Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


numnuts
 Share

Recommended Posts

54 minutes ago, pete675 said:

 

It is truly bizarre. One month someone will say ' These vaccines, it's a plot to remove oldies and save on pensions' and the next month they'll go and get the vaccine.

 

Wagner and Nietzsche discussed philosophic ideas together and talked of ............the hidden and deep seated urge to self-destruction.  That must be the reason.

 

It blows my mind that someone who is even a little bit awake to this stuff would go and get one. I just laugh at the virus nonsense at this stage, I've paid it no attention for quite a while. But the vaccine, pathogenic priming, DNA alteration for generations to come.... now that stuff is fucking terrifying!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the event that anyone faces the dilemma of withholding personal information from a policy officer the following precedent can be used as suggested by UKColumn in a calm manner. Also supported by article at the end by gardencourtchambers.co.uk

 

 

Rice v. Connolly (1966) is an English legal precedent holding that there is no strict, general legal duty to assist a police officer prior to any possible arrest or caution, with even basic police enquiries nor to accompany the officer to a requested location. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rice_v_Connolly

 

 

https://swarb.co.uk/rice-v-connolly-1966/

Rice v Connolly: 1966

No Legal Duty to Assist a Constable

At common law there is no legal duty to provide the police with information or otherwise to assist them with their inquiries. Lord Parker set out three questions to be answered when asking whether there had been an obstruction of an officer in the execution of his duties: (1) Was there any obstruction of a constable? (2) Was the Constable acting lawfully in the execution of his duty? And (3) Was the obstruction intended to obstruct the constable in the execution of his duty?
Lord Parker CJ said: ‘It is also in my judgment clear that it is part of the obligations and duties of a police constable to take all steps which appear to him necessary for keeping the peace, for preventing crime or for protecting property from criminal injury. There is no exhaustive definition of the powers and obligations of the police, but they are at least those, and they would further include the duty to detect crime and to bring an offender to justice . . it seems to me quite clear that the defendant was making it more difficult for the police to carry out their duties, and that the police at the time and throughout were acting in accordance with their duties. The only remaining ingredient, and the one upon which in my judgment this case revolves, is whether the obstructing of which the defendant was guilty was a wilful obstruction. ‘Wilful’ in this context not only in my judgment means ‘intentional’ but something which is done without lawful excuse, and that is indeed conceded . . Accordingly, the sole question here is whether the defendant had a lawful excuse for refusing to answer the questions put to him. In my judgment he had. It seems to me quite clear that although every citizen has a moral duty or, if you like, a social duty to assist the police, there is no legal duty to that effect, and indeed the whole basis of the common law is the right of the individual to refuse to answer questions put to him by persons in authority, and to refuse to accompany those in authority to any particular place; short, of course, of arrest.’
. . and ‘In my judgment there is all the difference in the world between deliberately telling a false story someth ing which on no view a citizen has a right to do – and preserving silence or refusing to answer, something which he has every right to do. Accordingly, in my judgment, looked at in that perfectly general way, it was not shown that the refusal of the defendant to answer the questions or to accompany the police officer in the first instance to the police box was an obstruction without lawful excuse. ‘

 

 

https://www.gardencourtchambers.co.uk/news/administrative-court-overturn-conviction-for-refusing-to-provide-name-and-address-in-relation-to-suspected-breach-of-coronavirus-regulations

The Administrative Court sitting at Cardiff today issued an important judgment on the right to silence, the legal duties of citizens and the scope of the Coronavirus Regulations.

In Neale v DPP, the court quashed the applicant’s conviction for obstructing a police officer by failing to provide his name and address when requested to do so in order that a Fixed Penalty Notice be issued for allegedly breaching the Coronavirus Regulations.

No express legal duty to provide personal details to a police constable was created by the legislation and the High Court concluded that it was not possible to imply such a duty. In giving judgment Mrs Justice Steyn, sitting with Lord Justice Dingemans, observed that ‘the right to remain silent is not reserved only for those who are innocent and beyond suspicion’ and the court should be wary of expanding police powers by implication.

Edited by zarkov
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sexpistol50 said:

Why do millions of people get these vaccines thinking they're safe, don't they do research into the risks ?

It takes me all my time to take herbal supplements .

 

Personally I feel they must be soulless.

Or maybe to much faith in the black mirror.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Fluke said:

You can bet yourself that the Russian variant will be more deadly than the Brazilian or Kent. 

 

I'm waiting for some SJW journalist moron to blame Putin for deliberately sending it, and then we can have another big bullshit Russia saga.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Going to be interesting @skitzorat what happens in New Zealand with the Vax roll out now, like I said yesterday I think you might have a mega shitstorm heading your way bro & all hells gonna break loose.

Or maybe not.

Maybe they will cover it up, but usually about a week after it all go's pear shape according to all these other countries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, oddsnsods said:

They claim around 400 have died from this shot in the UK, but then again they seemed to have covered up many deaths in carehomes, denying it was caused by the jab...🤔

And covered up the deaths in the initial trials as well.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, DarianF said:

This was probably already posted. But just popped up in my related videos.

 

 

Adil Ray  at 30 seconds in can't stop grinning. Dupers delight. 

 

They all truly mean this from the heart and aren't just reading a prepared script from a board behind the camera.

Most of them look like hostages.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, k_j_evans said:

I'm still hoping that some enlightened hacker will lock Billy Boy in his "smart" home and leave him to starve to death.

 

Wishful thinking, but my bet is, he has underground escape route!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, oddsnsods said:

 

Your child being segregated, made to wear a mask or coerced into twice weekly tests.

Not consented to test

also said nonto mask

 

they listening currently

 

where could we go with this?genuinely interested in your thoughts

 

love an argument with the school

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Outsider said:

Adil Ray  at 30 seconds in can't stop grinning. Dupers delight. 

 

They all truly mean this from the heart and aren't just reading a prepared script from a board behind the camera.

Most of them look like hostages.

 

 

How many of these dickheads have actually read the fine print from the vaccine manufactures? Reads like a horror show. Friggin morons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Outsider said:

Adil Ray  at 30 seconds in can't stop grinning. Dupers delight. 

 

They all truly mean this from the heart and aren't just reading a prepared script from a board behind the camera.

Most of them look like hostages.

 

 

COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca (TGA)

https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/auspar-chadox1-s-covid-19-vaccine-astrazeneca-210215-pi.pdf

 

Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine (FDA)

https://30g7el1b4b1n28kgpr414nuu-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Pfizer-BioNTech-COVID-19-Vaccine-EUA-Fact-Sheet-for-HCP_0.pdf

 

MODERNA COVID-19 VACCINE (FDA)

https://www.fda.gov/media/144637/download

 

Not recommended for pregnant women. Effects on fertility unknown. Contains genetically modified organisms. I could go on. But I bet these retards haven't read a single page.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, vinny79 said:

Not consented to test

also said nonto mask

 

they listening currently

 

where could we go with this?genuinely interested in your thoughts

 

love an argument with the school

 

 

Well warn them you could sue under the equality act & maybe play them this video & show what kind of world they are turning us into.

Mandatory vaccines is next for a virus that doesn't effect children.

But definitely effects their mental health.

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, k_j_evans said:

So, WHY is your home page Microsoft? Set it to about:blank and see nothing except what you want to see. Why are you watching the BBC? Are you a masochist? I'm still hoping that some enlightened hacker will lock Billy Boy in his "smart" home and leave him to starve to death.

it isnt mate, iv got a page on my browser n it gives me all the latest bollocks...yes i am tuned in to ther terror attack.....this is a time when u need to be.......billy boy will transfer is mind to a fuckin cyborg mate

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • lake locked this topic
  • lake unlocked this topic
  • Beaujangles featured this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...