Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


Message added by Grumpy Owl,

This topic is for all general discussion regarding the current COVID-19 pandemic. There are of course numerous other related topics for discussing specific aspects of this pandemic in more detail. And there are other parts of this forum for more 'off-topic' discussions.

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Outsider said:

They moan and grumble about the restrictions, wearing masks but they still comply!

The masses are a docile inert lump with no apparent desire to be free of all this shite. 

You’re right about the masks. Time for them to come off. People copy other peoples behaviour and the more who wear the more will copy.  The more who don’t they will copy that. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 58.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • DarianF

    3126

  • Avoiceinthecrowd

    2460

  • oddsnsods

    2421

  • SimonTV

    2342

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

I have now been called to the final vaccination deadline as a health care professional. I informed my employer that these vaccines are not technically vaccines, but are "gene therapies" as they employ

You wont believe this.   I just went down Lidls to get some steak.   Security guard calls me out as I walk past & I ignore him. Gets my steak walks to the credit only till

EXPLAIN PLEASE........   People expect so many answers without giving anything back in return.   If the "tin foil hatters" are so nuts, how about the rule followers give some answe

Posted Images

45 minutes ago, Outsider said:

This is their new normal and unfortunately many of them are entirely happy with it. If the proles can spend their money on junk products and get pissed in a pub again then all is good with the world. Really quite a depressing day....and it once again shows how easily the masses are steered and controlled.

Today should have been a day when the collective said enough is enough....tore of the masks, knocked over the sanitiser stations and swamped those businesses with normal pre covid behaviour. It didn't happen so was just another example of blind obedience to the state.

Took a walk today through the fields on the way home went past my local pub .

Observations: marquees with tapes separating them from the pavement & blocking half the pavement, people kind of hemmed in.

A man rolling a cigarette with his mask on, some noise but not overly loud.

Probably 30 seats in total and nearly all filled at about 5pm.

 

To me it looks so strange, my gut feeling is it is a novelty yet again & numbers will decline rapidly enough to close the pub eventually.

Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, zarkov said:

Old photo - recognise his face  (lower pic) from a decade back - search on curezone and you'll find the old photos as far as I remember.

The bloke in the picture was a bit of a Colloidal Silver fanatic and a search should also bring up US national news stories featuring him too.

 

Reverse image search doesn't bring it up. Any source for that? 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Mitochondrial Eve said:

 

 

Sorry guys but I am going to have to call BS on this. This statement about 1,500 samples supposedly of Covid-19 instead testing positive for influenza A and influenza B has been doing the rounds since early December 2020 and, in my view, is fake.

 

The post first seems to have originated in the comments section of this thread on 6th December 2020 posted anonymously.

 

https://www.wadeburleson.org/2020/12/presidents-vaccines-mr-edwards-and.html

 

image.png.c70102f20e77bed524d2905aeb308999.png

 

The post then went viral on Facebook at which point it started being attributed to a Professor Robert Oswald of Cornell University. On learning this, the real Professor Oswald issued a statement on his Cornell University profile page.

 

https://www.vet.cornell.edu/research/faculty/robert-oswald-phd

 

image.png.d4a615c56cd688837e6e267c8d0b32d3.png

 

 

A couple of months back, a video then circulated on social media of somebody reading out the exact same statement which I repeatedly called out on Telegram at the time with nobody being able to give me the name of the actual clinical lab scientist who had allegedly authored the statement. It could have been literally anybody reading it out.

 

Now the statement is being attributed to a Dr Derek Knauss who is supposedly a clinical lab specialist, focusing on virology and immunology, based in Southern California. I would like to see some evidence that there is a genuine Dr Derek Knauss willing to take credit for this statement. All I have been able to find via search engines are dodgy looking websites crediting the statement to this so-called individual but nothing to substantiate this further.

 

Given that the post started as an anonymous comment and was then misattributed to Professor Robert Oswald, I find it hard to believe that this latest incarnation currently doing the rounds is any less fake than before. This is one case where I will have to agree with the fact checkers.

 

1 hour ago, Mitochondrial Eve said:

 

 

Sorry guys but I am going to have to call BS on this. This statement about 1,500 samples supposedly of Covid-19 instead testing positive for influenza A and influenza B has been doing the rounds since early December 2020 and, in my view, is fake.

 

The post first seems to have originated in the comments section of this thread on 6th December 2020 posted anonymously.

 

https://www.wadeburleson.org/2020/12/presidents-vaccines-mr-edwards-and.html

 

image.png.c70102f20e77bed524d2905aeb308999.png

 

The post then went viral on Facebook at which point it started being attributed to a Professor Robert Oswald of Cornell University. On learning this, the real Professor Oswald issued a statement on his Cornell University profile page.

 

https://www.vet.cornell.edu/research/faculty/robert-oswald-phd

 

image.png.d4a615c56cd688837e6e267c8d0b32d3.png

 

 

A couple of months back, a video then circulated on social media of somebody reading out the exact same statement which I repeatedly called out on Telegram at the time with nobody being able to give me the name of the actual clinical lab scientist who had allegedly authored the statement. It could have been literally anybody reading it out.

 

Now the statement is being attributed to a Dr Derek Knauss who is supposedly a clinical lab specialist, focusing on virology and immunology, based in Southern California. I would like to see some evidence that there is a genuine Dr Derek Knauss willing to take credit for this statement. All I have been able to find via search engines are dodgy looking websites crediting the statement to this so-called individual but nothing to substantiate this further.

 

Given that the post started as an anonymous comment and was then misattributed to Professor Robert Oswald, I find it hard to believe that this latest incarnation currently doing the rounds is any less fake than before. This is one case where I will have to agree with the fact checkers.

 

 I have traced the source of that claim myself and contacted the original source and they couldn't verify it however, the fact checkers ended up disputed it on the basis that it was submitted by the wrong person. The original source was never verified though and we don't know whether it was ever real. The tests could still do with independent testing. The rest of the article seems valid with sources though. 

 

https://www.xandernieuws.net/algemeen/laboratoria-in-vs-kunnen-in-niet-een-van-1500-positief-getesten-covid-19-vinden/

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, skitzorat said:

Could mRNA Vaccines Permanently Alter DNA? Recent Science Suggests They Might.

 

Research on SARS-CoV-2 RNA by scientists at Harvard and MIT has implications for how mRNA vaccines could permanently alter genomic DNA, according to Doug Corrigan, Ph.D., a biochemist-molecular biologist who says more research is needed.

 

Over the past year, it would be all but impossible for Americans not to notice the media’s decision to make vaccines the dominant COVID narrative, rushing to do so even before any coronavirus-attributed deaths occurred.

 

The media’s slanted coverage has provided a particularly fruitful public relations boost for messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines — decades in the making but never approved for human use — helping to usher the experimental technology closer to the regulatory finish line.

 

Under ordinary circumstances, the body makes (“transcribes”) mRNA from the DNA in a cell’s nucleus. The mRNA then travels out of the nucleus into the cytoplasm, where it provides instructions about which proteins to make.

 

By comparison, mRNA vaccines send their chemically synthesized mRNA payload (bundled with spike protein-manufacturing instructions) directly into the cytoplasm.

 

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and most mRNA vaccine scientists, the buck then stops there — mRNA vaccines “do not affect or interact with our DNA in any way,” the CDC says. The CDC asserts first, that the mRNA cannot enter the cell’s nucleus (where DNA resides), and second, that the cell — Mission-Impossible-style — “gets rid of the mRNA soon after it is finished using the instructions.”

 

A December preprint about SARS-CoV-2, by scientists at Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), produced findings about wild coronavirus that raise questions about how viral RNA operates.

The scientists conducted the analysis because they were “puzzled by the fact that there is a respectable number of people who are testing positive for COVID-19 by PCR long after the infection was gone.”

 

Their key findings were as follows: SARS-CoV-2 RNAs “can be reverse transcribed in human cells,” “these DNA sequences can be integrated into the cell genome and subsequently be transcribed” (a phenomenon called “retro-integration”) — and there are viable cellular pathways to explain how this happens.

 

According to Ph.D. biochemist and molecular biologist Dr. Doug Corrigan, these important findings (which run contrary to “current biological dogma”) belong to the category of “Things We Were Absolutely and Unequivocally Certain Couldn’t Happen Which Actually Happened.”

 

The findings of the Harvard and MIT researchers also put the CDC’s assumptions about mRNA vaccines on shakier ground, according to Corrigan. In fact, a month before the Harvard-MIT preprint appeared, Corrigan had already written a blog outlining possible mechanisms and pathways whereby mRNA vaccines could produce the identical phenomenon.

 

In a second blog post, written after the preprint came out, Corrigan emphasized that the Harvard-MIT findings about coronavirus RNA have major implications for mRNA vaccines — a fact he describes as “the big elephant in the room.” While not claiming that vaccine RNA will necessarily behave in the same way as coronavirus RNA — that is, permanently altering genomic DNA — Corrigan believes that the possibility exists and deserves close scrutiny.

 

In Corrigan’s view, the preprint’s contribution is that it “validates that this is at least plausible, and most likely probable.”

 

Reverse transcription

As the phrase “reverse transcription” implies, the DNA-to-mRNA pathway is not always a one-way street. Enzymes called reverse transcriptases can also convert RNA into DNA, allowing the latter to be integrated into the DNA in the cell nucleus.

 

Nor is reverse transcription uncommon. Geneticists report that “Over 40% of mammalian genomes comprise the products of reverse transcription.”

 

The preliminary evidence cited by the Harvard-MIT researchers indicates that endogenous reverse transcriptase enzymes may facilitate reverse transcription of coronavirus RNAs and trigger their integration into the human genome.

 

The authors suggest that while the clinical consequences require further study, detrimental effects are a distinct possibility and — depending on the integrated viral fragments’ “insertion sites in the human genome” and an individual’s underlying health status — could include “a more severe immune response … such as a ‘cytokine storm’ or auto-immune reactions.”

 

In 2012, a study suggested that viral genome integration could “lead to drastic consequences for the host cell, including gene disruption, insertional mutagenesis and cell death.”

 

Corrigan makes a point of saying that the pathways hypothesized to facilitate retro-integration of viral — or vaccine — RNA into DNA “are not unknown to people who understand molecular biology at a deeper level.”

 

Even so, the preprint’s discussion of reverse transcription and genome integration elicited a maelstrom of negative comments from readers unwilling to rethink biological dogma, some of whom even advocated for retraction (though preprints are, by definition, unpublished) on the grounds that “conspiracy theorists … will take this paper to ‘proof’ that mRNA vaccines can in fact alter your genetic code.”

 

More thoughtful readers agreed with Corrigan that the paper raises important questions. For example, one reader stated that confirmatory evidence is lacking “to show that the spike protein only is expressed for a short amount of time (say 1-3 days) after vaccination,” adding, “We think that this is the case, but there is no evidence for that.”

 

In fact, just how long the vaccines’ synthetic mRNA — and thus the instructions for cells to keep manufacturing spike protein — persist inside the cells is an open question.

 

Ordinarily, RNA is a “notoriously fragile” and unstable molecule. According to scientists, “this fragility is true of the mRNA of any living thing, whether it belongs to a plant, bacteria, virus or human.”

 

But the synthetic mRNA in the COVID vaccines is a different story. In fact, the step that ultimately allowed scientists and vaccine manufacturers to resolve their decades-long mRNA vaccine impasse was when they figured out how to chemically modify mRNA to increase its stability and longevity — in other words, produce RNA “that hangs around in the cell much longer than viral RNA, or even RNA that our cell normally produces for normal protein production.”

 

It is anyone’s guess what the synthetic mRNA is doing while it is “hanging around,” but Corrigan speculates that its enhanced longevity raises the probability of it “being converted over into DNA.”

 

Moreover, because the vaccine mRNA is also engineered to be more efficient at being translated into protein, “negative effects could be more frequent and more pronounced with the vaccine when compared to the natural virus.”

 

Dollar signs

Corrigan acknowledges that some people may dismiss his warnings, saying “If the virus is able to accomplish this, then why should I care if the vaccine does the same thing?”

 

He has a ready and compelling response:

“[T]here’s a big difference between the scenario where people randomly, and unwittingly, have their genetics monkeyed with because they were exposed to the coronavirus, and the scenario where we willfully vaccinate billions of people while telling them this isn’t happening.”

Unfortunately, the prevailing attitude seems to be that the “race to get the public vaccinated” justifies taking these extra risks.

 

In mid-November, after the Jerusalem Post told readers that “when the world begins inoculating itself with these completely new and revolutionary vaccines, it will know virtually nothing about their long-term effects,” an Israeli hospital director argued that it’s not worth waiting two more years to ferret out mRNA vaccines’ “unique and unknown risks” or potential long-term effects.

 

In the U.S., enthusiasm for mRNA technology is similarly unfettered. Just a few days after the CDC released updated data showing that more than 2,200 deaths of individuals who had received either the Pfizer or Moderna mRNA vaccines had been reported as of Mar. 26 , The Atlantic praised the technology, suggesting that the “ingenious” synthetic mRNA technology behind Pfizer’s and Moderna’s COVID vaccines represented a “breakthrough” that could “change the world.”

Rather than dismiss the prospect of retro-integration of foreign DNA as a “conspiracy theory,” scientists should be conducting studies with the mRNA-vaccinated to assess actual risks.

 

For example, Corrigan believes that while in vitro data in human cell lines (one of the data sources examined by the Harvard-MIT researchers) offer “air tight” results, there is still a need to conclusively demonstrate real-life genomic alteration through “PCR, DNA sequencing or Southern Blot … on purified genomic DNA of COVID-19 patients” — and vaccinated individuals.

 

Yet instead of addressing these research gaps, companies are salivating over the potential to use human-edited mRNA to “commandeer our cellular machinery” and “make just about any protein under the sun.”

 

A March 10 press release pronouncing mRNA vaccines the clear winners of the COVID-19 vaccine race noted that all major pharmaceutical companies are now “testing out the [mRNA] technology by entering into license agreements and/or collaboration with well-established RNA companies.”

 

In old Disney cartoons, viewers often witnessed Donald Duck’s rich uncle, Scrooge McDuck’s, “bulging eyes [turn] into oversized Vegas slot machine dollar signs” when contemplating opportunities to increase his already immense wealth.

 

Judging by pharmaceutical company executives’ willingness to overlook mRNA vaccines’ long-term — and possibly multigenerational — risks, they must be similarly entranced by dollar-sign visions of a never-ending pipeline of “plug and play” mRNA products.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/science-mrna-vaccines-alter-dna/

 

Bombshell: Moderna Chief Medical Officer Admits MRNA Alters DNA

 

Several prominent physicians, doctors, Sons of Liberty Media Health and Wellness expert Kate Shemirani, her colleague Dr. Kevin Corbett, and I have postulated that the current experimental mRNA injection for coronavirus, aka COVID-19, could alter one’s genetic code or DNA. Bill Gates stated it, which was included in my video “Human Genome 8 and mRNA Vaccine” on Brighteon.com. It is one reason the term “experimental human genome altering mRNA injection” has been used to describe the jab being foisted onto the mostly unsuspecting public. While many in the media, Dr. Anthony Fauci and his merry band of chronic liars, and “fact checkers” have declared this claim as false, a video of a TEDx Beacon Street talk by Tal Zaks, chief medical officer of Moderna, Inc., one pharmaceutical company manufacturer of the experimental mRNA technology injection, confirms mRNA injection for COVID-19 can change your genetic code or DNA. This TEDx Beacon Street talk occurred in 2017.

 

Zaks calls it “hacking the software of life”. In the first minute of the video Zaks states, “we’ve been living this phenomenal digital scientific revolution, and I’m here today to tell you, that we are actually hacking the software of life, and that it’s changing the way we think about prevention and treatment of disease.” [Emphasis mine.] He even repeats that they (Moderna) think of it like an operating system, which the Moderna website indicates as “Our Operating System”.

 

https://www.sgtreport.com/2021/03/bombshell-moderna-chief-medical-officer-admits-mrna-alters-dna/

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Mitochondrial Eve said:

 

 

Sorry guys but I am going to have to call BS on this. This statement about 1,500 samples supposedly of Covid-19 instead testing positive for influenza A and influenza B has been doing the rounds since early December 2020 and, in my view, is fake.

 

The post first seems to have originated in the comments section of this thread on 6th December 2020 posted anonymously.

 

https://www.wadeburleson.org/2020/12/presidents-vaccines-mr-edwards-and.html

 

image.png.c70102f20e77bed524d2905aeb308999.png

 

The post then went viral on Facebook at which point it started being attributed to a Professor Robert Oswald of Cornell University. On learning this, the real Professor Oswald issued a statement on his Cornell University profile page.

 

https://www.vet.cornell.edu/research/faculty/robert-oswald-phd

 

image.png.d4a615c56cd688837e6e267c8d0b32d3.png

 

 

A couple of months back, a video then circulated on social media of somebody reading out the exact same statement which I repeatedly called out on Telegram at the time with nobody being able to give me the name of the actual clinical lab scientist who had allegedly authored the statement. It could have been literally anybody reading it out.

 

Now the statement is being attributed to a Dr Derek Knauss who is supposedly a clinical lab specialist, focusing on virology and immunology, based in Southern California. I would like to see some evidence that there is a genuine Dr Derek Knauss willing to take credit for this statement. All I have been able to find via search engines are dodgy looking websites crediting the statement to this so-called individual but nothing to substantiate this further.

 

Given that the post started as an anonymous comment and was then misattributed to Professor Robert Oswald, I find it hard to believe that this latest incarnation currently doing the rounds is any less fake than before. This is one case where I will have to agree with the fact checkers.

It's true that it could be fake.

However, labs are not currently testing for flu at all, only covid19,  which is why only covid19 is being reported. Flu obviously hasn't disappeared, it's just not being tested as all resources are being thrown to the so called pandemic. 

It's not beyond the bounds of possibility that someone who wishes to remain anonymous has tested samples for flu, just to see.

On the other hand, without any proof or evidence,  it could be entirely fictional!!

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/7/2021 at 6:31 PM, Avoiceinthecrowd said:

recall David Icke spoke of a researcher that discovered variations in ice crystal forms from water labelled with opposing intend like love and hate. The crystals from the jar labelled hate were distorted as opposed to the beautiful crystals from the jar labelled love. The implications are mindboggling.

What would happen if TPTB/medical institutions told everyone to love/heal/imagine their bodies [made of water] becoming healthier and healthier instead of peddling mRNA jabs that, I believe, will disconnect the mind/body from  Spirit. Imagine if we were all taught that we are, in essence, atoms vibrating at a higher/lower frequency and that our bodies are constantly, without our conscience effort, rebuilding itself towards optimum health and vitality. Imagine if we were told that our POWER can even manipulate atoms on the other side of the world!!  We're a hologram.

 

Power of Intention: Water Crystal Experiments by Dr. Masaru Emoto

image-asset.png?format=1000w
 
"The study used data gathered from a three day period, using 1,900 people in Austria and Germany who focused their intentions towards water samples located inside an electromagnetically shielded room in California."
 
water.jpg
 
Book page image
Edited by skitzorat
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/7/2021 at 6:40 PM, BossCrow said:

it probably helps if you can get to them early - that's why kids start school/brainwashing so early.

"get them while they're young, Evita, get them while they're young."

 

Such was the Marxist revolutionary Che Guevara’s advice to Evita Peron, at least in her story as told by Sir Tim Rice and Lord Lloyd-Webber in their famous musical. lol

CheHigh.jpgEvita”. I was browsing the channels on TV some… | by Jeanalyn Sandler |  KeepIt112 | Medium

 

May be an image of 6 people, child and food

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Mitochondrial Eve said:

 

 

Sorry guys but I am going to have to call BS on this. This statement about 1,500 samples supposedly of Covid-19 instead testing positive for influenza A and influenza B has been doing the rounds since early December 2020 and, in my view, is fake.

 

The post first seems to have originated in the comments section of this thread on 6th December 2020 posted anonymously.

 

https://www.wadeburleson.org/2020/12/presidents-vaccines-mr-edwards-and.html

 

image.png.c70102f20e77bed524d2905aeb308999.png

 

The post then went viral on Facebook at which point it started being attributed to a Professor Robert Oswald of Cornell University. On learning this, the real Professor Oswald issued a statement on his Cornell University profile page.

 

https://www.vet.cornell.edu/research/faculty/robert-oswald-phd

 

image.png.d4a615c56cd688837e6e267c8d0b32d3.png

 

 

A couple of months back, a video then circulated on social media of somebody reading out the exact same statement which I repeatedly called out on Telegram at the time with nobody being able to give me the name of the actual clinical lab scientist who had allegedly authored the statement. It could have been literally anybody reading it out.

 

Now the statement is being attributed to a Dr Derek Knauss who is supposedly a clinical lab specialist, focusing on virology and immunology, based in Southern California. I would like to see some evidence that there is a genuine Dr Derek Knauss willing to take credit for this statement. All I have been able to find via search engines are dodgy looking websites crediting the statement to this so-called individual but nothing to substantiate this further.

 

Given that the post started as an anonymous comment and was then misattributed to Professor Robert Oswald, I find it hard to believe that this latest incarnation currently doing the rounds is any less fake than before. This is one case where I will have to agree with the fact checkers.

 

I'm usually quite cautious with debatable material. But this might be genuine. The claimed researcher posting the comment knows the right jargon and seems at least somewhat plausible. A  researcher would have very good reasons to keep quiet, of course.

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, gibby said:

Some of the reactions I get from some people  close and  not so close..........

 

The state will look after us

 

They wouldn't harm us  ... would they?

 

They wouldn't lie to us...why would they?

 

I believe it all because they said it on the telly...they wouldn't lie

 

How could they possibly organise all this to harm people

 

Ive taken the jab cos its easier to go and see people and go on holiday

 

When everybody gets the vac we will be free ( blame the non vaxers for any delay )

 

Ive took the vac cos I want my life back !! (phew)

 

Ive had it and feel fine  cant wait till my 2nd one

 

the BBC wouldnt lie

 

The Govt wouldn't lie

 

and so it goes on and on and on ..................................  I despair !!

 

The BBC and government do nothing but lie... Kuwaiti babies flung from incubators, Saddam's People Shredder, WMDs, Allied troops go into Afghanistan to stop the heroin trade, barrel bombs, White Helmets saving victims of gas attacks  etc etc. It is second nature to them...

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, skitzorat said:

Its truly unbelievable, isn't it... just found it so thought I'd share what the aussie govt news agency is telling people... Vit C is a myth a healthy diet doesn't do jack..

 

my favourite is

 

we have no .......adaptive immune system

They can be right... How the fcuk did we get from an ape to a parasite writing such nonsenses... 🤔

Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, Bee said:

How on earth can he play his part in this? Why isn't he speaking out about it?

 

 

He is doing his part. He is telling people and opening eyes. He has a young family and his job is to save lives...without him doing his job many more lives would be lost. I am also hearing of police officers here who are unhappy with how it is.  Not all obviously but its the inability to provide for their families that keeps them at work...and for the paramedic he wants to save lives.

 

I speak to a lot of people... and today I was told this: There is a Mennonite minister in this region who says they have around 18,000 who go to their local church. In 2019 they had 49 deaths and he finds it peculiar that in 2020 they also had 49 deaths. Even though the figure is the same and that is coincidence enough - the real point of interest is obviously that no more died during a so-called pandemic.

 

Another happening in the S W region is that about a couple of months ago...a muslim 23 year old tested positive to covid ( PCR) He was a drug user. He overdosed and was put down as a covid death...not any report of the overdose. Lots of media coverage claiming it was covid. I now know someone who actually knows the family and they carried on with burial without an autopsy....because they knew the reason and due to their faith kept it quiet.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, BridgeBuilder said:

 

Interesting. So does the dog get infected then? 🤔

 

 

I wonder what the dogs actually sniff for.... Likely asshole...based on the fact that the anal swabs claim there is a higher incidence LOL. A dog would be very familiar with that sniffing routine.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Pina Colada said:

Yikes

12 hours ago, SimonTV said:

Those who have been vaccinated against new coronaviruses are not allowed to donate blood for the time being.

 

So here we go....less lives saved as no blood for transfusions....sounds about right...

Edited by Beaujangles
  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/9/2021 at 6:28 PM, vinny79 said:

Paywall locked

 

what if you don’t have a phone

 

 if covid is real lol, they want to touch my phone?

 

no

 

anyone have full article

 

 

A lot of the time paywalled articles can be read when you put them into the archive.

 

Here you go

 

https://archive.ph/CLx0B

image.png.5ba37e25f9223364de3615bb143896ce.png

Edited by skitzorat
Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Pina Colada said:

 

Quote from above article:

Professor McLaws, who is also a member of the World Health Organization’s advisory panel on COVID-19, said Australia should reconsider the vaccine rollout schedule.

She said we should be vaccinating frontline workers and younger people with the Pfizer vaccine in order to "ringfence" the elderly.

"For those 50 and over, AstraZeneca does give a good level of protection," she said.

"Once our young have their Pfizer, the elderly are even more protected.

"Really, we need the Pfizer to start with the young ones because they are the ones that place the older people at risk."

 

Who is Professor McLaws?

 

A lying shill, obviously.

https://www.9news.com.au/national/blood-clots-likely-not-linked-to-astrazeneca-vaccine-says-leading-epidemiologist/e19b9d94-cc58-4fc8-874d-0b49a9ce6b81

 

 

 

 

She's the arhectypal global health mega shill. Sniffing around Bill Gates' inner arse ring for so long, she wouldn't remember anything else. The bio says it all. https://research.unsw.edu.au/people/professor-marylouise-mclaws

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/9/2021 at 7:38 PM, dewin said:

Worth posting again as a reminder.

 

Freedom of Information requests sent to HUNDREDS of international govts, universities and official medical/health departments/institutions "seeking records that describe the isolation of a SARS-COV-2 virus from any unadulterated sample taken from a diseased patient."

 

ALL replied in the negative. Copies of letters/statements in the link.

 

https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-around-the-world-have-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification/

 

May be an image of 1 person and food

NBC Nightly News 23 Jan 2021

Edited by skitzorat
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...