Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


numnuts

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Covidiot said:

 

It's the same minset that forces those at little risk of covid to be under house arrest. Their mentality is obviously "If I have to have one then so should you". Divide and conquer. Have the sheeple police themselves. It has worked a treat! We are now a nation of brainwashed/braindead bed wetters. The Elites have won, the final moves are being made, checkmate is around the corner. I have lost all faith of a happy end to this Orwellian tale.

 

Spot on.

 

The policed are the police.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Ziggy Sawdust said:

 

Seeing as they feel you are responsible for their health I wonder how they'd react to you following them around the supermarket removing any sugary shit, high fat foods and additive ridden filth from their trolley?

 

Somebody once sugared the local Tesco a couple of times, they

put honey on the trolley handles and when inside they must have made a small hole in a sugar bag, placed it in the trolley and walked around with it spilling out, it's strange, they never did catch the culprit.😎

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Shy Talk said:

Prince Phil in hospital. If he doesn't make it is there any chance it won't be blamed on Covid (let's not pretend he had a vaccine last month) and milked for all it's worth? Fantastic PR opportunity for the regime.

Well, he said he wanted to come back as a virus. Don't suppose he wanted to go out with one though.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Professor Mark Woolhouse, a member of SAGE, has told MPs that there was not a single virus outbreak linked to crowded beaches last summer.

 

This information comes from the BBC News Health Editor, Hugh Pym, but is also covered in the latest Hugo Talks video below.

 

 

 

Edited by Mitochondrial Eve
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Young people volunteering to be infected with 'the virus'. Am I right in saying that they haven't actually isolated the coronavirus yet? If that's the case, what are they exposing the volunteers to?  Just remember the old saying: 'never volunteer for anything...'

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/feb/17/ive-accepted-the-risk-volunteering-to-be-exposed-to-covid-in-new-trials

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Shy Talk said:

Prince Phil in hospital. If he doesn't make it is there any chance it won't be blamed on Covid (let's not pretend he had a vaccine last month) and milked for all it's worth? Fantastic PR opportunity for the regime.

 

Oh dear, look out, didn't he want to come back as a virus :classic_ohmy::classic_biggrin:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, SimonTV said:

Your exhaled breathe has to go some where. Where do people think it goes? Time to end this pointless mask debate forever.

 

That's it.

 

End of debate.

 

FACE MASKS DO NOT WORK !!

 

But of course anyone with a bit sense knows that mandatory face masks have nothing to do with health and everything to do with psychological programming. As Icke said the mask is a symbol of submission and obedience to the state.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Shy Talk said:

Prince Phil in hospital. If he doesn't make it is there any chance it won't be blamed on Covid (let's not pretend he had a vaccine last month) and milked for all it's worth? Fantastic PR opportunity for the regime.

 

If he dies it'll be put down as Covid the media will relentlessly tell us that 'a national treasure has fallen victim to the deadly virus, so please, please get the vaccine so the same doesn't happen to you.'

 

Inconvenient facts like he's 99 years old and whether or not he got the vaccine will be swept under the carpet.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Lamp Of Truth said:

 

Yep, EVERYTHING is black and white in the mainstream media and mainstream society in general, there are no gray areas.

 

Just like the chequer board

 

1638629696_acheq.png.ecb41495e4a5a2d55251ea4c8f99f34f.png

 

Your either with Satan or your against him, there is no middle ground!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I understand this paper properly from scientists at the Max Planck Institute, it suggests that the risks of mRNA being reverse transcribed to DNA rather than being translated into proteins has been underestimated by at least a factor of one thousand.

 

https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2021-02/m-tum020221.php

 

https://phys.org/news/2021-02-underestimated-mutation-potential-retrogenes.html

 

Quote

Genetic information is stored in DNA and transcribed as mRNA. The mRNA is usually translated into proteins. However, it has long been known that mRNA can also be reverse transcribed to DNA and integrated back into the genome. Such cases are referred to as retrogenes. In an article, a team from the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology in Plön and the Zoological Institute of the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing now reports that this process was previously underestimated by at least a factor of one thousand and that it is an important new mutation mechanism.

 

I assume that this means that the mRNA vaccines - supposedly aimed to target the spike protein - come with a hugely greater risk than previously appreciated, at least in the mainstream, of altering the recipient's DNA (a process where the retrogene acts as a "regulatory mutation" which the study states is "usually harmful")?

 

This could be a useful study to debunk mainstream claims that mRNA vaccines do not alter DNA.

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mitochondrial Eve said:

If I understand this paper properly from scientists at the Max Planck Institute, it suggests that the risks of mRNA being reverse transcribed to DNA rather than being translated into proteins has been underestimated by at least a factor of one thousand.

 

https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2021-02/m-tum020221.php

 

https://phys.org/news/2021-02-underestimated-mutation-potential-retrogenes.html

 

 

I assume that this means that the mRNA vaccines - supposedly aimed to target the spike protein - come with a hugely greater risk than previously appreciated, at least in the mainstream, of altering the recipient's DNA (a process where the retrogene acts as a "regulatory mutation" which the study states is "usually harmful")?

 

This could be a useful study to debunk mainstream claims that mRNA vaccines do not alter DNA.

Is there a risk of DNA transfer between a vaccinated person and an unvaccinated one by bodily fluids...similar to AIDS? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Sexpistol50 said:

I spoke to my GP as I'm allergic to Penicillin , I told her I won't be taking the vaccine as I don't want to to get a  allergic reaction , she said I will need to look at your medical records and phone you back , she phoned me back and said ' You don't carry a pen around with you and I can't see anything on your records , I was fucking raging as years ago in the 90s and was prescribed Penicillin and I had problems breathing and had to go to casualty hospital, after that I was prescribed antibiotics that were not Penicillin, she said ' You will be alright get the vaccine when your offered , honestly GPs are fucking hopeless it was like talking to a brick wall

 

they have a sense of entitlement in the sense that they feel entitled to do whatever the heck they like to your body as if it isn't really your property

 

No one should ever be completely confident of what they are doing in medicine because the preferred practice or course of treatment for things changes every generation which is an admission that what they were doing before wasn't the correct thing to do

 

But if things have evolved for each generation before then isn't it reasonable to assume that the same will be true of our generation and that what is considered 'best practice' now will in a generations time be looked back on with disdain?

 

So if we know that then instead of a hungry policy of maximum intervention, shouldn't the medical fraternity be far more cautious and pursue a policy of 'minimum intervention' to ensure that they minimise potential harms?

 

But no....they always plough on with an unquestioning entitlement and a sense of blind belief in what they are doing. It's scary when you get to see it up close and its that kind of entitlement that saw for example people being deformed due to thalidomide or harmed by DDT or thimerosol or frontal lobotomies etc

 

So if the doctors won't question then it has to fall to us to do it but of course the corporate media (with ties to big pharma) will then be ready to try and shame us into compliance by calling us 'conspiracy theorists' if we dare to question the 'best practice' of today or what we could call: the rejected practice of tomorrow

Edited by Macnamara
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Sexpistol50 said:

I spoke to my GP as I'm allergic to Penicillin , I told her I won't be taking the vaccine as I don't want to to get a  allergic reaction , she said I will need to look at your medical records and phone you back , she phoned me back and said ' You don't carry a pen around with you and I can't see anything on your records , I was fucking raging as years ago in the 90s and was prescribed Penicillin and I had problems breathing and had to go to casualty hospital, after that I was prescribed antibiotics that were not Penicillin, she said ' You will be alright get the vaccine when your offered , honestly GPs are fucking hopeless it was like talking to a brick wall didn't want to listen and lied that she couldn't find anything on my allergy in my medical records, All GPs are singing from the same hymn sheet , I won't be getting any vaccine I haven't had a vaccine since I was at high school, they can stick their so called vaccine .

This made me furious, especially because it is exactly how so many of these GPs behave. 

 

They'd better not try it on with me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Sexpistol50 said:

I spoke to my GP as I'm allergic to Penicillin , I told her I won't be taking the vaccine as I don't want to to get a  allergic reaction , she said I will need to look at your medical records and phone you back , she phoned me back and said ' You don't carry a pen around with you and I can't see anything on your records , I was fucking raging as years ago in the 90s and was prescribed Penicillin and I had problems breathing and had to go to casualty hospital, after that I was prescribed antibiotics that were not Penicillin, she said ' You will be alright get the vaccine when your offered , honestly GPs are fucking hopeless it was like talking to a brick wall didn't want to listen and lied that she couldn't find anything on my allergy in my medical records, All GPs are singing from the same hymn sheet , I won't be getting any vaccine I haven't had a vaccine since I was at high school, they can stick their so called vaccine .

 

Aren't these GP's getting paid for every vaccine they give ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • lake locked this topic
  • lake unlocked this topic
  • Beaujangles featured this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...