Bombadil Posted March 25, 2021 Share Posted March 25, 2021 1 hour ago, TFH said: With all due respect I don't require a doctor's note to stand on my human rights. They are inalienable. I'll carry on with life as usual and if someone tries to refuse me services because I can't wear a mask I'll take legal action under the Equality Act. I agree with you that you should not have to justify your existence. Damn right! But remember human rights are given and taken away by the law makers. What human rights means in U.K. compared to Morocco for example, or any other country are not necesssarily the same interpretation. Also remember how many blatant, unquestionable rights violations all governments commit everyday. Bombings, illegal arrests , violations against women etc. The only right you or any one else has is to stand up and defend what matters to you regardless of the push back from authority. Meaningful changes, such as right to vote for women, LGBTQ’s rights etc have only come about from years of pressure against the system. Doesn’t matter what your rights are when police shoot first and ask questions after. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bombadil Posted March 25, 2021 Share Posted March 25, 2021 Just now, Bombadil said: I agree with you that you should not have to justify your existence. Damn right! But remember human rights are given and taken away by the law makers. What human rights means in U.K. compared to Morocco for example, or any other country are not necesssarily the same interpretation. Also remember how many blatant, unquestionable rights violations all governments commit everyday. Bombings, illegal arrests , violations against women etc. The only right you or any one else has is to stand up and defend what matters to you regardless of the push back from authority. Meaningful changes, such as right to vote for women, LGBTQ’s rights etc have only come about from years of pressure against the system. Doesn’t matter what your rights are when police shoot first and ask questions after. IMO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarianF Posted March 25, 2021 Share Posted March 25, 2021 Just now, Bombadil said: I agree with you that you should not have to justify your existence. Damn right! But remember human rights are given and taken away by the law makers. What human rights means in U.K. compared to Morocco for example, or any other country are not necesssarily the same interpretation. Also remember how many blatant, unquestionable rights violations all governments commit everyday. Bombings, illegal arrests , violations against women etc. The only right you or any one else has is to stand up and defend what matters to you regardless of the push back from authority. Meaningful changes, such as right to vote for women, LGBTQ’s rights etc have only come about from years of pressure against the system. Doesn’t matter what your rights are when police shoot first and ask questions after. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bombadil Posted March 25, 2021 Share Posted March 25, 2021 52 minutes ago, Lamp Of Truth said: It's got to this stage because every advancement of the agenda was sold by the mainstream media as being something completely different to it's actual purpose : Destruction of freedom of speech - Sold as combating racism and discrimination of all kinds Corrupting youth through amoral and decadent music and TV - Cool, cutting edge and rebellious The beginning of the destruction of basic freedoms - Defending us against Al Qaeda Dumbing down of media and culture - Cool and fun entertainment Destruction of Western culture and history - Inclusivity/diversity and righting the wrongs of past racism and discrimination Creating a weak and sick population - Vaccines are essential to protect us from various diseases Getting the world's population addicted to the internet and technology which isolates people and increases mental illness - This is the cutting edge and will make you more intelligent and have more friends The end of freedom and human rights - Protecting us from Covid19 Room 101 awaits us all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oddsnsods Posted March 25, 2021 Share Posted March 25, 2021 (edited) Heres a peer reviewed journal on PCR fraud..that go's into 45 amp cycles what the NHS has been using to detect dead viral fragments. External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive results. Between 30 and 35 there is a grey area, where a positive test cannot be established with certainty. This area should be excluded. Of course, one could perform 45 PCR cycles, as recommended in the Corman-Drosten WHO-protocol (Figure 4), but then you also have to define a reasonable Ct-value (which should not exceed 30). But an analytical result with a Ct value of 45 is scientifically and diagnostically absolutely meaningless (a reasonable Ct-value should not exceed 30). All this should be communicated very clearly. It is a significant mistake that the Corman-Drosten paper does not mention the maximum Ct value at which a sample can be unambiguously considered as a positive or a negative test-result. This important cycle threshold limit is also not specified in any follow-up submissions to date. https://cormandrostenreview.com/report/ threshold above 35 generally involves people who are not infectious, yet NHS England documentation that has not been updated since January runs cycle thresholds to 45 that identify people who are not infectious. (Q1283) https://business.senedd.wales/documents/s500005944/Research brief.pdf Edited March 25, 2021 by oddsnsods Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarianF Posted March 25, 2021 Share Posted March 25, 2021 1 minute ago, oddsnsods said: Heres a peer reviewed journal on PCR fraud..that doesnt even go into 45 cycles what the NHS has been using to detect dead viral fragments. External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive results. Between 30 and 35 there is a grey area, where a positive test cannot be established with certainty. This area should be excluded. Of course, one could perform 45 PCR cycles, as recommended in the Corman-Drosten WHO-protocol (Figure 4), but then you also have to define a reasonable Ct-value (which should not exceed 30). But an analytical result with a Ct value of 45 is scientifically and diagnostically absolutely meaningless (a reasonable Ct-value should not exceed 30). All this should be communicated very clearly. It is a significant mistake that the Corman-Drosten paper does not mention the maximum Ct value at which a sample can be unambiguously considered as a positive or a negative test-result. This important cycle threshold limit is also not specified in any follow-up submissions to date. https://cormandrostenreview.com/report/ threshold above 35 generally involves people who are not infectious, yet NHS England documentation that has not been updated since January runs cycle thresholds to 45 that identify people who are not infectious. (Q1283) https://business.senedd.wales/documents/s500005944/Research brief.pdf Quote "Complete live viruses are necessary for transmission, not the fragments identified by PCR. Prospective routine testing of reference and culture specimens and their relationship to symptoms, signs and patient co-factors should be used to define the reliability of PCR for assessing infectious potential. Those with high cycle threshold are unlikely to have infectious potential." https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33270107/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ziggy Sawdust Posted March 25, 2021 Share Posted March 25, 2021 2 hours ago, DarianF said: Because it's disgusting virtue signalling. Because it's a symbol of slavery. Because the negative effects can be serious. I could go on. Out of likes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TFH Posted March 25, 2021 Share Posted March 25, 2021 8 minutes ago, Bombadil said: I agree with you that you should not have to justify your existence. Damn right! But remember human rights are given and taken away by the law makers. What human rights means in U.K. compared to Morocco for example, or any other country are not necesssarily the same interpretation. Also remember how many blatant, unquestionable rights violations all governments commit everyday. Bombings, illegal arrests , violations against women etc. The only right you or any one else has is to stand up and defend what matters to you regardless of the push back from authority. Meaningful changes, such as right to vote for women, LGBTQ’s rights etc have only come about from years of pressure against the system. Doesn’t matter what your rights are when police shoot first and ask questions after. I mostly agree. However, in the context of me going into Tesco to get a jar of coffee, I don't have to justify that in the UK because I have inalienable (not given or taken away by humans but imparted by my creator). They can only take what I allow them to by capitulation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted March 25, 2021 Share Posted March 25, 2021 (edited) Just been having a look through the mainstream news sites as you do I don't read the articles properly, go straight for the comments . Here are a few choice ones from the most recent BBC news article about the extension of the 'act' in the UK. There are more than just a few like these... The last one is the best.. Edited March 25, 2021 by Doc 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oddsnsods Posted March 25, 2021 Share Posted March 25, 2021 Just now, DarianF said: Exactly dead fragments, from previous Coronavirus. (colds) Lets not get into the 28/60 days of a PCR test death for any reason fraud. Truthyspoon needs breaking in gentle, coz he obviously doesnt have the slightest clue right now. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roscommon Posted March 25, 2021 Share Posted March 25, 2021 2 hours ago, Truthspoon said: Settle down BC. So why do the Japanese wear facemasks? There are hills to fight and die on and wearing face-masks isn't one of them. Nor is it useful and constructive to demonise people who do. Perhaps it does prevent the transmission of Covid 19, but I daresay you probably don't believe that exists do you? Wearing a mask is not only dangerous, but it's also a statement that you have very little confidence in your immune system. Our immune system needs constant practice, and masks suppress this essential balancing act from running it's course naturally. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ziggy Sawdust Posted March 25, 2021 Share Posted March 25, 2021 2 hours ago, TFH said: Hahahahahaha. "Dear Mr xxxx You have been invited to book your Covid-19 vaccinations" How about go fuck yourselves you complicit twats!? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greatdayforfreedom Posted March 25, 2021 Share Posted March 25, 2021 1 minute ago, Doc said: Just been having a look through the mainstream news sites as you do I don't read the articles properly, go straight for the comments . Here are a few choice ones from the most recent BBC news article about the extension of the 'act' in the UK. There are more than just a few like these... 2 minutes ago, Doc said: Just been having a look through the mainstream news sites as you do I don't read the articles properly, go straight for the comments . Here are a few choice ones from the most recent BBC news article about the extension of the 'act' in the UK. There are more than just a few like these... BBC disabling the comments section in 5......4......3......2...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bombadil Posted March 25, 2021 Share Posted March 25, 2021 4 minutes ago, TFH said: I mostly agree. However, in the context of me going into Tesco to get a jar of coffee, I don't have to justify that in the UK because I have inalienable (not given or taken away by humans but imparted by my creator). They can only take what I allow them to by capitulation. I refer you to the George Carlin video Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bombadil Posted March 25, 2021 Share Posted March 25, 2021 24 minutes ago, oddsnsods said: tRuSt ThE ScIeNcE. Trust no one Scully. Muller was fucking right! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarianF Posted March 25, 2021 Share Posted March 25, 2021 9 minutes ago, oddsnsods said: Exactly dead fragments, from previous Coronavirus. (colds) Lets not get into the 28/60 days of a PCR test death for any reason fraud. Truthyspoon needs breaking in gentle, coz he obviously doesnt have the slightest clue right now. I think Ziggy managed to cut through the shit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarianF Posted March 25, 2021 Share Posted March 25, 2021 8 minutes ago, Bombadil said: I refer you to the George Carlin video Imagine if George were alive now, seeing all this Covid bullshit. He would probably design the best stand up show in the history of the universe to take the piss out of it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted March 25, 2021 Share Posted March 25, 2021 10 minutes ago, greatdayforfreedom said: BBC disabling the comments section in 5......4......3......2...... There's loads of them! Could be russian bots I guess but I keep seeing it on loads of different MSM sites where comments are open. Here a few more. Something is brewing in the flock.. Even the 'tits and footy' brigade at my workplace are starting to smell the shite. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Human10 Posted March 25, 2021 Share Posted March 25, 2021 52 minutes ago, Beaujangles said: ...and your eyesight lol This works fine TY Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Truthspoon Posted March 25, 2021 Share Posted March 25, 2021 (edited) 20 minutes ago, Ziggy Sawdust said: Fuck the fuck off. Really? Is that your response? Are you an SJW wannabee or something? Seriously guys.... look at yourselves, I'm just giving a different opinion and some of you behaving no different to Biden's hysterical town burning maniacs. If you can't discuss things without having an emotional meltdown and resorting to hysteria and insults then something is wrong with you. Edited March 25, 2021 by Truthspoon 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roscommon Posted March 25, 2021 Share Posted March 25, 2021 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lamp Of Truth Posted March 25, 2021 Share Posted March 25, 2021 3 hours ago, Truthspoon said: Surgeons! Good point, they wear face masks too. Why do you think they do that? To stop saliva from falling into the opening they're operating on. This is fact, nothing to do with their breath. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Truthspoon Posted March 25, 2021 Share Posted March 25, 2021 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Lamp Of Truth said: To stop saliva from falling into the opening they're operating on. This is fact, nothing to do with their breath. Yeah, because operating on a human body is so mouth watering. Maybe all that raw meat triggers a subconscious feeding response and only the cotton surgeon mask stops the surgeon from going into an immediate feeding frenzy. I can't believe you said that and even said it was a fact.... this doesn't look good people. Edited March 25, 2021 by Truthspoon 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Chinnery Posted March 25, 2021 Share Posted March 25, 2021 https://richieallen.co.uk/whitty-covid-difficult-to-find-most-people-have-mild-or-no-symptoms/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Human10 Posted March 25, 2021 Share Posted March 25, 2021 2 minutes ago, Truthspoon said: Yeah, because operating on a human body is so mouth watering. I can't believe you said that and even said it was a fact.... this doesn't look good people. Just in case you missed something and got on the wrong forum... https://www.primarydoctor.org/masks-not-effect Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.