pi3141 Posted October 1 Share Posted October 1 As member of Bectu I get its publication, it was leaked to the Guardian that the BBC is exploring outsourcing and offshoring some of its operations, Bectu are all over it. They correctly state - Outsourcing and potentially offshoring large numbers of jobs runs totally counter to the growth agenda. I started a thread on the new 'For Profit Social Landlords' offshored in Jersey as is the case of Lloyds division. Curry's the High St retailer is offshoring parts of its operations. The Royal Air Force leases a few of its Jets from a Private Offshore Hedge Fund. We have many companies - Facebook, Amazon and others who are Offshore. The energy sector, Gas and Oil is largely Offshore companies. So to spell it out - The worker will pay for a TV licence and that money will be given to an offshore company. The government will fill Social Housing and give Tax payers money to an Offshore company. Our defence budget will go to Offshore companies. Our High St and services will be provided by Offshore companies. Our Banks will son no doubt be Offshore. Our government infrastructure IT etc is and will be run by Offshore companies. We buy our Cars and goods from foreign companies. We buy our food from foreign companies. We buy our energy from abroad. We rent our military hardware from offshore companies. This is a 1 way street. We create the wealth and then instead of that money circulating in our economy it is given, untaxed to Offshore companies. The Social landlords will control the housing market, dictating the price, they will impose strict rules onto tenants to minimise their insurance costs, they will not maintain the properties and it looks like it will be down to the tenant to maintain the properties - fined when moving if not up to standard. We will work for Offshore companies, Bank with Offshore banks, Rent from Offshore companies, have all our services provided by Offshore companies, our goods and food will come from abroad. None of these companies will pay tax back into our economy. Its a 1 way street where all the cash in our economy is sucked out of the country into Offshore accounts. We are already saddled with huge debt, if there can be no wealth accumulating in our economy, we can never pay it back. Perpetual debt slaves to a government that takes our Taxes and gives it to Offshore companies that the Government has no legal control over. This is Fascism. This is debt slavery. Global debt slavery to unaccountable Offshore entities managed by the governments. That's the British Government with inflation tracked pensions and large salaries and the EU government with bigger salaries and higher Pensions and no doubt we will need a third 'Global' government to tell the EU what to do, who will then tell the British government what to do. We will have huge government bureaucracy, unaccountable faceless politicians who our politicians will say 'its not us its the EU' when we ask the 'EU' we will be told 'no its not us its the Global government' and when an individual tries to address a 'Global Government' about a personal or small issue, it will be considered inconsequential to a 'Global Government' so in effect, absolutely no redress what so ever. Companies, who operate within our country are allowed to be 'Offshore' Workers are not. We must contribute to the society we live in, but our employers do not. Companies have legal human rights, but no officer of that company can be held accountable for a crime committed by the company. Neither can the Shareholders, that's already our law, but on a Global scale? Under what legal system would we prosecute an Offshore company that commits a crime in our country? International Law? It has no force, will it under a Global government, of course not, they will resist for centuries any change to International Law because it means as it stands, they can largely act with impunity. They won't change that and put responsibilities on their shoulders. They are above that, above criticism or justice like for the commoners. Big crimes can be waived away, meanwhile an anti government post will be Policed and acted upon with great efficiency. Burglaries and street crime won't - don't have time for that. Labour, the workers party, who under Starmer said they are the Business and workers' party, are doing nothing to address this transfer of wealth from the UK to the Global stage. They are actively supporting it by offering money to corporations to buy houses its people can't afford and rent them back to them while taking the profits out of the country. When he announced the ID system the sign behind him said 'Global Progress' not National. As a Nation, we are broke economically, but government wants to give itself a pay rise, give more wealth away and seek to control the workers lives down to the nitty gritty with an expensive ID scheme, take us back into EU with associated costs. In other words, increase government and spending at a time when we can't afford it. Increase humanitarian aid at a time when we can't afford it. Encourage businesses to go offshore because its too expensive to operate in the UK. In the name of 'Decency' apparently. Nationalism is a dirty word now. National Broadcaster - Racist. Offshore it to foreign nationals. National Health Service - Racist, who else has the privilege of a National Health Service. National School and Curriculum - Racist. How many 3rd world countries enjoy free education? National Express - Racist. It just is cos it has 'National' in the name. So why isn't the Royal Family racist? All that history of colonialism and imperialism, how can a person of ethnicity bear to live in a country that keeps its 'Royal Family' with its history of imperialism and all the crimes that went with it with all the displays of historical imperialism like the 'Trooping The Colour' or 'Changing of the Guards' or 'Opening of Parliament' ceremony? The Coronation etc? We saw in the News how that awful lady racially abused a British person at the Palace by asking where she came from. This government ha been caught out socially engineering the news by shipping in paid protestors via the Police to present a false narrative to the media who duly report it. This government has accused anyone who doesn't agree with it as racist, they've used the Hitler smear and labelled large numbers of its citizens racist. They have changed the justice courts into a two tier system which is harsher against its indigenous people. Things are going downhill fast, there will be a crash and I do believe a better world will rise from the ashes. If not, its Prison Planet for a few centuries under corporate rule. 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pi3141 Posted October 1 Author Share Posted October 1 So now we know why Labour won’t Nationalize any industry. It's Racist. A national company, serving the nation, staffed by nationals owned by nationals, paying taxes and dividends to the nation. It's not inclusive, it's racist. Think of the NHS. A national service, started by white people to cater for white people, paid for by white people. Does any other country have this? No, because it's British white privilege. It's racist. It would be fair if we transfer ownership of NHS to a foreign company to run it with their own people. Look at the white privilege we have, a young girl gets educated by a school, paid for by white people, she can then train as a nurse, then get a job in a privileged job, in a national service, paid for by whites for the use of that white society. Thats racist. We should remove free education or at least teach the same curriculum as is done in the poorest 3rd world country. That way, our children will not have an advantage over 3rd world children. If that child can then get a job in a foreign owned company, that child will have greatly reduced their white privilege. Tongue in cheek, but, Labour is totally on board with globalization which means rejoining the EU and giving our industries to foreign companies. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pi3141 Posted October 1 Author Share Posted October 1 White privilege White privilege, or white skin privilege, is the societal privilege that benefits white people over non-white people in some societies, particularly if they are otherwise under the same social, political, or economic circumstances.[1][2] With roots in European colonialism and imperialism,[3] and the Atlantic slave trade, white privilege has developed[4] in circumstances that have broadly sought to protect white racial privileges,[5] various national citizenships, and other rights or special benefits.[6][7] Link - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_privilege The NHS has been a special benefit for white people in Britain for a long time. Many hospitals were built during British colonial and Imperial times. As a National service It mainly served white British citizens, for a long time. No other country has a National Health service like the NHS. The NHS is an example of white privilege. The NHS is a racist institution. If you use or work for the NHS, without acknowledging your white privilege, you are racist. Prove me wrong. Remember, we are Globalists now, Multicultural and inclusive. Nationalist's are racists. Anything benefitting from colonial times must be torn down. So under our new Global status, why should WE have an NHS? Why should we have that special benefit when others don't? How does having a special benefit within our nation, that others of similar economic and social systems do not, how can it not be white privilege and hence racist? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Campion Posted October 2 Share Posted October 2 The fact that wiki (from the Frankfurt School) only talk about white privilege and not Afro privilege or Asian privilege just shows who has a target on their backs at the moment. It's not privilege though. Where it does exist (and many white people do the reverse) it's just an ingroup preference, which all groups can have. A natural survival instinct we have evolved since tribal times in the distant past. People trust others when they have a community together and a cohesive society. For example I have no problem with Christians in the congregation of my local church giving preference to each other more than others outside their congregation. How can we be expected to build high-trust communities unless we give those a priority over strangers? Which is perhaps the point, because the elites don't want us having that kind of self-determination. Our natural instincts are described as something evil to be suppressed so we can be slaves to their multicultural system. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluke Posted October 2 Share Posted October 2 (edited) Honest question and I am not trying to be snarky when you say fascism you are referring to an authoritarian system right? I'm assuming you are not referring to Oswald Mosley style system which if I'm not mistaken ironically Palantir has the grandson of oswald Mosley working there. Edited October 2 by Fluke Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.