Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.

numnuts

By numnuts,
in Covid-19 & NWO

 Share

Recommended Posts

Guest Gone Fishing...

Guest Gone Fishing...

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Sidlittle said:


sadly John Squire posted a pro-mask tweet in response 30 mins later... I guess you won’t be seeing them live again .. 


LOL.....still at odds 😂 

l never got to see the Roses but l've seen Ian on a Solo tour.
His autobiography 'Already in Me' is a good read.

A real cool dude.


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Problem child

Problem child

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, Basket Case said:


LOL.....still at odds 😂 

l never got to see the Roses but l've seen Ian on a Solo tour.
His autobiography 'Already in Me' is a good read.

A real cool dude.


 

I know yea haha

I saw Ian a few times and the roses once in Manc more recently. The man has huge following and a lot of respect, he is untouchable in my eyes.

They will struggle to tar his name.

British legend. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
owen

owen

Posted
Posted

I have my letter ready to send off to my sons school tomorrow. It outlines my disgust at social distancing rules and the constant fear mongering of the teacher talking about the virus, deaths etc. I go into detail about the psychological impact on the kids and also the fact that these measures seem indefinite maybe even permanent. I mention that Michael Martin announced on friday that current  measures may be in force until 2022. What is amazing to me is other parents are not even talking about the effect of this on our kids. Im really disappointed with Irish people, fighting Irish my ass

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mitochondrial Eve

Mitochondrial Eve

Posted
Posted
14 hours ago, Kovidiot said:

can you give a bit more info, if you know, of what this is exactly. Was this graph up on that page since 2018?

 

As far as I can tell, the consensus is that the website is genuine - it has been capturing a lot of attention and curiosity on social media including Simon Dolan and the Ickes. It appears to show trading in Covid-19 test kits, instruments and apparatus in 2017/2018, long before Covid-19 was "discovered" at the end of 2019. There is excitement that this is evidence of planning for the virus and thus helps to refute the mainstream narrative.

 

An alternative explanation is that there has been a change in the product title after the event which has now been re-described to Covid-19 more specifically to aid with searchability. The latter explanation doesn't negate that the products were being traded in 2017/2018 but perhaps under a more generic name at that point - if the inventory could also be combined with other evidence such as a patent for testing, this would be clearer proof of planning for the virus in advance.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kovidiot

Kovidiot

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Mitochondrial Eve said:

 

As far as I can tell, the consensus is that the website is genuine - it has been capturing a lot of attention and curiosity on social media including Simon Dolan and the Ickes. It appears to show trading in Covid-19 test kits, instruments and apparatus in 2017/2018, long before Covid-19 was "discovered" at the end of 2019. There is excitement that this is evidence of planning for the virus and thus helps to refute the mainstream narrative.

 

An alternative explanation is that there has been a change in the product title after the event which has now been re-described to Covid-19 more specifically to aid with searchability. The latter explanation doesn't negate that the products were being traded in 2017/2018 but perhaps under a more generic name at that point - if the inventory could also be combined with other evidence such as a patent for testing, this would be clearer proof of planning for the virus in advance.

yep i did a bit of research on it and it could either be one of those two answers you posted. The thing is that without a screenshot preceding 2020 we cannot tell if and when the change was made

Edited by Kovidiot
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Grumpy Owl

Grumpy Owl

Posted
Posted

Coronavirus: Further 2,988 cases confirmed in UK

A further 2,988 cases of coronavirus have been reported in the UK in the past 24 hours, government data showed.

It is the highest daily number of new cases since 22 May and a rise of 1,175 on Saturday's figure, according to the UK government's coronavirus dashboard.

Scotland recorded 208 new cases on Sunday, its highest daily increase for more than 17 weeks.

Two further deaths within 28 days of a positive test were recorded in the UK, the latest data shows.

Overall, 347,152 cases have been confirmed with 41,551 deaths recorded.

_114263603_uk_daily_cases_with_ra_6sep-nc.png  

Wales recorded a further 98 cases, its highest daily rise since 30 June, and Northern Ireland recorded 106 new cases, its highest rise since 25 April.

 

From: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-54050342

 

 

OOH SCARY!! But, how many deaths? Two? How many of these 'cases' are actually 'ill'?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
wingwang

wingwang

Posted
Posted

Oh, COVID-19 diagnostic test instruments were being supplied in 2018!

 

From: https://wits.worldbank.org/trade/comtrade/en/country/GBR/year/2018/tradeflow/Exports/partner/ALL/nomen/h5/product/902780

 

WITS.png

 

 

But WHO says COVID-19 was only discovered December 19!

 

From: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/question-and-answers-hub/q-a-detail/q-a-coronaviruses

 

WHO-C19.png

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
karmaxxxx

karmaxxxx

Posted
Posted
On 9/5/2020 at 10:16 PM, Problem child said:

this vid might be useful for those with kids going back to school

 

Thank you for that link to video. @Problem child

for anyone else here is the letter for the schools to print off and hand to the headteacher.

Dear Re: corona-virus protocols  I am writing to you regarding my son/daughter, NAME who is due to return to year X ON DATE NAME has been very happy at SCHOOL NAME and is looking forward to returning to see his friends. However, both he and I have some serious concerns that we would like to address in writing before term commences. In the interests of being succinct I will list these as follows: 1. I do not consent to NAME using hand sanitiser. Hand sanitisers contain powerful chemicals that permeate the skin and enter the bloodstream, as well as being implicated in causing dermatitis and destroying vital beneficial bacteria on the skin - essential for maintaining a strong immune system. I only consent to him washing his hands with conventional soap and water. I also do not consent to him using antibacterial chemicals to clean his desk and equipment for the same reason. 2. I do not give our consent to participating in the NHS track and trace scheme, and do not want our contact details passed over to the NHS or any other agency for the purposes of tracking and tracing.  Any agency having or using our data without our consent is in breach of the GDPR and therefore illegal. 3. I do not know what the school's policy will be on mask-wearing but I wish to make clear the legal position on masks, which is that those suffering hidden disabilities are exempt, and under the Equalities Act 2010 and Disabilities Discrimination Act, it is illegal to ask someone if they have a hidden disability or what it is. Therefore, were the school to mandate masks, it would be illegal for them to ask any pupil why they were not wearing one. It would also be incumbent on the school to instruct all pupils and staff on the law regarding masks and exemptions, to ensure anyone without a mask is not discriminated against. 4. I do not feel that schools are the place for medical processes to take place, and I only allow trusted healthcare professionals to conduct medical procedures on my son. Therefore, I do not consent to NAME receiving any corona-virus testing or any other medical procedure at school. If he develops symptoms of illness, I will keep him at home as I would with any other illness, and arrange any treatment myself. 5. I do not consent to any detainment of NAME on school premises or elsewhere for any reason. I expect him to return home at the usual time every day unless I have given my express permission otherwise. Finally I would like to address the use of Vanoquat. I’m sure you are aware that this contains the chemical Di-methyl Benzyl Ammonium Chloride as its active ingredient. This is a Quaternary ammonium compound that causes lung damage, the development of asthma and can and does cause skin rashes. Animal studies have also shown that it produces poor sperm count, impaired fertility, and birth defects. Although I am aware that this will not be applied until the end of the day and only in empty classrooms, Quaternary ammonium compounds do not dissipate from a surface. They remain on hard surfaces, creating opportunities for exposure many times until the substance is actively removed. However this product won’t be actively removed and instead will be layered continuously, multiple times and, due to the nature of the fogger, will literally contaminate everything.  This, in tandem with the frankly OCD use of sanitizers and toxic cleaning products is hugely concerning to me. Firstly a bio hazardous poison is literally being sprayed all over the children's environment. The second reason is that in wiping out all bacteria and all microbes we are actually depriving our bodies of the complex interactive environment that we require in order to thrive. Human beings possess and require more bacteria in our bodies than the number of cells we have, and when we strip our environment of the microbial complexity that humans need in order to support the diversity and the balance of our microbiome we become extremely vulnerable to illness. If we sterilise our environment we will be sterilising our own microbiome with serious repercussions for the health and well-being of the children. Not even mentioning the psychological ramifications of this. I understand very well that you are between a rock and a hard place, but the evidence is very clear that children are not at risk from COVID and all epidemiological studies to date show they are not transmitting the virus either to adults or the wider community.  Therefore could you also please furnish me with the risk analysis that was carried out before these protocols were devised and let me know who is liable for any potential long term adverse health effects as a result?   ‘This kind of insanity has no logical or scientific basis and therefore to indulge in these ‘known to be health damaging protocols’ is surely pandering to the lowest common denominator in terms of common sense‘ Kindest regards
 
 
SHOW LESS
 
 
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Beaujangles locked and unlocked this topic
  • lake locked this topic
  • lake unlocked this topic
  • Beaujangles featured this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...