Coronavirus Mega-Thread.

[Outsider]

6 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

 

what if william shakespeare a not highly literate minor actor didn't write all of those plays and in fact they were written by a team of writers much like modern day sitcoms? What if 'william shakespeare' is just a pen name used by that team of writers and the use of that name by the cabal today is an inside joke which says to those with with the eyes to see that the whole thing is just a facade concealing a lie?

Or perhaps the proles don't have a clue who he is because he doesn't have a Fakebook account.

[Outsider]

3 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

 

yes absolutely. This is why david says its a 'perception deception'

 

The conspirators create false perceptions in the minds of the mass of the public so that the public perceive a false reality to exist so that they then behave according to that false perception of reality. They have effectively cast a spell over them

 

This could be the false perception that a country has weapons of mass destruction that it doesn't have or it could be that a country is under threat from 'terror' or that it is facing a deadly pandemic where there are no mass die-offs etc

 

Then there are those who have not fallen under the effects of the spell who are trying to wake up the masses to the false perception but receiving anger in reply hence the quote "it's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled"

The Spellcasters must also have a good chuckle at how passionately we argue our case and how little traction we seem to get!

[Macnamara]

3 minutes ago, Outsider said:

Or perhaps the proles don't have a clue who he is because he doesn't have a Fakebook account.

 

give it 5-10 years time and he will be replaced in the curriculem by rap albums by Jay Z so as to 'decolonise' literature

 

This will all aid in a dive in the IQ level of school children

[Mr Chinnery]

Flip the 9 new cases 666.

 

They really are taking the p1ss.

[Macnamara]

5 minutes ago, Outsider said:

The Spellcasters must also have a good chuckle at how passionately we argue our case and how little traction we seem to get!

 

oh yes they give us a nod now and then in their speeches but they control the corporate media and the education system so they control the vast majority of the flow of information to the minds of the public

 

 

 

 

Edited March 12, 2021 by Macnamara

[Edgecrusher]

3 minutes ago, Human10 said:

My mom was Jehovah's Witness and they pushed me to their baptism - I refused and stopped attend their meetings when I was 12.

I stopped having studies when I was about 13 (I'm 48 now), I couldn't do it anymore, and yeah, whilst I love my mum and her firends (I've grown up with them, and they're a different generation), I don't like the vibe around the assemblies and meetings - I did used to take her to the bigger assemblies still - until this all started.

I could never tell her about some of the strange things around the Witnesses, she's 82, and I just could't do that to her. If I even bought it up I'd never forgive myself.

I'm glad she watches UK Column and various other things I show her, and hasn't taken the "vaccine".

I think it's my mum really that woke me up when I was still in a pushchair... i was getting dragged around door knocking with her, as my dad was at work, and I remember asking her "what's armageddon?" She said wait until 2020 

No, she didn't say that haha but I always remember asking her, I think it jarred me really early on.

[Macnamara]

49 minutes ago, Edgecrusher said:

This is definitely a case of the sheep fucking the farmer 

 

[FrankVitali]

15 hours ago, Bullion said:

So how do we yell MOFO now....... hey you FO 

 

I think the politically correct way is along the lines of..  Come back 'ere you Guardian-fucker.

[skitzorat]

On The Psychology Of The Conspiracy Denier

A closer look at the class that mocks.

 

https://off-guardian.org/2021/03/12/on-the-psychology-of-the-conspiracy-denier/

 

[Free Range]

27 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

 

what if william shakespeare a not highly literate minor actor didn't write all of those plays and in fact they were written by a team of writers much like modern day sitcoms? What if 'william shakespeare' is just a pen name used by that team of writers and the use of that name by the cabal today is an inside joke which says to those with with the eyes to see that the whole thing is just a facade concealing a lie?

I was trying to say something similar in the queen thread the other day in response to the Marlowe authorship, but gave up as i couldnt post it. Whenever i read or see a Marlowe play i could immediately get into it. ive never been able to do that with Shakespeare. Im confused until at least the second act. It dawned on me it was the same confusion i had with a lot of the 'must see' US series. Lost comes to mind. They dont do much for me. I prefer a world created by one author. I wondered whether Shakespeare was also a team effort as i couldnt make out any coherent voice when reading or watching it.

[Macnamara]

8 minutes ago, Free Range said:

I was trying to say something similar in the queen thread the other day in response to the Marlowe authorship, but gave up as i couldnt post it. Whenever i read or see a Marlowe play i could immediately get into it. ive never been able to do that with Shakespeare. Im confused until at least the second act. It dawned on me it was the same confusion i had with a lot of the 'must see' US series. Lost comes to mind. They dont do much for me. I prefer a world created by one author. I wondered whether Shakespeare was also a team effort as i couldnt make out any coherent voice when reading or watching it.

 

well marlowe's death is a bit mysterious...

 

there is just a lot of content in the plays that seems to have been outside the experience of the actor william shakespeare

Edited March 12, 2021 by Macnamara

[alexa]

35 minutes ago, Lamp Of Truth said:

But then again even if the Anti-Christ did appear on TV I think if the BBC presented him and his message in a positive light a lot of Christians would still obey because they saw it on the BBC !!!

 

I remember talking to this Christian women about a passage in the Bible which states, ' every eye shall see Jesus when he returns', and she then said, 'Well of course every eye will see him, as we all have TV's now' I'm like 

[Macnamara]

8 minutes ago, FrankVitali said:

I think the politically correct way is along the lines of..  Come back 'ere you Guardian-fucker.

 

parents will increasingly be sidelined by the state who will tell us that parenting is a 'qualified right' which the state can remove at any time so perhaps it would be 'hey you state-sanctioned guardian-fucker'

[Free Range]

4 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

 

well marlowe's death is a bit mysterious

Always thought his style was too different to be the sole author. But part of the team. Yeah why not

[Macnamara]

8 minutes ago, Free Range said:

Always thought his style was too different to be the sole author. But part of the team. Yeah why not

 

one theory is that francis bacon was the guy who built the team behind the shakespeare plays

[Bullion]

7 hours ago, bamboozooka said:

i think its funny how he never sits in one place in his garden for more than a minute.

those pesky tracking satellite weapons trying to get a lock on him.

Some time ago he used to walk and talk outside of his garden, now he seems to always be within the bounds of his garden..... maybe lots of requests for peacock vision 

[Macnamara]

25 minutes ago, skitzorat said:

On The Psychology Of The Conspiracy Denier

A closer look at the class that mocks.

 

https://off-guardian.org/2021/03/12/on-the-psychology-of-the-conspiracy-denier/

 

 

sorry i'm outta likes but that's a great article, thanks for posting. Well worth a read

[Free Range]

2 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

 

one theory is that francis bacon was the guy who built the team behind the shakespeare plays

Makes sense. And Marlowe disappears. yOu could spend an entertaining few years looking back through history assuming it was all as fake as the present. Think thats the schtick of a Marshall (somebody or other) Its thought hes part of a team also!

[Macnamara]

6 hours ago, B14 said:

t I went a few rounds with pro-vaxxers and I mean to tell you...it's frankly terrifying the way their minds think. They will have NO PROBLEM outing those from society who don't take the jabs. How can they not see the terrifying similarities between the current situation and say nazi Germany, Stalinistic Russia, etc.,?

 

because they were the kind of people, back then, who WERE the bolsheviks or the stalinists or maoists etc

Edited March 12, 2021 by Macnamara

[Macnamara]

6 minutes ago, Free Range said:

Makes sense. And Marlowe disappears. yOu could spend an entertaining few years looking back through history assuming it was all as fake as the present.

 

well lets not necessarily throw everything out but if we keep our feet on the ground we can explore

 

lets consider that back then plays were the equivalent of TV today. EVERYONE watched them. The poor crowded into the standing only area at the front and were bawdy and lively and the rich sat up in the booths around the sides of the theatre and even the royal court watched them

 

So the plays were an opportunity to propagandise the public. Through plays the public could be given false perceptions of history or events for example the play 'macbeth' was pure propaganda

 

So you could see them as entertainment whilst also keeping an eye out for signs of what today would be called psychological 'nudging'

 

But that's the first rule of historiography: first assess for a bias

Edited March 12, 2021 by Macnamara

[skitzorat]

Dr Sukharit Bhakdi's 7minute Statement

 

https://lbry.tv/@Doctors4CovidEthics:d/Prof.-Sucharit-Bhakdi-statement-on-EMA-open-letter.ENG:0

[Outsider]

15 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

 

well lets not necessarily throw everything out but if we keep our feet on the ground we can explore

 

lets consider that back then plays were the equivalent of TV today. EVERYONE watched them. The poor crowded into the standing only area at the front and were bawdy and lively and the rich sat up in the booths around the sides of the theatre and even the royal court watched them

 

So the plays were an opportunity to propagandise the public. Through plays the public could be given false perceptions of history or events for example the play 'macbeth' was pure propaganda

 

So you could see them as entertainment whilst also keeping an eye out for signs of what today would be called psychological 'nudging'

 

But that's the first rule of historiography: first assess for a bias

Very interesting, quite frighting really how deep it's possible to go down this rabbit hole. 

[Macnamara]

6 minutes ago, Outsider said:

Very interesting, quite frighting really how deep it's possible to go down this rabbit hole. 

 

the conspiracy is old (dark occultism is old)

 

bacon wrote a piece called 'new atlantis' which some believe is the secret society networks blueprint for a new empire they wanted to build in the americas

 

but all historic texts should be assessed for bias. If you have two accounts from different sides in a battle you may get drastically different accounts because they are both invested in creating a positive perception of their own sides achievements and goals.

Edited March 12, 2021 by Macnamara

[Macnamara]

4 minutes ago, perpetual said:

This dawned on me when I read someone saying that we are already digital....which is true. There are many credit/debit card transactions and even those that have stash of cash in the bank....it's digital. It has gone digital many years ago.

 

Now, you know US fiat is going to collapse at some point soon because they have been prrrrrriiiiiinting like there is no tomorrow. Christine Lagarde who is the President of the European Central Bank says they are also going to start prrrrrriiiiiinting. Interesting huh?

 

they HAVE to print to prop up the ponzi scheme

 

everytime they do that old bit in the news about 'should we raise the debt ceiling' the answer will always be YES

 

This is because everytime they bring more fiat into existence they create new debt which cannot be paid off

 

Until it collapses of course as ponzi schemes do

[Outsider]

1 hour ago, Macnamara said:

 

oh yes they give us a nod now and then in their speeches but they control the corporate media and the education system so they control the vast majority of the flow of information to the minds of the public

 

 

 

 

Haha... vital importance of knocking down this rubbish...