Coronavirus Mega-Thread.

[Bombadil]

Hi Tunique.

I always got the impression Norway was a more rational thinking country.

vax passports prove me wrong

[BossCrow]

59 minutes ago, Liberty said:

You talk a good game. Won’t you teach me to do the same?

 

when I was off work with anxiety due to lockdown after taking care of people of all ages that had attempted suicide daily, I did not wear a mask in main supermarkets as I had the exemption. I would had kicked off had someone approached as I was 100% in the right  The law would looked at it and my situation more than favourably and I would have won.  However, since returning, I have had to declare myself medically fit which means realistically I have to wear it or risk losing my job. Except for local shop which does not bother me partly because I know them and have been communicating throughout about the lie.  For example: hospital empty. People not on incubators but being diagnosed as covid 19 with a multitude of conditions.  I think of it like this:  The Chinese Communist Party never got this far by revealing themselves. 

In short, I handle my own situations according to my own circumstances. 

I’ll do good work in my own way. Not how someone tells me to or thinks I should. 

That's fair enough. Just wanted to mention you don't need a medical exemption in th UK. According to the rules you can exempt yourself if you think the mask will harm you-

[Liberty]

4 minutes ago, BossCrow said:

That's fair enough. Just wanted to mention you don't need a medical exemption in th UK. According to the rules you can exempt yourself if you think the mask will harm you-

Thanks. I have to wear one for work so cannot claim I can’t wear one in a supermarket.  

Edited April 8, 2021 by Liberty

[Liberty]

That and the mask is my exception to the vaccine atm. It will probably get recalled like all the Chinese shit too but better than succumbing to the synthetic jabs. I’ll tolerate it and rely on my immune system. 

[Tunique]

11 minutes ago, Bombadil said:

Hi Tunique.

I always got the impression Norway was a more rational thinking country.

vax passports prove me wrong

Hi Bombadil

 

When EU says jump, Norway jumps. Many of the leaders loves to show their agenda 2030 pin.

 

I would gladly move to Texas now, if I could

 

 

Edited April 8, 2021 by Tunique

[Avoiceinthecrowd]

2 minutes ago, perpetual said:

 

Hence my previous campaign post.

The key is.....you cannot tell them so how do you convey your message?

By going through the backdoor, letting them figure out your message by leading questions.

If you ask a big question, if you present a big idea like "they are out to depopulate us", they will not get this. It's too much of a bigger steps. And nobody likes to be told but IF they come to a conclusion on their own thinking, though you lead them there with your crafty questions, it's acceptable. lol

Thats why I liked your "funeral home pamphlet" prop. A very clever play sure to get their attention. Thats what my strategy was missing.

[SuperstarNeilC]

[Avoiceinthecrowd]

4 minutes ago, perpetual said:

 

We need to go arrest BG.

 

Whatever happened to the Common Law Court? Anything come out of it btw?

We need to find him first. Also he may have several stand-in doubles. I know I would if I was doing what he is doing, issuing death threats to an entire world.

[Avoiceinthecrowd]

10 minutes ago, perpetual said:

 

Hence my previous campaign post.

The key is.....you cannot tell them so how do you convey your message?

By going through the backdoor, letting them figure out your message by leading questions.

If you ask a big question, if you present a big idea like "they are out to depopulate us", they will not get this. It's too much of a bigger steps. And nobody likes to be told but IF they come to a conclusion on their own thinking, though you lead them there with your crafty questions, it's acceptable. lol

Let them think dissent was their idea, no conspiracy theory footprints. Again, appearing sincere is critical

[TFH]

This is so blatant. They're now bannering headlines like this in order to prime us further to receive the vaxx. Utter manipulation! 

 

"Covid: Deaths in England and Wales fall 92% since January peak" 

 

^^ Sooo, there is NO pandemic anymore even IF there was one originally?

 

 

"Meanwhile, the total number of deaths registered in the UK over one week is 5% below the five-year average." 

 

^^ Wait, what!? 

 

"It comes amid continued efforts to reassure the public over the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine's possible link to rare blood clots." 

 

^^ Mm hmm. And THERE'S the propaganda they want to insert into us. 

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-56682716

[SuperstarNeilC]

[Liberty]

Hold steady. We’ve got one under the spotlight. We’ve got to take them out one at a time. Inform ourselves and others and plant doubt. 

[FrankVitali]

The flu vaccine was invented 83 years ago.

 

It is still here today. Well up until 2020.

 

Just saying.

[epsom]

European Court of Human Rights Rules That Mandatory Vaccinations Are Legal

by Paul Joseph Watson

April 8th 2021

 

The European Court of Human Rights has ruled that mandatory vaccinations are legal in a significant judgment that could have a big impact on the rollout of the COVID-19 jab.

The ruling was in response to a complaint from a group of Czech families who had been fined and had their children denied nursery care over their refusal to let their kids take mandatory vaccinations against against nine diseases including diphtheria, tetanus, whooping cough, hepatitis B and measles.

 

The parents argued that the law was in violation of of Article 8 on the right to respect for private life, but the court disagreed and said that the compulsory jabs were in the “best interests” of children to ensure “every child is protected against serious diseases, through vaccination or by virtue of herd immunity.”

Mandatory vaccinations “could be regarded as being ‘necessary in a democratic society’,” the court judgment read.

Although not directly related to COVID, the ruling could have significant implications given current debates over vaccine passports and whether workers in some jobs should be forced to take the vaccine as a condition of employment.

This judgment “reinforces the possibility of a compulsory vaccination under conditions of the current COVID-19 epidemic,” Nicolas Hervieu, a legal expert specializing in the ECHR, told AFP.

It’s also worth noting that despite having left the European Union as a result of Brexit, the UK, which is currently in the process of planning for domestic vaccine passports, is still a member of the European Court of Human Rights.

[BossCrow]

1 hour ago, perpetual said:

 

Aside from your last sentence, agree.

We just don't know if this is it yet.

You're an Apocaloptimist.

[Avoiceinthecrowd]

23 minutes ago, epsom said:

European Court of Human Rights Rules That Mandatory Vaccinations Are Legal

by Paul Joseph Watson

April 8th 2021

 

The European Court of Human Rights has ruled that mandatory vaccinations are legal in a significant judgment that could have a big impact on the rollout of the COVID-19 jab.

The ruling was in response to a complaint from a group of Czech families who had been fined and had their children denied nursery care over their refusal to let their kids take mandatory vaccinations against against nine diseases including diphtheria, tetanus, whooping cough, hepatitis B and measles.

 

The parents argued that the law was in violation of of Article 8 on the right to respect for private life, but the court disagreed and said that the compulsory jabs were in the “best interests” of children to ensure “every child is protected against serious diseases, through vaccination or by virtue of herd immunity.”

Mandatory vaccinations “could be regarded as being ‘necessary in a democratic society’,” the court judgment read.

Although not directly related to COVID, the ruling could have significant implications given current debates over vaccine passports and whether workers in some jobs should be forced to take the vaccine as a condition of employment.

This judgment “reinforces the possibility of a compulsory vaccination under conditions of the current COVID-19 epidemic,” Nicolas Hervieu, a legal expert specializing in the ECHR, told AFP.

It’s also worth noting that despite having left the European Union as a result of Brexit, the UK, which is currently in the process of planning for domestic vaccine passports, is still a member of the European Court of Human Rights.

If the judge(s) refused to admit evidence dismissing it as conspiracy theory the petitioners can sue for a retrial and formal complaints against the negligent arbitrators. But seeing as the whole show was probably staged you will never hear of this decision being appealed. I see it as a powerful propaganda tool to disuade those that might have otherwise sued. If I was a gambling man I would bet my last dollar no one will ever see that court transcript. Here in my jurisdiction you need the judge's permission to obtain an audio transcript. They used to be freely available until a judge got caught saying something very incriminating when he thought the absent defendant would never ask a transcript and blow it open on the web. So, in my jurisdiction if you catch a judge saying something to refuse evidence based on the judge's personal bias you need his permission to obtain the evidence against him. I imagine most courts must be aware of this danger and have preventive measures in place. Even if the trial is legit good luck getting a transcript. I should ask Dr Fuellmich if he can get the transcript.

Edited April 8, 2021 by Avoiceinthecrowd

[Avoiceinthecrowd]

13 minutes ago, BossCrow said:

You're an Apocaloptimist.

Out of likes...it has great meme appeal.

[BossCrow]

5 minutes ago, perpetual said:

 

Bitch!

She is the head of planned parenthood. How dare you! 'Doc' you are a threat to the humanity.

Now, isn't there a connection to the Common Purpose?

 

I read her story cringe worthy for some reason....may be because of who she is.

 

EDIT: Incentivize a vaccine? A donut  won't cut it girl.

 

Just found this in the Twatter comments -

 

[GSM]

19 minutes ago, epsom said:

European Court of Human Rights Rules That Mandatory Vaccinations Are Legal

by Paul Joseph Watson

April 8th 2021

 

The European Court of Human Rights has ruled that mandatory vaccinations are legal in a significant judgment that could have a big impact on the rollout of the COVID-19 jab.

The ruling was in response to a complaint from a group of Czech families who had been fined and had their children denied nursery care over their refusal to let their kids take mandatory vaccinations against against nine diseases including diphtheria, tetanus, whooping cough, hepatitis B and measles.

 

The parents argued that the law was in violation of of Article 8 on the right to respect for private life, but the court disagreed and said that the compulsory jabs were in the “best interests” of children to ensure “every child is protected against serious diseases, through vaccination or by virtue of herd immunity.”

Mandatory vaccinations “could be regarded as being ‘necessary in a democratic society’,” the court judgment read.

Although not directly related to COVID, the ruling could have significant implications given current debates over vaccine passports and whether workers in some jobs should be forced to take the vaccine as a condition of employment.

This judgment “reinforces the possibility of a compulsory vaccination under conditions of the current COVID-19 epidemic,” Nicolas Hervieu, a legal expert specializing in the ECHR, told AFP.

It’s also worth noting that despite having left the European Union as a result of Brexit, the UK, which is currently in the process of planning for domestic vaccine passports, is still a member of the European Court of Human Rights.

I'm not sure if I can see this working on compulsory vaccination for covid. The stuff this related to is for once in a lifetime jab but this Covid is a multi jab per year scenario. I can't see how long people would put up with it as not many of the population go for the flu jab. In logical terms the side effects have more chance of killing the kids supposedly do of dying from covid. I'm not sure how that scenario would stand up in court. I think homeschooling will be on the cards as the get out as I can only see them saying to go school you would have to it. Ironically when schools were reopening it was all talk of they can go back because it doesn't spread around kids and they don't suffer from it, couple of weeks later there playing the compulsory jabs scenario. 

[Avoiceinthecrowd]

 

Were the judges named? How hard can it be for international police investigative forces to look up the names of those judges and crosscheck them for pharma stock market shares. A conflict of interest of that degree would nullify the ruling. Then the big job would be finding a judge that does not have these ties to pharma. 

 

All I know about police/court relationships is that cops never cite a judge found driving while pickled. I know of stories about judges retaliating against cops for not playing along. Giving tgem a rough time in court. Making them wait all day to be heard. Pressure tactics. They play very dirty.

[GSM]

One thing that got me the other day was why was they saying the rare bloodcots kill 4 in a million? Wouldn't it been 1 in 250,000. It was bugging me as when school teach maths they tell you to reduce it down to the lowest denominations. Anyone got an idea on that. Was it a million sounds more unlikely? 1 in 250,000 still sounds rare and wouldnt amount to much in uk population

[GSM]

2 minutes ago, Avoiceinthecrowd said:

 

Were the judges named? How hard can it be for international police investigative forces to look up the names of those judges and crosscheck them for pharma stock market shares. A conflict of interest of that degree would nullify the ruling. Then the big job would be finding a judge that does not have these ties to pharma. 

 

All I know about police/court relationships is that cops never cite a judge found driving while pickled. I know of stories about judges retaliating against cops for not playing along. Giving tgem a rough time in court. Making them wait all day to be heard. Pressure tactics. They play very dirty.

The problem would be finding a judge not in on it. More chance of catching covid I think

[Avoiceinthecrowd]

Here we are now with what is being labelled a green light to mandatory vaccination. As long as the transcripts are hidden the decision has no weight. Let me have that transcript if it exists and I will show you some exciting and extremely revealing posts.

Edited April 8, 2021 by Avoiceinthecrowd

[Avoiceinthecrowd]

Just now, GSM said:

The problem would be finding a judge not in on it. More chance of catching covid I think

I like the idea of catching judges that whore out their credentials to fraudulently influence stock values. Especially when they have the power to induce the public into the false belief their body can be violated against their will for the greater good. This must never reach precedent status. Should be investigated top to bottom considering the implications. The military are not bound by these decisions. They can try the matter in their own courts. Maybe they should seize the court documents and retry it.

[GSM]

8 minutes ago, Avoiceinthecrowd said:

Here we are now with what is being labelled a green light to mandatory vaccination. As long as the transxripts are hidden the decision has no weight. Let me have that transcript if it exists and I will show you some exciting and extremely revealing posts.

Considering that case started in I think 2013 and doesn't apply to covid would that infer you would have several years of arguing that it's against your rights before it reaches verdict. I imagine that may get special fast tracked as fakedemic may have gone away by then

Edited April 8, 2021 by GSM
Predictive text piece of shite