Anti-Immigrant Protests Continue

[pi3141]

20 minutes ago, Grumpy Owl said:

 

I don't suppose this means that the Royal Navy are going to be deployed to turn these boats around and stop them landing on our shores?  

 

It should do. But i bet your right.

[J47]

the thing is, it is a reasonable assumption that not all, would follow the call to enact that PI1, I appreciate that is the concern but moderates, would not endorse the extreme element. 

Edited September 7 by J47

[wagdog19]

7 hours ago, pi3141 said:

Starmer to move migrants to military barracks to face down Farage threat

08:27, 07 Sep 2025, updated 12:36, 07 Sep 2025

By GREG HEFFER, POLITICAL CORRESPONDENT and CAMERON ROY

 

iKeir Starmer is ready to move Channel migrants to former military barracks to ward off the threat posed by Nigel Farage.

 

The Prime Minister has told his reshuffled Cabinet to 'go up a gear' after making sweeping changes to his ministerial ranks following Angela Rayner's resignation on Friday.

 

Link - https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15074065/Panicking-Keir-Starmer-ready-leave-Labour-MPs-feeling-queasy-human-rights-overhaul-asylum-seekers-barracks-bid-ward-Nigel-Farage-threat.html

 

 

FFS

 

Thousands of men of unknown backgrounds of fighting age to be put up in former military barracks, in other words, a stronghold. 

 

That's a clever idea.

 

Some military guy in the states is saying extreme Islam is simple to understand, they want the destruction of Israel and a worldwide Islamic caliphate under Sharia Law, everybody converts to Islam or is put to death.

 

It's a simple ideology that all Muslims are aware of.

 

The conflict to force change is called Jihad and is a prophetic war among Muslim and infidels or unbelievers that they believe will happen. They just waiting for the signs like Christian rapturists to signal end times and the start of Jihad.

 

Putting 100's of thousands of men with these beliefs in areas they can secure and defend is totally stupid.

 

If China and Russia give the nod, Iran will declare Jihad and every Muslim in the world knows they are to forcefully conquer all infidels and unbelievers and instigate Islamic rule wherever they are.

 

 

[Anti Facts Sir]

8 hours ago, pi3141 said:

Starmer to move migrants to military barracks to face down Farage threat

 

 

As I always said, Nige is the PTB's handy stooge to push through PRS agendas. Now they can start training up these "migrants" in the best possible place.

 

But the public never cotton on that Farage is an agent provocateur doing the PTB's work.

[pi3141]

13 hours ago, wagdog19 said:

 

 

This is exactly what's wrong with the world. 

 

Pagan horsesh*t.

 

[pi3141]

13 hours ago, Anti Facts Sir said:

As I always said, Nige is the PTB's handy stooge to push through PRS agendas. Now they can start training up these "migrants" in the best possible place.

 

But the public never cotton on that Farage is an agent provocateur doing the PTB's work.

 

Yeah, knowingly or not, it looks like he'll push through questionable policies. 

 

He came as the voice of reason, but how did he get that platform in the first place.

 

 

[Mr H]

Did I c that right?

 

New home secretary, describe herself as a "devout Muslim. The center point of her life"

 

[pi3141]

32 minutes ago, Mr H said:

Did I c that right?

 

New home secretary, describe herself as a "devout Muslim. The center point of her life"

 

 

 In terms of her stance on Israel and Gaza, she has been seen with “Free Palestine” placards, including at a Palestine Solidarity Campaign rally, and she abstained on the vote to proscribe Palestine Action earlier in the summer. Her stance on Palestine Action will be in the spotlight now that she is taking over the helm from Yvette Cooper, who was responsible for the ban.

 

 

Snip

 

However, she has abstained from several key votes on Israel-Gaza related topics, including a Scottish National Party call for “Ceasefire in Occupied Gaza” Amendment in November 2023, a call for suspension of arms sales to Israel in March 2024, and she did not sign a letter urging the UK to uphold ICC arrest warrants against Israeli officials.

 

Link - https://www.jpost.com/international/article-866646

 

 

Feels like we're in a cartoon now.

 

On the one hand you could argue with her at the helm there can be no accusations of racism. 

 

On the other hand, a person's decision is largely based on personal experiences. If your atheist you'll default to science, religious and you'll default to religion. 

 

British or not she will feel a huge responsibility to help Muslims and be seen to be doing the right thing by Islam.

 

That's not putting British first is it.

 

A religious judge sitting on a case will always be guided by his faith.

 

A politically ideological judge will always be influenced by their ideology. 

 

If women feel oppressed being forced to wear the veil or burka, come to the UK where there is the same sharia law, although not legally enforceable, and you can pressured into wearing the veil by the Muslim Council of Britain to conform with the same oppression you fled from.

 

You could appeal to the Home secretary if you feel oppressed but they will tell you you should be a good Muslim and your free to follow your own interpretation of Islam while protecting the right of hardline Muslims to abuse and ostracise that person in their local community. 

 

That'll encourage social cohesion. 

 

Clown town.

 

If the Muslim Council of Britain want to demand a city be under Islam with Sharia law so British Muslim are free to practice Islam without restrictions. In line with their human rights as laid out by EHCR,

 

now is the time.

 

[pi3141]

Can we reinstate the Rwanda plan?

 

I'd really like to go. 

[k_j_evans]

3 hours ago, Mr H said:

Did I c that right?

 

New home secretary, describe herself as a "devout Muslim. The center point of her life"

 

If she is a devout muslim, should she be going out to work? I thought she should be at home looking after the kids and hubby. And if she is out in public, she should be wearing a headscarf and no lipstick or low necklines (which are in several photos). Not very modest.

[pi3141]

1 hour ago, k_j_evans said:

If she is a devout muslim, should she be going out to work? I thought she should be at home looking after the kids and hubby. And if she is out in public, she should be wearing a headscarf and no lipstick or low necklines (which are in several photos). Not very modest.

 

This is the thing with Islam, they are very good at PR.

 

Right now Palestinian women and girls can go to school, speak publicly and not wear a veil.

 

But once they've cemented their control, it all changes. 

 

[Mr H]

2 hours ago, k_j_evans said:

If she is a devout muslim, should she be going out to work? I thought she should be at home looking after the kids and hubby. And if she is out in public, she should be wearing a headscarf and no lipstick or low necklines (which are in several photos). Not very modest.

I think as with most religions devout is very subjective. 

[J47]

not establised that NF is working for the elite, despite the claims, he is, that the public have yet to see

 

we shall see

[1velocity7]

8 hours ago, Mr H said:

Did I c that right?

 

New home secretary, describe herself as a "devout Muslim. The center point of her life"

 

food for thought

 

 

[northern star]

Maybe its not about immigration, just the total incompetent fuckwits at the top of most countries.

Most of them are from Blair's Fabian Society and the gay Coalition of the Willies. We all know that now.

Get rid of them, give the people more autonomy, self-determination and self governance, and some semblance of order and common sense can prevail.

 

 

[pi3141]

9 hours ago, northern star said:

Get rid of them, give the people more autonomy, self-determination and self governance, and some semblance of order and common sense can prevail.

 

Hallelujah to that.

[1velocity7]

 

[Screamingeagle]

10 hours ago, 1velocity7 said:

 

you think people can outgun the police and millitary in a all out conflict??

 

There is a reason/s why all others instruments of society are privatised and millitary and police are not !!!!

[cosmicinaudio]

5 hours ago, Screamingeagle said:

you think people can outgun the police and millitary in a all out conflict??

 

There is a reason/s why all others instruments of society are privatised and millitary and police are not !!!!

 

I don't think what happens in a tin pot country like Nepal, which is chaotic at the best of times, is reflective of what is achievable in Britain or Western countries. Some of the rioters in Nepal looked better armed than the police, I saw some pictures of civilians carrying AK47s, etc, which is simply never going to be the case in Britain, this country has been systematically disarmed for decades and the police would do you for carry literally ANYTHING that could even vaguely be construed as a potential weapon, especially at a protest. In most third world countries the people are generally "wilder" and less controlled to begin with.

Edited September 10 by cosmicinaudio

[1velocity7]

are you ready for a false flag at the tommy robinson rally sept 13

[pi3141]

Revealed: Keir Starmer edited manual on interpreting human rights laws that prevent Britain from deporting small boat migrants

By HARRIET LINE, DEPUTY POLITICAL EDITOR

00:15 11 Sep 2025, updated 07:55 11 Sep 2025

 

Snip

 

In the book, a copy of which was obtained by GB News, a sentence written by Sir Keir reads: 'Above all else, the HRA [Human Rights Act] represents a new way of thinking about law, politics and the relationship between public authorities and individuals.

 

'Its potential is enormous; its effectiveness depends on the combined willingness of all of us to approach decision-making from a human rights perspective.'

 

The Prime Minister faced criticism last night for his failure to tackle migration.

 

Reform UK leader Nigel Farage told GB News: 'Keir Starmer was a key figure in turning the Human Rights Act and ECHR into the overriding force in British law that it is today. He says he wants to reform human rights laws but he wrote the how-to manual on how to use human rights laws.'

 

Snip

 

The report states: 'The ECHR has mutated from a shield against tyranny into a sword against sovereignty, often wielded to frustrate democratic government, override parliamentary intent, and paralyse effective policymaking on the most sensitive questions of law, borders, and national security.'

 

Link - https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15086583/Keir-Starmer-edited-manual-human-rights-laws.html

 

 

Did we really need the Human Rights in our British society to be improved or strengthened by EHCR?

 

I never felt oppressed before EHCR came in to effect.

 

So now, we have to question, if neither Europe or Britain were run by oppressive regimes at the time, was these laws ever meant to improve our way of life?

 

Or was it so the lawmakers and politicians had a new way, with legal cover, to renegotiate how power deals with us.

 

The EU original statement was a triumph for the working people, but the changes, additions and implementation of it has ended in - 

 

The report states: 'The ECHR has mutated from a shield against tyranny into a sword against sovereignty, often wielded to frustrate democratic government, override parliamentary intent, and paralyse effective policymaking on the most sensitive questions of law, borders, and national security.'

[pi3141]

Found on Facebook- 

 

I have been meaning to post about this for a while because the truth is, once you understand who the Fabians are, you stop wondering how the world became this twisted and you start seeing the pattern.

 

You stop thinking it is chaos and you start realising it is design. We have been conditioned to think change happens through revolutions, riots or coups, but what if I told you that the real power, the real architects of the system we live under, were the ones who never shouted, never marched, never set a street on fire… they just quietly infiltrated everything. That is the Fabian Society. The hidden hand that did not need to break the system because they became the system.

 

They started in London in 1884, a group of well-heeled intellectuals and social engineers who saw the crumbling British Empire and decided to rebuild the world in their own image. They did not want chaotic uprisings that might spiral out of their control like the French Revolution or the Bolsheviks. They wanted control. Order. A slow, deliberate reconstruction of everything, so gradual that the masses would not even notice until it was done. That is why they named themselves after the Roman general Fabius Maximus, known as the Delayer, who defeated stronger enemies not through battle but by waiting them out, slowly weakening them until he struck. Their emblem was a tortoise and their motto was “When I strike, I strike hard.” Their coat of arms was a wolf in sheep’s clothing. They told us exactly what they were from the beginning.

 

Wolves wrapped in fleece, smiling politely while they gutted the world.

 

The names attached to them are ones you will recognise from schoolbooks and old literature, but no one ever tells you what they were really doing. George Bernard Shaw, the famous playwright, was one of their key founders. He worshipped the idea of Nietzsche’s Übermensch, the Superman, and fantasised openly about building a world ruled by a godlike elite. He called Lenin the greatest Fabian of them all and pushed for population control, forced sterilisation and licensing who could even be born. He was not some eccentric poet. He was a eugenicist with influence. H G Wells was another Fabian, writing endless books not just about science fiction but about a planned world state, a New World Order run by experts and bureaucrats. Sidney and Beatrice Webb quietly designed the framework of the modern welfare state and the bureaucracy that came with it. Annie Besant, another Fabian, was a Theosophist who believed in preparing the world for a new messiah figure, the so-called World Teacher, which just so happens to mirror the same Luciferian cult belief system that keeps popping up in elite circles. These people were not trying to uplift humanity. They were trying to erase it and rebuild it like clay in their hands.

 

This is the key thing to understand. The Fabians did not go after the masses. They went after the gatekeepers. They infiltrated the education system, the universities, the civil service, the media, the banks and the political parties. They even founded the London School of Economics to train their own army of policy-makers, economists and global managers. They created the Labour Party as their political weapon. Every Labour government of the last century has been packed full of Fabians, from Clement Attlee to Harold Wilson to Tony Blair and Gordon Brown. Even the supposedly opposite Conservative Party has its own Oxbridge feeder network pushing the same agenda under different branding. It is all the same machine.

 

What makes them so dangerous is their method. They do not try to smash society in one blow. They slowly reshape it, one tiny step at a time, so each change feels normal. They call it gradualism. Boil the frog slowly and it will not jump out. By the time people wake up, the entire landscape has shifted. Culture, law, education, family, finance, religion, all of it quietly rewritten. That is why they use the tortoise as their symbol. They are slow, patient and relentless, but when they strike, they strike hard. Wars, financial collapses, cultural revolutions and engineered crises are not accidents. They are the hammer blows. They spend decades heating the world red hot through chaos, fear and exhaustion, then they reshape it on the anvil. George Bernard Shaw even designed a stained-glass window to celebrate their mission, which still sits at the London School of Economics today. It shows the Fabians literally hammering the world on an anvil while a shield above them bears the words “Pray devoutly, Hammer stoutly” and at the centre, a wolf in sheep’s clothing hovers over the globe. The inscription reads “Remould it nearer to the heart’s desire.” They could not have been more honest about it.

 

These people have always believed that humanity is too stupid to run its own life, so the educated class must do it for them. They see the rest of us as cattle to be managed, controlled, medicated, tracked and if necessary, culled. It is the same belief system you see in the modern technocrats, the World Economic Forum, the UN, the WHO, the central bankers and the Silicon Valley elite. All of them are pushing the same vision the Fabians sketched out more than a century ago. A centralised global system with no borders, no private property, no traditional families, no faith and no freedom. Just digital IDs, central bank digital currencies, algorithmic social credit scores and a single global religion managed by their hand-picked clerics. Even Tony Blair, a Fabian, launched the Tony Blair Faith Foundation to push Faith and Globalisation, which is just code for merging religions into one system to prop up their world government. They want control down to the level of your thoughts and they are dressing it all up in words like sustainability and equity to make it palatable.

 

This is not conspiracy theory. This is what they have always said, and they have done it in plain sight. They are the reason everything feels orchestrated from the top down, because it is. They do not break systems, they become them. They do not storm the gates, they become the gatekeepers. They do not burn the world down in riots, they rot it out from within, and by the time anyone notices, it is too late. They are the silent engineers of the collapse we are watching now. They do not care about freedom, or justice, or truth. They care about power. And they have played the longest game of all to get it.

 

The Fabian Society is not some relic of the past. It is alive, it is embedded in the very fabric of our governments and institutions, and it has never abandoned its mission. It waits patiently, building, infiltrating, reshaping, and when the world is finally hot enough, when the chaos has softened it up, when people are broken and begging for order, it will strike. Because that is what it was always created to do. It waits long. But when it strikes, it strikes hard.

 

 

Edited September 11 by pi3141

[Tinfoil Hat]

20 hours ago, 1velocity7 said:

are you ready for a false flag at the tommy robinson rally sept 13

Yes, absolutely! 

 

It's likely to be a trigger point for the implementation of further laws to restrict certain categories of people.

[NeoScota]

On 9/10/2025 at 10:13 PM, 1velocity7 said:

are you ready for a false flag at the tommy robinson rally sept 13

No,

My teeth are not responding to my bleaching kit. I shall be shamed. Spose if I wear a burkha though

[pi3141]

13 hours ago, NeoScota said:

Spose if I wear a burkha though

 

Yeah I'm thinking of identifying as a Muslim Woman, buying a burka, cut the bottom off so it's only a head covering and walking around in it.

I'm just worried about PacMan coming to get me.

 

It's that or a full face balaclava. 

A previous member did something similar, he got stopped by armed police! 

 

Funny as f*ck.

 

 

(Hayabusa was members name on old forum)