Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


numnuts
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, GSM said:

sorry basket case just rechecked it was frank vitalI who mentioned the lorry protest. Got confused there, I had been reading your post previous where you was talking to some one about protests. My bad just been a bit dumb on remembering names to post.

I'll get my facts in order next time. Sorry bc

Edited by GSM
Typo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Gone Fishing...
Just now, GSM said:

I'll get my facts in order next time. Sorry bc

 

No worries. 

I was just clarifying.. 

:0)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it was @wingwang who said this is damage limitation & my thoughts too.

 

https://twitter.com/p_beejal/status/1376659023743844356?s=20

 

Nobody is talking about the 45x cycle threshold that was used. RT-PCR.

I have tried bringing this up with PCR lab people & they are very hostile.

Then you also have the fact that has come out very recently about these labs only testing for one target gene instead of the standard agreed 3 for a true positive.

 

ONS Admits Ignoring Manufacturer Instructions in PCR Testing

 

rcpath.org/uploads/assets/90111431-8aca-4614-b06633d07e2a3dd9/Guidance-and-SOP-COVID-19-Testing-NHS-Laboratories.pdf 45x cycles NHS. (page16)

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

Russia has approved what it says is the world’s first coronavirus vaccine for pets, the state veterinary service said Wednesday.

https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2021/03/31/russia-approves-worlds-first-coronavirus-vaccine-for-pets-a73420

 

Sadly April the first isn't till tomorrow 😢

Who's next the wild animals?

Sick bastards.

Edited by Itsa
  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, FrankVitali said:

Something I can't get my head around...

 

A lot of countries now suspending the AstraZenica jab because of fears of blood clots. But a number of them only banning it for under 60s.

 

Why? Blood clots don't pick and choose based on age.

 

This is like pure age-based genocide right in your face.   Oh its safe for over 60s but not under 60s. Was I born yesterday?

 

My point is moot because I believe all these Covid jabs are experimental untested potentially harmful anyway.

 

Surely though if you're going to ban a jab over safety concerns, you'd ban it for all ages.

 

Exactly and also didn't a load of countries decide the AZ jab was unsafe for over 60s and then they backtracked rather unconvincingly. 

 

This is why I think their downfall will be them tripping over their lies once too often. 

 

I think we all know all the "vaccines" are a premature death sentence but I suspect a large proportion of the under 60s get a placibo so as not too make it too obvious and of course to keep the slaves alive for the time being or at least until their usefulness wears out and then they can get bumped off with the real devil juice. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, oddsnsods said:

 

200w.gif?cid=82a1493bzt34ifhetz0ei43ol6a

This is literally going to be the problem, people are so attached to this lie they will react with anger.

 

One of my best friends is a GP. She is now the covid lead practitioner in her practice. Back in May last year, I told her it was all lies and she was so angry that I had the audacity to say that, even if she didn't accept that the whole thing is a hoax, then at least she could accept it's all hyped up to hysteria.

 

But, no.

 

Long story short, after telling me that out of her 11,000 patients, 3 MAYBE EVEN 4 , NOT CONFIRMED, elderly people had died WITH it at this point (May 2020) and I laughed derisively, and said wake up. We hardly speak now, what can I say to her anymore?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, zArk said:

the Complainant or Claimant creates the court. it is owned by the creator. The law is the law of the case. Whatever the claimant 'claims' is the law , is the law. The defendant cannot introduce new law , it is not his court. the defendant is subject to the court and thus subject to the law.

the judge maintains the integrity of the court

 

people must stop being the defendant, people have the ability to become the counter-complainant or counter claimant any time they wish, the counter-claimant creates his own court alongside the claimants court. the counter-claim writes the law of his case.

if the counter-claim is at a court of record, it is a superior court and has authority over the inferior court system.

 

 

 

The court is a venue, a host for for the resolution of disputes. The judge observes the debate to insure the motions are legal. After weighing the evidence a sentence is pronouced and it is hoped to the satisfaction of the parties. This is what I expect to see. I am mostly disappointed in that expection. A crown prosecuter once confided to me that the administration of justice is a game. Since then I carry one of these in my wallet at all times;

 

Snip-it_1617184205135.jpg.92d522ccfd8f0d2571db3d8d80740661.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, oddsnsods said:

I think it was @wingwang who said this is damage limitation & my thoughts too.

 

https://twitter.com/p_beejal/status/1376659023743844356?s=20

 

Nobody is talking about the 45x cycle threshold that was used. RT-PCR.

I have tried bringing this up with PCR lab people & they are very hostile.

Then you also have the fact that has come out very recently about these labs only testing for one target gene instead of the standard agreed 3 for a true positive.

 

ONS Admits Ignoring Manufacturer Instructions in PCR Testing

 

rcpath.org/uploads/assets/90111431-8aca-4614-b06633d07e2a3dd9/Guidance-and-SOP-COVID-19-Testing-NHS-Laboratories.pdf 45x cycles NHS. (page16)

 

 

 

My intuiton recently told me (though I've been regularly looking at these graphs) that the first wave from last year was almost entirely man made and the start of the second wave starting in September shows very heavy manipulation. Very sad state of affairs.

 

More precise questions needed.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Pina Colada said:

This is literally going to be the problem, people are so attached to this lie they will react with anger.

 

One of my best friends is a GP. She is now the covid lead practitioner in her practice. Back in May last year, I told her it was all lies and she was so angry that I had the audacity to say that, even if she didn't accept that the whole thing is a hoax, then at least she could accept it's all hyped up to hysteria.

 

But, no.

 

Long story short, after telling me that out of her 11,000 patients, 3 MAYBE EVEN 4 , NOT CONFIRMED, elderly people had died WITH it at this point (May 2020) and I laughed derisively, and said wake up. We hardly speak now, what can I say to her anymore?

Unfortunately I think she is blinded by a likely huge salary increase and threat of losing her medical licence if she doesn't toe the covid line. 

 

She could of course resign and work in a supermarket I suppose but if she's got a family a big mortgage and other bills she is not going to want to throw that all away even if it means she knows deep down it's all a big lie. Hence our dick head PM saying the success of the "vaccine" was down to greed. 

 

If it was me and I wanted to still be friends I would just sadly accept her stance and try not to engage in covid conversation if you can. It's a tough one either way. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, FrankVitali said:

Something I can't get my head around...

 

A lot of countries now suspending the AstraZenica jab because of fears of blood clots. But a number of them only banning it for under 60s.

 

Why? Blood clots don't pick and choose based on age.

 

This is like pure age-based genocide right in your face.   Oh its safe for over 60s but not under 60s. Was I born yesterday?

 

My point is moot because I believe all these Covid jabs are experimental untested potentially harmful anyway.

 

Surely though if you're going to ban a jab over safety concerns, you'd ban it for all ages.

 

I think the reasoning however misguided is the risk to reward %.

 

Under 60s according to them very little chance of getting covid, so why risk a blood clot? Over 60s according to them have high risk of getting covid and dying so worth taking the risk, according to them!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Pina Colada said:

This is literally going to be the problem, people are so attached to this lie they will react with anger.

 

One of my best friends is a GP. She is now the covid lead practitioner in her practice. Back in May last year, I told her it was all lies and she was so angry that I had the audacity to say that, even if she didn't accept that the whole thing is a hoax, then at least she could accept it's all hyped up to hysteria.

 

But, no.

 

Long story short, after telling me that out of her 11,000 patients, 3 MAYBE EVEN 4 , NOT CONFIRMED, elderly people had died WITH it at this point (May 2020) and I laughed derisively, and said wake up. We hardly speak now, what can I say to her anymore?

 

Have to be careful as these people will turn on you like fundamentalist..even more easy now with the Corona act only one doctors signature needed to section you.

 

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2020/7/schedule/8/enacted

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was speaking to a Russian yesterday about the vaccine and the Russia vaccine is a traditional vaccine apparently. Which is interesting because they managed to get that done quite quickly as well. Why would the west have to use this new experimental mRNA type vaccine when they could have used a traditional vaccine? Is it because this mRNA vaccine is doing something else? What exactly is this mRNA vaccine doing, no one can realy explain it and if you dig deep enough it gets to a brick wall of intellectual property. So the Pharma companies hide what the vaccine is actually doing behind "trade secrets" and IP. 

Edited by SimonTV
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, serpentine said:

 

My intuiton recently told me (though I've been regularly looking at these graphs) that the first wave from last year was almost entirely man made and the start of the second wave starting in September shows very heavy manipulation. Very sad state of affairs.

 

More precise questions needed.

 

The old people being shipped off to nursing homes added to the mortality rate, seems to be a reoccurring theme happening in multiple countries. Considering Italy said most of the deaths were not due to covid as reported initially.

Also the DNR & ventilators must have played a big part.

 

The so called second wave im very sceptical about also with the 60days positive test on the death certificate.

Definitely wasent any real pandemic, compared with previous years in the UK.

 

ExxtTlhVIAg12y0?format=jpg&name=4096x409

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, zArk said:

the Complainant or Claimant creates the court. it is owned by the creator. The law is the law of the case. Whatever the claimant 'claims' is the law , is the law. The defendant cannot introduce new law , it is not his court. the defendant is subject to the court and thus subject to the law.

the judge maintains the integrity of the court

 

people must stop being the defendant, people have the ability to become the counter-complainant or counter claimant any time they wish, the counter-claimant creates his own court alongside the claimants court. the counter-claim writes the law of his case.

if the counter-claim is at a court of record, it is a superior court and has authority over the inferior court system.

 

 

 

 

Interesting. Thanks for the tips zark.

 

I was a mckenzie friend once for someone who tried paying a bill with a promissory note. Needless to say when the matter went to court, Judge-y didn't like it one bit. I quoted Lord Denning 'promissory notes are to be treated as cash' and all that. Could have fought it up the courts but was concerned about costs. I genuinely think the Judge didn't have a clue what we were talking about or the point we were trying to make.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SimonTV said:

Was speaking to a Russian yesterday about the vaccine and the Russia vaccine is a traditional vaccine apparently. Which is interesting because they managed to get that done quite quickly as well. Why would the west have to use this new experimental mRNA type vaccine when they could have used a traditional vaccine? Is it because this mRNA vaccine is doing something else? What exactly is this mRNA vaccine doing, no one can realy explain it and if you dig deep enough it gets to a brick wall of intellectual property. So the Pharma companies hide what the vaccine is actually doing behind "trade secrets" and IP. 

 

They are bringing out yet another different type of jab Novavax in the UK can be refrigerated.

 

I dont quite understand much about this tech.

 

https://www.novavax.com/our-unique-technology#recombinant-nanoparticle-vaccine-technology

Protein subunit vaccines

Instead of showing B-cells the entire pathogen, protein subunit vaccines only show the body parts of the virus. For Covid-19, most developers are going after the spike protein that SARS-CoV-2 uses to enter our cells. The hope is that by showing B-cells that characteristic protein, they’ll be able to recognize it on the pathogen itself, too. It’d be like showing your B-cells a novelty bedazzled bowling hat, and telling them to watch out for any invader wearing it in the future.

Protein subunits aren’t able to turn into a full-blown infection. But the immune responses they produce get weaker over time, which means that a person may require boosters throughout their life. Some annual flu vaccines take the form of protein subunits, as does the HPV vaccine. So far, none of the protein subunit vaccines have made it to testing in humans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, oddsnsods said:

 

Have to be careful as these people will turn on you like fundamentalist..even more easy now with the Corona act only one doctors signature needed to section you.

 

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2020/7/schedule/8/enacted

Hard to believe this is actually happening Odds. The situation is desperate. We are at the point where the truth community needs to knuckle down, stop conflating ideas about the 'virus', aliens, reptilian agendas and nanotech and start focusing on the hard data concerning this 'pandemic' . If we are going to get the info out and be taken seriously on the CV matter surely it makes sense to distance from theories that cannot be substantiated. The very fact that we are posting this info on the David Icke forum immediately detracts from people's willingness to believe us, merely through negative association. I love it here but will NEVER mention D.I when talking about the situation with family and friends. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Avoiceinthecrowd said:

Snip-it_1617167992910.jpg.696899066f33972b00ac788d3d0e5b9b.jpg

https://ottawa.ctvnews.ca/mobile/sheraton-hotel-in-ottawa-terminates-70-employees-on-temporary-leave-due-to-pandemic-1.5367145

 

Snip-it_1617168021297.jpg.47b80095d2ec5f9b7e0a63a38ecd3a34.jpg

 

Me thinks the world's hotels are going to go where the big money will be...gulags. Hotels everywhere converted into housing for the refuseniks that won't play the dying game like most normal folk. Everything is in place just put up fencing and a few yellow vests and you're in business. They wont let us travel unless its to leave this plane of existance so retask the hotels.

I've had similar thoughts. In South Birmingham there are countless buildings going up for students. We know that learning is going to become as remote a thing as working. When I see these characterless blocks going up, I see correction facilities.

 

Look at those wonderful 1950's East European lines:

 

 

Screenshot_20210331_114308.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • lake locked this topic
  • lake unlocked this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...