Occulus5 Posted June 22 Share Posted June 22 (edited) Anyone know what is it with the Titan sub implosion disaster that happened a few years ago, why it is still being talked about and what it was really all about?. In the past few weeks all I see on my youtube feed are videos about the Titan sub implosion, with youtubers and mainstream news outlets talking about it. I don't know what anyone else thinks but my feeling is that the story was a staged hoax or distraction. Looking at the design of that tiny sub I find it hard to believe it would ever be able to go to those depths to get to the wreck of the Titanic. I think there was something on one of the threads a few years back about the symbolism surrounding this sub and its unusual design and possible occult/masonic connection. Why is everyone so obsessed with this news story for?. Edited June 22 by Occulus5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mazthehobo Posted July 8 Share Posted July 8 On 6/22/2025 at 9:43 PM, Occulus5 said: Anyone know what is it with the Titan sub implosion disaster that happened a few years ago, why it is still being talked about and what it was really all about?. In the past few weeks all I see on my youtube feed are videos about the Titan sub implosion, with youtubers and mainstream news outlets talking about it. I don't know what anyone else thinks but my feeling is that the story was a staged hoax or distraction. Looking at the design of that tiny sub I find it hard to believe it would ever be able to go to those depths to get to the wreck of the Titanic. I think there was something on one of the threads a few years back about the symbolism surrounding this sub and its unusual design and possible occult/masonic connection. Why is everyone so obsessed with this news story for?. I think it was just a poorly made and heavily flawed submarine. Like an astronaut using a carrier bag over their head as a substitute for a full space helmet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Occulus5 Posted July 9 Author Share Posted July 9 16 hours ago, Mazthehobo said: I think it was just a poorly made and heavily flawed submarine. Like an astronaut using a carrier bag over their head as a substitute for a full space helmet. So you think it really happened and wasn't a hoax? considering the amount of money involved, a badly designed sub seems hard to believe, unless they were all amateurs. Some have pointed the symbolism of the Titan sub and that it resembles a worm. Anyone who is an expert in subs wouldn't design something so ridiculous looking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mazthehobo Posted July 11 Share Posted July 11 On 7/9/2025 at 10:07 AM, Occulus5 said: So you think it really happened and wasn't a hoax? considering the amount of money involved, a badly designed sub seems hard to believe, unless they were all amateurs. Some have pointed the symbolism of the Titan sub and that it resembles a worm. Anyone who is an expert in subs wouldn't design something so ridiculous looking. Well, I think the media coverage was odd. And I suppose whenever some rich people all die you should ask questions (like that super yacht that sank recently after apparently a rogue wave hit…) But there were warnings about the titan sub safety before it happened. And with that kind of pressure all it takes is one slight malfunction then it’s literally sayonara in two microseconds. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Occulus5 Posted July 11 Author Share Posted July 11 15 hours ago, Mazthehobo said: Well, I think the media coverage was odd. And I suppose whenever some rich people all die you should ask questions (like that super yacht that sank recently after apparently a rogue wave hit…) But there were warnings about the titan sub safety before it happened. And with that kind of pressure all it takes is one slight malfunction then it’s literally sayonara in two microseconds. I read on a wikipedia article (I've heard this before elsewhere) that Stew Peters believes the Titan was sabotaged to prevent the passengers from discovering the Titanic wasn't sunk by an iceberg. John Hamer seems to think something along those lines, but I don't know how this would make any sense. How would the crew of the Titan know from looking at the wreck whether an iceberg caused the damage from their tiny submersible? where they experts?. much of the bow is buried under the sand and mud. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mazthehobo Posted July 12 Share Posted July 12 13 hours ago, Occulus5 said: I read on a wikipedia article (I've heard this before elsewhere) that Stew Peters believes the Titan was sabotaged to prevent the passengers from discovering the Titanic wasn't sunk by an iceberg. John Hamer seems to think something along those lines, but I don't know how this would make any sense. How would the crew of the Titan know from looking at the wreck whether an iceberg caused the damage from their tiny submersible? where they experts?. much of the bow is buried under the sand and mud. Who knows… The media attention was overkill though. Reporting on things we we now know we’re not accurate. I read that James Cameron knew that same day what had happened and described the rescue attempt as a ‘pantomime’, or words to that affect…. Reminded me of the eye of Sauron, distracted by a small army whilst the ring was creeping up towards mount doom with Frodo. When he realised, it was too late. Question is… what were we being distracted from? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Occulus5 Posted July 14 Author Share Posted July 14 On 7/12/2025 at 1:16 PM, Mazthehobo said: Who knows… The media attention was overkill though. Reporting on things we we now know we’re not accurate. I read that James Cameron knew that same day what had happened and described the rescue attempt as a ‘pantomime’, or words to that affect…. Reminded me of the eye of Sauron, distracted by a small army whilst the ring was creeping up towards mount doom with Frodo. When he realised, it was too late. Question is… what were we being distracted from? Some think the Titanic wreck isn't really there and the ship never sank. Maybe the sub implosion (or hoax) was to put a stop to further sub expeditions. I know that sounds like a ridiculous theory. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anti Facts Sir Posted July 14 Share Posted July 14 I don't think it is that ridiculous, well maybe something's down there but they don't want people to know as it wouldn't follow the official narrative. People were speculating exactly that when the Titan thing happened. Because no way some DIY suicide sub would have got as far as it did, getting people to pay for sightseeing trips underwater. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.