Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


numnuts
 Share

Message added by Grumpy Owl,

This topic is for all general discussion regarding the current COVID-19 pandemic. There are of course numerous other related topics for discussing specific aspects of this pandemic in more detail. And there are other parts of this forum for more 'off-topic' discussions.

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Shy Talk said:

 

This article did the rounds a while back and it needs to be pointed out - the 64,000 is total deaths (caused by anything) in January, which is around 20,000 excess deaths if you accept that 1,500 people die on average per day. So it's possible at least 20,000 died from flu, which is still a huge figure for one month when compared with the 40-odd thousand over several months that they say have passed from flu this year. The MSM were clearly told not to run with the story that year and risk scuppering the big plans for 2020.

https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/health/flu-wales-australian-flu-hospitals-17532792

 

Flu is now circulating in Wales at its highest levels since winter began with so-called "Australian flu" the most common strain of the virus.

Latest figures from Public Health Wales' Influenza Activity in Wales report show flu prevalence has reached "medium intensity" across the country.

For the final week of 2019, GPs reported 37.1 consultations relating to influenza-like illness per 100,000 practice population, while the first week of 2020 showed similar levels at 33.1 consultations.

 

"During the week ending January 5, 177 patients attending hospital were confirmed with influenza, seven of whom were in intensive care."

 

"If you think you have flu and are pregnant or have a long-term health condition or are aged 65 or over, or if it is your child that is unwell, speak to your GP surgery as soon as possible as there is an increased risk of complications and they may prescribe antiviral medicines to help.

 

17:38, 8 JAN 2020

 

 

 

Strikes me as odd how this flu story was suddenly dropped..

Thinking on perhaps HCQ was the antiviral and thats why..?

Edited by shadowmoon
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just received this through the door today. 

Asking for a swab test to be done from a minor -  for a virus they have not isolated. Or proven to exist.  Just find that interesting?  Legal?

It arrived just in time, I had just 'laid a cable - like one of king kongs fingers it was'  - and realised we were running low on toilet paper.

Here it is: 

 

ltr01l.jpg

lttr1.jpg

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, sickofallthebollocks said:




 

 

 

Get the latest NHS information and advice about coronavirus (COVID-19).

Get a test to check if you have coronavirus

*Sign up to be contacted for coronavirus vaccine research*

Check if you or your child has symptoms
Find out about the main symptoms of coronavirus and what to do if you have them.

Testing and tracing
Get a test to check if you have coronavirus, understand your test result and find out what to do if you're contacted by NHS Test and Trace.

Self-isolation and treatment if you have symptom
Advice about staying at home (self-isolation) and treatment for you and anyone you live with.

People at higher risk
Advice for people at higher risk from coronavirus, including older people, people with health conditions and pregnant women.

Social distancing advice and changes to everyday life
Advice about avoiding close contact with other people (social distancing), looking after your wellbeing and using the NHS and other services.

*Take part in research*
*Find out about health research studies and how you may be able to take part.*

Links to more information about coronavirus
Links to government advice, information for health professionals and advice for other parts of the UK.

For government advice on staying safe outside your home go to gov.uk/staying-safe-outside-your-home

For further information go to nhs.uk/coronavirus or gov.uk/coronavirus.

Advice accurate as of 24/07/2020.

 

 

This was on a popup box on my doctors surgery homepage.. (bold highlights are my own doing.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has this been discussed on here yet? Part of the Coronavirus Act 2020:

 

Children

18(1)An individual who has responsibility for a child must, so far as reasonably practicable, secure that the child complies with any direction, instruction, requirement or restriction given to or imposed on the child under this Part of this Schedule.

(2)An individual who has responsibility for a child must provide to a person exercising a power under this Part of this Schedule such information and assistance in relation to the child as is reasonably necessary and practicable in the circumstances.

(3)A power under this Part of this Schedule to direct or require a child to go to a place may instead be exercised by directing or requiring an individual who has responsibility for the child to take the child to the place.

(4)A power under paragraph 10 or 14 may only be exercised in relation to a child in the presence of—

(a)an individual who has responsibility for the child, or

(b)if the child is not accompanied by such an individual, an adult (not being a person on whom powers are conferred under this Part of this Schedule) that the person exercising the power considers to be appropriate, having regard to any views of the child.

(5)Where a power under this Part of this Schedule is exercisable in relation to a child but the child is not accompanied by an individual who has responsibility for the child, the person by whom the power is exercisable must—

(a)if practicable, contact an individual who has responsibility for the child before the power is exercised, or

(b)if that is not practicable, take reasonable steps after the power is exercised to contact such an individual and inform them of any exercise of the power in relation to the child.

(6)Where a child has a right of appeal (see paragraph 17) the right may be exercised by an individual who has responsibility for the child.

(7)For the purposes of this paragraph—

  • “adult” means a person aged 18 or over;

  • “child” means a person under the age of 18;

  • an individual has responsibility for a child—

    (a)

    if the individual has custody or charge of the child for the time being (without being a person on whom powers are conferred by this Part of this Schedule), or

    (b)

    if the individual has parental responsibility for the child (within the meaning of the Children Act 1989)

     

    .https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2020/7/schedule/21/enacted

     

     

     

     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, BlueSky said:

Has this been discussed on here yet? Part of the Coronavirus Act 2020:

 

Children

18(1)An individual who has responsibility for a child must, so far as reasonably practicable, secure that the child complies with any direction, instruction, requirement or restriction given to or imposed on the child under this Part of this Schedule.

(2)An individual who has responsibility for a child must provide to a person exercising a power under this Part of this Schedule such information and assistance in relation to the child as is reasonably necessary and practicable in the circumstances.

(3)A power under this Part of this Schedule to direct or require a child to go to a place may instead be exercised by directing or requiring an individual who has responsibility for the child to take the child to the place.

(4)A power under paragraph 10 or 14 may only be exercised in relation to a child in the presence of—

(a)an individual who has responsibility for the child, or

(b)if the child is not accompanied by such an individual, an adult (not being a person on whom powers are conferred under this Part of this Schedule) that the person exercising the power considers to be appropriate, having regard to any views of the child.

(5)Where a power under this Part of this Schedule is exercisable in relation to a child but the child is not accompanied by an individual who has responsibility for the child, the person by whom the power is exercisable must—

(a)if practicable, contact an individual who has responsibility for the child before the power is exercised, or

(b)if that is not practicable, take reasonable steps after the power is exercised to contact such an individual and inform them of any exercise of the power in relation to the child.

(6)Where a child has a right of appeal (see paragraph 17) the right may be exercised by an individual who has responsibility for the child.

(7)For the purposes of this paragraph—

  • “adult” means a person aged 18 or over;

  • “child” means a person under the age of 18;

  • an individual has responsibility for a child—

    (a)

    if the individual has custody or charge of the child for the time being (without being a person on whom powers are conferred by this Part of this Schedule), or

    (b)

    if the individual has parental responsibility for the child (within the meaning of the Children Act 1989)

     

    .https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2020/7/schedule/21/enacted

     

     

     

     

 

 

Karl Lentz has proved, at court, that property rights trump all

 

child or children  is legalese. its a jurisdiction issue

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sickofallthebollocks said:

Just received this through the door today. 

Asking for a swab test to be done from a minor -  for a virus they have not isolated. Or proven to exist.  Just find that interesting?  Legal?

It arrived just in time, I had just 'laid a cable - like one of king kongs fingers it was'  - and realised we were running low on toilet paper.

Here it is: 

 

ltr01l.jpg

lttr1.jpg


Disgusting. Shame on any parents who sign their children up to this nonsense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sickofallthebollocks said:

Just received this through the door today. 

Asking for a swab test to be done from a minor -  for a virus they have not isolated. Or proven to exist.  Just find that interesting?  Legal?

It arrived just in time, I had just 'laid a cable - like one of king kongs fingers it was'  - and realised we were running low on toilet paper.

Here it is: 

 

ltr01l.jpg

lttr1.jpg

 

Apologies if these have been shared already.

 

ipsos Mori in the letter head, apparently is Latin for They/Themselves Die

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Number6 said:

Erm what did you say Billy Hellgates 🤔 lol. 

 

Bizarrely asked by Bloomberg whether “we are going to be OK,” the tech mogul dismissed the pandemic and said: “Certainly. We’re lucky this wasn’t a more fatal disease.”

Whole article: 

https://www.rt.com/usa/497942-bill-gates-coronavirus-vaccine/

 

 

 

 

Keep him talking, the more he does these interviews the more people realise he’s up to no good, already seen a couple of people say ‘ok now I know something strange is going on here with Bill Gates’ after that video 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Full Bloomberg article from RT article I posted earlier:

Bill Gates on Covid Vaccine Timing, Hydroxychloroquine, and That 5G Conspiracy Theory

The Microsoft co-founder has steered $350 million toward coronavirus projects and says we’ll turn a corner next year.

By Dina Bass and Candy Cheng

 

Bill Gates, the Microsoft Corp. co-founder and billionaire philanthropist, has become, for better and worse, a central character in the story of Covid-19. The good news: The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has pledged more than $350 million to fight the disease, including funds for vaccine manufacturing efforts at AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson, and Novavax. The bad news: Gates has been vilified by anti-vaxxers and other conspiracy theorists who claim he seeded the virus for his own nefarious purposes.

Gates says he’s optimistic about the world’s chances of seeing through the wilder theories and of beating the coronavirus, too. His remarks have been condensed and edited for clarity.

Bill Gates
▲ Gates
PHOTOGRAPHER: SPENCER LOWELL/TRUNK ARCHIVE

How confident are you we’ll have a working vaccine that can be widely distributed by the end of 2020?

Well, the initial vaccine won’t be ideal in terms of its effectiveness against sickness and transmission. It may not have a long duration, and it will mainly be used in rich countries as a stopgap measure.

We’d be lucky to have much before the end of the year. But then, in 2021, a number of other vaccines are very likely to get approved. The strongest response will probably come from the protein subunit. With so many companies working on it, we can afford quite a few failures and still have something with low cost and long duration.

 

For years, people have said if anti-vaxxers had lived through a pandemic, the way their grandparents did, they’d think differently. Whoops.

The two times I’ve been to the White House [since 2016], I was told I had to go listen to anti-vaxxers like Robert Kennedy Jr. So, yes, it’s ironic that people are questioning vaccines and we’re actually having to say, “Oh, my God, how else can you get out of a tragic pandemic?”

Given the skepticism, should a Covid vaccine be mandatory?

Making something mandatory can often backfire. But you might say that if you’re going to work in an old-folks home or have any exposure to elderly people, it would be required.

How long has it been since you hugged someone who doesn’t live in your home?

 

 

DATA: YOUGOV POLL, AUGUST 2020

What do you make of the conspiracy theories that you’re pursuing vaccine research to control people’s minds using 5G radio waves and so on?

It’s strange. They take the fact that I’m involved with vaccines and they just reverse it, so instead of giving money to save lives, I’m making money to get rid of lives. If that stops people from taking a vaccine or looking at the latest data about wearing a mask, then it’s a big problem.

 

What about the conversation around hydroxychloroquine, which the White House has promoted despite its repeatedly being shown to be ineffective and, in fact, to cause heart problems in some patients?

This is an age of science, but sometimes it doesn’t feel that way. In the test tube, hydroxychloroquine looked good. On the other hand, there are lots of good therapeutic drugs coming that are proven to work without the severe side effects.

We’ve seen the U.S. and other countries buying up vaccine supplies even before they’re approved. Is that harmful?

We need cooperation within countries and between countries. The U.S. as yet has not helped come up with procurement money for poor countries. We’ve funded more research and development than any country, but on factories and procurement, we’ve only taken care of ourselves. Every call I’m on with the pharma leaders and the leaders of countries is with the goal of, “Hey, we need everybody to be protected.”

How do you think this all ends?

The innovations in therapeutics will start to cut the death rate, but the true end will come from the spread of natural infections and the vaccine giving us herd immunity. For rich countries, that will be sometime next year, ideally in the first half. We’ll get out of this by the end of 2021.

So we’re going to be OK?

Certainly. We’re lucky this one wasn’t a more fatal disease.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/01/18/flu-epidemic-set-hit-britain-within-fortnight-83-million-now/

 

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/01/03/hospitalisations-flu-10-fold-higher-last-year-official-figures/

 

Just following on from the earlier article about 64k deaths in January 2018.

 

These links are both behind paywalls but you get the gist from the early copy. The first link, that talks about 8 million in the UK having flu, is also from Jan 2018. The other is from the first week of this year. They both beg several questions, and one is if this year's flu had been called the flu rather than the cynically scary, militaryesque Covid-19, would the authorities have been able to get away with so much? Would you be more likely to wear a mask (or generally do as you're told) if every news report began with 'Flu deaths/infections today hit . . . .'  rather than 'Covid-19 deaths/infections today hit . . . .'? Psychological warfare (that unfortunately has worked).

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is another video from the ACU Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee which has gathered 640 doctors willing to provide evidence that Covid-19 is fake, and who are raising questions as to who benefits from the Plandemic. Although the initiators of the committee are German doctors, it is an international effort and hearings are being held.

 

https://acu2020.org/english-versions/

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mitochondrial Eve said:

Here is another video from the ACU Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee

This link was under that video;
 


Germany - The COVID-19 Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee - Start Conference 03rd July 2020

"We will not be delayed any longer. We citizens have the power. We are doing it", with these words Heiko Schöning announced the Extra-Parliamentary Corona Investigation Committee (ACU) on 31st May 2020 in Stuttgart in front of 5000 demonstrators. On 3rd July 2020 the ACU started with an information conference in several languages.

All citizens, national and international, can make suggestions for experts and witnesses ([email protected]).

 

The speakers of the ACU (Heiko Schöning, Bodo Schiffmann, Martin Haditsch) invite the experts and witnesses to the public hearing of evidence.

Original in German: https://youtu.be/jb7WON_YVJw

For more details, please visit https://acu2020.org/international/

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Illuminator said:

 

You surprised mate? He's a fucking stooge. A badly paid one at that lol

Yeah I expected him to be a bit smarter haha, but his answer on ‘anti vaxxers’ and Kennedy jr was his best... basically telling people he’s the guy to go to if you wanna learn why people are against vaccines, and he’s got fantastic information 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/12/2020 at 2:47 AM, Mr H said:

 

Really interesting post man. Nutrition is something I'm trying to learn more about.

 

So just a question about the above part.

 

How does eating alkaline food make any significant difference?

 

I say that because to my understanding, you cannot change the ph value of your blood to any significant degree, and blood is the vehicle of nutrition?

Hi Mr. H.

 

That's my opinion based on my research and personal experience over the years.

 

As for alkaline and the blood pH level, I have been asked that before by a person trying to maintain the status quo in favor of the allopathic system.

 

I don't know where you heard or read that we cannot change the pH value of our blood but I would bet that is not entirely accurate. Maybe it's true, I don't know, but the ph level of food I think corresponds to frequency which is a topic that the "cabal" or "NWO" seem to always want to hide from people, for example the 5G frequency and its possible link to disrupting the body.

 

I think there is definitely a connection between alkaline side items and frequency and their ability to heal and regenerate cells. Although, I have not delved into the biology that deep technically, in relation to nutrition, to give you a definitive answer. Maybe it is raising the overall frequency of the person which creates an environment where lower frequency biological matter cannot live.

 

There are tests I have been wanting to conduct with food but I don't have the money for the devices needed to do so, so I am at a standstill with some of my own personal research.

 

What I do know is this. How I feel and look and the things I can do for my age. After switching my eating behavior and lifestyle to being far more disciplined I have not been sick and I am very often mistaken for being younger than I am.

 

Many millions of people don't even bother to read the ingredients on their "food" anymore, they buy it mainly because of how it tastes and because of the clever advertising and marketing gimmicks, but I would bet that I could take test subjects who ate terrible chemical "foods" and if they are willing, have them switch over to eating real food that is alive and electric, and I would bet they would see a major improvement in health.

 

In fact, many people who have had an awakening in terms of food have done this shift and report a dramatic positive change in health very quickly. Of course this creates problem for doctors and big pharma who stand to lose repeat business the more people take their health into their own hands, which is why the NWO are fighting so hard right now to maintain control with this boogeyman virus they have scared everyone with and then promised a vaccine to fix it. Those of us whom have been awake for some time can see that this is a ploy for control, not for health. The government really doesn't give a crap about people, that much is clear at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/12/2020 at 12:32 AM, shadowmoon said:

Interesting.

I never vaped at all , didn't  like the look of it from the start , before the CV hoax started the latest health scare by the media was vapers and their lungs.

There seem to be a lot less vapers now, I'm  certainly  not seeing the clouds of steam coming from people  like say 3 years ago.

 

Where did the vapers all go?

 

Shadowmoon, I think the vapers got scared. Or they are not out on the road and out as much. A lot of people have been staying home because they are scare and believe in this corona bs. Or they don't believe it but don't want to deal with masked morons.

 

I know what you mean, I used to see a lot more vapers blowing clouds of mist out their vehicle window, but not so much since this corona thing. Doesn't mean people have stopped vaping, but there are certainly less people out now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Messenger said:

Hi Mr. H.

 

That's my opinion based on my research and personal experience over the years.

 

As for alkaline and the blood pH level, I have been asked that before by a person trying to maintain the status quo in favor of the allopathic system.

 

I don't know where you heard or read that we cannot change the pH value of our blood but I would bet that is not entirely accurate. Maybe it's true, I don't know, but the ph level of food I think corresponds to frequency which is a topic that the "cabal" or "NWO" seem to always want to hide from people, for example the 5G frequency and its possible link to disrupting the body.

 

I think there is definitely a connection between alkaline side items and frequency and their ability to heal and regenerate cells. Although, I have not delved into the biology that deep technically, in relation to nutrition, to give you a definitive answer. Maybe it is raising the overall frequency of the person which creates an environment where lower frequency biological matter cannot live.

 

There are tests I have been wanting to conduct with food but I don't have the money for the devices needed to do so, so I am at a standstill with some of my own personal research.

 

What I do know is this. How I feel and look and the things I can do for my age. After switching my eating behavior and lifestyle to being far more disciplined I have not been sick and I am very often mistaken for being younger than I am.

 

Many millions of people don't even bother to read the ingredients on their "food" anymore, they buy it mainly because of how it tastes and because of the clever advertising and marketing gimmicks, but I would bet that I could take test subjects who ate terrible chemical "foods" and if they are willing, have them switch over to eating real food that is alive and electric, and I would bet they would see a major improvement in health.

 

In fact, many people who have had an awakening in terms of food have done this shift and report a dramatic positive change in health very quickly. Of course this creates problem for doctors and big pharma who stand to lose repeat business the more people take their health into their own hands, which is why the NWO are fighting so hard right now to maintain control with this boogeyman virus they have scared everyone with and then promised a vaccine to fix it. Those of us whom have been awake for some time can see that this is a ploy for control, not for health. The government really doesn't give a crap about people, that much is clear at this point.

 

Thank you so much for the added info. I have been on the path of spirituality for several years now, but I never paid any attention to food, and it has only come to my attention recently how important it is - so I am just starting my investigation - so I am completely ignorant - and my knowledge of ph values in the blood comes from my limited knowledge of main stream science, which I am starting to understand may not be true (understatement!)

 

Thank you so much for sharing your knowledge so freely. I may have further questions if that is ok, as my investigation matures.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Messenger said:

Shadowmoon, I think the vapers got scared. Or they are not out on the road and out as much. A lot of people have been staying home because they are scare and believe in this corona bs. Or they don't believe it but don't want to deal with masked morons.

 

I know what you mean, I used to see a lot more vapers blowing clouds of mist out their vehicle window, but not so much since this corona thing. Doesn't mean people have stopped vaping, but there are certainly less people out now.

 

I did wonder if it was related to 'masks and droplets'...( God I  hate those two words..) people seeing clouds of water vapour  and panicking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...