Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


Message added by Grumpy Owl,

This topic is for all general discussion regarding the current COVID-19 pandemic. There are of course numerous other related topics for discussing specific aspects of this pandemic in more detail. And there are other parts of this forum for more 'off-topic' discussions.

Recommended Posts

On 3/19/2021 at 10:59 PM, Bullion said:

So called “doctors” need to step away from treating people and stick to what they’re really good at......griffonage 😂

 

They are just glorified pill dispensers these day.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 49.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • DarianF

    2841

  • oddsnsods

    2279

  • Avoiceinthecrowd

    2048

  • SimonTV

    1932

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

You wont believe this.   I just went down Lidls to get some steak.   Security guard calls me out as I walk past & I ignore him. Gets my steak walks to the credit only till

Some images of today's demonstration in London (not taken by me personally).                

Fuck the fuck off.

Posted Images

On 3/19/2021 at 6:15 AM, skitzorat said:

I was thinking this too.. classic type of bait n switch...   AZ is bad, see we are being honest and telling you (offering something desirable to gain favour)....then... gotcha with the mRNA ones!  (thwarted with the less desirable)

 

oh and BTW all you people who lined up and got AZ, you have to have mRNA ones in 6 months and a double dose to make up for it, cos AZ has been completely withdrawn, it's fine, we are just doing this out of an abundance of caution because we really care, you see.......and we can then study the mixing of the cocktails..

 

And just to take the piss out of you, they say:

 

"The duration of protection has not yet been established. Studies are ongoing."

PAGE 3: https://www.ebs.tga.gov.au/ebs/picmi/picmirepository.nsf/pdf?OpenAgent&id=CP-2021-PI-01194-1&d=202103201016933

 

So all these idiots thinking they are 'protected' - even the Government admits they have no idea 😂

 

You morons.

Link to post
Share on other sites

wow late to this today just catching up. can't seem to find a decent livestream. Watching previously seemed pretty peaceful. Then on the sun they're saying clashes with police but haven't seen a livestream for that. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/18/2021 at 8:39 AM, oddsnsods said:

 

I know about terrain Zarkov & I have had my mercury removed & detoxed meticulously for over a year to try to avoid brain residue.

Mercury mainly creates candida overgrowth & then arthritis etc..but I know they are different symptoms to flu.

So I disagree & dont believe its just carsionagens from chemicals...otherwise we wouldnt have a flu season. People would just be getting ill whenever & it wouldnt be spread around the household.

Wasn't trying to imply that you dont know - just sharing.

Agree - it a combination and for each it is as diverse as each lifestyle.

Dr Andrew Hall Cutler had much to say of mercury and as an industrial chemist understood the nuances at the biological level to an depth that nearly all medical research rarely reaches.

http://amalgamillness.com/Mercury.html illustrates the multitude of conditions caused.

I also was not implying that chemicals are the only reason, they are a constituent.

 

Winter being colder and darker, we spend more time indoors, exposed to far more electromagnetic radiation from various sources including mains. If Firstenberg is correct as it appears he is then that corresponds to the seasonal nature of such illness.

Again - I am not saying that it is the only reason as each reaction/dis-ease is a the culminating effect of many causes.

Not much it seems occurs in isolation

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Avoiceinthecrowd said:

Snip-it_1616258464531.jpg.8fef79c733744a4caf9640bd896a6e05.jpg

https://www.theedgemarkets.com/article/scientists-probing-new-theories-whether-astrazeneca-shot-linked-blood-clots

 

Snip-it_1616258443093.jpg.ef6d75f1ae116a1d2f72ed522df728f7.jpg

 

How do we know the other vaccines are not doing clots too? Because the media did not report them they didn't happen. The fact that Zeneca's clots made mainstream is very suspicious too. They could have covered it up. Some kind of variation on the switch-and-bait theme.

 

Snip-it_1616258958359.jpg.60afd9e0c0d778de63f9244fb11e4509.jpg

 

They are all making a product to fight the same thing. Are we now to believe that besides the near impossibility of finding one recipe they would now have five? The vaccine companies have already said they are not in competition with each other. Clots should have been reported uniformly across brands.

There was a earlier video on this thread of a US doctor who talked in depth about the effects of aluminium hydroxide causing mini strokes to organs around the body. As a universal adjuvant the differences between manufacturers would be quantity.

Edited by zarkov
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, zarkov said:

There was a earlier video on this thread of a US doctor who talked in depth about the effects of aluminium hydroxide causing mini strokes to organs around the body. As a universal adjuvant the differences between manufacturers would be quantity.

Thank you. Very interesting. Out of likes.

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Ergo Storm said:

 

That's a rhetorical twisting of what I said.  I simply pointed out the intrusiveness of being asked for the basis of the exemption at all and how it was demeaning to be asked and have to reveal it (if you do, and looks wimpy, etc.).

On the rare occurrences that I've been asked I've just said "I'm exempt" and that has been enough. 

 

I personally think that the fact I'm not wearing a mask shows that I'm exempt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just got round to watching the Super Bowl half time show. As many have commented on here before, the symbolism and messaging in the Super Bowl half time show is often presented in a brazen way by the cabal, but this year was unbelievable:

 

 

If you can't be bothered watching the full performance, you'll get the gist from the last two minutes. The fully masked up zombified backing dancers, blinded by the lights (media brainwashing), interchanging between a kind of communist/satanic march and dancing energetically and freely. In the end, the camera pans to The Weekend with fireworks in the background, and when it pans back, all the zombified backing dancers are lifeless on the floor.

 

All very dark. I don't think this ends well for anyone marching to the tune of the cabal. 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah the people that are there now attacking police vans seem like they are paid provokoters. That blonde bloke with curly hair and skinny jeans seems like an antifa type. I haven't been following the streams but seems false. I haven't been following the protest last couple of hours so not sure what's happened.

 

Or are they the 'good guys' expressing frustration who knows. Seems the atmosphere has changed. 

Edited by Fluke
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, Not Thoth said:

On the rare occurrences that I've been asked I've just said "I'm exempt" and that has been enough. 

 

I personally think that the fact I'm not wearing a mask shows that I'm exempt.

I’ve never been asked either. Guess it depends on the jobsworth at the time. Had an interesting chat at a Sainsbury’s with a guy on the door. Asked him what they require etc. Tried to explain that no proof existed of exemption whether they wanted it or not. Also explained that anyone who wanted could purchase a lanyard or whatever, hence making the point of one utterly pointless.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had an interesting experience in my local shop. Cashier asked me to maintain that oxymoron of social distancing, even though she had two masks and a plastic barrier. When she was done she couldn’t understand why I wouldn’t swipe my card. Eventually I explained that if she wanted me to be at a distance how could I come forward to swipe. Silly trout. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/16/2021 at 5:56 PM, DarianF said:

 

I saw this article on the topic: https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/uk-35-people-deaf-and-25-blind-after-taking-mrna-vaccine-shots

 

But I tried to find the actual yellowcard data. And the website just keeps taking me around in circles. Same as the fkn VAERS website in the USA. Does anyone know how to work these bloody websites? Because it's doing my head it.

 

And of course, they would have designed it that way.

Just go here https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions and look up the one you want. The Summary isn't very useful. Prefer individual vaccines ones. 16 permanently blind from Pfizer to 7 March (data lock date) (237 deaths). 30 from AZ (289 deaths) but also temp blindness and lots of visual impairment

Link to post
Share on other sites

The fear is always that one is just playing a part in their narrative. They will use what you do in a preplanned dirty scheme to destroy you. Instead, no we make our own narrative.

Edited by SimonTV
Link to post
Share on other sites

WHAT A FANTASTIC DAY.....TODAY IS THE 1ST TIME IN ALL OF THIS IV ACTUALLY HAD HOPE..

 

 

FUCKING AMAZING.......

 

ME AND THE WIFE LOVED EVERY SINGLE FUCKING SECOND....AND EVERY VIDEO OF POLICE BRUTALITY SHARED....IS A POWERFUL MESSAGE TO THE FUCKIN SHEEP.

 

IM OVER THE MOON WHOOP WHOOOP

  • Like 9
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, shadowmoon said:

https://joedubs.com/tobacco-the-other-side-of-the-story/

 

Quite a different outlook there from Joe on tobacco.

When I  was young the majority of  adults  smoked, cancer was much rarer.

Few smokers now and cancer  we are told is 1 in 3 people. 

?

 

Felt for a while that the whole anti smoking movement that started in the 60's but really took off in the 90's was a gateway to making it seem acceptable for governments to take away basic freedoms

 

"Smoking causes cancer so we're going to protect you all by infringing on smokers rights and basic freedoms but it's OK because we're doing all this to protect you from cancer."

 

This put it into peoples subconscious minds that it was normal and acceptable for the state to interfere and dictate to grown adults how they should live their lives. It's a trend that has continued in ever more areas of our lives since the 1990's.

 

Cigarettes are bad for your health. Even if the cancer link has been exaggerated fairly sure the average life expectancy of cigarette smokers is significantly lower than non cigarette smokers.

But that shouldn't matter, as long as grown adults know the risks it's their right to live their life and do to their bodies what they like as long as they aren't hurting anyone free of government interference.

Seems if you really want to smoke tobacco the more sensible options would be cigars or pipe smoking, you don't inhale cigar or pipe smoke and the tobacco isn't loaded with chemicals.

Edited by Lamp Of Truth
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...