Police are taxi service for pro migrant protesters

[pi3141]

Saw this on FB, mainstream picking it up.

 

There was a video of Police ferrying 'Local' protestor back to the train station in Police vans.

 

Local protestors being taken to the train station so they can catch a train home, you know, one of those local trains we have, the ones that just go around the town locally.

 

If the Right Wing don't show up to start violence so they can legitimately condemn anti immigration protests, they ferry this lot in, to either discredit locals or these people start the violence instead.

 

Police take pro-migrant protesters to asylum hotel

Essex officers brought counter-demonstrators to face angry locals, claim witnesses

 

Will Bolton
 Crime correspondent. 
David Shipley.
 
Albert Tait
22 July 2025 10:02pm BST

Police have admitted escorting pro-migrant protesters to an asylum hotel at the centre of days of volatile demonstrations.

 

Essex Police initially denied that it had brought activists from the group Stand up to Racism to the Bell Hotel amid claims by anti-migrant protesters that the arrival of counter-demonstrators sparked the violence on July 17.

 

However, the force backtracked after being shown footage of the protesters being escorted by officers from a nearby station to the hotel.

 

On Wednesday, Essex Police will hold a press conference, at which is expected to explain its policing of the demonstrations.

 

It came as Angela Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister, admitted that mass migration is threatening community cohesion, amid growing fears over another summer of riots.

 

Link - https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/07/22/police-take-pro-migrant-protesters-to-asylum-hotel/?fbclid=IwY2xjawLtEP1leHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHvoFWhxDg9VPCe71_uELjhHTJeGljQLoA5XQNgo283wnLvIMOjCmvvrhdxhR_aem_iudlStzwJb7MZbMRWW_1KQ

 

 

We are seriously being played by Labour, they are using the Police to ferry left wing activists to local areas to pretend to be locals who say they love the immigrants in their area because diversity is our strength. 

 

Then the Police take them to the local train station so they can return to their own areas.

 

We're paying for this. 

[pi3141]

The Green's.

 

Do you think they are nice well meaning people, read their manifesto's through the years.

 

They are seriously deluded and dangerous imo, and it seems they support the illegal use of Police resources to perform covert social engineering actions to deceive the British Public.

 

They support Stand Up To Racism, who are the activists being sent up and down the country to pretend to be locals to cancel out legitimate local protest and smear the locals as Far Right.

 

The Green's are ideological fanatics, they are dangerous. 

 

 

 

Greens support the Stand up to Racism March 

Greens support the Stand up to Racism March

02/09/2023 / 03/09/2023 by Marcus

 

Green Party Councillors Sara Wilson and Ricky Knight join the Stand up to Racism march in Barnstaple square. Image: North Devon Green Party

North Devon Greens supporting the Stand Up To Racism demonstration in Barnstaple on 2 September 2023.

The Green Party is solidly opposed to all forms of discrimination and is happy to work with others to combat the worrying rise in far right activity we have experienced recently.

 

Sadly, the actions of this Conservative government and their demonisation of asylum seekers, people fleeing terrible conflicts that most of us can’t begin to imagine, only fuels and legitimises racist organisations such as Britain First.

 

We won’t sit back and let the racists and haters organise here in North Devon and we stand in solidarity with all our anti-racist colleagues and others who are standing up to racism and fascism.

 

Ends.

 

Link - https://northdevon.greenparty.org.uk/greens-support-the-stand-up-to-racism-march/

 

 

[pheasants revolt]

Not that I'm supporting the police.

 

They do this for a reason and always ferry in the opposition.

 

It controls the battlefield so group B can't outflank group A which will result in a massacre. Because let's face it one group was a bunch of left wing thugs and the other a mixture of aging men and women to go with the larier part of group A

 

Very rare I say this about the police but it's the right thing to do, they also do this for the more fiery football derbies Newcastle vs Sunderland being one example

[pi3141]

On 7/23/2025 at 5:09 PM, pheasants revolt said:

Very rare I say this about the police but it's the right thing to do, they also do this for the more fiery football derbies Newcastle vs Sunderland being one example

 

The government finding out about a protest, inform an activist group about the protest, then arrange for the police to take non locals, into a local protest, to protest in opposition against the actual locals, with the collusion of using police resources to take in the non locals pretending to be locals.

 

 

[pheasants revolt]

The police just ferry them under orders from the gov.

 

They are goons 

 

They escorted Britain first in Manchester

 

They escorted the unwashed in London today.

 

Can't argue about them letting agitators through however

[Occulus5]

Not sure if this is related, but yesterday in my local park (Liverpool area) I noticed someone had chalked in at two spots on one of the paths "Youtube digital ID trap (GB News)". Seeing GB News made me laugh cos they are 100% controlled opposition IMO. You never see "Digital ID (David Icke.com)" or "Digital ID trap (Bitchute)" or "Digital ID trap (Odysee)" or "Digital ID trap (Richplanet.net", or even "Digital ID trap (UK Column). No, it's always bloody GB News. It shows which media outlets the masses are listening to if they're not happy with the BBC, Sky etc. 

 

There was a migrant hotel protest yesterday in Hoylake on the Wirral. and as per usual the same old youtubers where out getting in on the act and filming it all for their youtube channel, not sure if Billy Moore was there but Charlie Veitch was (surprise surprise). None of these people get a monkey's about what's on, all they are interested in is creating content for their channel and filming as much drama and conflict as they can so they get views and subscribers. They masquerade themself as "investigative journalists" wanting the truth, but they have no idea what this is all about, or if they do they won't talk about it.

[JONJAY79]

 

 

Interesting to see the far left islamic unity hmm 

Edited August 4 by JONJAY79

[pi3141]

On 8/4/2025 at 5:29 PM, JONJAY79 said:

 

 

Interesting to see the far left islamic unity hmm 

 

 

I looked for references, seems they are called MCA now.

 

This is a good article- 

 

Time to End British Media’s Reliance on the Muslim Council of Britain

August 22, 2022Hannah Baldock

 

During the 1988 Rushdie affair, the violent fury in Britain unleashed against a work of literature, the Satanic Verses, and its author was chiefly organized by extreme Islamist factions within British Muslim groups, which later formed the core of the Muslim Council of Britain.

 

This was the first taste British society had of attempted mob rule and threats of violence by radical Islamic zealots attacking free speech. It revealed that the British public included throngs of irrational actors with scant regard for democratic values.

 

In his 2002 book The Two Faces of Islam: The House of Sa’ud from Tradition to Terror, American author and Muslim convert Stephen Schwartz warned about the use of the faith of Islam as a cover for “Islamofascism” – “a totalitarian ideology embodied among Sunni Muslims by such fundamentalists as the Saudi-financed Wahhabis, the Pakistani jihadists known as Jama’atis, and the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood. And in the ranks of Shia Muslims, by Hezbollah in Lebanon” as well as the ruling Ayatollahs in Iran and their international henchmen in the Quds force.

 

“The other face of Islam” wrote Schwartz “….pluralist, spiritual and committed to co-existence with the earlier Abrahamic revelations, Judaism and Christianity, [is] the one we must cultivate and support if we are to help the Muslim world conquer its own destructive demons – its version of fascist and communist totalitarianism – and thereby help ourselves.”

 

Yet, for the last fifteen years, most politicians and media in the UK have resolutely ignored this advice. They have made the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) the first port of call on issues affecting the Muslim community in the UK, despite the fact its founders had established sympathies for the violent Jamaat-e-Islami Islamist movement in South Asia, which advocates the creation of an Islamic state and the imposition of Sharia law.

The extremism of some of the MCB’s affiliates and officials is well-established. The MCB’s former director general Muhammed Abdul Bari, for instance, also served as chair of Jamaat-e-Islami’s European arm, the Islamic Forum of Europe (IFE). The IFE claims it is dedicated, according to a 2010 report in the Daily Telegraph, to changing the “very infrastructure of society, its institutions, its culture, its political order and its creed … from ignorance to Islam.”

 

An IFE document seen by the Telegraph states that through “hisbah” (the enforcement of Islamic law) and “jihad,” the organization aims to create a global Islamic regime, the caliphate, and its primary work is focused on “Europe, because it is this continent, despite all the furore about its achievements, which has a moral and spiritual vacuum.”

 

Despite the pro-caliphate worldview of its founders, the MCB has often set the terms of the national debate on issues concerning Islam and Muslims.

 

No position held by MCB officials has proved too unreasonable for the media to balk at consulting them or instead seek a second opinion from the Muslim community: not when founding MCB secretary general Iqbal Sacranie said of Salman Rushdie that “Death is perhaps too easy for him”; not when eight Glasgow Mosques affiliated with the MCB issued a fatwa in 2001, accusing Scottish publisher and Qu’ran scholar Paigham Mustafa, on headed paper of its affiliate Glasgow Central Mosque, of “satanic thoughts” for questioning traditional Islamic practices such as stoning adulterers and apostates. The fatwa called on Muslims to “terminate these elements and to protect the youth from this temptation.”

 

The MCB’s influence even survived, in 2009, when the British government stopped engaging with the group after its deputy secretary general, Daud Abdullah, signed the Istanbul Declaration, which, a government minister declared, “supports violence against foreign forces – which could include British naval personnel” and advocates “attacks on Jewish communities all around the world.”

 

Most of the media did not flinch during the MCB’s six year boycott by the council of Holocaust Memorial Day; nor stop consulting with the MCB when the 2016 BBC Radio 4 documentary “The Deobandis” uncovered active links between leaders of MCB affiliated mosques in Edinburgh and Glasgow and the banned Sunni extremist group Sipah-e-Sahaba (SSP), which is linked to the Taliban and Al-Qaeda.

And there were no consequences for the MCB in 2015 when leaflets were found at one of its affiliates, Stockwell Green Mosque, which incited the murder of Ahmadi Muslims should they refuse to convert to Sunni Islam.

 

The fact that Islamists have relatively little support from British Muslims has not even dethroned the MCB as the media’s preferred Muslim organization. An ICM poll included in the 2016 Policy Exchange report “Unsettled Belonging” revealed that the MCB was considered the preferred political leadership of British Islam by just 9% of British Muslims.

Despite all this, the media has faithfully aerated the MCB’s relentless campaigns, including the group’s attacks on the government’s counter-extremism program, “Prevent,” despite the ICM and other polls indicating a majority of British Muslims support the program.

Few journalists challenged the Islamist group’s campaign to introduce a definition of “Islamophobia” that failed to distinguish between Islam and Islamism and was opposed by not just counter-terrorism experts, but secularists, moderate Muslims and defenders of civil liberties, minority and women’s rights and freedom of speech.

 

These MCB campaigns had a powerful backer in Baroness Warsi, former co-chair of the Conservative party, who, in a curious double standard, while demanding zero tolerance on Islamophobia, argued in a debate on the government’s Counter-Terrorism and Border Security Bill in the House of Lords in October 2018 that the UK must not “become a country that polices thought” and speech while insisting on an end to the government’s “non-engagement with a wide range of Muslim community organisations and activists” and demanding that many regarded as extremists must be forgiven.

 

Both the MCB’s Sacranie and Abdul Bari, as well as Warsi, were signatories to a letter of complaint last March to the BBC after the new female Director General of the MCB, Zara Mohammed, was persistently asked on the BBC’s Woman’s Hour program about the number of female imams in the UK – a line of questioning they claimed was “strikingly hostile,” prompting the BBC to remove a clip of the offending interrogation from its website.

 

Mohammad was elected chair in 2016 of the Federation of Student Islamic Societies (FOSIS), an affiliate of the MCB and which, as the Times reported in 2015, the government’s Muslim Brotherhood Review concluded was established by the Muslim Brotherhood.

 

If Mohammed’s interviewer on Woman’s Hour had truly wanted to be hostile, she could have asked why she thought the chairpersons or officers of six FOSIS affiliates went on to conduct suicide bombings or be jailed for terrorism offences between 2006 and 2016. Former Prime Minister Nick Clegg commented in a 2011 speech that the group had “failed sufficiently to challenge terrorist and extremist ideologies.”

 

Former Commissioner for Countering Extremism Sara Khan lamented in the Guardian in 2017, after a spate of terror attacks in the UK that year, how “Fully exploiting the uncontested space we provided them, extremists promoted their supremacist, hate-filled ideology to thousands of Muslims on satellite channels, through social media, on campuses and community events, day in, day out. In the battle of ideas, deconstructing their ideological world view was then and remains now one of our greatest failures. And fail we did – collectively, as Muslim institutions, human rights organisations, anti-racist groups and governments.”

She added “While the Muslim Council of Britain perfected the art of issuing press statements, it did nothing to push back on such poisonous teachings.”

 

Swiss Yemeni professor of political science Elham Manea, who was almost radicalised by the Muslim Brotherhood in her teens, wrote in her 2021 book “The Perils of Non Violent Islamism,” that Westerners have been hopelessly gullible in their choice of “smiling and patient” Muslim Brotherhood or Salafi representatives as their go-to experts on Islam and Muslims.

The problem is clear. What, then, is the solution?

 

The answer may well lie with new reformist Muslim efforts. A new Muslim-led organization is determined to push back against Islamist ideology. The Oxford Institute for British Islam’s inaugural conference at St John’s College Oxford titled “Why British Islam? A Vision for the Future” ran from the 19th to 21st of August.

 

Manea delivered the opening khutbah (sermon) on “Women and Mosques” to a mixed gender congregation in the gardens of St John’s College, Oxford, where the call to prayer was sung by Malaysian-American Ani Zonneveld. Manea, also author of the 2016 book Women and Sharia Law: The Impact of Legal Pluralism in the UK, acknowledged that while change could be hard, even traumatic in any community, the time had come for mosques to become spaces where she could freely pray alongside her husband and daughter – an option that most British mosques,

especially from the Deobandi tradition, simply do not allow.

“No one has a monopoly on truth. Only God can accept or reject a prayer – and no institution or person can place itself in a position as a speaker of our God Almighty,” she said.

 

The Oxford Institute for British Islam, at which Manea is a visiting fellow, aims to dismantle the barriers to integration into British society erected by a fundamentalist reading of Islam.

 

At its launch in May at St Peter’s College Oxford, Muslim academic Taj Hargey said “The Oxford Institute for British Islam will demonstrate that violence against non-Muslims, blasphemers, apostates, FGM, women’s suppression, stoning to death, all these barbaric practices have no Qur’anic validation. They come from the Hadith, the alleged sayings of the Prophet Mohammed written 300 years after his death, the sharia, a concoction of medieval clerical opinion and the fatwas, arbitrary rulings masquerading as religious decrees like Khomeini’s against Salman Rushdie.”

 

At a panel discussion in August 2021 at the Henry Jackson Society thinktank titled “Countering Caliphism: Towards Integration or Segregation?” Hargey, a PhD in Islamic and oriental studies from St Anthony’s College, Oxford, added: “This medieval mullah Islam is in direct contrast to pristine Quranic Islam. It wishes to recreate the unrealistic reversion to a mythical utopia of seventh century Arabia, a mirage of the idealised Islamic state that the Prophet Mohammed established in 632.”

 

“British Muslims need to sever the theological umbilical cord and ideological nexus that binds them to an archaic and irrelevant medieval Islam.” added Hargey and said the Institute aims to “theologically empower” British Muslims to embrace a more “enlightened, erudite and egalitarian” version of their faith.

 

Other speakers at the OIBI’s inaugural conference included Yasmin Alibhai Brown, founder of British Muslims for Secular Democracy; OIBI visiting fellows Usama Hasan, an imam, scholar of Islam and a former senior researcher at erstwhile Muslim-led counter-extremism thinktank Quilliam.

 

Additional guests included Professor Steven Greer, professor of Human Rights at Bristol University Law School, and author of the 2022 book “Tackling Terrorism in Britain: Threats, responses and challenges twenty years after 9/11; as well as Paigham Mustafa, author of a new 2016 English translation of the Qu ‘ran: “God’s Message to Mankind” and pamphlets such as “Everything You Wanted to Know About Radical Islam But Were Afraid To Ask.”

The MCB’s selective outrage about Emma Barnett’s “hostile” interview with Glaswegian Director General Zara Mohammed is nowhere clearer than in its silence about the fatwa issued against Mustafa in 2001 by eight Glasgow Mosques. Mustafa had to seek police protection in 2018 after receiving death threats on Facebook.

 

“That fatwa is a serious concern, and the MCB should have an honest debate about that,” said Usama Hasan, ahead of the launch of the Oxford Institute for British Islam in May. “The last 20 years since 9/11, especially the ISIS years, really brought home to a lot of people how damaging and dangerous old style or decontextualised interpretations of Islam were. Sadly the MCB for all their good work and good intentions, cannot deal with the problem of Islamist extremism.”

He added: “While I defend their right to defend Muslims from Islamophobia, the MCB haven’t grappled with the nuts and bolts of Islamist extremism, which exists in the hardline rhetoric of Sunni Islamist and Shia Khomeinist groups. An example of that is the MCB’s pointless and counter productive opposition to Prevent alongside hard-line Islamists like CAGE, which is a danger to national security. Because the threat is still with us, we still have plots coming from Islamist terrorists. It is a massive problem.”

 

As OIBI visiting fellow Dr Steven Greer wrote in his 2022 book Tackling Terrorism in Britain: Threats, responses and challenges twenty years after 9/11, “The principal contribution of non-Muslims and the state should be to support and encourage those interpretations of all faiths and ideologies which are life-affirming, tolerant and non-violent and to discourage those which are not.”

This means making the OIBI a new port of call on issues concerning Islam and Muslims in the UK, and reflecting the true cultural and ideological diversity of this growing constituency.

 

Hannah Baldock is a former research fellow at the Centre for Radicalisation and Terrorism at the Henry Jackson Society.

 

Link - https://www.meforum.org/fwi/fwi-research/time-to-end-british-medias-reliance-on-the-muslim-council-of-britain

 

 

[pi3141]

Home Office tried to silence Robert Jenrick after small boat terror claims

 

Former immigration minister previously claimed that individuals linked to Islamic State had ‘waltzed right in’ to Britain across the Channel

 

Link - The Telegraph (behind paywall)

 

Yvette Cooper tried to silence him.

 

I can't stand the woman because she refused to define what a woman was for the sake of her career and obviously pension benefits. 

 

Then she got in power and asked the Police to spend more time policing social media for hate speech.

 

Now she's putting facial recognition cameras on our streets. I bet she didn't request the small boat immigrants be facial scanned on the way in.

 

She supports defining Islamophobia which will have a huge impact on free speech. 

 

She's f@cking clueless and dangerous while in power.

 

She's a non entity, not prepared to state what she believes until the party or courts have told her what to think. Not even to speak up for women or grooming gang victims in the UK. 

 

I don't want anyone like that in politics. 

 

Dangerous woman.

 

This current Labour party have so far proved themselves hugely inept.

 

Reversing Brexit on their own ideology, suppressing dissent, using political staging to interfere with genuine protest, damaging free speech and spying on the public. Ruining the economy, breaking manifesto promises, acting without public mandate, shielding people who are a danger to our society and who oppose our ideals and regard us as infidels, unbelievers who deserve no respect.

 

These people are a danger to our society. 

 

Since Tony Blair and the Scotsman, can't be bothered to Google his name, I've despised Labour.

 

Gordon Brown, that economic powerhouse that f@cked our pensions and sold our gold at the lowest ever price while calling old lady's 'bigots'

 

D*ckhead.

 

Sorry, bit of a rant.

 

/rant

 

[pi3141]

On 7/23/2025 at 2:44 AM, pi3141 said:

The Green's are ideological fanatics, they are dangerous. 

 

 

Greens elect as new leader an ex-hypnotherapist who said he could help women increase the size of their breasts using their minds

By DAVID WILCOCK, DEPUTY POLITICAL EDITOR

11:19 02 Sep 2025, updated 13:32 02 Sep 2025

 

Snip

 

He 

 also said his party would 'take on power and wealth' in the UK.

 

'We listen to the poorest communities, whether the migrant communities, disabled communities, the trans community, working-class communities, whoever needs us to have their back, we will be there.

 

'We will be there to amplify their voices, to listen to the most marginalised and minority communities, to speak with them, not for them, and challenge truth to power, to take on power and wealth in this country.'

 

Link - https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15057483/Green-Party-boob-whisperer-Zack-Polanski-new-leader-Corbyn.html

 

 

 

So in other words, they are not there for the majority, they are there to put the rights of the minority over the majority, the rights if immigrants over the population. 

 

They will offer net zero solutions far worse than anything Miliband can dream of.

 

They will use minority views to suppress the majority as we have seen with previous governments but these people will turbo charge it because they are advertising their party as intending to specifically put rights og minorities over the majority. 

 

As far as science is concerned, these oeople don't have a clue.

 

Seriously deluded and dangerous people.

 

God help us if they get into power, everything Labour or rather Fabian society is trying to do slowly and by stealth, the Green's will unashamedly roll out at lightning speed.

 

Their academic people are corrupt  - don't forget that government advisor who worked at a university ripping down posters protesting liw traffic neighborhoods because she lived there and advised the government LTN's are the greatest thing.

 

They are corrupt, ideological dangerous and scientifically inept people.

 

And that's not even taking into account economic or military policies.