Ergo Storm Posted March 20, 2021 Share Posted March 20, 2021 (edited) On 3/11/2021 at 3:09 PM, Beaujangles said: I think the fact that our bodies need oxygen and expel carbon dioxide is a medical fact. Restricting someones breathing is a criminal offence last I checked ie strangulation and suffocation to name but two. Forcing someone to do same to self surely falls into an even wider realm of criminal possibilities... ie holding a gun to someones head. By saying that medically you are exempt you are stating that you need and want to breathe sufficient oxygen. You don't do well with excess carbon dioxide. It causes you distress to be forced to do things against your will and better judgment, which in turn causes you to get thoughts that would not normally occur...like punching the lights out of anyone who crosses your path and insists that you follow orders that are in violation of your natural human state and conflict with your natural human emotions... I'd say that was medical and psychological reasons for being EXEMPT..... I didn't say to them I was medically-exempt. I said I was exempt. I'm was simply pointing out that Morrisons demand that someone be medically-exempt (or did at the time) and I considered that contrary to the regulations and that was the basis of my dispute with them. My post says the diametric opposite thing to what you and others have interpreted. Edited March 20, 2021 by Ergo Storm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.