Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


numnuts
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, shadowmoon said:

I was actually agreeing with you.

Perhaps I should have added its said by those trying to persuade others into taking the covid vaccine. 

 

I know you were shadowmoon. I wasn't insinuating that you were a bad thinker😉

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/30/2021 at 5:49 AM, Avoiceinthecrowd said:

We really hope we can come out of this while holding on to perks like electricity and automobiles and maintained roads and the internet but one must also imagine a societal breakdown the likes of which brings the masses down to the stoneage. At such a time and given you have done a good job staying alive you will start looking at horses differently. Personally I am very fluent with horses and this skill could take on a new value. Farming accoutrements pulled by horses are far more economical than upkeeping a tractor. In a new world farming and horses would work well together. Learn about saddles and shoeing and horse pathogens and mannerisms. From a personal point of view I always felt pity for the fate of the horse, looking at the automobiles going by, robbed him of his intimate relationship with man. Man explored and the horse led the way. I hope they find more uses for horses even if things stabilize. But for total meltdown they are the ultimate all terrain way to get around.

 

Same here. I used to be a saddler and still have most of my tools.  I also ran a horse-drawn carriage service for a museum and was a judge for driving and riding events. Also a horse riding instructor for many years (I ran a riding school). I can't shoe a horse, although I can remove a loose shoe. At one time I could hand milk a cow or a goat, but it's been a long time

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, FrankVitali said:

Keep seeing videos of "morgellons" from the masks and swab tests under microscopes. I find this hard to believe. Logically I would have thought it just tiny black fibres moving due to static.

 

Anyone else seen the vids and whats your thoughts?

Ive seen them and I have discounted them as static from the nylon. Simon posted one here earlier I think. Someone pulls apart the swab, which logically would generate a fair bit of static in the fibres. It's this sort of unsubstantial stuff that make us look stupid. No offense intended to you Frank.

Edited by Doc
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, oddsnsods said:

 

Pretty sure Ron Pauls a mason, but as a libertarian he always talks a lot of sense. Has been calling for the end to the war on drugs for 40+ years. Which was another war against the people, before the war on terror & now the war to own your soul. I remember when he ran for president & received the same treatment Trump got but worse.

He was trying to talk sense in the debates & the media were not impressed. Maybe RP was a real threat.

 

Vaccine passports are digital ID through the backdoor using medical martial law as the excuse. How can anyone not see this now? People dont value their freedom & deserve what they get really.

I dunno what I did to deserve the karma of watching this unfold & seeing exactly where its leading. Whilst my neighbours laugh with joy & seem happy as pigs in shit right now.

Ja, I guess most people in some sort of power are probably linked to something in some shape or form. Although the article wasn't written by Ron Paul.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, FrankVitali said:

Keep seeing videos of "morgellons" from the masks and swab tests under microscopes. I find this hard to believe. Logically I would have thought it just tiny black fibres moving due to static.

 

Anyone else seen the vids and whats your thoughts?

My bf made a video. He pulled out a brand new mask and looked at it with his phone camera. He looked at several masks. These things are definitely in there. I guess the question is, what are they? They seem to react to warmth. 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

 

Have to be careful as these people will turn on you like fundamentalist..even more easy now with the Corona act only one doctors signature needed to section you.

 

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2020/7/schedule/8/enacted

 

The Coronavirus Act, when it was first passed in March 2020, did amend the Mental Health Act so that only one doctor was needed to section somebody.

 

However, when the Coronavirus Act was reviewed at the end of September 2020, Matt Hancock resolved to sunset these provisions. Here is what he said:

 

https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2020-09-30/debates/AAB1B147-2F78-4F41-ADE6-F1E50B3F3ECB/CoronavirusAct2020(ReviewOfTemporaryProvisions)

 

Quote

I turn to a measure that we will not be renewing. I have said that we will keep measures in place only for as long as is necessary, and I can tell the House that in one area we will revoke a power that was part of the original Act. When creating the Act, we included provisions to modify mental health legislation to reduce from two to one the number of doctors’ opinions needed to detain someone under the Mental Health Act 1983 and to extend legal time limits on the detention of mental health patients. These were always powers of last resort, and I was not persuaded, even in the peak, that they were necessary, because our mental health services have shown incredible resilience and ingenuity. I have therefore decided that these powers are no longer required in England and will not remain part of the Act. We will shortly bring forward the necessary secondary legislation to sunset these provisions.

 

The relevant section of the Coronavirus Act (section 10) expired on 10th December 2020. Here is the link to the "latest available" part of the legislation confirming this.

 

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2020/7/section/10

 

image.png.c13837c4a7e161f7b8244133e82dca20.png

 

So we are back in the position that two doctors are needed to section somebody.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, perpetual said:

 

You are an honest lad with good heart no doubt. But we also have either weakness or things which we need to master. This is the half rotten bit.

Half rotten as in ive seen a lot of dark shit in my time that stays with you & had my innocence STOLEN.

Just now, perpetual said:

 

I was like this a little while ago until I was pointed out that it was my creation. You can go on blaming others so that you give away your power hence remaining a victim forever. OR once you own up to the fact that your decision here and there have lead you to this day....THEN you know you cannot blame others. Having said this, we have been programmed since birth that it's always others who causes harm. But we have choices and you have chosen a particular path that lead you here. It's something to contemplate over time on this but once you get it, you go up on the next level of game. Remember, many things are reversed to make you remain weak. Is it not?

 

There is an androgynous Noahide agenda going on blatantly in everything you see now..this is not natural.

They drug kids with puberty blockers..Hollyweird are forcing this agenda its antichrist, as in anti ascension.

Like churchianity its a bastardisation of hermetic teachings Satanised or materialised.

Definitely the darkside lol from that video.

They want to keep you on the animal plane spiritually, theres your lower Saturnian chakra energy.

 

Just now, perpetual said:

 

I viewed it as he was trying to tell us the truth.

If you are here, in the 3D, as a human, we are in the so called Satanic recycling centre whether you like it or not.

But if you learn the passwords and which way to turn in this maze, you will get out. You don't get out by chance.

You are already carrying alien genes. Gene manipulation happened aeons ago... I thought you knew these kind of things. :O

They are teaching you the opposite of where you are heading..like blatantly. This is what im saying.

 

The materialist agenda definitely wants you to give up your spirit & connection with the source.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, DarianF said:

800.jpeg

 

https://apnews.com/article/when-will-life-go-back-to-normal-160aebc4aef58fbe97395ec08ababa60

Dear Normal: Were you really that great in the first place?

 

Expect to see more and more articles like this from the MSM - Yeah the old normal may not ever come back but was it actually that great to begin with ?? The New Normal is great - All you have to do is sit at home all day and have food delivered to you. IT'S SO CONVENIENT !!

 

Fucking snakes.

Edited by Lamp Of Truth
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mitochondrial Eve said:

 

The Coronavirus Act, when it was first passed in March 2020, did amend the Mental Health Act so that only one doctor was needed to section somebody.

 

However, when the Coronavirus Act was reviewed at the end of September 2020, Matt Hancock resolved to sunset these provisions. Here is what he said:

 

https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2020-09-30/debates/AAB1B147-2F78-4F41-ADE6-F1E50B3F3ECB/CoronavirusAct2020(ReviewOfTemporaryProvisions)

 

 

The relevant section of the Coronavirus Act (section 10) expired on 10th December 2020. Here is the link to the "latest available" part of the legislation confirming this.

 

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2020/7/section/10

 

image.png.c13837c4a7e161f7b8244133e82dca20.png

 

So we are back in the position that two doctors are needed to section somebody.

 

Okay thanks, but still applicable to Wales.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 'League for Human Rights' has won its case against the Belgian State concerning the legality of coronavirus measures enacted under the Civil Safety Act of 2007. The court has ordered the Belgian State to lift the measures and to provide a sound legal basis for them otherwise a penalty of 5,000 Euros will be imposed per day up to a maximum of 200,000 Euros.

 

However, the Belgian State is looking to enact a pandemic law which will "provide a permanent legal basis for taking these kind of restrictive measures during a pandemic”.

 

https://www.brusselstimes.com/news/belgium-all-news/162742/belgium-must-lift-all-covid-19-measures-withing-30-days-brussels-court-rules-verlinden-human-rights-league-ministerial-decree-penalty-civil-safety-act-pandemic-law-coronavirus/

Belgium must lift ‘all Covid-19 measures’ within 30 days, Brussels court rules

The Belgian State has been ordered to lift “all coronavirus measures” within 30 days, as the legal basis for them is insufficient, a Brussels court ruled on Wednesday.

  • Thanks 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heard a sad story today.

 

Guy finds out he's terminally ill & worried about his family contacts his insurers. By all accounts they were very good & a minimum sum was to be paid out when the worst happened.

 

That day came but the insurers offered a fraction of the stated amount because his death certificate has Covid listed as the cause of death, not his terminal illness & has therefore invalidated any agreements.

 

Understand this is being challenged but unsuccessfully so far & even if the family win eventually how traumatic must that be?

 

I wonder how many other people have had similar experiences?

  • Sad 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, oddsnsods said:

Half rotten as in ive seen a lot of dark shit in my time that stays with you & had my innocence STOLEN.

 

There is an androgynous Noahide agenda going on blatantly in everything you see now..this is not natural.

They drug kids with puberty blockers..Hollyweird are forcing this agenda its antichrist, as in anti ascension.

Like churchianity its a bastardisation of hermetic teachings Satanised or materialised.

Definitely the darkside lol from that video.

They want to keep you on the animal plane spiritually, theres your lower Saturnian chakra energy.

 

They are teaching you the opposite of where you are heading..like blatantly. This is what im saying.

 

The materialist agenda definitely wants you to give up your spirit & connection with the source.

 

Boom. Odds, you are on fire mate. I'm big on Zen Buddhist philosophy, it's all about getting back to source. I'm not interested in organized religion and the Dali Lama is a knob but I know of no other religions that actively encourage you to ignore the teachings of the founder. Buddhism has helped me during these times. If anyone is interested in the secular side of Buddhism I highly recommend Steve Hagan's books on it. Stripped back, no bullshit all practical. The antithesis of Religion.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, DarianF said:

Another 'covid hero':

 

 

Another 'covid champion':

 

 

Bravo retard, bravo. Bill Gates will mail you a certification of appreciation soon:

 

 

 

Clearly these people can't see the irony that after getting the jab that will apparently get their lives back to normal they're still wearing face masks and isolated in their own home !!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, oddsnsods said:

 

Okay thanks, but still applicable to Wales.

 

Are you sure that the one doctor provision still applies to Wales?

 

I ask because the legislation which was used to sunset the mental health changes contained within the Coronavirus Act was called 'The Coronavirus Act 2020 (Expiry of Mental Health Provisions) (England and Wales) Regulations 2020'.

 

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukdsi/2020/9780348214017

 

And, according to Wikipedia, which I think is trustworthy on matters of legislation (albeit with its limitations for other more controversial topics), "By September 2020, the provisions addressing potential staff shortages in mental health services had not been required in England, and had only been commenced in part in Wales. An instrument to remove these provisions was laid before Parliament on 21 October and came into force on 9 December 2020."

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coronavirus_Act_2020#Provisions

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was looking at the list of vaccine side effects and noticed 13 sudden deaths. That seems like an extreme risk to take to me. Sure the chances are some high 1 in million but still a bit ridiculous for the benefit. I mean if you look at bungie jumping, you take a risk but you get a thrill. With this vaccine you risk sudden death and for protection against a virus with a low risk. Seems extremely non sensical from a risk perspective. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, FrankVitali said:

Keep seeing videos of "morgellons" from the masks and swab tests under microscopes. I find this hard to believe. Logically I would have thought it just tiny black fibres moving due to static.

 

Anyone else seen the vids and whats your thoughts?

Not convinced 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, perpetual said:

 

It's like you are saying you are sqweaky clean. Is there such person in the world?

Remember even the bible said that the God creates both good and evil....which I think true. If it was all good, then it wouldn't have caused natural disasters or whatever we consider negative. What we consider negative is actually good and it depends on your level to be able to transform it. If not, yeah you fail.

 

Both good and bad, light and dark is needed to sustain life. Energy is produced when the change occurs from + to -. Static, no movement is death.

 

God created evil that besets the earth when he created mankind with the free will to choose between good and evil. He did the same in Heaven and a third of the angels fell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Mitochondrial Eve said:

 

Are you sure that the one doctor provision still applies to Wales?

 

I ask because the legislation which was used to sunset the mental health changes contained within the Coronavirus Act was called 'The Coronavirus Act 2020 (Expiry of Mental Health Provisions) (England and Wales) Regulations 2020'.

 

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukdsi/2020/9780348214017

 

And, according to Wikipedia, which I think is trustworthy on matters of legislation (albeit with its limitations for other more controversial topics), "By September 2020, the provisions addressing potential staff shortages in mental health services had not been required in England, and had only been commenced in part in Wales. An instrument to remove these provisions was laid before Parliament on 21 October and came into force on 9 December 2020."

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coronavirus_Act_2020#Provisions

 

I read it earlier Eve but cant find the link I was after.

 

https://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Coronavirus_Act_2020_(Expiry_of_Mental_Health_Provisions)_(England_and_Wales)_Regulations_2020

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Mitochondrial Eve said:

 

The Coronavirus Act, when it was first passed in March 2020, did amend the Mental Health Act so that only one doctor was needed to section somebody.

 

However, when the Coronavirus Act was reviewed at the end of September 2020, Matt Hancock resolved to sunset these provisions. Here is what he said:

 

Back in the position that two doctors are needed to section somebody.

It's pretty clear to me sometime just after new year wancock,, bojo and toad got knobbled big time. 

There have been a number of very very odd changes recently which contradict their own bollocks talk. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • lake locked this topic
  • lake unlocked this topic
  • Beaujangles featured this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...