Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


numnuts
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Yasmina said:

Wow! Is that even legal, to put it in water supplies without people knowing and test it on them! Wtf is this bs!? Would a water filter even filter out lithium? 

 

 

 

Not sure about the legality or how good filters are, but it's definitely a question people should be asking.

Edited by EnigmaticWorld
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Yasmina said:

Wow! Is that even legal, to put it in water supplies without people knowing and test it on them! Wtf is this bs!? Would a water filter even filter out lithium? 

 

 

I remember years ago AJ going on about Japanese putting lithium in a towns drinking water to stem suicides. There are loads of studies. I guess if they enjoy putting toxic fluoride in drinking water then anything is possible. 

 

Found it, this is his old article:

https://www.prisonplanet.com/fox-news-covers-mass-drugging-of-society-with-lithium.html

Lithium tapwater study:

https://core.ac.uk/display/27175036

Texas study:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1699579/

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

NEWS HEADLINE REPORT FROM   (note the date 27th feb 2018 )

64,000 DIED OF FLU :    NO LOCKDOWN  ~  NO SOCIAL ISOLATION   ~   NO MASKS   ~  NO NEW NORMAL  !!!

 

Image

 

To those who understand the meaning of this news, no explanation is needed.

To those who refuse to understand, no explanation will suffice.

 

Edited by MR-E
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, FVCK BILLY G4TES said:

5G and the Internet of things originates from israel, I can't stress enough how amazing this video is on showing the origins of 5G, how it works, and why they were built under our noses

 

 

This is a really good video... out of likes but recommend people watch this!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MR-E said:

NEWS HEADLINE REPORT FROM   (note the date 27th feb 2018 )

64,000 DIED OF FLU :    NO LOCKDOWN  ~  NO SOCIAL ISOLATION   ~   NO MASKS   ~  NO NEW NORMAL  !!!

 

Image

 

To those who understand the meaning of this news, no explanation is needed.

To those who refuse to understand, no explanation will suffice.

 

 

This article did the rounds a while back and it needs to be pointed out - the 64,000 is total deaths (caused by anything) in January, which is around 20,000 excess deaths if you accept that 1,500 people die on average per day. So it's possible at least 20,000 died from flu, which is still a huge figure for one month when compared with the 40-odd thousand over several months that they say have passed from flu this year. The MSM were clearly told not to run with the story that year and risk scuppering the big plans for 2020.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/3/2020 at 2:43 PM, Seeker said:

Has anyone ever watched the film V for Vendetta, is relevant to the thread 

 

The zio propaganda flick? The dystopian aspects might be relevant, the way it inverts reality isn't though.

 

V For Vendetta: Reality Inverted

https://nwioqeqkdf.blogspot.com/2015/04/v-for-vendetta-reality-inverted.html

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Shy Talk said:

 

This article did the rounds a while back and it needs to be pointed out - the 64,000 is total deaths (caused by anything) in January, which is around 20,000 excess deaths if you accept that 1,500 people die on average per day. So it's possible at least 20,000 died from flu, which is still a huge figure for one month when compared with the 40-odd thousand over several months that they say have passed from flu this year. The MSM were clearly told not to run with the story that year and risk scuppering the big plans for 2020.

https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/health/flu-wales-australian-flu-hospitals-17532792

 

Flu is now circulating in Wales at its highest levels since winter began with so-called "Australian flu" the most common strain of the virus.

Latest figures from Public Health Wales' Influenza Activity in Wales report show flu prevalence has reached "medium intensity" across the country.

For the final week of 2019, GPs reported 37.1 consultations relating to influenza-like illness per 100,000 practice population, while the first week of 2020 showed similar levels at 33.1 consultations.

 

"During the week ending January 5, 177 patients attending hospital were confirmed with influenza, seven of whom were in intensive care."

 

"If you think you have flu and are pregnant or have a long-term health condition or are aged 65 or over, or if it is your child that is unwell, speak to your GP surgery as soon as possible as there is an increased risk of complications and they may prescribe antiviral medicines to help.

 

17:38, 8 JAN 2020

 

 

 

Strikes me as odd how this flu story was suddenly dropped..

Thinking on perhaps HCQ was the antiviral and thats why..?

Edited by shadowmoon
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just received this through the door today. 

Asking for a swab test to be done from a minor -  for a virus they have not isolated. Or proven to exist.  Just find that interesting?  Legal?

It arrived just in time, I had just 'laid a cable - like one of king kongs fingers it was'  - and realised we were running low on toilet paper.

Here it is: 

 

ltr01l.jpg

lttr1.jpg

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, sickofallthebollocks said:




 

 

 

Get the latest NHS information and advice about coronavirus (COVID-19).

Get a test to check if you have coronavirus

*Sign up to be contacted for coronavirus vaccine research*

Check if you or your child has symptoms
Find out about the main symptoms of coronavirus and what to do if you have them.

Testing and tracing
Get a test to check if you have coronavirus, understand your test result and find out what to do if you're contacted by NHS Test and Trace.

Self-isolation and treatment if you have symptom
Advice about staying at home (self-isolation) and treatment for you and anyone you live with.

People at higher risk
Advice for people at higher risk from coronavirus, including older people, people with health conditions and pregnant women.

Social distancing advice and changes to everyday life
Advice about avoiding close contact with other people (social distancing), looking after your wellbeing and using the NHS and other services.

*Take part in research*
*Find out about health research studies and how you may be able to take part.*

Links to more information about coronavirus
Links to government advice, information for health professionals and advice for other parts of the UK.

For government advice on staying safe outside your home go to gov.uk/staying-safe-outside-your-home

For further information go to nhs.uk/coronavirus or gov.uk/coronavirus.

Advice accurate as of 24/07/2020.

 

 

This was on a popup box on my doctors surgery homepage.. (bold highlights are my own doing.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has this been discussed on here yet? Part of the Coronavirus Act 2020:

 

Children

18(1)An individual who has responsibility for a child must, so far as reasonably practicable, secure that the child complies with any direction, instruction, requirement or restriction given to or imposed on the child under this Part of this Schedule.

(2)An individual who has responsibility for a child must provide to a person exercising a power under this Part of this Schedule such information and assistance in relation to the child as is reasonably necessary and practicable in the circumstances.

(3)A power under this Part of this Schedule to direct or require a child to go to a place may instead be exercised by directing or requiring an individual who has responsibility for the child to take the child to the place.

(4)A power under paragraph 10 or 14 may only be exercised in relation to a child in the presence of—

(a)an individual who has responsibility for the child, or

(b)if the child is not accompanied by such an individual, an adult (not being a person on whom powers are conferred under this Part of this Schedule) that the person exercising the power considers to be appropriate, having regard to any views of the child.

(5)Where a power under this Part of this Schedule is exercisable in relation to a child but the child is not accompanied by an individual who has responsibility for the child, the person by whom the power is exercisable must—

(a)if practicable, contact an individual who has responsibility for the child before the power is exercised, or

(b)if that is not practicable, take reasonable steps after the power is exercised to contact such an individual and inform them of any exercise of the power in relation to the child.

(6)Where a child has a right of appeal (see paragraph 17) the right may be exercised by an individual who has responsibility for the child.

(7)For the purposes of this paragraph—

  • “adult” means a person aged 18 or over;

  • “child” means a person under the age of 18;

  • an individual has responsibility for a child—

    (a)

    if the individual has custody or charge of the child for the time being (without being a person on whom powers are conferred by this Part of this Schedule), or

    (b)

    if the individual has parental responsibility for the child (within the meaning of the Children Act 1989)

     

    .https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2020/7/schedule/21/enacted

     

     

     

     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, BlueSky said:

Has this been discussed on here yet? Part of the Coronavirus Act 2020:

 

Children

18(1)An individual who has responsibility for a child must, so far as reasonably practicable, secure that the child complies with any direction, instruction, requirement or restriction given to or imposed on the child under this Part of this Schedule.

(2)An individual who has responsibility for a child must provide to a person exercising a power under this Part of this Schedule such information and assistance in relation to the child as is reasonably necessary and practicable in the circumstances.

(3)A power under this Part of this Schedule to direct or require a child to go to a place may instead be exercised by directing or requiring an individual who has responsibility for the child to take the child to the place.

(4)A power under paragraph 10 or 14 may only be exercised in relation to a child in the presence of—

(a)an individual who has responsibility for the child, or

(b)if the child is not accompanied by such an individual, an adult (not being a person on whom powers are conferred under this Part of this Schedule) that the person exercising the power considers to be appropriate, having regard to any views of the child.

(5)Where a power under this Part of this Schedule is exercisable in relation to a child but the child is not accompanied by an individual who has responsibility for the child, the person by whom the power is exercisable must—

(a)if practicable, contact an individual who has responsibility for the child before the power is exercised, or

(b)if that is not practicable, take reasonable steps after the power is exercised to contact such an individual and inform them of any exercise of the power in relation to the child.

(6)Where a child has a right of appeal (see paragraph 17) the right may be exercised by an individual who has responsibility for the child.

(7)For the purposes of this paragraph—

  • “adult” means a person aged 18 or over;

  • “child” means a person under the age of 18;

  • an individual has responsibility for a child—

    (a)

    if the individual has custody or charge of the child for the time being (without being a person on whom powers are conferred by this Part of this Schedule), or

    (b)

    if the individual has parental responsibility for the child (within the meaning of the Children Act 1989)

     

    .https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2020/7/schedule/21/enacted

     

     

     

     

 

 

Karl Lentz has proved, at court, that property rights trump all

 

child or children  is legalese. its a jurisdiction issue

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sickofallthebollocks said:

Just received this through the door today. 

Asking for a swab test to be done from a minor -  for a virus they have not isolated. Or proven to exist.  Just find that interesting?  Legal?

It arrived just in time, I had just 'laid a cable - like one of king kongs fingers it was'  - and realised we were running low on toilet paper.

Here it is: 

 

ltr01l.jpg

lttr1.jpg


Disgusting. Shame on any parents who sign their children up to this nonsense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sickofallthebollocks said:

Just received this through the door today. 

Asking for a swab test to be done from a minor -  for a virus they have not isolated. Or proven to exist.  Just find that interesting?  Legal?

It arrived just in time, I had just 'laid a cable - like one of king kongs fingers it was'  - and realised we were running low on toilet paper.

Here it is: 

 

ltr01l.jpg

lttr1.jpg

 

Apologies if these have been shared already.

 

ipsos Mori in the letter head, apparently is Latin for They/Themselves Die

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...