Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


Message added by Grumpy Owl,

This topic is for all general discussion regarding the current COVID-19 pandemic. There are of course numerous other related topics for discussing specific aspects of this pandemic in more detail. And there are other parts of this forum for more 'off-topic' discussions.

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, perpetual said:

Being an argumentative one, I would have said "you shut your f-up young lady."

And as they turned their back to walk away, I would have said bitch and ripped open their _ _ _ _. lol

Giving them every excuse to think "god, not only are these conspiracy theorists nut jobs, they can't even string a congruent sentence together." 😄😉😎

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 50.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • DarianF

    2850

  • oddsnsods

    2287

  • Avoiceinthecrowd

    2135

  • SimonTV

    1965

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

You wont believe this.   I just went down Lidls to get some steak.   Security guard calls me out as I walk past & I ignore him. Gets my steak walks to the credit only till

Some images of today's demonstration in London (not taken by me personally).                

Fuck the fuck off.

Posted Images

13 minutes ago, Made in Wales said:

Also trying to divide us on this forum as those that wear masks are less worthy of using this forum than those that don't is falling into the trap of infighting which is what the elites want.

My thoughts exactly! Especially considering the mask is a branch of this massive longcon...not the root. I prefer striking the root of goyim-19, the PCR test. When it goes down everything goes down with it. If all the masks disappeared tomorrow we would still be in it deep.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

In my home country, Norway, they are planning covid passport now. There are almost no covid deaths since march 2020.  I have no faith in my government.

 

I'm new to the DI Forum. Hello everyone 🙂

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, Liberty said:

You talk a good game. Won’t you teach me to do the same?

 

when I was off work with anxiety due to lockdown after taking care of people of all ages that had attempted suicide daily, I did not wear a mask in main supermarkets as I had the exemption. I would had kicked off had someone approached as I was 100% in the right  The law would looked at it and my situation more than favourably and I would have won.  However, since returning, I have had to declare myself medically fit which means realistically I have to wear it or risk losing my job. Except for local shop which does not bother me partly because I know them and have been communicating throughout about the lie.  For example: hospital empty. People not on incubators but being diagnosed as covid 19 with a multitude of conditions.  I think of it like this:  The Chinese Communist Party never got this far by revealing themselves. 

In short, I handle my own situations according to my own circumstances. 

I’ll do good work in my own way. Not how someone tells me to or thinks I should. 

That's fair enough. Just wanted to mention you don't need a medical exemption in th UK. According to the rules you can exempt yourself if you think the mask will harm you-

1319109357_ukmaskguidance.jpg.6584182eff47cac765c5b44ad205a312.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, BossCrow said:

That's fair enough. Just wanted to mention you don't need a medical exemption in th UK. According to the rules you can exempt yourself if you think the mask will harm you-

1319109357_ukmaskguidance.jpg.6584182eff47cac765c5b44ad205a312.jpg

Thanks. I have to wear one for work so cannot claim I can’t wear one in a supermarket.  

Edited by Liberty
Link to post
Share on other sites

That and the mask is my exception to the vaccine atm. It will probably get recalled like all the Chinese shit too but better than succumbing to the synthetic jabs. I’ll tolerate it and rely on my immune system. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Bombadil said:

Hi Tunique.

I always got the impression Norway was a more rational thinking country.

vax passports prove me wrong😟

Hi Bombadil🙂

 

When EU says jump, Norway jumps. Many of the leaders loves to show their agenda 2030 pin.

 

I would gladly move to Texas now, if I could😄

 

 

11232847.jpg

EU76Mf9WkAA0vSZ.jpg

agenda-2030-prins-resett-konprins-haakon.png

Edited by Tunique
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, perpetual said:

 

Hence my previous campaign post.

The key is.....you cannot tell them so how do you convey your message?

By going through the backdoor, letting them figure out your message by leading questions.

If you ask a big question, if you present a big idea like "they are out to depopulate us", they will not get this. It's too much of a bigger steps. And nobody likes to be told but IF they come to a conclusion on their own thinking, though you lead them there with your crafty questions, it's acceptable. lol

Thats why I liked your "funeral home pamphlet" prop. A very clever play sure to get their attention. Thats what my strategy was missing.

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, perpetual said:

 

We need to go arrest BG.

 

Whatever happened to the Common Law Court? Anything come out of it btw?

We need to find him first. Also he may have several stand-in doubles. I know I would if I was doing what he is doing, issuing death threats to an entire world.

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, perpetual said:

 

Hence my previous campaign post.

The key is.....you cannot tell them so how do you convey your message?

By going through the backdoor, letting them figure out your message by leading questions.

If you ask a big question, if you present a big idea like "they are out to depopulate us", they will not get this. It's too much of a bigger steps. And nobody likes to be told but IF they come to a conclusion on their own thinking, though you lead them there with your crafty questions, it's acceptable. lol

Let them think dissent was their idea, no conspiracy theory footprints. Again, appearing sincere is critical 😄

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is so blatant. They're now bannering headlines like this in order to prime us further to receive the vaxx. Utter manipulation! 

 

"Covid: Deaths in England and Wales fall 92% since January peak" 

 

^^ Sooo, there is NO pandemic anymore even IF there was one originally?

 

 

"Meanwhile, the total number of deaths registered in the UK over one week is 5% below the five-year average." 

 

^^ Wait, what!?🤔 

 

"It comes amid continued efforts to reassure the public over the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine's possible link to rare blood clots." 

 

^^ Mm hmm. And THERE'S the propaganda they want to insert into us. 

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-56682716

Link to post
Share on other sites

European Court of Human Rights Rules That Mandatory Vaccinations Are Legal

by Paul Joseph Watson

 

The European Court of Human Rights has ruled that mandatory vaccinations are legal in a significant judgment that could have a big impact on the rollout of the COVID-19 jab.

The ruling was in response to a complaint from a group of Czech families who had been fined and had their children denied nursery care over their refusal to let their kids take mandatory vaccinations against against nine diseases including diphtheria, tetanus, whooping cough, hepatitis B and measles.

 

The parents argued that the law was in violation of of Article 8 on the right to respect for private life, but the court disagreed and said that the compulsory jabs were in the “best interests” of children to ensure “every child is protected against serious diseases, through vaccination or by virtue of herd immunity.”

Mandatory vaccinations “could be regarded as being ‘necessary in a democratic society’,” the court judgment read.

Although not directly related to COVID, the ruling could have significant implications given current debates over vaccine passports and whether workers in some jobs should be forced to take the vaccine as a condition of employment.

This judgment “reinforces the possibility of a compulsory vaccination under conditions of the current COVID-19 epidemic,” Nicolas Hervieu, a legal expert specializing in the ECHR, told AFP.

It’s also worth noting that despite having left the European Union as a result of Brexit, the UK, which is currently in the process of planning for domestic vaccine passports, is still a member of the European Court of Human Rights.

Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, epsom said:

European Court of Human Rights Rules That Mandatory Vaccinations Are Legal

by Paul Joseph Watson

 

The European Court of Human Rights has ruled that mandatory vaccinations are legal in a significant judgment that could have a big impact on the rollout of the COVID-19 jab.

The ruling was in response to a complaint from a group of Czech families who had been fined and had their children denied nursery care over their refusal to let their kids take mandatory vaccinations against against nine diseases including diphtheria, tetanus, whooping cough, hepatitis B and measles.

 

The parents argued that the law was in violation of of Article 8 on the right to respect for private life, but the court disagreed and said that the compulsory jabs were in the “best interests” of children to ensure “every child is protected against serious diseases, through vaccination or by virtue of herd immunity.”

Mandatory vaccinations “could be regarded as being ‘necessary in a democratic society’,” the court judgment read.

Although not directly related to COVID, the ruling could have significant implications given current debates over vaccine passports and whether workers in some jobs should be forced to take the vaccine as a condition of employment.

This judgment “reinforces the possibility of a compulsory vaccination under conditions of the current COVID-19 epidemic,” Nicolas Hervieu, a legal expert specializing in the ECHR, told AFP.

It’s also worth noting that despite having left the European Union as a result of Brexit, the UK, which is currently in the process of planning for domestic vaccine passports, is still a member of the European Court of Human Rights.

If the judge(s) refused to admit evidence dismissing it as conspiracy theory the petitioners can sue for a retrial and formal complaints against the negligent arbitrators. But seeing as the whole show was probably staged you will never hear of this decision being appealed. I see it as a powerful propaganda tool to disuade those that might have otherwise sued. If I was a gambling man I would bet my last dollar no one will ever see that court transcript. Here in my jurisdiction you need the judge's permission to obtain an audio transcript. They used to be freely available until a judge got caught saying something very incriminating when he thought the absent defendant would never ask a transcript and blow it open on the web. So, in my jurisdiction if you catch a judge saying something to refuse evidence based on the judge's personal bias you need his permission to obtain the evidence against him. I imagine most courts must be aware of this danger and have preventive measures in place. Even if the trial is legit good luck getting a transcript. I should ask Dr Fuellmich if he can get the transcript.

Edited by Avoiceinthecrowd
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, perpetual said:

 

Bitch!

She is the head of planned parenthood. How dare you! 'Doc' you are a threat to the humanity.

Now, isn't there a connection to the Common Purpose?

 

I read her story cringe worthy for some reason....may be because of who she is.

 

EDIT: Incentivize a vaccine? A donut 🥯 won't cut it girl.

 

Just found this in the Twatter comments 😂-Ewe1raZWQAAFl29.jpeg.fdfabe00466135d9abb26397c2dd1fa8.jpeg

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, epsom said:

European Court of Human Rights Rules That Mandatory Vaccinations Are Legal

by Paul Joseph Watson

 

The European Court of Human Rights has ruled that mandatory vaccinations are legal in a significant judgment that could have a big impact on the rollout of the COVID-19 jab.

The ruling was in response to a complaint from a group of Czech families who had been fined and had their children denied nursery care over their refusal to let their kids take mandatory vaccinations against against nine diseases including diphtheria, tetanus, whooping cough, hepatitis B and measles.

 

The parents argued that the law was in violation of of Article 8 on the right to respect for private life, but the court disagreed and said that the compulsory jabs were in the “best interests” of children to ensure “every child is protected against serious diseases, through vaccination or by virtue of herd immunity.”

Mandatory vaccinations “could be regarded as being ‘necessary in a democratic society’,” the court judgment read.

Although not directly related to COVID, the ruling could have significant implications given current debates over vaccine passports and whether workers in some jobs should be forced to take the vaccine as a condition of employment.

This judgment “reinforces the possibility of a compulsory vaccination under conditions of the current COVID-19 epidemic,” Nicolas Hervieu, a legal expert specializing in the ECHR, told AFP.

It’s also worth noting that despite having left the European Union as a result of Brexit, the UK, which is currently in the process of planning for domestic vaccine passports, is still a member of the European Court of Human Rights.

I'm not sure if I can see this working on compulsory vaccination for covid. The stuff this related to is for once in a lifetime jab but this Covid is a multi jab per year scenario. I can't see how long people would put up with it as not many of the population go for the flu jab. In logical terms the side effects have more chance of killing the kids supposedly do of dying from covid. I'm not sure how that scenario would stand up in court. I think homeschooling will be on the cards as the get out as I can only see them saying to go school you would have to it. Ironically when schools were reopening it was all talk of they can go back because it doesn't spread around kids and they don't suffer from it, couple of weeks later there playing the compulsory jabs scenario. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Snip-it_1617918951435.jpg.0c4e97b45e8d1c4834348122af4c814d.jpg

 

Were the judges named? How hard can it be for international police investigative forces to look up the names of those judges and crosscheck them for pharma stock market shares. A conflict of interest of that degree would nullify the ruling. Then the big job would be finding a judge that does not have these ties to pharma. 

 

All I know about police/court relationships is that cops never cite a judge found driving while pickled. I know of stories about judges retaliating against cops for not playing along. Giving tgem a rough time in court. Making them wait all day to be heard. Pressure tactics. They play very dirty.

  • Sad 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

One thing that got me the other day was why was they saying the rare bloodcots kill 4 in a million? Wouldn't it been 1 in 250,000. It was bugging me as when school teach maths they tell you to reduce it down to the lowest denominations. Anyone got an idea on that. Was it a million sounds more unlikely? 1 in 250,000 still sounds rare and wouldnt amount to much in uk population

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Avoiceinthecrowd said:

Snip-it_1617918951435.jpg.0c4e97b45e8d1c4834348122af4c814d.jpg

 

Were the judges named? How hard can it be for international police investigative forces to look up the names of those judges and crosscheck them for pharma stock market shares. A conflict of interest of that degree would nullify the ruling. Then the big job would be finding a judge that does not have these ties to pharma. 

 

All I know about police/court relationships is that cops never cite a judge found driving while pickled. I know of stories about judges retaliating against cops for not playing along. Giving tgem a rough time in court. Making them wait all day to be heard. Pressure tactics. They play very dirty.

The problem would be finding a judge not in on it. More chance of catching covid I think

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...