pi3141 Posted September 12 Author Share Posted September 12 it's behind a paywall. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wagdog19 Posted September 12 Share Posted September 12 On 9/10/2025 at 10:13 PM, 1velocity7 said: are you ready for a false flag at the tommy robinson rally sept 13 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wagdog19 Posted September 12 Share Posted September 12 Wayne Kempson, Ross Kemp, Tommeeey.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wagdog19 Posted September 12 Share Posted September 12 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeoScota Posted September 13 Share Posted September 13 11 hours ago, pi3141 said: Yeah I'm thinking of identifying as a Muslim Woman, buying a burka, cut the bottom off so it's only a head covering and walking around in it. I'm just worried about PacMan coming to get me. It's that or a full face balaclava. A previous member did something similar, he got stopped by armed police! Funny as f*ck. (Hayabusa was members name on old forum) Hayabusa...aye I remember him and can imagine him doing something like that lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pi3141 Posted September 13 Author Share Posted September 13 8 hours ago, NeoScota said: Hayabusa...aye I remember him and can imagine him doing something like that lol Yeah he was legend. He an a mate drove round their city centre with balaclavas on! Armed police pulled them over. Freaking hilarious. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pi3141 Posted September 13 Author Share Posted September 13 (edited) I've been hearing about offshore companies funnelling taxes out of the UK since forever. I was aware of it as a teenager. That's 40 years ago! And yet, despite it being heavily reported and criticized for decades, no government has ever done anything about it. When Labour came to power in the 90's I thought it was an obvious thing for the party to do - stick it to the capitalists and gain a win for the economy and the working man. But no, they destroyed the private pension industry for the worker instead. Made it impossible to sustain final salary pensions for the workers. Who has heard of 'Economic Anarchist's' ? People who have accepted they cannot change the system for Anarchy, so instead, make a note of the sickness and lateness policy of the company they work for and make sure they use up the allocated quota every year. Go a bit slow at work, miss the odd deadline. Try not to be efficient so the company doesn't thrive. Why shouldn't politicians do the same? If your a socialist or communist, you despise working in the system, but you accept if you want to be a politician you have to. So be a bad one. Not too bad, but a wrong decision here and there, voting against certain policies to defeat them. Running the office inefficiently, ignoring key problems that could be solved, destroying things that work - Education Secretary forcing Academies to take disruptive children and making it to expensive to get a private education to all except the filthy rich etc. In this way, its death by a thousand cuts. Now, when I see politicians making dumb decisions, backing irrelevant policies that do little to address the issue, ignore excesses and corruption, cover up mismanagement or corrupt management, bailing out industries with tax payers money, watching uncontrolled housing inflation, overseeing excessive tax regimes that drive business away because they have a net zero ideology which contradicts a healthy economy for the worker. I think it has to be by design. I think it has to be the Fabians, the Communist's. I've told this story before, when I rented in Aylesbury we rented from a Muslim lady, nice lady. She explained she got her mortgage from the Muslim bank which meant she didn't pay interest. So our government allow for members of our society, and business's to have an unfair advantage over its own people. Who allowed that? Why? What economic progress does it bring to British people? None. Its unfair over struggling families. Government don't care though. Government talk about allowing asylum seekers from oppressive regimes to come here, yet allow Sharia Courts and Sharia Law - oppression for women to operate here. I wonder if there's a smirk on the government officials face when they tell an asylum seeker they will be going somewhere with a heavy Muslim presence that although can't legally enforce Sharia, there are Sharia courts and they will do so with public and social pressure. The thing is, to be this bad, its got to be intentional hasn't it? Our own people can't afford houses so give grants to offshore companies who will charge highest rent while doing minimum maintenance enforce strict rules and take the profits offshore. Take our Gas reserves, dump tonnes and tonnes of cement over the drill hole so we can never open it up again, destroy all the power generating centres and towers, build homes on them and hand them over to business, then put up a few windmills, watch the energy costs sky rocket and tell the people its for the planet. Take succeeding private schools and academies, tax them so they are unsustainable and force academies to take disruptive children. Close industries make thousands unemployed and then complain they are the problem because their benefits bill is to high. Lazy scroungers. And now, pay protestors and the Police to attend demonstrations, label the opposition far right and racist to distort public opinion. Send the Border Force out not to protect our Border's but to help illegal immigrants make it safely and tell us we're far right if we disagree. Mis manage the armed forces and allow Investment Companies to rent weapons of war to the British and Foreign governments so again those offshore investment companies can funnel our tax money paying for defence to slush funds offshore. Take the worst and most impractical energy pricing strategy, outlaw everything you can for the flimsiest of reasons - Laughing Gas because of Littering. These inconsequential bill's go through very quickly but closing offshore tax loopholes, its been over 40 years of complaints, billions lost in revenue and they barely hve a conversation about it. It seems obvious, they are not trying to work towards some sort of Utopian or fair society. They intentionally f*ck it up depending on their political ideology. Conservative want everything marketized, nor free NHS or Education, you pay for everything, every company must have share holders who get paid dividends off the backs of the workers. Or Labour want socialism, everything owned by the state, everything regulated, Unionized and strictly controlled. Tories get in, they build, Labour get back in, they tear down. Backwards and forwards because really, no one wants it to change. Just give us the illusion that change is possible, but its never within reach just yet. When really, they could call a halt to this whole thing tomorrow if they wanted. I think this is what they Fabians are doing. Making bad decisions, going slow, ignoring big problems in favour of minority problems, destroying the economy by chipping away at it. Bit by bit, damage the system until it's so weak it fails. Edited September 13 by pi3141 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pi3141 Posted September 13 Author Share Posted September 13 (edited) I'm sitting on my boat and a Muslim family have taken a boat out on to the river and are playing Islamic call to prayer so loudly im hearing it from half a mile away or so. It's echoing around the marina. Getting distant now. I guess they are going up river. A response to the flags? Letting us know it's their country now? Not at all antagonistic being a Sunday. Yes, the women were wearing Burkas. I wondered what was going on when they showed up this morning. Edited September 13 by pi3141 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pi3141 Posted September 13 Author Share Posted September 13 Ok it's Saturday! Lost the days there - to much time alone! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazzer Posted September 13 Share Posted September 13 Whose idea was it to let 2 groups of people that absolutely hate each march through London on the same fucking day? It`s got to be done on purpose hasn´t it? Even in football you never have 2 teams from the same city playing at home at the same time. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pi3141 Posted September 13 Author Share Posted September 13 From the BBC - 'More than 100,000' Reports are nearly a million. I know 1000,000 is more than 100,000 but come on. From the same BBC article- At the Stand Up To Racism rally, independent MP Diane Abbott told demonstrators they were there to stand together. "We know racism and violence and fascism is not new," she said. "But you know what? We have always defeated that racism and violence." But they don't defeat facism. As i have argued, Labour is overseeing the transfer of all business, farming and housing to private, offshore corporations, including parts of our armed services, while stripping rights away from citizens. That is the start of facism. Dianne Abbott was Labour. From Wiki - Abbott has been a prominent figure on the Labour left and a vocal campaigner on issues of race and inequality. She was suspended from the Labour Party in 2023 over comments about racism, later apologised, and had the whip restored ahead of the 2024 general election. In July 2025, she was suspended again after reiterating those remarks in a BBC interview, and currently sits as an independent MP. So basically she's a racist attending a stand up to racism rally. She argued only black people are subject to racism, all others its just prejudice. I've argued this before, emailed the Southern Law group. If a black person in a predominantly white dociety has 'racist' views, they are not racist and only prejudice. So if a black person says Scottish people are tight with money, it's prejudice, because the black person is living as a minority. If a white person says black people are lazy, they are racist because they are of the majority. So, if a white person goes to Africa and says black people are lazy, they are not racist anymore, they are prejudice. If a black person goes to Africa and says Scottish people are skinflints, they are now racist. My question to the southern law lot was - At which point of the journey does a person change from prejudice to racist? Is it in the airport lounge? When they enter international air space or when they land in the country where they are either the majority or minority? I didn't get an answer. These people don't have an intellectual bone in their body. Only hate and resentment. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pi3141 Posted September 13 Author Share Posted September 13 Where Did We Get the Idea That Only White People Can Be Racist? Peter Wood Snip The twin themes “only whites can be racist” and “all whites are racist” appeared at the University of Delaware in 2007. The “sustainability” dorm-based indoctrination program at UD offered this aperҫu: A RACIST: A racist is one who is both privileged and socialized on the basis of race by a white supremacist (racist) system. ‘The term applies to all white people (i.e., people of European descent) living in the United States, regardless of class, gender, religion, culture or sexuality. By this definition, people of color cannot be racists, because as peoples within the U.S. system, they do not have the power to back up their prejudices, hostilities, or acts of discrimination….’ This formulation was adopted by UD after consultation with Dr. Shakti Butler, a consultant who goes around advising colleges and universities to this effect. The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE), whose spotlight on UD led to the end of the residence program, archived a database of materials from it, including Dr. Butler’s “Diversity Facilitation Training.” Dr. Butler, incidentally, lists Boston University as one of her clients. She is a popularizer, not the originator of these conceits. But the thing to note is that there is a whole sub-industry within the diversity industry that is devoted to advancing the idea that only whites can be racist. Dr. Grundy is just repeating a widespread meme that circulates among the radicals of the diversity movement. In January 1987, Socialist Worker published the article “The Fallacy of Reverse Racism,” in which the author wrote, “Blacks cannot be ‘racists.’ link - https://www.nas.org/blogs/article/where_did_we_get_the_idea_that_only_white_people_can_be_racist Socialists at it again, white capitalists are racist and evil. Dianne Abbott is still up there, encouraging deluded lefties they are racist unless they destroy their own country. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1velocity7 Posted September 13 Share Posted September 13 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Campion Posted September 13 Share Posted September 13 (edited) 4 hours ago, pi3141 said: Where Did We Get the Idea That Only White People Can Be Racist? The first ideas like this I've seen come from the work of the Frankfurt School, dating to the 1920s. Though that was an outward public expression and the ideas may have been cooked up privately before then in the secret society networks. That was also the same time historically after WW1, when there was Woodrow Wilson's New World Order, the League of Nations, and America's growth to replace the old order of European empires. What we're seeing now is quite a late stage in the agenda when the white peoples have been successfully demoralised and brought down. Not long now till whites are minorities in their homelands and whatever the next stage in the plan is, we will begin to see. Edited September 13 by Campion Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr H Posted September 14 Share Posted September 14 Did anyone attend the rally? What was it like? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cosmicinaudio Posted September 14 Share Posted September 14 (edited) I wondered if they'd stage a false flag at this rally, maybe Robinson's assassination or attempted, but I don't think they will. The cabal HATE English nationalism, the last thing they'd want is to create a martyr for it. If any false flag is planned, I suspect it will involve English patriots killing left wing counter-protesters or migrants, to create maximum hatred towards English patriots and justify cracking down on them, maybe even get the English flag banned from being flown privately. The media are already pushing the narrative that St. George's cross clad thugs are beating poor innocent blacks to a pulp, just look at this Mail article today. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15096841/Moment-Tommy-Robinson-protest-march-turned-savage-Unconscious-man-dragged-safety-police-thugs-batter-horses.html The reality is at similar past marches, it's black thugs and gang members who have come out with knuckle dusters and weapons to attack English patriots and beat them to a pulp, and the Mail celebrated that. Yet they defend themselves against a black and they're suddenly racist thugs. Edited September 14 by cosmicinaudio Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pi3141 Posted September 14 Author Share Posted September 14 11 hours ago, Campion said: whatever the next stage in the plan is, we will begin to see. The next step is corporate rule. They own our land, control our food, our industries and our homes. They will funnel money out of economies into offshore accounts keeping those economies in debt and ensuring nobody owns anything. Everything will be regulated and taxed. Governments will be directed by businesses. Facism. Thats the next step. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tinfoil Hat Posted September 14 Share Posted September 14 https://youtu.be/__Wpqi3EGWo?si=dvRQYWdl9pyszZQU Huge numbers attending the event, and the usual misrepresentation, as expected, from the BBC. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cosmicinaudio Posted September 14 Share Posted September 14 (edited) 2 hours ago, pi3141 said: The next step is corporate rule. They own our land, control our food, our industries and our homes. They will funnel money out of economies into offshore accounts keeping those economies in debt and ensuring nobody owns anything. Everything will be regulated and taxed. Governments will be directed by businesses. Facism. Thats the next step. Where's there to escape? It seems to me all countries are run like that. Britain's bad enough but in many countries the theft and corruption is even more blatant than it is here. Maybe if you're fairly well off you can emigrate to a corrupt poor/third world country where your relative wealth can buy a high standard of living and exemption from some regulations and controls, but that's a double edged sword in itself. Also, in living like that you are really only kidding yourself that things are better. Your experience as a "rich" foreigner in a poor country won't be the same as what most locals who live there experience, who have much the same life with the same problems that you escaped Britain from. Some people point to Russia and China as our saviours, but they seem just the same, run by a corrupt and oppressive oligarchy. I'm long past thinking the grass is greener elsewhere, in my experience of travelling the common people have much the same complaints everywhere. At least in Britain we don't have to put up with petty corruption in our day to day lives. Unlike in Morocco and South Africa, two countries where I've hired cars and been pulled over by corrupt police for spurious claims of "speeding" or non-compliance with some imaginary road law that the officer has just pulled out of his arse on several occasions and extorted for money because I'm a white foreigner, and the corrupt police will have just put these "fines" in their back pocket, and there's nothing I can do about it because I'm a white foreigner. At least we don't have to put up with that type of shit in Britain, not yet any way. Edited September 14 by cosmicinaudio Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr H Posted September 14 Share Posted September 14 52 minutes ago, cosmicinaudio said: Where's there to escape? It seems to me all countries are run like that. Britain's bad enough but in many countries the theft and corruption is even more blatant than it is here. Maybe if you're fairly well off you can emigrate to a corrupt poor/third world country where your relative wealth can buy a high standard of living and exemption from some regulations and controls, but that's a double edged sword in itself. Also, in living like that you are really only kidding yourself that things are better. Your experience as a "rich" foreigner in a poor country won't be the same as what most locals who live there experience, who have much the same life with the same problems that you escaped Britain from. Some people point to Russia and China as our saviours, but they seem just the same, run by a corrupt and oppressive oligarchy. I'm long past thinking the grass is greener elsewhere, in my experience of travelling the common people have much the same complaints everywhere. At least in Britain we don't have to put up with petty corruption in our day to day lives. Unlike in Morocco and South Africa, two countries where I've hired cars and been pulled over by corrupt police for spurious claims of "speeding" or non-compliance with some imaginary road law that the officer has just pulled out of his arse on several occasions and extorted for money because I'm a white foreigner, and the corrupt police will have just put these "fines" in their back pocket, and there's nothing I can do about it because I'm a white foreigner. At least we don't have to put up with that type of shit in Britain, not yet any way. I think the main advantage of living abroad is that you can buy land and use it and it's not expensive and no planning regs. Land in UK is not affordable to most and heavily regulated. But yes if you're living a city lifestyle there's not much difference whever u go Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pi3141 Posted September 14 Author Share Posted September 14 Tommy Robinson gave a short talk at the end of the demo. He explained that Westminster Council retracted the license to protest 48 hours before. This meant the Police would have to view the demo as illegal and to meet it with force and a view to stop it. Robinson explained the government has used the tactics before. Grant permission, then withdraw permission and the Police has to change from peaceful policing, to using force. This creates a violent backlash from protesters, who can the be labeled illegitimate demo by violent thugs. On top of this, we see the government shipping paid protesters into legitimate protests they can't stop, to antagonize the protesters, force a violent confrontation so once again, the protest becomes violent and lose its legitimacy. This is clear social engineering by the government to present a narrative to the world and our society that is reinforced by bias reporting. This is as bad as China and Russia and their social controls. This is Labour, the working people's party. Surely now, everyone can see - they are wolves in sheep's clothing among the workers. Promising us they act in our best interests while selling out to globalists and using social engineering to cover up what they are doing. This is serious now. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pi3141 Posted September 14 Author Share Posted September 14 Some comments "If you want truth, because I was there. The police turned against us. They allowed the counter protest closer than agreed, then antagonised our peaceful crowd by pinning us in a certain area and forcibly narrowing that area so the opposing protests wouldn't meet. This involved charging by police in riot gear towards our well behaved crowd which resulted in retaliation.". Severe Weather Updates they were deliberately led the wrong way by police into the baby burning terrorists and their supporters, who then attacked the police and the british public, I've seen the video's from start to finish, not just a planned snippet, this government is a disgrace the most evil, treacherous government of all time. westminster council revoked the licence for the parade 48 hours beforehand and after tommy met with the police, the police stuck a middle finger up to westminster council and gave permission for it to go ahead as planned, so I'd say there was a few police officers who under orders from the treacherous government or bent anti british police commanders, followed orders and what a disaster that was for them because we stood firm and proud, and the terrorists and their supporters proved what they are, scum, 2 million people and 9 arrests, the police even allowed an extension be ause the patriots behaved so well and respectful, no smashed, looted shops, no attacking the police, or people going about their business, no cars lit on fire or police vans burnt, I'd say compared to any other group of protesters to date we were and have been, as procen, the most peaceful, up yours starmer your time is up, between labour and the connies they're support has dropped to around 40% between them, starmer and his scummy government need to go!!!! 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cosmicinaudio Posted September 14 Share Posted September 14 3 hours ago, Mr H said: I think the main advantage of living abroad is that you can buy land and use it and it's not expensive and no planning regs. Land in UK is not affordable to most and heavily regulated. But yes if you're living a city lifestyle there's not much difference whever u go Good point, in most countries people are allowed to build a house to live in on their own land and no one interferes. Over here if you have the audacity to do as much as put a shed or a fence on your own land the council and local NIMBYs go mental. It's not just the government that's the problem, the UK is infested with people who see it as their life's work to interfere with and obstruct people applying for planning permission and trying to utilise their own land. It's a real cultural problem I think. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Campion Posted September 14 Share Posted September 14 18 minutes ago, pi3141 said: I'd say compared to any other group of protesters to date we were and have been, as procen, the most peaceful, up yours starmer your time is up, between labour and the connies they're support has dropped to around 40% between them, starmer and his scummy government need to go!!!! Fair enough to want the government to go, but there's nothing new in them wanting to break the ordinary people who want to have a peaceful protest or live outside the system. I'm old enough to remember the battle of Orgreave and the battle of the Beanfield in the 80s which were under a conservative government squashing the hopes and dreams of the folk. But, this protest was billed as "Uniting the Union". Tommy R supports multiculturalism and immigration, it's just Muslims he has a problem with, he supports Hindus and Hindutva. https://www.financialexpress.com/world-news/what-tommy-robinson-thinks-of-indians-as-he-leads-anti-immigration-protests-in-london/3977225/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cosmicinaudio Posted September 14 Share Posted September 14 (edited) 18 minutes ago, Campion said: But, this protest was billed as "Uniting the Union". Tommy R supports multiculturalism and immigration, it's just Muslims he has a problem with, he supports Hindus and Hindutva. I've noticed many British "patriots" support Indian mass immigration, god knows why because most of them don't support us. The typical Indian view is that England is an evil colonialist country that deserves what it's getting and should be obliged to have open borders, that we owe them ten-fold. Case in point the books written by Hindu nationalist and supremacist Shashi Tharoor that are just anti-British polemics about how evil Britain is and how we owe them reparations. Many British people naively believe Indians are their friends, they don't know what they really think. Indians are more than happy to team up with their Pakistani and Bangladeshi ethnic kin when it involves their collective South Asian interests against the native English. Edited September 14 by cosmicinaudio Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.