Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


numnuts

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Sidlittle said:


I can’t find one with the latest figures but here are some older examples 

 

 

FB83D5B9-60BD-4D8E-81A3-D27739AF06AA.jpeg

 

Thank you very much, Sir. Unfortunately the thread elsewhere got shut down. It went:

 

Covid vax is not a vax

mRNA has no long term studies

Real risk of covid

Propaganda video of Wuhan 'dive to the floor' Clan

Questioned PCR tests

 

Soy Boy came back with,

"My momma died of covid." Like it was the trump card.

"How do you know that?" 

"Bwahahahaha. I can't tell my mommy. I'm gonna tell the mod instead."

 

And just like that the thread got sanitised [not the hand version, of course]. Some good info left, though, to make people think.

 

The mod felt the need to post this...

 

"As a reminder, this page is a safe place for people who are affected by this to come to share their concerns. That being said, no one should have to feel they need to defend or explain themselves to any other member and all members are cautioned to be respectful of each other.
Politics and conspiracy theories have no place here. This is a group warning to everyone. I don’t ever ban people but there’s a first time for everything."

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Snip-it_1616893945112.jpg.366a407c4409e7b7b8b4ff351087f457.jpg

https://www.blogto.com/city/2021/03/ontario-emergency-brake-more-severe-how-it-will-work/

 

Snip-it_1616893991147.jpg.8ccc02b50e95809eadca4a3520368877.jpg

 

Decoded this means putting into law a rapid solution to eliminating competition when the dominant tribe feels like it. The dominant tribe sits up there controlling large untouchable monopolies while emerging competitors are slammed by covid measures and effectively bankrupted out of existance. This crap is being written into stone. A permanent and very selective societal on/off switch.

 

Who is doing this, who benefits;

 

Crossword quiz,

33 across...4 letters meaning "chosen ones". "Semites".

Edited by Avoiceinthecrowd
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Basket Case said:

 

Bollox. 

 

Just because it's a gas doesn't mean it doesn't hang around and stay within the fibers. 

 

Does it just magically float away somewhere safe ? 

 

They sterilise the swabs with this gas (Ethylene Oxide) and then immediately put them into sealed packets. 

 

This is basic science and you need a good grasp of that , which very few have to understand this .....

 

Boiling at 10C it will push out from any plastic wrapper , leaving pico grams of EtO left in the swab ...It just cannot deliver the toxic amount required , about only one Millionth of the amount !!! ..

 

This is the problem , if people are not good a science , they believe any scare story! ...

 

And I'm VERY good ...at ALL science! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Avoiceinthecrowd said:

This is your evidence that nanobots is a viable claim? More like the nanobots are the red herring. I have yet to see compelling proof of the viability of such devices,

 

Have you watched the video ?? 

 

If you have point out the errors with time references and we can discuss it ( on the thread involved) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, oz93666 said:

 

Have you watched the video ?? 

 

If you have point out the errors with time references and we can discuss it ( on the thread involved) 

I have made my position on this matter fairly clear a few posts back (not necessarily in response to you) when I explained my belief that should such devices become viable for applications such as those you put forward the scientists involved would disappear along with the plans. Same issue as not releasing a real deadly virus for fear the wind will blow it back in their faces. This belief of mine, in my mind at least, overrides its validity or not. Even if it were valid its going nowhere. Hackers would have a field day with those. 

Edited by Avoiceinthecrowd
Link to comment
Share on other sites

LATE NIGHT. well early morning thought!!!

 

ALL THESE "sheeple" that have received the "poison" so far ( and later) will be more susceptible to the "flu" virus that arrives in the winter.

So next Oct / Nov (2021) there will be MORE testing and of course the "flu" virus will be identified as "covid". There may well be many more deaths occurring as the weakened immune systems (a result of the vaccines!) begin to result in people falling ill.

HENCE another "worse" so called 2nd Pandemic that Gates referred to, and another one hinted at by Hancock.

Anyone have a thought on this particular "theory"?

Edited by Concerned Citizen
Corrections
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Avoiceinthecrowd said:

I have made my position on this matter fairly clear a few posts back (not necessarily in response to you) when I explained my belief that should such devices become viable for applications such as those you put forward the scientists involved would disappear along with the plans.

 

This is not how things work .... ALL scientific research like this is cabal funded and controlled ...

 

This is cutting edge ... no independent scientists could have the resources to create anything close .. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, oz93666 said:

 

This is not how things work .... ALL scientific research like this is cabal funded and controlled ...

 

This is cutting edge ... no independent scientists could have the resources to create anything close .. 

 

 

I was not implying hackers would "create" it. I was saying they could take control of the finished product. Hackers don't build the equipment they commandeer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Avoiceinthecrowd said:

Snip-it_1616897875755.jpg.5858000868ce1c8fac57f8df42840fd1.jpg

 

Looks like the ethylene oxide on the covid swabs leaves a residue. Contrary to a claim made earlier in this discussion that the stuff leaves no residue. They actually classify it as a "side effect".

 

No one has said it leaves NO residue , in my post above I said the amount left would be about a millionth of the amount that would produce toxic effects ....

 

Modern analytic equipment can detect the tiniest amount . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, oz93666 said:

 

No one has said it leaves NO residue , in my post above I said the amount left would be about a millionth of the amount that would produce toxic effects ....

 

Modern analytic equipment can detect the tiniest amount . 

Hardly anything worthy of being called a side effect. If it is not worthy of concern it is not a side effect. Yet they describe it as a side effect. Are you good enough in science to know how little is required to produce an effect on the central nervous system and brain. Perhaps all is required is a tiny tiny amount. Repeated testing increases exposure. A microdot of lsd will send you to lala for 12 hours.

Edited by Avoiceinthecrowd
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, oz93666 said:

 

No one has said it leaves NO residue , in my post above I said the amount left would be about a millionth of the amount that would produce toxic effects ....

 

Modern analytic equipment can detect the tiniest amount . 

Have you tested the swabs to see how much ethylene oxide residue is left on the covid swabs? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Avoiceinthecrowd said:

Have you tested the swabs to see how much ethylene oxide residue is left on the covid swabs? 

 

No ... a gestimation made from a good knowledge of chemistry/physics how gasses diffuse ....

 

I could be out , perhaps the victim receives  100,000 times below toxic levels from one swabbing....

 

This is backed up by the fact that Wearhouse workers surrounded by MILLIONS of these swabs , working 60 hrs a week with them  . show no ill effects , they would be subject to much higher levels , since the swabs are fresh from the manufacturer ...   by the time they reach the user , a few days or a week , virtually all EtO will be gone . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, oz93666 said:

 

No ... a gestimation made from a good knowledge of chemistry/physics how gasses diffuse ....

 

I could be out , perhaps the victim receives  100,000 times below toxic levels from one swabbing....

 

This is backed up by the fact that Wearhouse workers surrounded by MILLIONS of these swabs , working 60 hrs a week with them  . show no ill effects , they would be subject to much higher levels , since the swabs are fresh from the manufacturer ...   by the time they reach the user , a few days or a week , virtually all EtO will be gone . 

Those workers are not shoving those swabs into the deepest recesses of their nasal cavities. Where the contact with the central nervous system is intimate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Avoiceinthecrowd said:

Those workers are not shoving those swabs into the deepest recesses of their nasal cavities. Where the contact with the central nervous system is intimate.

They are breathing the fumes 8hrs a day ... breathing through the nose gets the vapor deep up the nose , as far as any swab......

 

10 million times would probably be more accurate .... these workers get 10 millions time more EtO than someone getting a swab ... And they still have no toxic reaction 

Edited by oz93666
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, oz93666 said:

They are breathing the fumes 8hrs a day ... breathing through the nose gets the vapor deep up the nose , as far as any swab......

 

10 million times would probably be more accurate .... these workers get 10 millions time more EtO than someone getting a swab 

They wear breathing apparatus. If they dont they are in violation of safety standards for industry. Are we talking of illegal migrant workers or well organized corporate industries?

 

Snip-it_1616900225008.jpg.d8691001e92b1d071aa4cadd7152ebdc.jpg

Edited by Avoiceinthecrowd
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Avoiceinthecrowd said:

They wear breathing apparatus. If they dont they are in violation of safety standards for industry. Are we talking of illegal migrant workers or well organized corporate industries?

I think we have spent enough time on this ...

 

We all agree ... Don't take a swab !  Something very nasty on it , could be even worse than the vaccine! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, oz93666 said:

I think we have spent enough time on this ...

 

We all agree ... Don't take a swab !  Something very nasty on it , could be even worse than the vaccine! 

When someone asks me why I won't swab I like to say more than just dont want to take it. I like to elaborate my reasons and EtO has become a compelling angle. Doctors and nurses like an explanation for non compliance with a little bandwidth. They like hearing that your refusal is well thought out. At this point I can't exclude EtO from my personal list of concerns. Perhaps I will change my mind in time but for now I'm not sold on it's safety. This is an integral part of the covid process and we deserve to know why they are so eager to shove that shite so deep in the nasal cavity.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

 

Deadly twin variant Pete.

Sorry I was thinking a little more abstract ,one was gay and one was straight ,given this day and age which is the variant.

As I said to Mr sawdust ,I will have to leave the mushrooms alone😉

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...