Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


numnuts
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 4/23/2021 at 8:30 AM, alexa said:

Nurse warns: Stay away from vaxxed people!

https://153news.net/watch_video.php?v=B6U99DXK5RUW

This is huge!

Its almost unbelievable

If its true what she says then a some kind of germ/object jumps from one body to another and infects them

Well as far as i know this is the 1st time in medical history such a thing has happened

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, vinny79 said:

Genuinely getting sick of the number 33

 

I see it everywhere, here in this thread and I’ve also commented in the one below

 

the bbc are just pushing the number all of the time

 

cant Put my finger on it

 

sorry if slightly OT but I think relevant 

 

 

 

The major association is 33 degree Freemason. Many US Presidents have been 33 degree Freemasons, Truman for instance - there's even a photo in Life magazine of him in the full regalia. JFK wasn't one, but just by 'coincidence' he was assassinated in Dallas on the 33 degree of latitude: http://copycateffect.blogspot.com/2013/11/Mason33.html

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From https://principia-scientific.com/statement-on-virus-isolation-sovi/

Further links at the end

Statement On Virus Isolation (SOVI)

Published on April 24, 2021

Written by John O'Sullivan

 

cc-5.jpg?resize=550%2C203&ssl=1

Since August 2020* Principia Scientific International has been among the forefront of organisations questioning the official narrative of whether the SARS-CoV-2 virus, allegedly the cause of the COVID19 pandemic, can be proven to exist in empirical science.

We see that no lab has successfully isolated the ‘virus’ to establish a gold standard. The following is an important Statement On Virus Isolation (SOVI) by Dr Andrew Kaufman MD et al. that addresses these concerns in depth.

 

Isolation: The action of isolating; the fact or condition of being isolated or standing alone; separation from other things or persons; solitariness.

– Oxford English Dictionary

The controversy over whether the SARS-CoV-2 virus has ever been isolated or purified continues. However, using the above definition, common sense, the laws of logic and the dictates of science, any unbiased person must come to the conclusion that the SARS-CoV-2 virus has never been isolated or purified. As a result, no confirmation of the virus’ existence can be found. The logical, common sense, and scientific consequences of this fact are:

  • the structure and composition of something not shown to exist can’t be known, including the presence, structure, and function of any hypothetical spike or other proteins;
  • the genetic sequence of something that has never been found can’t be known;
  • “variants” of something that hasn’t been shown to exist can’t be known;
  • it’s impossible to demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 causes a disease called Covid-19.

In as concise terms as possible, here’s the proper way to isolate, characterize and demonstrate a new virus. First, one takes samples (blood, sputum, secretions) from many people (e.g. 500) with symptoms which are unique and specific enough to characterize an illness. Without mixing these samples with ANY tissue or products that also contain genetic material, the virologist macerates, filters and ultracentrifuges i.e. purifies the specimen. This common virology technique, done for decades to isolate bacteriophages1 and so-called giant viruses in every virology lab, then allows the virologist to demonstrate with electron microscopy thousands of identically sized and shaped particles. These particles are the isolated and purified virus.

 

These identical particles are then checked for uniformity by physical and/or microscopic techniques. Once the purity is determined, the particles may be further characterized. This would include examining the structure, morphology, and chemical composition of the particles. Next, their genetic makeup is characterized by extracting the genetic material directly from the purified particles and using genetic-sequencing techniques, such as Sanger sequencing, that have also been around for decades. Then one does an analysis to confirm that these uniform particles are exogenous (outside) in origin as a virus is conceptualized to be, and not the normal breakdown products of dead and dying tissues.2 (As of May 2020, we know that virologists have no way to determine whether the particles they’re seeing are viruses or just normal break-down products of dead and dying tissues.)3

****

1 Isolation, characterization and analysis of bacteriophages from the haloalkaline lake Elmenteita, KenyaJuliah Khayeli Akhwale et al, PLOS One, Published: April 25, 2019. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0215734 — accessed 2/15/21
2 “Extracellular Vesicles Derived From Apoptotic Cells: An Essential Link Between Death and Regeneration,” Maojiao Li1 et al, Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, 2020 October 2. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcell.2020.573511/full — accessed 2/15/21
3 “The Role of Extracellular Vesicles as Allies of HIV, HCV and SARS Viruses,” Flavia Giannessi, et al, Viruses, 2020 May

*****

If we have come this far then we have fully isolated, characterized, and genetically sequenced an exogenous virus particle. However, we still have to show it is causally related to a disease. This is carried out by exposing a group of healthy subjects (animals are usually used) to this isolated, purified virus in the manner in which the disease is thought to be transmitted. If the animals get sick with the same disease, as confirmed by clinical and autopsy findings, one has now shown that the virus actually causes a disease. This demonstrates infectivity and transmission of an infectious agent.

None of these steps has even been attempted with the SARS-CoV-2 virus, nor have all these steps been successfully performed for any so-called pathogenic virus. Our research indicates that a single study showing these steps does not exist in the medical literature.

Instead, since 1954, virologists have taken unpurified samples from a relatively few people, often less than ten, with a similar disease. They then minimally process this sample and inoculate this unpurified sample onto tissue culture containing usually four to six other types of material — all of which contain identical genetic material as to what is called a “virus.” The tissue culture is starved and poisoned and naturally disintegrates into many types of particles, some of which contain genetic material. Against all common sense, logic, use of the English language and scientific integrity, this process is called “virus isolation.” This brew containing fragments of genetic material from many sources is then subjected to genetic analysis, which then creates in a computer-simulation process the alleged sequence of the alleged virus, a so called in silico genome. At no time is an actual virus confirmed by electron microscopy. At no time is a genome extracted and sequenced from an actual virus. This is scientific fraud.

The observation that the unpurified specimen — inoculated onto tissue culture along with toxic antibiotics, bovine fetal tissue, amniotic fluid and other tissues — destroys the kidney tissue onto which it is inoculated is given as evidence of the virus’ existence and pathogenicity. This is scientific fraud.

From now on, when anyone gives you a paper that suggests the SARS-CoV-2 virus has been isolated, please check the methods sections. If the researchers used Vero cells or any other culture method, you know that their process was not isolation. You will hear the following excuses for why actual isolation isn’t done:

  1. There were not enough virus particles found in samples from patients to analyze.
  2. Viruses are intracellular parasites; they can’t be found outside the cell in this manner.

If No. 1 is correct, and we can’t find the virus in the sputum of sick people, then on what evidence do we think the virus is dangerous or even lethal? If No. 2 is correct, then how is the virus spread from person to person? We are told it emerges from the cell to infect others. Then why isn’t it possible to find it?

Finally, questioning these virology techniques and conclusions is not some distraction or divisive issue. Shining the light on this truth is essential to stop this terrible fraud that humanity is confronting. For, as we now know, if the virus has never been isolated, sequenced or shown to cause illness, if the virus is imaginary, then why are we wearing masks, social distancing and putting the whole world into prison?

Finally, if pathogenic viruses don’t exist, then what is going into those injectable devices erroneously called “vaccines,” and what is their purpose? This scientific question is the most urgent and relevant one of our time.

We are correct. The SARS-CoV2 virus does not exist.

Sally Fallon Morell

Sally Fallon Morell, MA

Thomas Cowan

Dr. Thomas Cowan, MD

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, DarianF said:

The Manufacturing of a Mass Psychosis - Can Sanity Return to an Insane World?:

 

 

 

Great video - thank you.

 

Comment section is always interesting too !

tkzubaran

9 hours ago

The irony of this being posted in a google service, the main culprit of the sad state of the west, and the greatest manufacturer of mass psychosis in history, is not lost in me.

 

DrSulikSquirrel

10 hours ago

"Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one." -- Charles Mackay, 1841, "Memoirs of Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds"

 

S.A.

10 hours ago

Really interesting because I've been wanting someone to print up a bunch of t-shirts that say "Legalize Sanity".

 

Marcus

8 hours ago

The ending Thomas Paine quote deserves its full text:

"Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph. What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly: — 'Tis dearness only that gives every thing its value. Heaven knows how to put a proper price upon its goods; and it would be strange indeed if so celestial an article as FREEDOM should not be highly rated."

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jikwan said:

This is huge!

Its almost unbelievable

If its true what she says then a some kind of germ/object jumps from one body to another and infects them

Well as far as i know this is the 1st time in medical history such a thing has happened

 

Relatively speaking, it may be how we first looked at people who had HIV. When Aids first came about we tended to keep our distance from them, until we found out that you can only get Aids by them passing on bodily fluids.

BUT......... I'm not taking any risks with this Satan shit. I'd keep my distance for now if I were you.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like the Daily Mail is showing the fake staged crap. Always have to have some weird pushing and shoving and a bloody head.... Just one bloody head usually.  Meanwhile almost a million protesters managed to protest without any bother. Strange that.

 

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9507223/Thousands-anti-lockdown-activists-march-central-London.html

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who is this Dominic Cummings ? 

 

No 10 rages at 'nasty, sexist' Dominic Cummings as he is said to be plotting to accuse Boris Johnson of being so determined to avoid another lockdown he would tolerate big Covid death toll 

No 10 rages at 'nasty, sexist' Dominic Cummings amid fears of new accusation against Prime

Allies of the Prime Minister levelled the damning charge that those loyal to Dominic Cummings (pictured left) had been behind 'nasty and sexist briefings' against Mr Johnson's fiancee, Carrie Symonds (pictured together right), in which they exaggerated the influence she wields in No 10. The Downing Street fightback came amid fears that Mr Cummings is planning to reveal the details of shocking private remarks that Mr Johnson is said to have made about the pandemic. His lurid comment was allegedly made shortly after he ordered November's second lockdown. He vowed never to repeat such draconian measures as he faced opposition from Tory backbenchers alarmed by the economic and social cost. Downing Street furiously denies that Mr Johnson made the graphic remark - in which he is said to have ruled out any more 'f****** lockdowns', regardless of the 'bodies'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Beaujangles said:

Looks like the Daily Mail is showing the fake staged crap. Always have to have some weird pushing and shoving and a bloody head.... Just one bloody head usually.  Meanwhile almost a million protesters managed to protest without any bother. Strange that.

 

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9507223/Thousands-anti-lockdown-activists-march-central-London.html

 

Lying scum-bags......Again! Always showing the worse, never the good🤬

Only five arrests out of how many ?

 

Edited by alexa
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, alexa said:

until we found out that you can only get Aids by them passing on bodily fluids.

"We found out".....means the "experts" and paid for "scientists"

told us the "facts"

No, im not believing it because ive come across top virologists stating they tried every possible way of transferring "virus" from one person to another without success. Even they injected large amounts of the virus into another person...nothing!

Their conclusion was virus cannot be transmitted. Viruses do not exist.

The AIDS thing....wasnt that also a virus?

How comes all known viruses, when put to the test proved not transferrable .....except the aids one?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jikwan said:

"We found out".....means the "experts" and paid for "scientists"

told us the "facts"

No, im not believing it because ive come across top virologists stating they tried every possible way of transferring "virus" from one person to another without success. Even they injected large amounts of the virus into another person...nothing!

Their conclusion was virus cannot be transmitted. Viruses do not exist.

The AIDS thing....wasnt that also a virus?

How comes all known viruses, when put to the test proved not transferrable .....except the aids one?

I’m aware of terrain theory, Antoine Beauchamp, Dr Stefan Lanka and all that. I hear them, the terrain is super super important for health and a big reason why diseases manifest. But one thing I don’t overly understand is if germ theory isn’t true, or can’t pass on a virus, then what about std’s? Like you only get them after coming into contact with someone else who has it

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Seeker said:

I’m aware of terrain theory, Antoine Beauchamp, Dr Stefan Lanka and all that. I hear them, the terrain is super super important for health and a big reason why diseases manifest. But one thing I don’t overly understand is if germ theory isn’t true, or can’t pass on a virus, then what about std’s? Like you only get them after coming into contact with someone else who has it

You not alone about std contoversy.

Me too....it still bugs me.

There is a germ theory facebook group i came across that offered credible and logical explinations why sexual deseases exist and what their causes were. I ll try and dig it up for you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Jikwan said:

"We found out".....means the "experts" and paid for "scientists"

told us the "facts"

No, im not believing it because ive come across top virologists stating they tried every possible way of transferring "virus" from one person to another without success. Even they injected large amounts of the virus into another person...nothing!

Their conclusion was virus cannot be transmitted. Viruses do not exist.

The AIDS thing....wasnt that also a virus?

How comes all known viruses, when put to the test proved not transferrable .....except the aids one?

 

I suppose it depends what the hell is in these vaccines ??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, alexa said:

 

I suppose it depends what the hell is in these vaccines ??

This is a very new concept to me. I found out about it a few hours ago.

My take on it is this...

Whatever the vaccinated person emits is a toxin.

That there toxin must be the same as other known toxins eg mercury.

So if i recently swallowed a bunch of mercury and caughed in your direction you would breathe in a few particles. I suspect you would very slightly feel some unease after a while as this mercury travels through your system.

But this new vaccine toxin must be much more damaging

Its a toxin, not a virus imo

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Seeker said:

I’m aware of terrain theory, Antoine Beauchamp, Dr Stefan Lanka and all that. I hear them, the terrain is super super important for health and a big reason why diseases manifest. But one thing I don’t overly understand is if germ theory isn’t true, or can’t pass on a virus, then what about std’s? Like you only get them after coming into contact with someone else who has it

This the best i could dig up so far

Can find that facebook group

 

I dont think it's fair to say you are more likely to catch VD from a "low class whore".  I think most "VDs" are caused by the misguided preparation and clean-up rituals that people go through before and after sex which often involve some toxic products, or the unhygienic practice of using saliva as a lubricant — most people's saliva contains some sugar and possibly candida which can cause thrush.

 

Herpes happens as a result of protective bacterial coatings being stripped away from the skin, which is why you can get it (in the form of a cold sore) from kissing or from being in a very cold climate (skiers are highly prone to cold sores).  If you get a cold sore from kissing someone, they didn't pass a disease onto you.  They may well have played a part in stripping away part of your immune system and may have introduced an irritant into your cracked skin via their saliva (probably just sugar again).

 

Soap will be a major cause of infection that can be passed from one person to another during sex (resulting in that fishy smell we all know).  As I am sure that washing powder residues are a significant cause of disease (whooping cough resulting from inhaling them from bedding), I suspect these toxins could be passed from underwear -> genitals -> other person's genitals causing disease in both sexual partners.  I have heard of people getting chlamydia despite reporting to have never had a sexual encounter, so some toxic product is probably the cause (the fact eucalyptus-eating koalas tend to have it may be a clue).


Btw, smallpox vaccination used to be a major cause of syphilis: http://whale.to/vaccines/smallpox10.html

 

I would say that any disease that appears to have been passed via sex would be more accurately described as an act of "communal poisoning".

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Jikwan said:

This is a very new concept to me. I found out about it a few hours ago.

My take on it is this...

Whatever the vaccinated person emits is a toxin.

That there toxin must be the same as other known toxins eg mercury.

So if i recently swallowed a bunch of mercury and caughed in your direction you would breathe in a few particles. I suspect you would very slightly feel some unease after a while as this mercury travels through your system.

But this new vaccine toxin must be much more damaging

Its a toxin, not a virus imo

 

PFIZER VACCINE IS ALIVE, LIVING CELLS AND ORGANISMS ARE APPARENTLY VISIBLE UNDER A MICROSCOPE!

https://153news.net/watch_video.php?v=361M125D9M6K

  • Thanks 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, perpetual said:

Oh you must learn to go above them to become immune from stares and low level comments. It is your chance to master this. It's not always about witty comment you make etc.... it could be an energetic stance where you don't have to say anything but they will hesitate to say anything....just in case.  It shows an area you need to work on.

I love this, thank you, very very true 😍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, alexa said:

 

london rally 24th april 2021

 

Looks great that, of course he had to get 'the families of the dead...' shite in at the end.

BBC with nothing about the march on their website this morning, as if it didn't happen....

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, perpetual said:

Oh you must learn to go above them to become immune from stares and low level comments. It is your chance to master this

I can do this, but half the time now I simply cba with them. The terror stricken in their worm filled masks, who even wants to be around them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, alexa said:

 

I suppose it depends what the hell is in these vaccines ??

What puzzles me about these vaccines. 

Person A gets vaccine and is fine.

Person B gets vaccine and ends up in ICU or seriously ill. 

 

One has their body reprogrammed with no side effects and the other is wiped out.

..?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, shadowmoon said:

What puzzles me about these vaccines. 

Person A gets vaccine and is fine.

Person B gets vaccine and ends up in ICU or seriously ill. 

 

One has their body reprogrammed with no side effects and the other is wiped out.

..?

 

Yes it is baffling ?:classic_unsure: Maybe it has something to do with a persons DNA.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

8 minutes ago, shadowmoon said:

What puzzles me about these vaccines. 

Person A gets vaccine and is fine.

Person B gets vaccine and ends up in ICU or seriously ill. 

 

One has their body reprogrammed with no side effects and the other is wiped out.

..?

Possibly out of a box of 100 seringes 94% are fairly safe and wont produce much trouble 6% contain much more toxic stuff

They want to cause damage without overdoing it

Edited by Jikwan
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • lake locked this topic
  • lake unlocked this topic
  • Beaujangles featured this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...