Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


Message added by Grumpy Owl,

This topic is for all general discussion regarding the current COVID-19 pandemic. There are of course numerous other related topics for discussing specific aspects of this pandemic in more detail. And there are other parts of this forum for more 'off-topic' discussions.

Recommended Posts

Just now, oddsnsods said:

 

They bring out the 4 horseman coaches special for you.

 

0_British-Evacuees-Arrive-Home-From-Coro

 

Its all a bluff for sheepies anyway, pretty sure human rights act, says something about freedom to travel or I could be wrong. But still pretty sure like all these other guidelines, which arnt actually laws.

Are a bluff & would be thrown out court.

 

(1) Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each state.

(2) Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country.

https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/

 

They should have added, "unless Bill Gates says otherwise."

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 49k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • DarianF

    2827

  • oddsnsods

    2259

  • Avoiceinthecrowd

    2009

  • SimonTV

    1902

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

You wont believe this.   I just went down Lidls to get some steak.   Security guard calls me out as I walk past & I ignore him. Gets my steak walks to the credit only till

Some images of today's demonstration in London (not taken by me personally).                

Fuck the fuck off.

Posted Images

6 minutes ago, oddsnsods said:

 

They bring out the 4 horseman coaches special for you.

 

0_British-Evacuees-Arrive-Home-From-Coro

 

Its all a bluff for sheepies anyway, pretty sure human rights act, says something about freedom to travel or I could be wrong. But still pretty sure like all these other guidelines, which arnt actually laws.

Are a bluff & would be thrown out court.

 

They rely on intimidation like 10 years prison, or £10,000 fine. Just bully boys.

 

4ybima.jpg

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, oddsnsods said:

 

They bring out the 4 horseman coaches special for you.

 

0_British-Evacuees-Arrive-Home-From-Coro

 

Its all a bluff for sheepies anyway, pretty sure human rights act, says something about freedom to travel or I could be wrong. But still pretty sure like all these other guidelines, which arnt actually laws.

Are a bluff & would be thrown out court.

Tbh I dont consent to them violating my freewill through all of the gas lighting and what they do.

I might have even laughed a little if the coaches were different colours!!

Are those coaches an in your face pre-warning signal for those peeps that are taken from the airports of what was to come btw!!!!!!!

 

I must be reading too much or not

Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, DarianF said:

 

 

 

19 minutes ago, DarianF said:

 

Works for me. Weird. Just making the point, as they say, "welcome to the suck." I like to add the line, "we're fucked."

 

Can you post the link without embedding it ? 

So we can check it out.. 

Thanks 

BC 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Basket Case said:

 

 

Can you post the link without embedding it ? 

So we can check it out.. 

Thanks 

BC 

 

Welcome To The Suck by Thomas Newman. Jarhead Soundtrack (2005).

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

A little more insight into the nature of the character of these demented parasites.

Dutch court REINSTATES coronavirus curfew in break-neck reversal of earlier order to end ‘illegitimate’ policy

A Dutch appeals court has revived the country’s Covid-19 curfew just moments before it came into effect, overturning a ruling handed down hours earlier ordering the government to lift the “illegitimate” measure immediately.

A three-judge appellate panel granted an emergency injunction following a request from the Dutch government on Tuesday, agreeing to vacate the earlier order from a lower court to end the nightly curfew, DW reported. The decision came just moments before the 9pm curfew was set to take effect, with the judges scheduling a full hearing on its legality for Friday.

The appeals judges argued that they wanted to avoid what they called a “yo-yo effect,” referring to public confusion around whether the curfew was still in force, adding that “in this case, the state’s interests weigh more than that of Virus Truth’s,” the activist group that brought the initial complaint against the curfews to court – also known by its Dutch name, Viruswaarheid.

 

The remainder of the article  https://www.rt.com/news/515767-dutch-court-covid-curfew/

Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, DarianF said:

 

(1) Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each state.

(2) Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country.

https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/

 

They should have added, "unless Bill Gates says otherwise."

 

In the UK & Australia I presume you have right to travel under common law, which  lots of freeman try & use with cars but then is different as they bring in the highways act.

But We have a right of abode under the Immigrations act 1971 also I am reading briefly.

 

The “right of abode” is the right to “live in, and to come and go into and from, the United Kingdom without let or hindrance”. This right of abode is set out in section 1(1) of the Immigration Act 1971, the foundational legislation for current UK immigration law. The Home Office puts it another way in its guidance to officials: the right of abode is a “complete exemption from UK immigration control” (Nationality: right of abode, version 4.0, 23 May 2018).

 

Only thing, they can say with all these rights & UN human rights act.

If its a threat of national security to others, then your rights are superseeded.

I guess in court you have to prove, the PCR fraud & Covid scam.

Like the German tourists did in Portugal.

Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, oddsnsods said:

 

In the UK & Australia I presume you have right to travel under common law, which  lots of freeman try & use with cars but then is different as they bring in the highways act.

But We have a right of abode under the Immigrations act 1971 also I am reading briefly.

 

The “right of abode” is the right to “live in, and to come and go into and from, the United Kingdom without let or hindrance”. This right of abode is set out in section 1(1) of the Immigration Act 1971, the foundational legislation for current UK immigration law. The Home Office puts it another way in its guidance to officials: the right of abode is a “complete exemption from UK immigration control” (Nationality: right of abode, version 4.0, 23 May 2018).

 

Only thing, they can say with all these rights & UN human rights act.

If its a threat of national security to others, then your rights are superseeded.

I guess in court you have to prove, the PCR fraud & Covid scam.

Like the German tourists did in Portugal.

 

It's all too bloody complex. Who knows.

Link to post
Share on other sites

BREAKING:

CEO Mark Zuckerberg Takes ‘Anti-Vax’ Stance in Violation of His Own Platform's New Policy "I Share Some Caution on this [Vaccine] Because We Just Don't Know the Long-Term Side Effects of Basically Modifying People's DNA and RNA"

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

There's a few million people out there who were not told they were having their DNA/RNA modified before they got injected.

 

Who is at fault here?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, serpentine said:

BREAKING:

CEO Mark Zuckerberg Takes ‘Anti-Vax’ Stance in Violation of His Own Platform's New Policy "I Share Some Caution on this [Vaccine] Because We Just Don't Know the Long-Term Side Effects of Basically Modifying People's DNA and RNA"

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

There's a few million people out there who were not told they were having their DNA/RNA modified before they got injected.

 

Who is at fault here?

 

Could end up looking like Zukerborg or Bezo.😱

Only Zuker is allowed to question the longterm irreversible apocalypse..from these jabs that arnt vaccines they have fooled the world into taking.

 

Pretty sure hes gas lighting us..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Farage has put out a video calling to scrap the EU human rights act.

Which doesnt exist the pro EU freaks point out.🤭

But Nigel in the video says..we need to get rid of the "European convention on human rights."

So he knows full well its not an EU thing.

This weasel just seems to be getting more sinister to me, what is his real game & why put out such obvious disinfo making us look fools for wanting to stop mass immigration?

Nigel has just proved recently hes owned by big pharma.

Has this anything to do with it.👇🤔🤥

 

EuS548WWQAQXhPk?format=jpg&name=900x900

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, BossCrow said:

EuSaPIrXMAMb-xZ.jpeg.0875f3ffa3a06dd0a7d29e23f0a7ed56.jpeg

Staged protests to be filmed on Feb 22nd. Think this is in London but I'm not sure.

 

 

 

Pretend protests: psyops to be used at a later date for false flag or fake news.🤭

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Anti Facts Sir said:

...being anti- COVID jabs is not the same as being against vaccines in general. It's a phoney argument.

 

The way I see it the jab is an assault with a deadly weapon. The criminal negligence of those administering it is clear. If they said you must report to an execution center to be summarily shot would be the same as forcing a lethal injection under any circumstances. So, where is the concept of self defense in all this? We are dealing with habitual mass murderers hell-bent on killing or injuring as many of us as possible for their personal gain. What are we justified to do to defend ourselves from attempted murder? What would the metaphorical "reasonable person" do under similar circumstances?

 

Snip-it_1613535860090.jpg.7929ca43d4ebf5816afc8fd96852fec0.jpg

Coven-19 vaccination center. Book your jab now!

Edited by Avoiceinthecrowd
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Dizza said:

Ok so when you come back off of holiday all passengers must quarantine.

So what about the airplane staff do they?

so what about the security staff escorting them off of the planes to the hotels do they?

Does the coach driver have to quarantine after mixing with all who could be affected?

 

Sh! Don't give em any ideas, they'll have us all wearing hazmat suits next!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Third shot may be needed to combat new coronavirus variants, Bill Gates says

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/bill-gates-covid-vaccine/

 

The magical variants, that are so deadly.. Yet no evidence they are anyway more potent.

All it proves if the vaccines arnt effective & a joke, really completely useless & designed that way.

Is just a cash cow gravy train how the fuck can anybody be this insane to support this madness. Gone from daily deaths too cases & now this variant bullshit to keep the drama never ending. No mention of old people dropping like flies from the vaccine. The people that are most at risk. Beyond doubt in Gibraltor.

 

Does the flu jab also become obsolete after a few weeks of being on the market?

 

If youve had the flu, could you catch it the following week if its mutated? lol

 

Like at this stage I reckon if they told the goylem, they needed to be jabbed weekly. They would be queuing without question.

 

"COG".uk 🤣 identifies all the new strains for government. Set up by Vallance & SAGE.

 

The UK is a world leader in sequencing SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. Of all the coronavirus genomes that have been sequenced in the world, nearly half have been sequenced by COVID-19 Genomics UK Consortium (Cog-UK). The consortium began life on March 4 when Sharon Peacock, a professor of public health and microbiology at the University of Cambridge, emailed a handful of scientists and asked for their help. The Conversation spoke to Professor Peacock about that day and what happened after.

 

 

Q: How did you get funding?

The application was on Sir Patrick Vallance’s desk by March 15. He and Professor Chris Whitty, the chief medical officer for England, had what they called a “COVID-19 fighting fund”. They reviewed our proposal and strongly supported it.

I also contacted Sir Mike Stratton, director of the Wellcome Sanger Institute in Cambridge. I asked Mike if they could support us as they have the technology to do large-scale sequencing. He said yes, and since then, Sanger has contributed a great deal.

So at the outset, we got about £14.5 million from the government, plus in-kind funding from Sanger, which together came to a total of around £20 million.

We started on April 1, but we’d already done quite a lot of sequencing by then. About 260 coronavirus sequences were already in the bag.

Most of the sequencing of coronavirus samples is done at the Wellcome Sanger Institute in Cambridge, England. Neil Grant / Alamy Stock Photo

Q: So the sequencing began even before Cog-UK was launched?

Because a lot of people had sequencing instruments and expertise, they had already started work. There are sequencing instruments in labs across the country. We hadn’t catalogued where or what at that stage. And, in fact, we weren’t particularly prescriptive about what types of sequencing instruments we asked the labs to use. People used what they thought worked well for them.

Q: How did other scientists react?

 

We considered the risk of lack of genetic variation, but went ahead. What we did was rather bold at the time.

 

Laboratory testing for COVID-19 using the so-called PCR test in the UK is roughly divided into two testing pathways. If you are hospitalised with COVID-19, your sample will get tested in a local laboratory. We call that pillar one.

Cog-UK collects samples from about 90 different laboratories at the moment, which is quite a logistical challenge. These are sent to regional sequencing hubs that focus mostly on sequencing from their region. These are really important samples because they are from the sickest people with COVID-19.

Pillar two testing is done in the Lighthouse labs, which were set up to

 

 

Q: Why are we suddenly seeing all of these mutations that give the coronavirus an advantage now?

It’s not the first time that we have observed mutations that have given the virus an advantage. At the end of March 2020, we noticed something for the first time in the UK: a mutation in the spike protein called D614G. This wasn’t in the original virus that was first detected in China. But the virus with this mutation rapidly expanded and replaced the other viral lineages circulating at the time.

 

https://theconversation.com/qanda-with-sharon-peacock-coronavirus-variant-hunter-154808

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, alexa said:

 

Ha! Mark Zuckerberg the guy who used to be Human!

 

 

 

He was sort of human, before the gene therapy they started him on at the cloning nursery pod where he was created.🤭

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...