Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


numnuts
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 9/5/2020 at 10:16 PM, Problem child said:

this vid might be useful for those with kids going back to school

 

Thank you for that link to video. @Problem child

for anyone else here is the letter for the schools to print off and hand to the headteacher.

Dear Re: corona-virus protocols  I am writing to you regarding my son/daughter, NAME who is due to return to year X ON DATE NAME has been very happy at SCHOOL NAME and is looking forward to returning to see his friends. However, both he and I have some serious concerns that we would like to address in writing before term commences. In the interests of being succinct I will list these as follows: 1. I do not consent to NAME using hand sanitiser. Hand sanitisers contain powerful chemicals that permeate the skin and enter the bloodstream, as well as being implicated in causing dermatitis and destroying vital beneficial bacteria on the skin - essential for maintaining a strong immune system. I only consent to him washing his hands with conventional soap and water. I also do not consent to him using antibacterial chemicals to clean his desk and equipment for the same reason. 2. I do not give our consent to participating in the NHS track and trace scheme, and do not want our contact details passed over to the NHS or any other agency for the purposes of tracking and tracing.  Any agency having or using our data without our consent is in breach of the GDPR and therefore illegal. 3. I do not know what the school's policy will be on mask-wearing but I wish to make clear the legal position on masks, which is that those suffering hidden disabilities are exempt, and under the Equalities Act 2010 and Disabilities Discrimination Act, it is illegal to ask someone if they have a hidden disability or what it is. Therefore, were the school to mandate masks, it would be illegal for them to ask any pupil why they were not wearing one. It would also be incumbent on the school to instruct all pupils and staff on the law regarding masks and exemptions, to ensure anyone without a mask is not discriminated against. 4. I do not feel that schools are the place for medical processes to take place, and I only allow trusted healthcare professionals to conduct medical procedures on my son. Therefore, I do not consent to NAME receiving any corona-virus testing or any other medical procedure at school. If he develops symptoms of illness, I will keep him at home as I would with any other illness, and arrange any treatment myself. 5. I do not consent to any detainment of NAME on school premises or elsewhere for any reason. I expect him to return home at the usual time every day unless I have given my express permission otherwise. Finally I would like to address the use of Vanoquat. I’m sure you are aware that this contains the chemical Di-methyl Benzyl Ammonium Chloride as its active ingredient. This is a Quaternary ammonium compound that causes lung damage, the development of asthma and can and does cause skin rashes. Animal studies have also shown that it produces poor sperm count, impaired fertility, and birth defects. Although I am aware that this will not be applied until the end of the day and only in empty classrooms, Quaternary ammonium compounds do not dissipate from a surface. They remain on hard surfaces, creating opportunities for exposure many times until the substance is actively removed. However this product won’t be actively removed and instead will be layered continuously, multiple times and, due to the nature of the fogger, will literally contaminate everything.  This, in tandem with the frankly OCD use of sanitizers and toxic cleaning products is hugely concerning to me. Firstly a bio hazardous poison is literally being sprayed all over the children's environment. The second reason is that in wiping out all bacteria and all microbes we are actually depriving our bodies of the complex interactive environment that we require in order to thrive. Human beings possess and require more bacteria in our bodies than the number of cells we have, and when we strip our environment of the microbial complexity that humans need in order to support the diversity and the balance of our microbiome we become extremely vulnerable to illness. If we sterilise our environment we will be sterilising our own microbiome with serious repercussions for the health and well-being of the children. Not even mentioning the psychological ramifications of this. I understand very well that you are between a rock and a hard place, but the evidence is very clear that children are not at risk from COVID and all epidemiological studies to date show they are not transmitting the virus either to adults or the wider community.  Therefore could you also please furnish me with the risk analysis that was carried out before these protocols were devised and let me know who is liable for any potential long term adverse health effects as a result?   ‘This kind of insanity has no logical or scientific basis and therefore to indulge in these ‘known to be health damaging protocols’ is surely pandering to the lowest common denominator in terms of common sense‘ Kindest regards
 
 
SHOW LESS
 
 
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, wingwang said:

Oh, COVID-19 diagnostic test instruments were being supplied in 2018!

 

From: https://wits.worldbank.org/trade/comtrade/en/country/GBR/year/2018/tradeflow/Exports/partner/ALL/nomen/h5/product/902780

 

WITS.png

 

 

But WHO says COVID-19 was only discovered December 19!

 

From: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/question-and-answers-hub/q-a-detail/q-a-coronaviruses

 

WHO-C19.png


This is quite a bigee isn't it Wingwang?  I mean, this is really alarming, that there is proof of covid19 before it was EVER mentioned? 
Nice one (out of likes)

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Seeker said:

 

Is anyone else repulsed by this Turkey tourism advert? 

Sick fucks they are who would put out that propaganda geared towards kids, with the meat robot airport employee pointing the infrared beam at the child's forehead. Then the advert claims for our health, while they show the kid eating bacon and eggs and potatoes. Lol *sigh* 

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry to vent in this thread but today got to me. The mainstream media are scum. 

 

I saw my elderly relative put his hands up when my nan passed him the phone, to say have you sprayed it? Spraying the daily newspaper thats delivered.

 

Seeing my flesh and blood behaving like this is utterly infruiating and upsetting. 

 

Then overheard him on the phone to his friend talking about masks and shops, "oh its got a sign on the door but i go in and no ones wearing one" i am thinking FUCKING GOOD.

 

They ordered tons of masks both surgical and cloths. When they were out of the house fir the day the masks were hanging on a cabinet i had to hide the masks under some magazines as it was pissing me off. 

 

Then another elderly relative went to a meet up first one since covid. Usually 6 of them. One hasnt gone as she REFUSES to go out of the house because she is terrified. Shes younger as well. In her late 60s and apart from being a bit of a salad dodger NO pre existing health issues. 

 

I also overheard HER on the phone saying "i had to wear a mask in the hospital for an hour i felt quite unwell"

 I couldnt help but raise my voice and said "well take the thing off then!!!" 

 

Then its back to watching sly and BBC news every couple of hours religiously. 

 

Boils my fucking blood. Apologies for language but despite me being dissapointed in some of the older generation the gaslighting and the way they have been treated is dispicable and this weekend really brought home just how deep the programming is. 

 

Despicable msm. These are seriously sinister times. 

 

 

 

Edited by Fluke
  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

RT PCR

When they run this test they use "amplification cycles" on the sample from the patient, this is a way to multiply the genetic material in the sample to create many copies so that it is easier to test.  But what is not well known is that the cycles also create random mutations of the DNA.  The technology actually creates random genetic material.  So if the patient has dna in the test tube with the code ABC, then after you run a cycle you will have a million copies of ABC ... plus you will have some random mutations of ABB, CAB etc....  The technology of the test creates this impurities.

The upshot of that is that if you run a test and do 45 amplification cycles, you have so many impurities that it will almost certainly test positive for CV19 because one of the impurities created will match the CV19 dna pattern.

But another problem is that you are creating new dna sequences.   I don't know how alive these samples are, but it is s good technique to create random viruses because you are playing the lottery with dna.   And there are a lot of tests being done right now and then flushed down the sink  into the environment.   Scientists have a habit of flushing things down the sink and outside the building those things start growing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, wingwang said:

Oh, COVID-19 diagnostic test instruments were being supplied in 2018!

 

From: https://wits.worldbank.org/trade/comtrade/en/country/GBR/year/2018/tradeflow/Exports/partner/ALL/nomen/h5/product/902780

 

WITS.png

 

 

But WHO says COVID-19 was only discovered December 19!

 

From: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/question-and-answers-hub/q-a-detail/q-a-coronaviruses

 

WHO-C19.png

THEY'VE JUST CHANGED IT BACK!!!!!!

 https://wits.worldbank.org/trade/comtrade/en/country/GBR/year/2018/tradeflow/Exports/partner/ALL/nomen/h5/product/902780

(Look NO Covid19) ???????
 

fgs.PNG

Edited by sickofallthebollocks
layout
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sickofallthebollocks said:

World Bank Records COVID-19 Test Kits Exported In 2017, 2018

More on this here:   (news item dated september 6 2020)

https://nationalfile.com/world-bank-records-covid-19-test-kits-exported-in-2018/


from the page:

The World Bank website has an active record for “COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Instruments and apparatus (902780) exports by country in 2018” even though the World Health Organization did not name Coronavirus “COVID-19” until February 2020 amid this year’s outbreak. There is also a record for COVID-19 tests exported in 2017. At this time, we await a clear explanation from officials as to why this record exists, and will update accordingly.

Dr. Anthony Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) actually funded a study on Bat Coronavirus, which was a project that included scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, the Chinese lab at the center of controversy over their bat research. That study confirmed in 2018 that humans have died from coronavirus.

Here’s an excerpt from the April 4, 2018 NIAID website entry entitled “New Coronavirus Emerges From Bats in China, Devastates Young Swine”: “A newly identified coronavirus that killed nearly 25,000 piglets in 2016-17 in China emerged from horseshoe bats near the origin of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV), which emerged in 2002 in the same bat species. The new virus is named swine acute diarrhea syndrome coronavirus (SADS-CoV). It does not appear to infect people, unlike SARS-CoV which infected more than 8,000 people and killed 774. No SARS-CoV cases have been identified since 2004. The study investigators identified SADS-CoV on four pig farms in China’s Guangdong Province. The work was a collaboration among scientists from EcoHealth Alliance, Duke-NUS Medical School, Wuhan Institute of Virology and other organizations, and was funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, part of the National Institutes of Health. The research is published in the journal Nature. The researchers say the finding is an important reminder that identifying new viruses in animals and quickly determining their potential to infect people is a key way to reduce global health threats.”

 

w1.PNG

Edited by sickofallthebollocks
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sickofallthebollocks said:


How cheeky. (I say cheeky, my internal monologue is a bit stronger than that...)

 

I’ve been trying to play about with archive.org to see if they have a snapshot pre-edit but no luck so far, maybe one of you guys will be luckier (and more proficient) than me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, anomie said:


How cheeky. (I say cheeky, my internal monologue is a bit stronger than that...)

 

I’ve been trying to play about with archive.org to see if they have a snapshot pre-edit but no luck so far, maybe one of you guys will be luckier (and more proficient) than me. 

Yeah good idea Anomie - there will be a record of this change - wish I knew how.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, anomie said:


How cheeky. (I say cheeky, my internal monologue is a bit stronger than that...)

 

I’ve been trying to play about with archive.org to see if they have a snapshot pre-edit but no luck so far, maybe one of you guys will be luckier (and more proficient) than me. 

https://web.archive.org/web/20200906145623/https://wits.worldbank.org/tariff/trains/en/country/CAN/partner/ALL/nomen/h5/product/902780

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Grumpy Owl said:

OOH SCARY!! But, how many deaths? Two? How many of these 'cases' are actually 'ill'?

 

 

basing their analysis and ethos upon vaccine science where cases equate to a fixed ratio of mortality

 

the Gov policy is vaccine science before the vaccine is implemented

 

deaths were down from 10 per 100,000 to 0.2 per 100,000 but cases were average around 300 per 100,000

 

but the vaccination case / death ratio is fixed

 

 

mmus.jpg.0d961ab63d690cc94699162debe1a30c.jpg

Edited by zArk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • lake locked and unlocked this topic
  • lake locked this topic
  • lake unlocked this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...