Coronavirus Mega-Thread.

[FrankVitali]

[DarianF]

7 minutes ago, FrankVitali said:

 

 

Stand by for the obligatory Snopes 'fact check'  – An elderly gentleman tripped and fell outside a vaccine centre, hitting his head and causing his heart to stop; conspiracy theorists claiming his death was related to the vaccine are promoting dangerous information. Vaccines are proven safe and effective.

 

Update: The Government and NHS are leading an urgent effort to improve the safety of entry and exit points to Covid vaccination centres. Engineers have been hired to provide expert advice on improving stairs and railing. We must all work together to keep the community safe.

Edited April 11, 2021 by DarianF

[FrankVitali]

https://brandnewtube.com/watch/we-are-the-resistance-and-we-will-win-this-war_yz96TU5OWcAKIEC.html

 

Vernons new vid

[DarianF]

3 minutes ago, DarianF said:

 

Stand by for the obligatory Snopes 'fact check'  – An elderly gentleman tripped and fell outside a vaccine centre, hitting his head and causing his heart to stop; conspiracy theorists claiming his death was related to the vaccine are promoting dangerous information. Vaccines are proven safe and effective.

 

Update: The Government and NHS are leading an urgent effort to improve the safety of entry and exit points to Covid vaccination centres. Engineers have been hired to provide expert advice on improving stairs and railing. We must all work together to keep the community safe.

 

"He jumped out of the tree, and came at me with a chainsaw."

 

 

 

[FrankVitali]

Aye well it wouldn't be the first time, remember a while ago, a bloke fell off a ladder and they blamed that on Covid.  Something along the lines of, covid caused him to have breathing difficulties and fall from the ladder.

 

 

 

 

Edited April 11, 2021 by FrankVitali

[DarianF]

Red herring. Obesity cover story for fake PCR bullshit results. "Great health reset." Interesting.

 

 

 

[DarianF]

"In a rare admission of the weakness of Chinese coronavirus vaccines, the country's top disease control official says their effectiveness is low and the government is considering mixing them to give them a boost."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-04-11/chinese-official-says-local-vaccines-lacks-effectiveness/100061932

 

Mixing. Yeah, sounds safe.

[Mitochondrial Eve]

A Family Court in Weimar has ruled that coronavirus measures imposed upon students in schools cannot be justified and are not scientifically reasonable or necessary. This is following an action brought by a mother concerned about the physical, psychological and pedagogical effect on her children of masks, tests and social distancing.

 

What is particularly good about this judgment is the sheer depth in which the science behind the measures was examined causing the mainstream thinking to be picked to shreds. I have summarised the findings below under the headline.

 

The original source is linked below along with the translation of it.

 

https://2020news.de/sensationsurteil-aus-weimar-keine-masken-kein-abstand-keine-tests-mehr-fuer-schueler/

 

https://docs.google.com/document/d/13tlF0vUYQBYba7_d-tam3cSt0dUDqlI1MeQvO0TbM_E/edit

 

Sensational verdict from Weimar: no masks, no distance, no more tests for students

 

1) Masks

• All the available scientific evidence shows that masks have no effect on the incidence of infection. Politicians may only be interested in the symbolic value of the mask.
• Masks are not only useless but are dangerous especially given that they are often touched with the hands and become a contamination risk. The population has not been taught how to use masks properly and it would be unrealistic to expect the population to achieve appropriate handling of the masks.
• Transmission by aerosols is medically implausible and scientifically unproven, whilst the theory is harmful for human coexistence as people can no longer feel safe in indoor spaces.
• Any potential small benefit from masks, should a new variant emerge, is countered by numerous potential side effects on the physical, psychological and emotional wellbeing of the children.

2) Social Distancing

• Keeping a distance of 1.5 metres is only potentially of value where symptoms are present. Yet still this hasn't been scientifically proven.
• Keeping a 1.5 metre distance amongst asymptomatic individuals is not supported by any science. However, this greatly impairs human coexistence - particularly more carefree contact among children - without any apparent benefit in reducing transmission.
• Close contacts of less than 1.5 metres, even where an individual has cold symptoms, does not pose a risk as contact times are typically too short for transmission to occur.
• Asymptomatic transmission is extremely rare and statistically meaningless.
• There is no evidence that compliance with social distancing reduces the risk of infection.

3) PCR and Rapid Antigen Tests

• Only genetic material can be identified by the PCR test and cannot confirm whether a person is infected with an active pathogen. The test cannot distinguish between "dead" matter (harmless genome fragments as a remnant of the body's immune system) and living matter in the form of a fresh virus capable of reproducing.
• PCR parameters can be manipulated, including via the number of target genes to be tested along with the cycle threshold value used (with positive tests arising from 35+ cycles having no scientific basis). It is noted that the WHO's RT-PCR protocol initially recommended using up to 45 cycles without defining a cycle threshold value for positive.
• Rapid antigen tests only detect protein components without any connection to an intact, reproducible virus.
• There are high rates of false positive test results, particularly among asymptomatic individuals.
• Neither PCR tests nor rapid antigen tests are suitable for making a diagnosis.

The judge therefore concluded in light of the lack of scientific evidence to support the measures, that the encroachment upon fundamental rights is unconstitutional and entirely disproportionate. The measures passed were deemed to have arisen from a "factual disconnect that has reached historic proportions". The court therefore ruled that, with immediate effect, schools are prohibited from imposing these measures any longer.

[DarianF]

1 minute ago, Mitochondrial Eve said:

A Family Court in Weimar has ruled that coronavirus measures imposed upon students in schools cannot be justified and are not scientifically reasonable or necessary. This is following an action brought by a mother concerned about the physical, psychological and pedagogical effect on her children of masks, tests and social distancing.

 

What is particularly good about this judgment is the sheer depth in which the science behind the measures was examined causing the mainstream thinking to be picked to shreds. I have summarised the findings below under the headline.

 

The original source is linked below along with the translation of it.

 

https://2020news.de/sensationsurteil-aus-weimar-keine-masken-kein-abstand-keine-tests-mehr-fuer-schueler/

 

https://docs.google.com/document/d/13tlF0vUYQBYba7_d-tam3cSt0dUDqlI1MeQvO0TbM_E/edit

 

Sensational verdict from Weimar: no masks, no distance, no more tests for students

 

1) Masks

• All the available scientific evidence shows that masks have no effect on the incidence of infection. Politicians may only be interested in the symbolic value of the mask.
• Masks are not only useless but are dangerous especially given that they are often touched with the hands and become a contamination risk. The population has not been taught how to use masks properly and it would be unrealistic to expect the population to achieve appropriate handling of the masks.
• Transmission by aerosols is medically implausible and scientifically unproven, whilst the theory is harmful for human coexistence as people can no longer feel safe in indoor spaces.
• Any potential small benefit from masks, should a new variant emerge, is countered by numerous potential side effects on the physical, psychological and emotional wellbeing of the children.

2) Social Distancing

• Keeping a distance of 1.5 metres is only potentially of value where symptoms are present. Yet still this hasn't been scientifically proven.
• Keeping a 1.5 metre distance amongst asymptomatic individuals is not supported by any science. However, this greatly impairs human coexistence - particularly more carefree contact among children - without any apparent benefit in reducing transmission.
• Close contacts of less than 1.5 metres, even where an individual has cold symptoms, does not pose a risk as contact times are typically too short for transmission to occur.
• Asymptomatic transmission is extremely rare and statistically meaningless.
• There is no evidence that compliance with social distancing reduces the risk of infection.

3) PCR and Rapid Antigen Tests

• Only genetic material can be identified by the PCR test and cannot confirm whether a person is infected with an active pathogen. The test cannot distinguish between "dead" matter (harmless genome fragments as a remnant of the body's immune system) and living matter in the form of a fresh virus capable of reproducing.
• PCR parameters can be manipulated, including via the number of target genes to be tested along with the cycle threshold value used (with positive tests arising from 35+ cycles having no scientific basis). It is noted that the WHO's RT-PCR protocol initially recommended using up to 45 cycles without defining a cycle threshold value for positive.
• Rapid antigen tests only detect protein components without any connection to an intact, reproducible virus.
• There are high rates of false positive test results, particularly among asymptomatic individuals.
• Neither PCR tests nor rapid antigen tests are suitable for making a diagnosis.

The judge therefore concluded in light of the lack of scientific evidence to support the measures, that the encroachment upon fundamental rights is unconstitutional and entirely disproportionate. The measures passed were deemed to have arisen from a "factual disconnect that has reached historic proportions". The court therefore ruled that, with immediate effect, schools are prohibited from imposing these measures any longer.

 

This is some epic level shit. Great find!

[Mikhail Liebestein]

1 hour ago, Mr H said:

I think a lot of people enjoy wearing masks now. One to show what a good person they are and second some wear for fashion reasons.

 

Interesting that amongst all the talk of getting our freedoms back there is no mention of getting rid of the masks. 

 

I assume some people are also just pig ugly.

 

I once picked this up in a nightclub whilst at Uni, shouldn't have had my beer goggles on:

 

 

[DarianF]

Lady Goes Off On Orange County CA Board Of Education For Wanting To Secretly Vaccinate Children

VIDEO: https://banthis.tv/watch?id=607336a3c5f4c31752d33944

 

If you can follow her superfast talking, it's worth sticking with. She rips them a new arsehole.

[FrankVitali]

 

 

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/astrazeneca-covid-vaccine-side-effects-a-e-swamped-b928986.html

[Shy Talk]

30 minutes ago, Mitochondrial Eve said:

A Family Court in Weimar has ruled that coronavirus measures imposed upon students in schools cannot be justified and are not scientifically reasonable or necessary. This is following an action brought by a mother concerned about the physical, psychological and pedagogical effect on her children of masks, tests and social distancing.

 

What is particularly good about this judgment is the sheer depth in which the science behind the measures was examined causing the mainstream thinking to be picked to shreds. I have summarised the findings below under the headline.

 

The original source is linked below along with the translation of it.

 

https://2020news.de/sensationsurteil-aus-weimar-keine-masken-kein-abstand-keine-tests-mehr-fuer-schueler/

 

https://docs.google.com/document/d/13tlF0vUYQBYba7_d-tam3cSt0dUDqlI1MeQvO0TbM_E/edit

 

Sensational verdict from Weimar: no masks, no distance, no more tests for students

 

We occasionally have these isolated court rulings - I think there was a Portuguese one early on regarding the PCR nonsense - but they turn into false dawns. There's clearly some dodgy process at work preventing a ripple effect across regions and then countries.

[Bombadil]

35 minutes ago, Mikhail Liebestein said:

 

I assume some people are also just pig ugly.

 

I once picked this up in a nightclub whilst at Uni, shouldn't have had my beer goggles on:

 

 

If you visit my down the darling above will look like Miss World

[DarianF]

1 minute ago, Shy Talk said:

 

We occasionally have these isolated court rulings - I think there was a Portuguese one early on regarding the PCR nonsense - but they turn into false dawns. There's clearly some dodgy process at work preventing a ripple effect across regions and then countries.

 

It's a shame they're all in countries that require translations. Snopes will just claim the transaltion as fake news. lol

[Mikheil]

16 minutes ago, DarianF said:

 

It's a shame they're all in countries that require translations. Snopes will just claim the transaltion as fake news. lol

It wouldn't matter if God himself came down and told everyone that the whole scamdemic is complete and utter bullshit. The fucking stupid Karen cunts, and these chinless, knuckle dragging assholes that dare to call themselves men, would scream at him and demand that he wear a fucking mask and that he is just another conspiracy nut.

 

They LOVE this shit. They are getting what they demand. The Government is making laws to tell them how to live. They want MORE laws, more tougher controls, more fines and jail time for non-believers. Just fucking MORONS, disguised as humans.

[Shake]

1 hour ago, Mikhail Liebestein said:

 

I assume some people are also just pig ugly.

 

I once picked this up in a nightclub whilst at Uni, shouldn't have had my beer goggles on:

 

 

Looks like Madeline Albright

[Shake]

The next time challenges me, it will be along the lines of the following....

 

"Where's your mask?"

"I don't wear them, I suffer with CFS"

 

Puzzled look on the yellow vested idiot

 

If you want to know what that is it's

COMMON FUCKING SENSE

Edited April 11, 2021 by Shake

[Pina Colada]

"They" have consistently lied to us about everything else, and now of course this too!!!

 

Surprise!!! The mRNA vaccines will, after all, change your DNA.

 

 

https://www.nexusnewsfeed.com/article/health-healing/could-mrna-vaccines-permanently-alter-dna/

 

[zarkov]

3 hours ago, FrankVitali said:

 

 

Out of likes - thanks.

 

If the obscure yellow card scheme worked this would not be happening.

 

[Beaujangles]

Fifteen year old in Bristol UK commits suicide due to lockdown.

Edited April 11, 2021 by Beaujangles

[Beaujangles]

Also, spoke to my son in Mexico, he informed me that Mexico is not locking down it is wide open and that their hospitals are at 16% - nowhere near full. Says no sign of any pandemic...

[Beaujangles]

So today in this lovely Ontario lockdown...haha.. I went to a party :-).  Talked to a paramedic who told me that he is noticing that they are being called out to care homes for elderly people who have DNR orders. This means that as a paramedic he is not supposed to try to resuscitate. They then have to take this patient to hospital where they die. Once they are dead they are registered as a ` covid `death. Basically, he says that paramedics are not supposed to be called for DNR patients - but that they are being called and bringing them to the hospital where the hospital makes money from the death. Especially a `covid`death as we know.

 

He also says he has seen NO symptomatic covid patients himself and that there is no more work for them as paramedics in past year , in fact he says it is less than usual. Says hospitals locally are far from full.

Edited April 11, 2021 by Beaujangles

[bamboozooka]

spent the day with my parents. mums bday.

they are getting the "time for your 2nd shot" txt.

i woke up early morning with a panic attack.

Edited April 11, 2021 by bamboozooka

[Athenry04]

2 minutes ago, bamboozooka said:

spent the day with my parents. mums bday.

they are getting the "time for your 2nd shot" txt.

i woke up early morning with a panic attack.

 

Know the feeling, my mam had her second shot last week, just waiting now to see what happens. She is neg blood though, and I have a hunch that they will do better with side effects. My reasoning is that as the majority of elites are neg, they may have made the jab more damaging to the common blood types such as us.