Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


numnuts

Recommended Posts

Snip-it_1621095810260.jpg.1cb6caa20b00dff5f9c9e51424f72f5f.jpg

https://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-news/shops-and-services-are-opening-again-in-gatineau-but-remain-off-limits-for-ottawans/wcm/44bd4a6b-1f88-4450-bb5d-9ad42c9ed89b/amp/

 

Snip-it_1621095869320.jpg.07af24b1da4bb797b99c4d70c64364e9.jpg

 

This curfew/lockdown mechanism is becoming so entrenched that it can be invoked fullscale at will. They can come in and out of these measures systematically. One cellphone alert message that this or that case number is threatening and boom..lockdown..essential this and that. Now we are no longer dealing with stemming the growth of a dangerous mindvirus but are dealing with the challenge of dismantling a fully mature, fully operational control grid.

Edited by Avoiceinthecrowd
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Gee said:

It probably isn't designed to kill everyone. It probably is to change the people but will kill many through the process. Their true targets will be those they can't control and will not conform... Hello :)

I wish them luck and fun with morons left... 😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Avoiceinthecrowd said:

A friendly reminder to those devoted to correcting the wrongs and seek a fair society. Please build in a vigilence mechanism to conserve your advances. Beat the mindvirus and "disinfect" it to keep it away.

That is an icredibly diplomatic way to say do not incriminate yourself to the thought police by allowing your mind to spill on these pages. Am I right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Morpheus said:

I have an idea. Anyone who has held a public office position is now no longer able to hold such a position ever from now on. 

 

You can only hold public office for 1 year and if there's any sign of corruption you face the death penalty. This should deter any shenanigans. 

Brilliant! Conflict of interest cases don't get a fast death. Pushing agonizing slow death injections to increase your wealth because you have a position of public trust. Thats a very slow and agonizing sentence. Start giving the sadists a reason to think twice about abusing public trust. It was like that in many countries throughout history. Covid, in those places and times would have ended near the start with heads on stakes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gee said:

Biggest problem I see is that there is no clear organisation or direction. The protesters walk and dance around the streets of London. The organisation that is visable seems not to be effective and almost possibly close to establishment figures, if not slighly removed. I wonder really what paradigm this is.

 

 

Why does it need to be organised - just the fact that people pour into the streets should be enough for the ``establishment`` to sit up and take notice. Not everyone can travel to designated places at the moment for many reasons...not least physical impairments...

 

If word got out for everyone to voice their stance by going into the main areas of their immediate locations and uploading these `protests`to media portals - it wouldnt take long before the 100 monkey syndrome could kick in.  Why do protests have to be in one place - it should be all over.  Look at the nations response with the clapping for NHS... every twat on a doorstep was making themselves heard....they even let off fireworks in some cases...

 

Imagine if the country became a nationwide November 5th - It may seem stupid, but who knows who it could wake up... maybe it just needs a fire putting up their asses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Woodsman said:

Good to see people think this is hilarious when such a serious problem. I DON’T read mainstream media at all have NO TV and NO MOBILE. One of the research sources was Alex Jones from Info Wars. (I can name some more) It’s also claimed that the US Health man was funding coronavirus research at the facilities despite this being illegal.

Or... Newsweek? 

https://www.newsweek.com/dr-fauci-backed-controversial-wuhan-lab-millions-us-dollars-risky-coronavirus-research-1500741

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Morpheus said:

Take it whatever way you want. But neither they nor Alex Jones especially, is a trusted independent source. 

OK. Please suggest some reliable independent resources to check then? UK Column? 21 Century Wire? NHS? The PM (That is a JOKE) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Woodsman said:

Please suggest some reliable independent resources to check then?

What would you like to look at?

5 minutes ago, Woodsman said:

That is a JOKE

I know, I do have a sense of humour. But I suppose what I am trying to show you, in a very sarcastic way (I do apologise for that I don't mean to belittle or be cruel) but if we are to maintain quality of information then we need to use quality control on the information we receive. I'm sure I'm not the only one who will tell you that Jones is a shill, so I would take whatever he says with a very big pinch of salt. 

Edited by Morpheus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Gee said:

That is an icredibly diplomatic way to say do not incriminate yourself to the thought police by allowing your mind to spill on these pages. Am I right?

What is spilling on these pages is the blueprint for a better society. Doubt I would ever imply that congregating to seek peace and justice are subversive. My philosophy with regards to speaking freely in oppressive regimes is that I would say the same to their faces. Show them my disgust and ask them how they managed to stay that stupid after reading all my posts. After 20 years speaking openly on bulletin boards and forums in the least I have saved myself long gulag interrogations. Told them everything on my mind.

Edited by Avoiceinthecrowd
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Morpheus said:

What would you like to look at?

I know, I do have a sense of humour. But I suppose what I am trying to show you, in a very sarcastic way (I do apologise for that I don't mean to belittle or be cruel) but if we are to maintain quality of information then we need to use quality control on the information we receive. I'm sure I'm not the only one who will tell you that Jones is a shill, so I would take whatever he says with a very big punch of salt. 

No problem. English Jokes. I do understand vital to keep focused on facts and info.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, metak88 said:

 

There's a calendar of future events on the right side on this forum.

https://forum.davidicke.com/index.php?calendar/

 

Notice also on DI website:

https://davidicke.com/2021/05/13/london-protest-this-saturday-1pm/

Where exactly was that advert with the location? I didn't see it displayed prominently. I also looked at other websites (SORUK, Piers Corbyn), but saw nothing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do view World Freedom Alliance and Children’s Health Defence and there is someone called Tucker Carlson who investigates some of the issues I think?. I am told that a certain news channel in OZ (which also has one in the UK) is much different in the attitude towards the virus and lockdowns.

 

I have contacts in the NHS but these are frightened to talk about that in public. (I have tried to see if would whistleblow but won’t)  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Grumpy Owl said:

 

Because its all horseshit. I don't believe there is any 'variant

I think the vaccination is causing the variant as an idiosyncratic body adaption 

 

I would love to see , for those claimed to have variant, info like

Vaccinated?

Symptomatic?

Hospitalised?

ill? 

Age

Etc

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Woodsman said:

No problem. English Jokes. I do understand vital to keep focused on facts and info.

 

I didn't realise you weren't British, my bad. Where are you from? 

 

As far as info goes, it's about verification, if the information you have cannot be verified then I'd be very careful about divulging said information. What this shit has taught me and trust me, I've been doing this since I was 17 for 20 years and I am equally guilty for looking at shit information. But more so now, people I thought could be trusted cannot actually be trusted. Honestly, knock about with @oddsnsods & @EnigmaticWorld and trust me, people you thought were good have shady backgrounds. 

 

I used to very much like Jordan Peterson, I kind of still do to a point, but then these two have shown me another side and now I just think he's a zio pushing shill. Funny isn't it? Just when you think you've got it nailed down, someone you thought was good for information is a fuckin shill. 

 

So what I am saying is be careful who you promote, because what the 2 individuals have taught me above is that you can't be too careful when researching information. 👍

Edited by Morpheus
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Grumpy Grapes said:

Where exactly was that advert with the location? I didn't see it displayed prominently. I also looked at other websites (SORUK, Piers Corbyn), but saw nothing. 

 

It was published on DI website in 'Featured' news section.

Bottom-right corner of the image says it comes from telegram channel where most of the organizing and info info sharing has moved to.

 

🌎World Wide Demonstration🌎

https://t.me/worldwidedemonstration

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Morpheus said:

As far as info goes, it's about verification, if the information you have cannot be verified then I'd be very careful about divulging said information. What this shit has taught me and trust me, I've been doing this since I was 17 for 20 years and I am equally guilty for looking at shit information. But more so now, people I thought could be trusted cannot actually be trusted. Honestly, knock about with @oddsnsods & @EnigmaticWorld and trust me, people you thought were good have shady backgrounds. 

 

I used to very much like Jordan Peterson, I kind of still do to a point, but then these two have shown me another side and now I just think he's a zio pushing shill. Funny isn't it? Just when you think you've got it nailed down, someone you thought was good for information is a fuckin shill. 

 

I've learned enough over the years now to just go with my own 'instincts'.

 

And I also know now how people can be 'turned', and become controlled opposition thanks to 'filthy lucre'.

 

I know people call out Alex Jones as a 'shill', and he most probably is, but I don't doubt that there was a time when he was 'genuine'.

 

Same goes for people like Tommy Robinson, they start out on the 'right side' with good intentions, build up a 'following' and then they become corrupted.

 

There are always people I have 'question marks' over, like Paul Joseph Watson for example, or Lauren Southern.

 

There is enough disinformation being pushed around by the mainstream media as it is, so we all need to be wary of disinformation being pushed around in the 'alternative circles', by those who may have been co-opted as 'controlled opposition'.

 

Keep an open mind. Stay objective. Think critically. Question EVERYTHING.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...