Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


numnuts

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, whatthefoxhat said:

The online harms regs were always a given from day one,no amount of petitions (god how i despise online petitions) no appeals from any group or otrganisation was ever going to change that,this is just the rubber stamp procedure

 

What no one is talking about though is what are we going to do when they do come for sites like this? and they will thats also a given

 

Maybe someone far more versed in the witchcraft of the intricacies of the www would care to comment?

 

It is not a problem to create a 'site' .... it is a problem who you give knowledge about it to!

 

To put it in another way (and no I am not saying history, as taught, is correct .... it is just a way to highlight the issue):

 

Lets say you are French resistance in WW2, then how do you trust new people?

How do you allow someone new, access to your hidden network?

It would only take one bad apple to fuck everything!

 

^^^^ That is the problem, making a 'place' is simple.

 

and I have said for some time that 'they' have no choice but to close all alternative voices down .... once 'they' have all 'they' need!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saw a couple walk past me in the street today and the man had had a stroke, the one side of his face was tense, he looked like the joker on one side. Truly sad. Probably from the vaccine.

 

Endless reports on social media coming through from people with side effects. 

 

 

 

 

Untitled.jpg

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, eddy64 said:

 

well most people won't want the hassle of being arrested by the police even if they are in the right according to the law.

 

crimebodge on youtube shows that half the time the police dont know what the law is theyre supposed to be enforcing.

 

 

 

The police swear an oath to protect our fundamental human rights.

 

 

 

EclkqTrXYAEk4Ad.thumb.jpeg.cd8d99b497f3dc54602b5628a42bedc9.jpeg

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, SimonTV said:

Lots of reports of brain fog, it must be attacking their pineal gland or it is micro blood clotting all over their body + brain. it is destroying the pathways in their brain that lead to normal brain operation. 

 

 

Untitled.jpg

 

Possible the liver has isolated the toxins are stored them in the gall-bladder where they form gallstones.

 

A full gallbladder causes brain-fog and tiredness. Hulda Clarke Gall-bladder cleanse could help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, SimonTV said:

Lots of reports of brain fog, it must be attacking their pineal gland or it is micro blood clotting all over their body + brain. it is destroying the pathways in their brain that lead to normal brain operation.

 

i dunno i think their brains had some operational issues before they had the injections. They've just made themselves that bit more retarded

 

yes that's harsh but its not as harsh as the world their retardism is forcing me and others to live in

 

As for the brain fog it is probably nanobots eating their brain...like a modern labotomy

Edited by Macnamara
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Tinfoil Hat said:

The insidious tw@s are deliberately setting family members up to turn on each other and it sickens me.

 

My mother is 80 and has had both jabs. I've tried to dissuade her, but because she once told me this talk frightens her and she can't think about it, I agreed not to try to tell her any more.

 

She's tried a few times to persuade me to have the vaccine and I've just shut her down by saying that she refuses to listen to my reasons for saying it must be avoided so she needs to stop trying to insist I should have it.

 

I just called her saying I'm off work sick and she started very aggressively demanding that I have the 'Covid test'. I tried to say that Covid is just another strain of flu, but didn't get the sentence out because she was bellowing over the top of me, "I'm not listening to that shit". 

 

It's too frustrating. I love her dearly, but I said, "You will not listen to facts", to which she replied, "Not YOUR facts", so that's it. She, like so many others, is completely determined not to even consider anything unless it's from Bojo or Wankcocks vile lips, or the fucking mainstream liars.

 

I found myself shouting, "You stupid woman", and hanging up on her. 

 

The last thing I want is a rift with my mum in her twilight years, but I can't stand how fully manipulated so many people are.

 

And my sister! We had a big family fall out a few years back and haven't spoken since. But I felt sure she'd be seeing through what's going on now, as she's a long time 'conspiracy theorist'.

 

But she's making Megabucks now, having set up in business with a couple of colleagues. So when, not long back, I said to my mum that I doubted my sister would have the jab, she triumphantly announced, "Of course she is. She knows she has to if she wants to holiday abroad".

 

I could truly despair, but have decided I'm not responsible for anybody else. I can't, and won't impose my will on others so if they are too scared to know the truth, or so thick that they value foreign travel above health & real freedoms, it's not my fault - or yours. It's 100 per cent their fault.

 

7 hours ago, whatthefoxhat said:

 There does seem to be more mass obedience amongst the older generations ,my parents are very similar in age to your mother and the levels of unquestioning obedience startled me at first but i have to give them the benefit of the doubt in that they are phone and computer illiterate with no plans on that changing in their lifetime,my mother watched her daughter spend 11 days in hospital after having her first jab,she  then proceeded to have her second jab and flatly refuses to believe that the jab was in any way connected to my sisters hospital stay

 

I visited them yesterday and realised this may be the last year of their lives , i hope they surprise me and dont cark it this winter but i'm mentally steeling myself for it happening

 

We shouldn't stereotype but there is something about over 60's (or boomers) that makes them particularly stubborn and resistant to alternative info, my parents are both boomers and just like that.

Could be because they grew up in a much less cynical and negative world back in the 40's, 50's, 60's and so more are likely to trust the BBC and government more than younger generations who have grown up in a more cynical world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, skitzorat said:

 

Out of laughs..

 

 

 

Not hard to get a job for the MSM I wouldn't have thought if you are amongst certain circles. Just act contemptible and obnoxious and everything the British public want you shill for the opposite. Helps if you are non white or disabled.. oh and brain dead. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

As for the brain fog it is probably nanobots eating their brain...like a modern labotomy

 

'nanobots? what are you talking about Mac, you sound like a crazy person!'

Nanobots will live in our brains in the 2030s, says Google boss

Web Log: Engineering director Ray Kurzweil predicts what future holds for AI and humans

Thu, Oct 19, 2017, 07:35

Ray Kurzweil is director of engineering at Google but he is better known for writing best-selling books outlining the future of artificial intelligence.

He has made 147 predictions on the future of technology including the ubiquity of wearable devices and the move from desktops and laptops to smartphones and tablets. In fact, his prediction rate has been rated 86 per cent accurate.

With this in mind, fans were excited to see Kurzweil answer their questions in a live streaming interview session last week where he elaborated on his predictions.

Computer vision

Kurzweil thinks true AI will arrive when narrow fields within machine learning, computer vision and so on get broader and broader until there “won’t really be any difference between AI and natural [human] intelligence”.

“It is not an alien invasion of AI from Mars; we’re going to make ourselves smarter by merging with it,” he added. This merging will happen using nanobots, he predicts.

“In the 2030s we are going to send nanorobots into the brain that will provide full immersion virtual reality from within the nervous system and will connect our neocortex to the cloud. Just like how we can wirelessly expand the power of our smartphones 10,000-fold in the cloud today, we’ll be able to expand our neocortex.”

https://www.irishtimes.com/business/technology/nanobots-will-live-in-our-brains-in-the-2030s-says-google-boss-1.3259597

Scientists propose putting nanobots in our bodies to create ‘global superbrain’

by Colm Gorey

12 Apr 2019

A team has proposed using nanobots to create the ‘internet of thoughts’, where instant knowledge could be downloaded just by thinking it.

An international team of scientists led by members of UC Berkeley and the US Institute for Molecular Manufacturing predicts that exponential progress in nanotechnology, nanomedicine, artificial intelligence (AI) and computation will lead this century to the development of a human ‘brain-cloud interface’ (B-CI).

Writing in Frontiers in Neuroscience, the team said that a B-CI would connect neurons and synapses in the brain to vast cloud computing networks in real time.

Such a concept isn’t new with writers of science fiction, including Ray Kurzweil, who proposed it decades ago. In fact, Facebook has even admitted it is working on a B-CI.

However, Kurzweil’s fantasy about neural nanobots capable of hooking us directly into the web is now being turned into reality by the senior author of this latest study, Robert Freitas Jr.

https://www.siliconrepublic.com/machines/brain-cloud-interface-nanobots-global-superbrain

 

Edited by Macnamara
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Lamp Of Truth said:

 

 

We shouldn't stereotype but there is something about over 60's (or boomers) that makes them particularly stubborn and resistant to alternative info, my parents are both boomers and just like that.

Could be because they grew up in a much less cynical and negative world back in the 40's, 50's, 60's and so more are likely to trust the BBC and government more than younger generations who have grown up in a more cynical world.

 

I'm a boomer, born in 63.

 

I suppose any born in war years had to believe then that we - and by extension, our Government were the heroes.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tinfoil Hat said:

I'm a boomer, born in 63.

 

I suppose any born in war years had to believe then that we - and by extension, our Government were the heroes.

 

I was brought upto be patriotic and my family is very patriotic but the truth is that had we lost the war our leaders were just as culpable for war crimes as the other side

 

It could just have easily been our leaders put on nuremburg trials for firebombing civilians or nuking them or bombing the roofs above their heads

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, shadowmoon said:

some of the replies are like purest unfiltered 77th, some seem genuinely unaware?

I really don't know how we could even begin to get through to most of them.

 

you won't get through to them.....they want to fluff and be fluffed

 

it takes strength to live honestly and they haven't got it

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • lake locked this topic
  • lake unlocked this topic
  • Beaujangles featured this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...