Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


Message added by Grumpy Owl,

This topic is for all general discussion regarding the current COVID-19 pandemic. There are of course numerous other related topics for discussing specific aspects of this pandemic in more detail. And there are other parts of this forum for more 'off-topic' discussions.

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Human10 said:

It could be just 'mistake'... He could got in a trap of this idea... Personally I would recommend to watch doc Reid Sheftall Truth in Science. Facts, no BS. He deserve more exposure. I don't think his channel will last for long on YT...

 

I like Vernon, listening to him when everyone else I know was listening to that dodgy shill john campbell and nodding their heads to his every utterance.

 

Nobody has every answer to everything not even the old man in the chair..

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 57.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • DarianF

    3083

  • Avoiceinthecrowd

    2460

  • oddsnsods

    2412

  • SimonTV

    2273

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

I have now been called to the final vaccination deadline as a health care professional. I informed my employer that these vaccines are not technically vaccines, but are "gene therapies" as they employ

You wont believe this.   I just went down Lidls to get some steak.   Security guard calls me out as I walk past & I ignore him. Gets my steak walks to the credit only till

EXPLAIN PLEASE........   People expect so many answers without giving anything back in return.   If the "tin foil hatters" are so nuts, how about the rule followers give some answe

Posted Images

4 minutes ago, shadowmoon said:

 

"My Dear Derek, please don't wake up yet, we need more dailymail articles and there's only 3 chapters left to complete until the book is ready."

Wife Kate says doctors have no idea why the virus has taken such a hold over Derek, who is believed to be the longest-suffering Covid patient.

 

In the world, ever? Blimey what are the chances of that happening?

Hang in there Derek your wife is doing you proud!

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Outsider said:

Wife Kate says doctors have no idea why the virus has taken such a hold over Derek, who is believed to be the longest-suffering Covid patient.

 

In the world, ever? Blimey what are the chances of that happening?

Hang in there Derek your wife is doing you proud!

Every time he sees her coming he shuts his eyes tight.. "I'm still ill, I can't move.."

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, skitzorat said:

Like if an invisible plane managed to dodge all the ground to air defence missiles that surround probably the most fortified slither of land on Earth, and then manage to crash into the most defended building on Earth, then manage to turn into invisible dust particles leaving only identifiable remints of a partially destroyed wall of the building?🤪

 

David Icke did the funniest bloody speech on this. I pissed myself laughing. I think it was called something like "David Icke rips apart 9/11". It was a very old one on YouTube, but just so funny. "Fighter aircraft launched, oooooohhh just missed" had the audience laughing so hard. I wish I could find it somewhere. But yes, the absurdity of Norad being hoodwinked by some guys in a cave in Afghanistan is beyond comical. It's another level.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, oddsnsods said:

Pfizer's Covid vaccine is linked to MORE blood clots than AstraZeneca's – so why isn't the EU banning it? Hypocrisy of European nations revealed as Italy admits decision was 'POLITICAL'

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9366963/Coronavirus-Pfizers-Covid-vaccine-linked-blood-clots-AstraZenecas-UK.html

 

If it is political why has non European countries banned it as well? 

Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, shadowmoon said:

Every time he sees her coming he shuts his eyes tight.. "I'm still ill, I can't move.."

Haha....makes perfect sense, I feel ill only after a few seconds of her appearing on TV, the poor sod is married to her!

 

 

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, SimonTV said:

 

If it is political why has non European countries banned it as well? 

 

LOL been through this already.. its not about saving lives thats all I know.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, skitzorat said:

Is that the treasonous one that allows foreign troops on aussie soil? to "assist" with natural disasters such as floods and "climate change" and........ pandemics..I hadn't actually seen it as a Bill.

 

I remember you and I bought it up a while ago with Bullion; he said something about Defence Forces not turning guns on their own people to me and I replied.. thats why theyve bought in some new law and I think it was you that verified......terrifying...I remember watching Max Igan talk about it first...

 

Yep, that's the one. I can't remember if @Bullion and I brought it up originally, but we definitely did discuss it. At the time it was still being 'debated'. But since then, it has now passed both houses of Parliament.

 

The full final text is right here (official): https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/bills/r6594_aspassed/toc_pdf/20117b01.pdf;fileType=application%2Fpdf

 

It's unbelievable. They can decide what constitutes an emergency or pending emergency, allow foreign military and police forces onto our soil, and just to piss in our faces, anything these foreign forces do to the civilian population – they are not civilly or criminally liable for. Seriously, god help us. This is so far beyond treason... I can't even find the words.

 

Think of the power this gives these bastards. This is so dangerous and shiver when I think about what they could do to us in the future.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Moderna vaccine trials on babies and other children under 12 is taking place in collaboration with the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (where Anthony Fauci has ruled the roost for a generation) at the National Institutes of Health, and the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority at the US Department of Health and Human Services.

The first young children have received their shots in this trial and Moderna CEO Stephane Bancel said the vaccine was being tested on healthy children in select cities in the US and Canada.

“This pediatric study will help us assess the potential safety and immunogenicity of our Covid-19 vaccine candidate in this important younger age population,” Bancel said.

There are eight study sites and the first one to get underway is Phoenix, Arizona.

Local Fox 10 reported to the public that they can now sign up to get their children vaccinated against Covid-19 in the Moderna trial in the south-west city. Fox added:

“I am just really excited. I am excited to be a part of getting this out to the public,” Rachel Guthrie, a mother of three, told the station.

When she heard about the Moderna trial for children, she knew she wanted to sign up her three-year-old son Ollie and one-year-old daughter Charlotte.

“The risks are so minuscule compared to what the benefits are,” she said.

To qualify for the trial, kids need to be between six-months-old and 12-years-old.

Although the trial just began, a huge response has already started to pour in.

“It has just been amazing, mind-boggling and very reassuring and good,” said Dr. Steve Plimpton, who is the principal investigator for the Moderna study for Covid-19.

He says there are eight study sites in the US, and Phoenix is the first location to get started.

Participants are willing to travel from all over to Phoenix to take part, including those from the south.

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Outsider said:

The Moderna vaccine trials on babies and other children under 12 is taking place in collaboration with the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (where Anthony Fauci has ruled the roost for a generation) at the National Institutes of Health, and the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority at the US Department of Health and Human Services.

The first young children have received their shots in this trial and Moderna CEO Stephane Bancel said the vaccine was being tested on healthy children in select cities in the US and Canada.

“This pediatric study will help us assess the potential safety and immunogenicity of our Covid-19 vaccine candidate in this important younger age population,” Bancel said.

There are eight study sites and the first one to get underway is Phoenix, Arizona.

Local Fox 10 reported to the public that they can now sign up to get their children vaccinated against Covid-19 in the Moderna trial in the south-west city. Fox added:

“I am just really excited. I am excited to be a part of getting this out to the public,” Rachel Guthrie, a mother of three, told the station.

When she heard about the Moderna trial for children, she knew she wanted to sign up her three-year-old son Ollie and one-year-old daughter Charlotte.

“The risks are so minuscule compared to what the benefits are,” she said.

To qualify for the trial, kids need to be between six-months-old and 12-years-old.

Although the trial just began, a huge response has already started to pour in.

“It has just been amazing, mind-boggling and very reassuring and good,” said Dr. Steve Plimpton, who is the principal investigator for the Moderna study for Covid-19.

He says there are eight study sites in the US, and Phoenix is the first location to get started.

Participants are willing to travel from all over to Phoenix to take part, including those from the south.

 

 

 

“The risks are so minuscule compared to what the benefits are,” she said.

 

Err, Rachel I think you'll find you've signed your kids up for a trial to discover what the risks and benefits are.

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Why is it that normal sheep's are still oblivious to the fact most people on TV during live shows and during parliamentary sessions are still not wearing masks but are still demanding kids must wear them on returning to school and when people go out to the shops. Also oblivious to everyone being basically told to stay at home but lately the guidelines are stating being out in the open has minimal transmission rates. When will people wake up.

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, skitzorat said:

What a coincidence something very similar was rolled out in the UK shielding the forces from prosecutions from doing harm, even rape....and then boots on the streets in Liverpool doing "tests" ...and now the Aussie troops giving shots...It's almost as if its globally coordinated?!!!  fuck I've been wearing my tinfoil hat too tight!

 

https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL2009/S00105/dangerous-streamlining-emergencies-militarisation-and-civil-liberties.htm

 

The granting of such immunities, notably to institutions vested with powers to wound and kill, should cause shuddering in the community. It effectively nullifies any enforceable right of redress in instances of harm. It is also a statement of exclusion: judges and their scrutiny will not be needed. The protectors know best.

 

 

The bill would “enhance” the ability of such personnel “to respond to natural disasters and other civil emergencies.” The bill promises “more flexible service operations for reservists”. It will also permit “the Governor-General to act on the advice of the Minister for Defence, after consultation with the Prime Minister, in all circumstances and not just for reasons of urgency.” Broadness in executive power is the enemy of liberty.

 

Human rights activist and advocate Kellie Tranter finds much room for concern, having a keen interest in the problems behind militarising climate change responses and, for that matter, the dangers involved in the deployment of military personnel in areas of civilian concern. “Defence forces used in a civilian context should not be normalised,” she suggests, with good reason, in a briefing paper on the Enhancement of Defence Force Response to Emergencies Bill. She points out that this latest proposed amendment lacks definitional scope. “Other emergencies” is simply not defined. The Defence Assistance to the Civil Community policy is already wide in application, seemingly decided by those in the Department of Defence. “It is not inconceivable to see the normalisation of military forces on the streets responding to public order issues that should be dealt with by police, for example protests.”

 

” The proposed immunities would also extend to “foreign military and police forces”, suggesting more than a cheerful nod of approval to those nuclear armed allies across the pond. “The use of a foreign army or militarised police force should not be allowed at all, and certainly not without the safeguard of citizens’ rights of access to courts.”

 

....Australian Defence Force to deal with, for instance, “domestic violence”, or likely dangers to “declared infrastructure” are left undefined. Vagueness bedevils the legislation, passed ostensibly to protect the populace against terrorist attacks. “Once deployed, military personnel can exercise extraordinary powers over civilians, overturning basic legal and democratic rights.”

The trend is not being arrested. Australia’s defence forces, unlike the current prime minister, envisage a future of climate change chaos and a pressing need for readiness. The Department of Defence, in a recent update, also worries about the “long-term impacts of the coronavirus pandemic”, which has “deeply altered the economic trajectory of the region and the world with implications for Australia’s prosperity and security.” We have been warned.

 

****************************

I can't find anything as extreme in NZ, although "enforcement officer" is very vague..

 

enforcement officer means—

(a)the Director-General:

(b)a medical officer of health appointed under the Health Act 1956 for a health district:

(c)a constable:

(d)in relation to any function or power, a person authorised to perform that function or power under section 18 or a person in a class of persons authorised to perform that function or power under section 18

 

18Authorised persons

(1)The Director-General may authorise a suitably qualified and trained person who is not an employee of the Ministry of Health, or a class of suitably qualified and trained persons who are not employees of the Ministry of Health, to carry out any functions and powers of an enforcement officer under this Act.

 

Enforcement

As with the orders made under the Health Act 1956, non-compliance with orders provided for in the Bill may result in imprisonment or a fine on conviction. A mental element (for example, the person acted intentionally) has been included in these offences to reflect the severity of conviction as a penalty. To further support the enforcement of health measures in the orders and to promote greater compliance, infringement offences have been added for non-compliance with orders. Businesses that do not comply with orders (for example, by not ensuring physical distance requirements are met by customers and staff) can be ordered to close for up to 24 hours. The policy objective underpinning these enforcement measures is to enable a graduated response approach to offending.

To enable enforcement of the measures in orders, the Police are given a power to enter premises, including private dwellinghouses and marae, without a warrant if they have reasonable grounds to believe that people have gathered there in contravention of an order and entry is necessary for the purpose of giving people a direction to comply with the order (for example, giving an order to disperse). Enforcement officers can enter without a warrant any premises other than private dwelling houses and marae if they have reasonable grounds to believe that a person is failing to comply with any aspect of an order.

 

 

 

Thats comforting..... Jackboots can only nab me at the Drs or shop or push me into a store off the streets lol  as only police can enter my actual house and take me away to an isolation facility if I return a positive PRC test  - that they can force me to take...especially if I was stupid enough to use "trace n trace" and it binged me after being next to some stranger when I was buying smokes and bread at the 711 who had tested postitive.

 

 

 

I wouldn't be surprised if other goodies are rolled out, although since they've dearmed us and the country is full of brainwashed sheep - (you would have heard of that ol' Kiwi-sheep joke Aussies used to always taunt me at the pub, with which I never found funny at the time, but REALLY don't find it funny now...)- I believe they just won't bother bringing the boots out as everyone is seemingly happy to just roll up their sleeve....I've come to believe thats why NZ has gotten off so lightly... why waste resources and risk upsetting the herd when they will merrily walk themselves into the slaughterhouse and thank you for it>?

 

https://www.legislation.govt.nz/bill/government/2020/0246/latest/LMS344134.html

In saying all of the above it is only valid for 90 days before having to be renewed - hence the random lockdowns in Auckland every now and then I think...

- strangely enough, I cannot find for the life of me clearly identify specify of dates as it its all mangled up through a cacophony of different notices lol for example

 

Reprint as at 7 March 2021

Coat of Arms of New Zealand

COVID-19 Public Health Response (Alert Level Requirements) Order (No 4) 2021

 

1308300728_Screenshot2021-03-16225212-min.png.07ec34aa3ba74d31103683dccdc8104f.png

 

 

Very good research there mate. More scary stuff. Oh hey, did I ever post the removal of children powers from the South Australian government? That's probably the sickest of all (but each state is basically just as psychopathic, with minor variations). Try this one on for size. I didn't believe it when I first read it, but I verified it. It's true (i.e. not that I didn't believe they would do it, obviously they're crazy they'll do anything, but I didn't believe they would state it so blatantly):

 

"Without   derogating   from  section  25,  an  authorised  officer  may,  for  the  purpose  of  ensuring   compliance  with   any  direction   under  that  section,  remove  a child  from  any  premises,  place,  vehicle   or  vessel  to  a place of residence  of the child  or to a hospital  or quarantine  facility,  as the authorised  officer  thinks fit  (and may, in  doing so, use such force as is reasonably  necessary)."

 

No, I'm not kidding [ https://www.legislation.sa.gov.au/LZ/V/A/2020/COVID-19 EMERGENCY RESPONSE (FURTHER MEASURES) AMENDMENT ACT 2020_14/2020.14.UN.PDF ]. It's on page 10.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, DarianF said:

 

Very good research there mate. More scary stuff. Oh hey, did I ever post the removal of children powers from the South Australian government? That's probably the sickest of all (but each state is basically just as psychopathic, with minor variations). Try this one on for size. I didn't believe it when I first read it, but I verified it. It's true (i.e. not that I didn't believe they would do it, obviously they're crazy they'll do anything, but I didn't believe they would state it so blatantly):

 

"Without   derogating   from  section  25,  an  authorised  officer  may,  for  the  purpose  of  ensuring   compliance  with   any  direction   under  that  section,  remove  a child  from  any  premises,  place,  vehicle   or  vessel  to  a place of residence  of the child  or to a hospital  or quarantine  facility,  as the authorised  officer  thinks fit  (and may, in  doing so, use such force as is reasonably  necessary)."

 

No, I'm not kidding [ https://www.legislation.sa.gov.au/LZ/V/A/2020/COVID-19 EMERGENCY RESPONSE (FURTHER MEASURES) AMENDMENT ACT 2020_14/2020.14.UN.PDF ]. It's on page 10.

That's some seriously messed up stuff. I doubt they'll be taking them to there houses

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, GSM said:

That's some seriously messed up stuff. I doubt they'll be taking them to there houses

 

 

Almost as messed up as the Western Australian government giving itself the power to force you to wear electronic tracking bracelets if you don't follow their fake virus quarantine narrative:

 

"A non-compliant [person in] quarantine will have one of these devices fitted [to them]"

https://www.sbs.com.au/news/electronic-tracking-devices-among-new-coronavirus-powers-for-wa-security-agencies

 

See section 70A. Electronic monitoring of persons in quarantine https://www.parliament.wa.gov.au/Parliament/Bills.nsf/5924018EEA598B994825853B001C0B08/$File/Bill179-1.pdf ].

Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Outsider said:

The Moderna vaccine trials on babies and other children under 12 is taking place in collaboration with the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (where Anthony Fauci has ruled the roost for a generation) at the National Institutes of Health, and the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority at the US Department of Health and Human Services.

The first young children have received their shots in this trial and Moderna CEO Stephane Bancel said the vaccine was being tested on healthy children in select cities in the US and Canada.

“This pediatric study will help us assess the potential safety and immunogenicity of our Covid-19 vaccine candidate in this important younger age population,” Bancel said.

There are eight study sites and the first one to get underway is Phoenix, Arizona.

Local Fox 10 reported to the public that they can now sign up to get their children vaccinated against Covid-19 in the Moderna trial in the south-west city. Fox added:

“I am just really excited. I am excited to be a part of getting this out to the public,” Rachel Guthrie, a mother of three, told the station.

When she heard about the Moderna trial for children, she knew she wanted to sign up her three-year-old son Ollie and one-year-old daughter Charlotte.

“The risks are so minuscule compared to what the benefits are,” she said.

To qualify for the trial, kids need to be between six-months-old and 12-years-old.

Although the trial just began, a huge response has already started to pour in.

“It has just been amazing, mind-boggling and very reassuring and good,” said Dr. Steve Plimpton, who is the principal investigator for the Moderna study for Covid-19.

He says there are eight study sites in the US, and Phoenix is the first location to get started.

Participants are willing to travel from all over to Phoenix to take part, including those from the south.

 

 

 

Maybe it's good if IQ could be inherited... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, oddsnsods said:

 

Things happen so fast is easy to forget, but if you remember with the roll out of the AZ. Germany started slagging us off saying the AZ wasent good enough straight away, followed by other countries & Brexit people were saying how great our jab was & they were proud of it.. this must have been a while ago now & its just escalated from there really.

Norway reported 29 deaths from Pfizer back in January & was no talk about banning anything.

So I do think its political & some kind of pharma battle.

Australia also refused Pfizer & chose AZ & Canada all colonial influences of course.

Its funny how the media are now starting to admit it when someone dies & not leaving their little disclaimers.

 

How can you have this many people dying & over 600 in UK alone, yet these countries only deem AZ as the issue.

Why isnt the British government banning these vaccines then...I pointed out has been about 39 deaths from cardiac arrest with the AZ in UK. Its all what the pre$$titutes choose to report I guess & our government keeps quiet.

 

https://twitter.com/AlexBerenson/status/1371486125756407808?s=20

 

Good jab, bad jab.

Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, oddsnsods said:

Pfizer's Covid vaccine is linked to MORE blood clots than AstraZeneca's – so why isn't the EU banning it? Hypocrisy of European nations revealed as Italy admits decision was 'POLITICAL'

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9366963/Coronavirus-Pfizers-Covid-vaccine-linked-blood-clots-AstraZenecas-UK.html

Asked what he would say to those in the UK who are booked to receive an Oxford jab, Professor Openshaw told BBC Radio 4 yesterday: 'I really wouldn't be worried at the present time.

'I think it is very clear that the benefits of being vaccinated at the moment so far outweigh the possible concern over this rather rare type of blood clot

 

in partnership with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
 

https://www.immunology.org/news/bsi-reaction-government-announcement-spending-review

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, DarianF said:

 

Almost as messed up as the Western Australian government giving itself the power to force you to wear electronic tracking bracelets if you don't follow their fake virus quarantine narrative:

 

"A non-compliant [person in] quarantine will have one of these devices fitted [to them]"

https://www.sbs.com.au/news/electronic-tracking-devices-among-new-coronavirus-powers-for-wa-security-agencies

 

See section 70A. Electronic monitoring of persons in quarantine https://www.parliament.wa.gov.au/Parliament/Bills.nsf/5924018EEA598B994825853B001C0B08/$File/Bill179-1.pdf ].

 

@skitzorat FYI this document:

 

https://www.parliament.wa.gov.au/Parliament/Bills.nsf/5924018EEA598B994825853B001C0B08/$File/Bill179-1.pdf

 

see pages 4 and 5.

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, skitzorat said:

@DarianF

 

“Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right.”

 

I remember studying Orwell at university. We were told it was all fiction. Yeah.... sure. 😁

 

That quote I'm sure inspired Equilibrium (2002) - movie starring Christian Bale.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, DarianF said:

 

Almost as messed up as the Western Australian government giving itself the power to force you to wear electronic tracking bracelets if you don't follow their fake virus quarantine narrative:

 

"A non-compliant [person in] quarantine will have one of these devices fitted [to them]"

https://www.sbs.com.au/news/electronic-tracking-devices-among-new-coronavirus-powers-for-wa-security-agencies

 

See section 70A. Electronic monitoring of persons in quarantine https://www.parliament.wa.gov.au/Parliament/Bills.nsf/5924018EEA598B994825853B001C0B08/$File/Bill179-1.pdf ].

And most people are just fine and dandy with those bills getting past.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...