints online instead?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Sensiblejoe said:

 

I honestly can't see this happening, I think we need to be careful of propaganda stories both sides of the spectrum for and against vaccines. I think we should just gather as much evidence locally and decide for ourselves. At the moment the worst story I have heard locally is one guy in hospital with blood clot, but then who knows if the vaccine caused it because this guy has numerous health problems. 

 

I know one thing for sure in no way shape or form should vaccine companies be trusted.

 

Did you know?

 

1. The FDA did not approve Moderna or Pfizer mRNA gene therapeutics they dubbed "vaccines". It simply authorized them. Fauci confirms. 19 doctors warned the world of the dangers. AstraZeneca is being dropped by 24 countries, and by Ontario as of May 11/21. Johnson & Johnson, a Viral Vector(1) " injection" that was given Emergency Use Authorization on Feb. 27, 2021, was halted by several states due to the formation of blood clots. The CDC had confirmed. But distribution resumed after a 10 day pause. The CDC also confirms(2) the Pfizer & Moderna jabs are the deadliest of all "vaccines", also shown in a bar chart and a video with step-by-step navigation of the VAERS site.

 

The primary consideration is whether an experimental injection is warranted for a disease with a 99.9% survival rate. I am for tried, true and tested (safe) vaccines. I am NOT for experimental gene therapeutics backed by disastrous animal studies, used on humans for the first time in history. The Israeli People Commitee said of the Pfizer shot: There has never been a vaccine that has harmed as many people

 

3. The FDA & CDC have not revealed to the public over 20 adverse effects, including Death, related to Covid19 injections, which were discussed in an October 2020 meeting, see pg. 16 of document. 3,837 deaths from Covid19 injections are reported by the National Vaccine Information Center as at 4/30/2021, and one-third of the deaths occurred within 48 hours. 5 prominent doctors discuss how the Covid jab is a bioweapon

 

4. The mRNA jab delivers a synthetic, inorganic molecule (medical device) that programs your cells to synthesize pathogens in the form of the spike protein that your immune system will constantly have to fight off for the rest of your life, according to experts such as Molecular Biologist & Immunologist, Professor Dolores Cahill. She explains. Fauci confirms. Dr. Lee Merritt reconfirms.

Real all of the information:

 

https://nojabforme.info/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Tinfoil Hat said:

 

Well, that was unexpected.

 

Was it someone here who suggested earlier that gov's failings would be shown, in preparation for who (or what) ever 1 World leadership is waiting in the wings? 

Cummings is a key actor in this theatre, his disappearance from gov was all fake and planned....he is about to return to the stage to carry out the next act. A planned collapse of the government...the bunkers are all ready and prepped for the main players to retreat to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Thoth001 said:

 

A final day means a new beginning. Revelations is a masonic symbolic text and anything happening in any generation since it has been written, the words can be applied to. Or another way of looking at it, is remember the Elite in those times wrote and put these books together, so no doubt they could follow Revelations as a blueprint for their control.

 

Not when you properly reference the Bible with scripture against scripture.

The Bible does state to prove everything!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, alexa said:

 

Not when you properly reference the Bible with scripture against scripture.

The Bible does state to prove everything!

 

Scripture against scripture? You do understand the writers of the NT many believe the (Piso family) also had the OT books in their hands while writing the NT? And their are still many grave errors and contradictions. But I know this is probably something we should talk about in a religious part of the forum.😆

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Thoth001 said:

 

Scripture against scripture? You do understand the writers of the NT many believe the (Piso family) also had the OT books in their hands while writing the NT? And their are still many grave errors and contradictions. But I know this is probably something we should talk about in a religious part of the forum.😆

 

Agree yes we should 👍

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • lake locked this topic
  • lake unlocked this topic
  • Beaujangles featured this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...