Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


numnuts
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Metaspiral said:

 

I'm tempted to apply and advise anyone who tests postive not to worry. I'll explain the poitive results for goats, birds, fruits etc and then explain that the virus most likely doesn't even exist. So, relax and look after your immune system and all will be well! I wonder how long I would last?

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Tinfoil Hat said:

https://www.bbc.com/news/amp/world-middle-east-52696833

 

Chinese ambassador to Israel found dead at home.

 

I wonder why he was offed. Did he possibly have a contact giving him info?

 

2 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

Twitter is run by trolls, which most probably know already. I am new but have noticed always the so called trending is certain posters attacking anti lockdown or anyone who go's against the narrative. They capitalise on anything they can to try & ridicule or DEHUMANISE. #HydePark

 

As the U.K. mass media well know too, on top of all other forms of social media, yet they say nothing about it. The Israeli mafia infiltrating regular U.K. internet forums, unbeknown to virtually all of the U.K. citizens posting on such forums, is of no concern to them apparently. :classic_smile:

 

2 hours ago, Metaspiral said:

The attack on that mans sign is an excellent example of what I just mentioned. It reads perfectly well to me. Its amazing that your allowed to call people fucking wankers and cunts and that's not viewed as abusive. What a pit of lost souls.

 

I am certainly no shrinking violet, but it also disgusts me how ordinary U.K. citizens, who are just surfing online, can get abused like that. The motive is to obviously drive them away from any meaningful debate, but such gross behaviour must be outlawed in my view.

 

2 hours ago, bamboozooka said:

are we being told the virus was chemtrailed around the world. seeding clouds, rain, gales.

 

Untitled.jpg

 

Yes, Donal Trump stirring for World War III in his ongoing 5D chess marathon with the PTB. Perhaps he is really saying Israel; not China? Look at his lips very closely. Can 'Chi-nar' really be 'Is-rail'?

 

2 hours ago, Quixotina said:

Yes last November for me too. From a shifty GP (they get £250 a throw for each jab) I could be your Mum but I was fit.

 

G.P.'s shouldn't earn a single penny, when it comes to what drugs or vaccines etc. they are doling out. The current system is diabolical.

Edited by numnuts
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Velma said:

Truthers are now at war, literally, with this "paeodophile gang" called government and armed Americans won't take this lying down. A prepper did a poll asking who will take the vaccine, result: 93% - HELL NO! George Soros thinks that at this "revolutionary" moment, the Cabal can now achieve the "inconceivable." Game, Set & Match. I beg to differ...

 

The PTB tried so hard, over the past 10 years or so, to take their guns away.

 

2 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

No more likes Meta, but yes its all so obvious on there, a losing battle. Its tedious as they are all to easy to own anyway with their arguments like the covid1984 are severely flawed. I would be a much better paid poster than these HASBARA types. They all tried to attack Piers Corbyn rabidly also & claim hes anti Semitic.?What kind of society has no issue with its government sending out armies of propagandist trolls trying to derail free speech.

 

To be fair, I would say a society that isn't fully aware. A society with a bunch of total C**TS masquerading as a free press.

 

2 hours ago, Velma said:

There is no "coronavirus" it is a ruse.

 

So, do you totally dismiss this story? Before Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gadaffi, Hugo Chavez and some top Taliban boys went down, then were they all in on it too? On the night of 9/11, the infamous 'Israeli Crew' were on BBC Newnight, with their hit list of countries to attack. Iran was on that list, along with the countries I have just mentioned (at one juncture or another), and they also named North Korea and Syria. They were very close to taking down Assad, before Putin intervened, and we have seen them trying hard to engage North Korea. Iran is not PTB, for me, even if some freemasons have been active over there. :classic_laugh:   

     

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/iran-coronavirus-us-target-country-special-version-covid19-a9417206.html

 

Coronavirus: Iran’s leader suggests US cooked up ‘special version’ of virus to target country.

 

https://youtu.be/X60csSUkyWE?t=3474

 

2 hours ago, Grumpy Owl said:

If Wi-Fi is a concern, there is no need to put the router inside a Faraday cage, just go into its settings and turn the Wi-Fi functionality off. ?

 

You couldn't do this with a recent version of the BT modem/router, which is why I dumped it. I don't know about the latest version. Best thing I ever did anyway. All of the mainstream gratis ones are in backdoor heaven. I recommend everyone gets a solely wired modem/router, preferably non-Western PTB (I got a Draytek), for their main home set-up. Just use your phones separately for wireless stuff, if you have to. If anyone needs any help setting up their new modem/router, then just find someone on Checkatrade to sort it out for you. It shouldn't take any more than 10 minutes really. :classic_smile: 

 

2 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

Apparently, the march gathering was organised by Britain First Jayda (((Judah))) so all the leftie Guardian readers have jumped in on the trollfest.

 

It should have been a loose march, in my view.

 

2 hours ago, KillBill said:

The Daily Mail referred to the gatherings as 'hard-left demos'.

 

https://scramnews.com/britain-first-behind-uk-freedom-movement-anti-lockdown-events/

 

The formula is simply to use a strong word, then to just add 'left' or 'right' on to the end of it, so as to get your 'term of the day'. I am still waiting patiently to be called an 'intense rightist'. :classic_laugh:     

Edited by numnuts
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How widespread it is I don't know, but in one instance someone was not allowed to take out cash in person over the counter.

It was under the daily amount needed to give notice.

They were asked what it was for!

And refused.

 

Remember serfs, its not really your money and we'd prefer it if you used contactless payment, alongside your contactless life...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, bamboozooka said:

 

 

Untitled.jpg

Untitled8.jpg

 

bucking hell man. seems you just want to screech TDS at everything to shut down debate like zionists do with anti-semitism.

 

i'd say 90% of this forum would post trumpist-like material even though he bes exposed as a wrongun so many times on certain issues.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, numnuts said:

Yes, Donal Trump stirring for World War III in his ongoing 5D chess marathon with the PTB. Perhaps he is really saying Israel; not China? Look at his lips very closely. Can 'Chi-nar' really be 'Is-rail'?

 

Man, get with the times, it's gotta be 7D chess by now!

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just caught a little part of an interview with Jonathan Sumption on the BBC...... 
 

“90% of covid19 registered deaths have multiple causes.

 

Lockdown should be voluntary .
 

This is a very mild epidemic.

 

This lockdown is destroying livelihoods on a massive scale, it is doing enormous damage”.

 

 

It’s great to hear the truth finding it’s way onto the MSM.

 

 

As for the BBC (mouthpiece) interviewer?....... what a joke!.

 

 


 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Given To Fly said:

bucking hell man. seems you just want to screech TDS at everything to shut down debate like zionists do with anti-semitism.

 

I don't even see what it's supposed to achieve. If I was some globocuck that gets offended over Trump's words like I'm some purple haired writer at Buzzfeed, then yeah the TDS thing would make sense, but anyone who has seen my posts will know I'm more right wing than these fake conservative grifters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Heavenman said:

Just caught a little part of an interview with Jonathan Sumption on the BBC...... 
 

“90% of covid19 registered deaths have multiple causes.

 

Lockdown should be voluntary .
 

This is a very mild epidemic.

 

This lockdown is destroying livelihoods on a massive scale, it is doing enormous damage”.

 

 

It’s great to hear the truth finding it’s way onto the MSM.

 

 

As for the BBC (mouthpiece) interviewer?....... what a joke!.

 

 


 

 

Yes posted his article which is in today's Sunday Times earlier in the thread. Excellent.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, kj35 said:

Yes posted his article which is in today's Sunday Times earlier in the thread. Excellent.  


Just seen that now kj35. What a great read. I find it difficult to disagree with anything he has written (unlike the BBC mouthpiece who had to be corrected several times for trying to put words in his mouth). The only bit I might disagree with is that politicians are not wicked men, other than that it’s bang on.

 

And probably worthy of reposting in case anyone, like me, missed it the first time. 

 

6 hours ago, kj35 said:

Sensible article in the Sunday Times questioning lockdown and Neil Ferguson

 

The lesson of Covid-19 is brutally simple and applies generally to public regulation. Free people make mistakes and willingly take risks. If we hold politicians responsible for everything that goes wrong, they will take away our liberty so that nothing can go wrong. They will do this not for our protection against risk, but for their own protection against criticism.

The lockdown was originally justified as a temporary measure to spread coronavirus infections over a longer period. This was to allow time for the NHS’s critical care capacity to catch up. Hence the slogan “Protect the NHS”.

It was never much of a rationale. The NHS is there to protect us, not the other way round. How could its unpreparedness possibly justify depriving the entire UK population of its liberty, pushing us into the worst recession since the early 18th century, destroying millions of jobs and hundreds of thousands of businesses, piling up public and private debt on a crippling scale and undermining the education of our children?

Since the prime minister’s broadcast last Sunday, the lockdown has found a new rationale. The government has dropped “Protect the NHS” from its slogan. The reason is plain from the paper it published the following day. The NHS is not at risk.

This is partly because the government has done an outstanding job in increasing intensive care capacity, and partly because the threat to the NHS was always overstated. The critical care capacity of the NHS has nearly doubled since January, even without the 4,000 or more additional beds in seven temporary Nightingale hospitals. Around the top of the spike in infections, on April 10, 41% of NHS general acute beds were empty. Only 51% of acute beds were occupied by a Covid-19 patient. The current figure is 20%. The Nightingale hospitals stand empty. These are government figures.

Today, the lockdown is only about shielding us from the risk of infection. This raises serious questions about our relationship with the state. It is our business, not the state’s, to say what risks we will take with our own health. We are not fools or children needing to be told by ministers what is good for us, and forced by police officers to do it. We should not need to consult ministers, as the first member of the public to phone in to the daily press conference did, about whether she was allowed to hug her grandchildren.

The usual answer is that by going out and about we may infect other people. But that no longer works as an excuse for coercion. Those who do not want to run the risk of being infected can isolate themselves voluntarily. They will be no worse off than they are under the current compulsory regime. The rest of us can then get on with our lives.

The continuance of the lockdown is particularly odd given that in its latest paper the government accepts that, whatever we do, Covid-19 is likely to be with us long term. So unless it plans to keep the lockdown in place for ever, all that it achieves is to put off the moment when we have to face the risk anyway.

The prime minister told the House of Commons on Monday that his new so-called plan was workable because the British would use their common sense. In that case, why not allow them to do so by leaving the decisions to them?

Instead, we are resorting to law, which, because it requires exact definition, will always cover very many things that are perfectly harmless. Thus it was OK to go for a walk in the park but not to sunbathe. It is OK to drive to the Lake District but not to visit your second home. It is OK to meet one person but not two, and OK to do it in the front garden but not in the back. This kind of thing is arbitrary and absurd. It discredits the law as well as those who make it.

So how has the government ended up in this unsustainable position?

The answer is that, having originally embarked on a sensible policy that would have avoided a lockdown, it did a 180-degree turn on the afternoon of March 23, without thinking of the wider implications. It was in a blind panic provoked by Professor Neil Ferguson’s “reasonable worst case” of 510,000 deaths. Quite apart from the fact that a worst case is by definition an unlikely one, few scientists now support this figure. But it has had disastrous consequences. It pushed the government into making a decision that mocks our humanity and treats us all as mere tools of government policy.

The government terrified people into submission by giving the impression that Covid-19 was dangerous for everyone. It is not. It attacks people with serious vulnerabilities. By most estimates, between 0.5% and 0.75% of infected persons die. Of those, 87% are over 65 and at least 90% have multiple causes only one of which is Covid-19, according to the Office for National Statistics. The death rate for those under 50 is tiny. For the overwhelming majority, the symptoms are mild. Yet Matt Hancock solemnly intoned that “if you go out, people will die”, in what was surely the high point of governmental hype.

The prime minister’s broadcast was supposed to be his Churchillian moment. Instead, we beheld a man imprisoned by his own rhetoric and the logic of his past mistakes.

The lockdown is now all about protecting politicians’ backs. They are not wicked men, just timid ones, terrified of being blamed for deaths on their watch. But it is a wicked thing that they are doing.

Lord Sumption is a former Supreme Court judge and last year’s BBC Reith 

 


 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Heavenman
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Guest pinned this topic
  • Beaujangles locked and unlocked this topic
  • lake locked this topic
  • lake unlocked this topic
  • Beaujangles featured this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...