Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.

Message added by Grumpy Owl,

This topic is for all general discussion regarding the current COVID-19 pandemic. There are of course numerous other related topics for discussing specific aspects of this pandemic in more detail. And there are other parts of this forum for more 'off-topic' discussions.

Recommended Posts

17 hours ago, skitzorat said:

What would happen if TPTB/medical institutions told everyone to love/heal/imagine their bodies [made of water] becoming healthier and healthier instead of peddling mRNA jabs that, I believe, will disconnect the mind/body from  Spirit. Imagine if we were all taught that we are, in essence, atoms vibrating at a higher/lower frequency and that our bodies are constantly, without our conscience effort, rebuilding itself towards optimum health and vitality. Imagine if we were told that our POWER can even manipulate atoms on the other side of the world!!  We're a hologram.


Power of Intention: Water Crystal Experiments by Dr. Masaru Emoto

"The study used data gathered from a three day period, using 1,900 people in Austria and Germany who focused their intentions towards water samples located inside an electromagnetically shielded room in California."
Book page image

We all need LOVE, and I believe it does us good physically, mentally, spiritually. More Love! No jabs, No lies.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 57.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • DarianF


  • Avoiceinthecrowd


  • oddsnsods


  • SimonTV


Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

I have now been called to the final vaccination deadline as a health care professional. I informed my employer that these vaccines are not technically vaccines, but are "gene therapies" as they employ

You wont believe this.   I just went down Lidls to get some steak.   Security guard calls me out as I walk past & I ignore him. Gets my steak walks to the credit only till

EXPLAIN PLEASE........   People expect so many answers without giving anything back in return.   If the "tin foil hatters" are so nuts, how about the rule followers give some answe

Posted Images

1 hour ago, The Illuminator said:


Exact same thing is happening to a friend of a friend who has been fully vaxed. Fit and healthy late 30s bloke.



Aluminium is in the vaccine and it's toxic. What if they upped the dose of aluminium, what then?
How these drug companies can say these side effects are 'rare' is beyond me, when they've added the toxin!

from 2011 (An adjuvant is an ingredient used in vaccines)
Aluminum vaccine adjuvants: are they safe?

Aluminum is an experimentally demonstrated neurotoxin and the most commonly used vaccine adjuvant. Despite almost 90 years of widespread use of aluminum adjuvants, medical science's understanding about their mechanisms of action is still remarkably poor. There is also a concerning scarcity of data on toxicology and pharmacokinetics of these compounds. In spite of this, the notion that aluminum in vaccines is safe appears to be widely accepted. Experimental research, however, clearly shows that aluminum adjuvants have a potential to induce serious immunological disorders in humans. In particular, aluminum in adjuvant form carries a risk for autoimmunity, long-term brain inflammation and associated neurological complications and may thus have profound and widespread adverse health consequences.

(i) Aluminum (Al3+), suspected as a toxicant for 100years, injures the CNS and immune systems, individually and synergistically.
(ii) Al3+disrupts biological water dynamics and macro-molecules: DNAs, RNAs, proteoglycans, and proteins.
(iii) Al3+disrupts H-bond cooperativity interfering with the quantum coherence of living systems.
(iv) Al3+interferes with biological signaling—biosemiosis—from the very lowest to the highest levels in the nervous system.
(v) The effects are synergistic with other toxicants, including mercury, lead, fluoride, and glyphosate.
taken from page 19- https://people.csail.mit.edu/seneff/Shaw_et_al_JOT_2014.pdf

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, perpetual said:


Does Human Rights bill define HUMAN?

I was thinking, human don't have moneky's DNA though we may share some. So the vaxxed are theoretically non-human or hybrid that the bill may not apply to them. I think consequence could be great. Hence they will usher in a change of Human Rights bill to accommodate the hybrid which will probably makes it less protective for the unvaxxed.



For what its worth they had to amend the agriculture bill last year because vaxxed humans are now GMO. The amended was specifically de-regulating GMOs.


Dolores said about this, though I don't know what bill she was referring to specifically.


Possibly this:




The Earl of Lindsay said: “I believe this Bill is an opportunity for the Government to adopt an amendment that would enable future access to precision-breeding tools such as new gene-editing technologies”.


Edited by FrankVitali
Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, pete675 said:


I'm usually quite cautious with debatable material. But this might be genuine. The claimed researcher posting the comment knows the right jargon and seems at least somewhat plausible. A  researcher would have very good reasons to keep quiet, of course.


There are some things said by this "clinical lab scientist" that I wouldn't necessarily disagree with. For example, I do believe Covid-19 to be flu rebranded, as is suggested, and that deaths have occurred mainly due to co-morbidities. Also, what is said about the genome of the virus being extrapolated from 37 RNA base pairs is also correct as far as my understanding goes, and I agree that SARS-CoV-2 has not been isolated in pure form. So I can see why some people may have been persuaded that this is genuine.


But it is the part about Koch's postulates that is a big red flag for me and which is what caused me to doubt the claims when I first saw the post in December. This "clinical lab scientist" and his "team" claim to have tested the supposed Covid-19 samples through Koch's postulates and then under an electron microscope. It is then claimed that two other viruses were identified - influenzas A & B - rather than SARS-CoV-2.


Firstly I would suggest that the way it is phrased sounds pretty unscientific to me. But, more importantly, it is my understanding that no virus - including influenzas A & B - has ever been isolated according to Koch's postulates which is why mainstream science now relies on sequence-based microbial identification. I posted about this in another thread here.



It was from watching a Dr Sam Bailey video that I became aware of the actual paper that called for a reconsideration of Koch's postulates and which is now relied on by scientists who dispute that Koch's postulates are the gold standard for proving the existence of microbial pathogens. It is because of this paper that sequence-based microbial identification is now preferred by the mainstream.




As I said in the other thread, the paper openly acknowledges that Koch's postulates cannot be used for viruses because it is not possible to isolate a virus from other genetic material. This would include influenzas A & B.


So, if these lab scientists really have managed to find a way to isolate a virus according to Koch's postulates, this would be a huge achievement that has never been accomplished before! In terms of the methodology provided in the statement (supposedly now from a Dr Derek Knauss), they "did not use the BS PCR test" to do this but where is their paper outlining how they did accomplish this feat that has eluded all other scientists?


It is also claimed that they are suing the CDC. Where is the evidence for this? Why has there been no update on the progress of the case which supposedly started in December or even before?


And why is this same statement being recycled and recirculated over and over again - with different alleged authors - when it is now 6 months old?

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, The Illuminator said:

They dont know what it is. Dark spots on lungs from MRI. Pretty scary. Obviously there will be no link to the Lucifer juice like you say.


Sounds horrible.  

I feel bad for the people duped by this vaccine.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, The Illuminator said:


Exact same thing is happening to a friend of a friend who has been fully vaxed. Fit and healthy late 30s bloke.



A guy off a forum I read has posted that his best mate and his wife have both got corona and are very ill with it at the moment, that's despite both of them having the jab 3 weeks ago. Not one other poster on a thread that is very active has questioned this or indeed mentioned how he has contracted the virus after having the jab or even how he has become so sick, I thought the whole idea of the jab was to stop this. 


It's truly mindboggling and I just can't get my head around what people are thinking (or not as the case may be). 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

UK Police break front door in due to breach of quarantine even though the person is asymptomatic and has not been sick.

Few lies under pin these lies, the asymptomatic spread lie and the lie that "the virus" has an infection delay, where you could be infected but not show symptoms. While historically if you get sick you get symptoms the two are linked exclusively.



Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, shadowmoon said:

Sounds horrible.  

I feel bad for the people duped by this vaccine.

Sounds too awful :(   Why or why didn't these people check when something wasn't right. They didn't want to listen.

And with half or more of the population sick the healthy will have to take care of them, but we won't have the vaccine passports, so will we be allowed to shop I wonder? Supermarket are going to lose a lot of business.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, oddsnsods said:



I saw people warning against this alleged Mike Yeadon quote on Telegram yesterday. Apparently he is trying to spread the word that he did not say this.


I have now taken a look at the link cited and what is said bears very little resemblance to what is being suggested in the image above. Perhaps others may like to cross-check too.



Edited by Mitochondrial Eve
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...