Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


numnuts
 Share

Recommended Posts


"I seek to trace the novel features under which despotism may appear in the world. The first thing that strikes the observation is an innumerable multitude of men, all equal and alike, incessantly endeavoring to procure the petty and paltry pleasures with which they glut their lives. Each of them, living apart, is as a stranger to the fate of all the rest; his children and his private friends constitute to him the whole of mankind. As for the rest of his fellow citizens, he is close to them, but he does not see them; he touches them, but he does not feel them; he exists only in himself and for himself alone; and if his kindred still remain to him, he may be said at any rate to have lost his country.

 

Above this race of men stands an immense and tutelary power, which takes upon itself alone to secure their gratifications and to watch over their fate. That power is absolute, minute, regular, provident, and mild. It would be like the authority of a parent if, like that authority, its object was to prepare men for manhood; but it seeks, on the contrary, to keep them in perpetual childhood: it is well content that the people should rejoice, provided they think of nothing but rejoicing. For their happiness such a government willingly labors, but it chooses to be the sole agent and the only arbiter of that happiness; it provides for their security, foresees and supplies their necessities, facilitates their pleasures, manages their principal concerns, directs their industry, regulates the descent of property, and subdivides their inheritances: what remains, but to spare them all the care of thinking and all the trouble of living?

 

Thus it every day renders the exercise of the free agency of man less useful and less frequent; it circumscribes the will within a narrower range and gradually robs a man of all the uses of himself. The principle of equality has prepared men for these things; it has predisposed men to endure them and often to look on them as benefits.

 

After having thus successively taken each member of the community in its powerful grasp and fashioned him at will, the supreme power then extends its arm over the whole community. It covers the surface of society with a network of small complicated rules, minute and uniform, through which the most original minds and the most energetic characters cannot penetrate, to rise above the crowd. The will of man is not shattered, but softened, bent, and guided; men are seldom forced by it to act, but they are constantly restrained from acting. Such a power does not destroy, but it prevents existence; it does not tyrannize, but it compresses, enervates, extinguishes, and stupefies a people, till each nation is reduced to nothing better than a flock of timid and industrious animals, of which the government is the shepherd.

 

 I have always thought that servitude of the regular, quiet, and gentle kind which I have just described might be combined more easily than is commonly believed with some of the outward forms of freedom, and that it might even establish itself under the wing of the sovereignty of the people.

 Our contemporaries are constantly excited by two conflicting passions: they want to be led, and they wish to remain free. As they cannot destroy either the one or the other of these contrary propensities, they strive to satisfy them both at once. They devise a sole, tutelary, and all-powerful form of government, but elected by the people. They combine the principle of centralization and that of popular sovereignty; this gives them a respite: they console themselves for being in tutelage by the reflection that they have chosen their own guardians. Every man allows himself to be put in leading-strings, because he sees that it is not a person or a class of persons, but the people at large who hold the end of his chain.


 By this system the people shake off their state of dependence just long enough to select their master and then relapse into it again. A great many persons at the present day are quite contented with this sort of compromise between administrative despotism and the sovereignty of the people; and they think they have done enough for the protection of individual freedom when they have surrendered it to the power of the nation at large. This does not satisfy me: the nature of him I am to obey signifies less to me than the fact of extorted obedience. "

 --- Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America (1835)


To extrapolate from and riff on that last sentence:

 

The nature of the tests and vaccines you are forced to take signifies less than the fact of extorted obedience.

 

Imagine this: everybody is imprisoned (as they are now under house arrest in most places, completely restricted from freedom of movement)

The only ways allowed by power to exit the prison are:

 

1) Take a vaccine with no liability, not knowing what it is or what it does, just on the say-so of some authority figure you're supposed to trust and respect and who is part of an elite who have already raped you, your family and all your ancestors multiple times.  

 

2) If you're male, agree to be circumcized (what's the big deal? 70 to 90% of males already are). If you're female agree to have half of your clitoris removed (what's the big deal? It's just a reasonable preventative measure. You'll still have plenty of nerves there and feel things, just not half as much as your average nymphomaniac, which is desirable anyway, right? Why would you want to be addicted to sex because it feels so good anyway? And why should females get to have intact genitals and not males? How is that fair?)

 

3) Bend over and let a complete stranger stick a broomstick up your rear end. In and out once to the depth of about 10 inches.  You can use lube if you want. One stroke and then you're free to go and do whatever you want. There might be occasional re-injections of the broomstick though to make sure you're an obedient and trustworthy person.

 

4) Bend over and let a complete stranger stick a tube up your rear end and give you a coffee enema (which is supposedly very healthy for you, Amandha Vollmer even says it's part of her daily routine). There might be occasional re-applications of the coffee enema, for your own health, of course, and just to make sure you're an obedient and trustworthy person.


Which one would the so-called "truthers" take if there was no other way to participate in "modern society" and stay out of the woods and living a life of complete obscurity and restricted movements? Which one would be least scary and most agreeable? The last two roads to freedom involve only private humiliations, whereas the first two roads involve private humiliation plus a high possibility of physical injury and damage with no recourse to damages.

And yet all 4 courses of action would be accepting the principle of extortion, agreeing to being extorted, being given a choice only in a controlled lesser of 'evils" situation or a choice of the least unwanted and unchosen and never the freely chosen, correct?

 

Therefore, morally speaking, all four courses are just as reprehensible and are agreements to a contract with extortion. All 4 courses are paths to the corruption that keeps the "system" intact.

 

Therefore, it matters not how you agree to extortion, as long as you agree to it, then the bad karma that all human beings who seek power by exploiting others are wary of coming back to themselves, is more or less neutralized. This, of course, is also why they never hide anything or hide things in plain sight: for people to see it and know about it and still agree to it, therefore reversing the laws of karma.

 

In other words, if you beat somebody up for no reason, then you're a bad, violent person who has it coming to him. But if you beat somebody up in a boxing match that you both agreed to and got paid for, then the same amount of physical damage inflicted or even more is not seen as bad but only as "part of the game" agreed to.  

 

 

aj5txp.jpg
 
9sqei6.png
 
3cmxju.jpg
 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by synergetic67
Link to comment
Share on other sites

white lives matter? hmm nah not so much...

How the British Government subjected thousands of people to chemical and biological warfare trials during Cold War

Exclusive: Historians had previously thought that such operations were much less extensive

David Keys@davidmkeys
Thursday 09 July 2015 00:36

During the Cold War, the British Government used the general public as unwitting biological and chemical warfare guinea pigs on a much greater scale than previously thought, according to new historical research.

In more than 750 secret operations, hundreds of thousands of ordinary Britons were subjected to ‘mock’ biological and chemical warfare attacks launched from aircraft, ships and road vehicles.

 

Up until now historians had thought that such operations had been much less extensive. The new research, carried out by Ulf Schmidt, Professor of Modern History at the University of Kent, has revealed that British military aircraft dropped thousands of kilos of a chemical of ‘largely unknown toxic potential’ on British civilian populations in and around Salisbury in Wiltshire, Cardington in Bedfordshire and Norwich in Norfolk.

Substantial quantities were also dispersed across parts of the English Channel and the North Sea. It’s not known the extent to which coastal towns in England and France were affected.

 

The research reveals, for the first time, that around 4600 kilos of the chemical, zinc cadmium sulphide (now thought to be potentially carcinogenic, on account of its cadmium content) were dispersed from ships, aircraft and moving lorries between 1953 and 1964.

Professor Schmidt’s investigation – published on 9 July as a book, Secret Science – has revealed that commuters on the London underground were also used as guinea pigs on a substantially larger scale than previously thought.

The new research has discovered that a hitherto unknown biological warfare field trial was carried out in the capital’s tube system in May 1964.

The secret operation – carried out by scientists from the government’s chemical and biological warfare research centre at Porton Down, Wiltshire - involved the release of large quantities of bacteria called Bacillus globigii. The scientists were keen to discover whether ‘long distance travel of aerosols’ in the tube network ‘was due to transportation within trains’ or through the tube’s air ventilation systems.

At the time, the government thought that Bacillus globigii bacteria were harmless – but they are today regarded as a cause of food poisoning, eye infections, and even septicaemia. It is not known whether the authorities attempted to properly test the bacterium before releasing it into the tube system. An earlier series of tube field trials, in July 1963, has been known to historians for many years.

However, the new research has now revealed that some of the British scientists involved had grave misgivings about the field trials that had been carried out. Indeed some had long felt that it was not politically advisable to conduct large-scale trials in Britain with live bacterial agents.

One particular test – involving live plague bacteria – was carried out off the west coast of Scotland in 1952. It’s long been known that a fishing vessel inadvertently passed through the cloud of bacteria and that the authorities were very worried that the fishermen might contract the disease.

The plague bacteria field trials, though at sea, took place only a few miles from the Isle of Lewis which had a population of several thousand.

The government scientists, carrying out the trials, banked on the fact that the prevailing wind normally blew away from the coast. If, however, the wind had changed direction, thousands of Hebrideans would have been at risk from plague infection, says Professor Schmidt.

Following the fishing vessel incident, the scientists were eager to carry out any further potentially very hazardous field trials outside the UK. Prime Minister Churchill therefore approved a plan to carry out tests in a British overseas territory, the Bahamas.

 

New research shows that the government scientists took the view that the Bahamas was the best place “on the surface of the globe” to carry out tests “without restrictions”.

In 1954, the British government sent Cold War biological warfare scientists to an area of sea near an uninhabited island in the Bahamas to release clouds of dangerous Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis viruses. These organisms were capable of causing, in humans, high fever, long term fatigue, headaches and occasionally death.

The new research reveals, for the first time, that in another British imperial possession, Nigeria, a location was found for chemical warfare field trials. In an area called Obanaghoro in southern Nigeria, four British Cold War scientific missions spent a total of around 15 months dispersing, and assessing the effects of, large quantities of experimental nerve gas weapons. The advantage of the location was that it permitted field trials to be carried out in a tropical environment – and, of course, that it was not in Britain or Australia.

The extent that local people (including locally employed field trial personnel) were affected by the nerve agents is not known.

Historians have so far been unable to find out who did the particularly hazardous work of ‘hand-charging’ the nerve agent artillery shells, mortar bombs and aircraft cluster bombs. Likewise they have not been able to discover the extent to which local Nigerian soils were contaminated or whether nearby villages and schools were affected by any of the toxic clouds that would have been blown across the countryside.

“The government records I’ve been looking at are conspicuously silent on all this,” said Ulf Schmidt.

“Officials had clearly good reasons as to why the kind of experiments undertaken in Nigeria were strictly prohibited on the British mainland, which is why the files and photographic records surrounding Britain’s post-war nerve agent testing in Africa were regarded as particularly sensitive,” he said.

Professor Schmidt’s research has also revealed the vast scale of Cold War chemical warfare tests carried out on ‘volunteer’ British service personnel here in the UK – involving numbers of people much greater than previously thought.

His investigation now suggests that up to 30,000 secret chemical warfare substance experiments were carried out, mainly at Porton Down, on more than 14,000 British soldiers between 1945 and 1989. He believes that, in most cases, the servicemen were not given sufficient information to allow them to give properly informed consent.

Ulf Schmidt’s book, Secret Science, is published today on 9 July, by Oxford University Press.

Spreading diseases: ‘Harmless’ proxies

 

Aircraft, lorries and ships spread 4,600kg of cadmium sulphide in one decade

Zinc Cadmium Sulfide ultra-fine particles

. This inorganic compound was used by Cold War scientists in the UK and the US as a supposedly harmless proxy to simulate the behaviour, in the lower atmosphere and on the ground, of biological warfare substances. However it is still not known whether particles of ZCS that may have become embedded in people’s lungs for decades could ultimately cause disease.

 

Bacillus globigii. This bacterium was used as a supposedly harmless proxy to simulate the behaviour, in terms of dispersal and penetration, of biological warfare aerosols. Although not considered harmful when it was used in Cold War field trials, it is now known to be capable of causing fevers, food poisoning (occasionally resulting in death), peritonitis and septicaemia .

Pasteurella pestis (now known as Yersina pestis). Clouds of this highly infections bacterium were dispersed only over areas of sea – but nevertheless very near to Lewis, a Scottish Island with thousands of inhabitants. In order not to infect the islands, it appears that the scientists relied entirely on the wind not changing direction and speed. This bacterium is the one that has caused plague epidemics worldwide in the past (including those of the medieval world’s Black Death).

Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis. Clouds of this virus were dispersed over an area of sea close to an uninhabited island in the Bahamas. The virus debilitates or kills horses and donkeys and can also cause severe fever and even death in humans. Mosquitos spread the virus further by biting equines.

G-series nerve agents. Clouds of this chemical warfare weapon were dispersed during field trials in a small part of southern Nigeria, some miles north of the town of Warri. G-series nerve agents were first developed by the Nazis before and during World War Two. The group includes substances like sarin and attacks the human nervous system, causing loss of bodily function and normally death. Survivors are likely to suffer long-term neurological damage and psychiatric disorders.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/how-british-government-subjected-thousands-people-chemical-and-biological-warfare-trials-during-cold-war-10376411.html

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Gone Fishing...
3 minutes ago, mike hunt said:

No. Exactly - i think they are lying about the vaccine. Just a bunch of crisis actors getting saline solution for the cameras!

 

One of my best mates tried to stop his elderly Dad getting the vaxxine a few weeks ago.
He complained of dizziness every day after the jab and died 7 days after.
Sitting on the sofa doing the a crossword after doing the daily 2 mile round trip walk for the paper.
No flu symptoms - nothing but dizziness after the vaxxine. 
l don't know which type of vaxxine it was, but it was for the Con-1984 BS.
.
This goes along with countless similar accounts.
This vaxxine kills.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Basket Case said:

 

One of my best mates tried to stop his elderly Dad getting the vaxxine a few weeks ago.
He complained of dizziness every day after the jab and died 7 days after.
Sitting on the sofa doing the a crossword after doing the daily 2 mile round trip walk for the paper.
No flu symptoms - nothing but dizziness after the vaxxine. 
l don't know which type of vaxxine it was, but it was for the Con-1984 BS.
.
This goes along with countless similar accounts.
This vaxxine kills.
 

RIP

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Gone Fishing...
Just now, mike hunt said:

RIP

 

That doesn't help his son - my mate , or his wife (who did not have the vaxxine.)
.
There is no way this whole BS plandemic has been organised to inject the worlds population with saline.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Basket Case said:

There is no way this whole BS plandemic has been organised to inject the worlds population with saline.
 

The general public are getting the "real" vaccines-that-aren't-actual-vaxxines-but-experimental-cocktails, but I would not be surprised if all the famous celebs, political leaders etc who are jabbed for the camera are actually getting anything at all. If the needles are going in, of course.

 

I tried for weeks to stop my old man getting the vaccine. He's just fallen for all this 100%. Couldn't get his done quick enough and proudly showed me his Pfizer card. I told him of all the evidence that suggests they're not a good idea and said, there is nothing in your life that requires you to have this. You don't work anymore, you don't travel abroad anymore, you don't use public transport, you hate going to anywhere there are people eating and drinking....why the hell do you want it so badly, when it could disable you or even end your life early?

 

"It's free. And it can't do any harm".

 

Sigh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, mike hunt said:

Does anyone believe the vaccine numbers? I myself know no one who has had the vaccine.

 

 

No, I don't believe a single statistic they regurgitate in the media, but if they are claiming nine million people have been vaccinated, although I don't know of any, then they will have to admit that cases are going down, transmission is declining, the curve has been flattened and the pressure is off the NHS. Which means, the necessity for lockdowns, quarantine, distancing, shielding, masks and obsessive cleanliness must have subsided. If not, then everything, including the millions of vaccinations, would have been an abject failure and all the suffering and sacrifices we made, completely in vain.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Basket Case said:

That doesn't help his son - my mate , or his wife (who did not have the vaxxine.)
.
There is no way this whole BS plandemic has been organised to inject the worlds population with saline.

 

people are dying after the vaccine but the authorities refuse to acknowledge a link:

 

7 hrs ago

Covid-19 vaccines used across the UK are safe, new MHRA analysis shows

By Press Association 2021

From December 9 to January 24, the MHRA received 22,820 reports of suspected side-effects, with the vast majority being mild and in line with most other types of vaccine, the MHRA said.

These included sore arms and mild flu-like symptoms (such as headache, chills, fatigue and aching muscles) that are short-lived, reflecting the body’s normal immune response to vaccines.

Overall, the MHRA received 101 reports of severe allergic reactions – associated with anaphylaxis or anaphylactoid reactions – for the Pfizer jab, and 13 for the Oxford vaccine. All the people recovered as far as the MHRA was aware.

The regulator also received 69 reports of facial paralysis or weakness with the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine and six for the AstraZeneca jab.

Some 107 reports involved patients who died shortly after vaccination with the Pfizer/BioNTech jab, alongside 34 reports for the Oxford vaccine.

“Review of individual reports and patterns of reporting does not suggest the vaccine played a role in the death.”

Side-effects overall appeared to be more common in younger age groups, but the MHRA suggested there may be biases in reporting, with younger people more likely to report side-effects.

https://www.yourlocalguardian.co.uk/news/national/19068119.covid-19-vaccines-used-across-uk-safe-new-mhra-analysis-shows/

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another one bites the dust. Created covid 19 saliva test. I don’t think this one was a good guy though. Looks like he’s expired his usefulness.   
 

https://nypost.com/2021/02/01/rutgers-researcher-creator-of-covid-19-saliva-test-dead-at-51/amp/?__twitter_impression=true

Rutgers researcher who created first COVID saliva test dead at 51
 

A research professor at Rutgers University who developed the first saliva test for the coronavirus has unexpectedly died, the college said.

New Jersey native Andrew Brooks, 51, passed away on Jan. 23, the university said in a statement, without elaborating. 

As the chief operating officer and director of technology development at RUCDR Infinite Biologics, Brooks led the effort to develop the COVID-19 saliva test.

The test received emergency use authorization by the Food and Drug Administration in April and a month later was approved for at-home use.

More than 4 million of the rapid response tests have been performed since March, Rutgers University said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Long article so i'll just post the start of it and the link if you want to read more:

Why Is There A Correlation Between The Vaccine Rollout And Increased COVID–19 Mortality?

by Iain Davis
Tuesday, 2nd February 2021

A number of unusual death events have been reported in care homes across the country since the beginning of the vaccine rollout. Officially, any connection to the vaccines has been denied and they have all been taken as evidence of the spread of new variant COVID–19.

The new Coronavirus variant tale, commonly offered by the mainstream media, asserts that SARS–CoV–2 consistently evolves into an ever more dangerous iteration of itself. If that were true, it would turn decades of virology, immunology and epidemiology on its head, and in any case, as we shall see, any such claim is unsupported by the the statistics.

The so called British variant was first discovered in September 2020o we can look at four distinct periods to see if we can observe its effect. Let's look at the period from the start of the alleged global pandemic to the end of the first hard lockdown.

Until 10 May 2020, the UK state tested 1,655,281 people. From this, they identified 210,500 so called cases (a positive test result). This resulted in 98,799 COVID–19 hospital admissions. There were 32,960 claimed COVID–19 deaths during the same period.

Therefore, the percentage chance of a test discovering an alleged "case" of COVID–19 was 12.7%. The claimed chance of one of these "cases" leading to hospitalisation was 46.9%, and the confirmed "case" risk of dying (Case Fatality Rate — CFR) was a staggering, and frankly unbelievable, 15.6%.

https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/why-there-correlation-between-vaccine-rollout-and-increased-covid–19-mortality

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Gone Fishing...
2 hours ago, mike hunt said:

Does anyone believe the vaccine numbers? I myself know no one who has had the vaccine.

 


l know one person who had it last week - no bad effects so far..
And 3 others planning on getting it withing the next 2 weeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So...

 

A *virus* so deadly that 99% of people who allegedly contract it, recover, and so deadly that the public are being told to pretend they have it, and get tested if they get a runny nose in winter.

 

A "vaccine" so safe that the chance of death after being given a dose is 15%.

 

Yes, everything appears to quite normal here.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

Some 107 reports involved patients who died shortly after vaccination with the Pfizer/BioNTech jab, alongside 34 reports for the Oxford vaccine.

“Review of individual reports and patterns of reporting does not suggest the vaccine played a role in the death.”

 

does anyone actually believe that?

 

so when they die of flu or pneumonia that was the covid but when they die after the injection then it wasn't the injection.....

 

see what they're doing there?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Basket Case said:

 

That doesn't help his son - my mate , or his wife (who did not have the vaxxine.)
.
There is no way this whole BS plandemic has been organised to inject the worlds population with saline.
 

 

There is no way 11million people have been currently vaccinated!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Anti Facts Sir said:

So...

 

A *virus* so deadly that 99% of people who allegedly contract it, recover, and so deadly that the public are being told to pretend they have it, and get tested if they get a runny nose in winter.

 

A "vaccine" so safe that the chance of death after being given a dose is 15%.

 

Yes, everything appears to quite normal here.

 

Originally, every ailment known to man was a symptom of Covid1984 except for a runny nose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • lake locked this topic
  • lake unlocked this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...