Cyberstalking Laws and More

Angelicalist · May 14

I am doing a RICO on some Cyberstalkers and I am Writing a Law Book for People to know the Laws of Texas and the United States, it will be Texas centered is what I am saying. This comes from just 3 Pages front and back that I have from 60+ Pages that I have that are mostly front and back, so it is something like 120 Pages, and this comes from just 3 of those Pages. Then I will insert my own Writing and use what I am Writing, some of it is not Related to Cyberstalking, some of it is about Self-Defense Murder and the History of the World and some Things related to History and the Bible and whatnot (the History of the Deodand Laws for example, and I go from Deodand to "Fighting Words" with Phonographs and Electronic Devices or Advertisements), I am going to call it "Free Speech and Sedition", but I just wanted to put it here as I Write it.

Definitions

Tex. Pen. Code Sec. 1.07 (This is where Coercion and Things are defined)

Tex. Pen. Code Sec. 49.01 – Intoxication and Alcoholic Beverages Offenses (Guevara v. State, 152 S.W.3d 45 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004) is an example)

Tex. Pen. Code Sec. 71.02 – Engaging in Organized Criminal Activity

Cyberstalking

18 USC Sec. 1028(a)(7) – Knowingly Transfers, Possesses, or uses, without lawful authority, a means of identification of another Person, with the intent to commit, or to aid or abet, or in connection with, any unlawful activity that constitutes a Violation of Federal Law, or that constitutes a Felony under any applicable State or Local Law

18 USC Sec. 371 – Conspiracy to Commit Offense or to Defraud the United States

18 USC Sec. 1349 – Attempt and Conspiracy

18 USC Sec. 2261A(2)(B) – Stalking – Causes, attempts to cause, or would be reasonably expected to cause substantial emotional distress to a person described in Clause (i), (ii), (iii) of Paragraph (1)(A)

18 USC Sec. 1343 – Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud

47 USC Sec. 227 – Restrictions on the Use of Telephone Equipment

47 USC Sec. 222 – Privacy of Customer Information

18 USC Sec. 1039 – Fraud and Related Activity in Connection with Obtaining Confidential Phone Records of a Covered Entity

18 USC 2511 – Electronic Communications Privacy Act

18 USC 2701 - Unlawful Access to Stored Communications

Rauhauser v. McGibney, 508 S.W.3d 377 (Tex. App. 2014) (Cyberstalking)

Lemoine v. Wolfe, 812 F.3d 477 (5^th Cir. 2016) (Cyberstalking Charge)

U.S. v. Garcia, SA-23-CR-00238-JKP (W.D. TX 2024) (18 USC 1028(a)(7)… Cyberstalking)

U.S. v. Elkins, 725 F.Supp.3d 570 (N.D. TX 2024) (Cyberstalking… 18 USC 2261A(2)(B))

U.S. v. Fajolu, 3:14CR00232 (N.D. TX 2019) (18 USC 371 [18 USC 1343])

U.S v. Disla, 805 F.2d 1340 (9^th Cir. 1986) (“Phone Hacking” or “Phone Phreaking”)

Hamlett v. Binghampton, 3:20cv880 (N.D. NY 2021) (“Officer’s Phone Hacking Skills”)

Shields v. Murdoch, 891 F.Supp.2d 567 (S.D. NY 2012) (“Phone Hacking by News Corp”)

Com. v. Gerulis, 616 A2d 686 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1992) (“Phone Phreakers”)

U.S. v. Henny, 527 F.2d 479 (9^th Cir. 1975) (“Phone Phreakers”)

Porup v. CIA, 17-cv-72 (D D.C. (“Phone Phreakers”… Footnote #2)

Wilder v. News Corp, 11 Civ. 4947 (S.D. NY 2014) (“Phone Hacking by News of the World Employees”)

Mckinney v. Morris, B240830 (Cal. App. 2013) (“Phone Hacking”)

U.S. v. Patterson, 534 F.2d 1113 (5^th Cir. 1976) (“Blue Box”)

U.S. v. Sorota, 515 F.2d 573 (5^th Cir. 1975) (“Blue Box”)

U.S. v. Clegg, 509 F.2d 605 (5^th Cir. 1975) (“Blue Box”… 18 USC 1343 “Wirefraud”)

U.S. v. Hammond, 598 F.2d 1008 (5^th Cir. 1979) (“Blue Box”)

Garcia v. Loredo, 702 F.3d 788 (5^th Cir. 2012) (Stored Communications, 18 USC 2701)

Doe v. Taylor ISD, 15 F.3d 443 (5^th Cir. 1994) (...”acted under Color of State Law by abusing authority Granted to them by the State to effect Searches and Seizures”…)

U.S. v. Hebert, 813 F.3d 551 (5^th Cir. 2015) (“Hebert Murdered Bloch and committed Identity Theft and a series of Bank Frauds while abusing his authority as a Sheriff’s Deputy”)

Guardiola v. State, 20 S.W.3d 216 (Tex. App. 2000) (“Stepped outside the Scope of their Authority by abusing the Grand Jury”)

Sex Related Laws and Tort

Tex. Pen. Code Sec. 21.18 – Sexual Coercion (We could call this a Coerced Revenge Porn Law also overlapping with Compelling Prostitution)

State v. Green, 613 S.W.3d 571 (Tex. App. 2020) (Cited by FastCase System as Sexual Coercion Case)

Chapter 129B – Liability for allowing Minors to Access

15 USC Sec. 6851 – Revenge Porn Law

Harris v. Henry, 1:22cv00366 (W.D. TX 2022) (“TVPRA prohibits various forms of Human Trafficking including Involuntary Servitude, Forced Labor and Sex Trafficking. 18 USC Sections 158-92… 18 USC Sec. 1595(a)… Sec. 98.002 of the Texas Civil Practices and Remedies Code creates a Civil cause of action against anyone who intentionally or knowingly benefits from participating in a venture that Traffics another Person”)

Tex. Civ. Prac. and Rem. Code Sec. 98B.004 – Common Law Right to Privacy

Sec. 652B – Intrusion on Seclusion

Sec. 652C – Appropriation of likeness

Sec. 652D – Publicity Given to Private Life

Sec. 652E – Publicly Placing a Person in False Light (7^th Amendment Implications related to Texas Courts)

Ex Parte: Morales, 212 S.W.3d 483 (Tex. App. 2006) (“School Employees… abusing Power or Authority to coerce Students to have Sex”)

Reno v. ACLU, 521 US 844 (1997) (“While discussion about… Nude Art may have some redeeming educational value for adults, they do not necessarily have any such value for Minors”)

Combs v. Tex. Ent. Ass’n, 347 S.W.3d 277 (Tex. 2011) (Nude Dancing Fee where Alcohol is served)

Robinson v. Jacksonville Shipyard, 760 F.Supp. 1486 (M.D. Fla. 1991) ([Nude Art Displayed at Workplace] Must be an Expression of the Business to have First Amendment Protections)

Humphry’s v. Medical Towers, 893 F.Supp. 672 (S.D. TX 1995) (Robinson cited in Texas)

Smith v. Thaler, 12-10435 (5^th Cir. 2013) (“citing Lawrence and holding that a Clergy Member ‘has no Liberty interest to engage in sexual activity by abusing his position of trust and authority’…” …”Members of the Clergy have neither a First Amendment nor a Liberty Interest in Sexual Activity gained through Exploitation of the Clergy-Counselee Relationship”)

Barr v. Arco Chemical Corp., 529 F.Supp. 1277 (S.D. TX 1982) (…Common Law Tortious Invasion of Privacy… Publicity given to Private Facts… “Thus a basic element of this form of the Tort is the intentional overhearing by one not intended to be a Party to the Communication… distinguishing the case in which a Party to a Conversation recording it from the case in which a detective listened to a Private Conversation on the Telephone extension”… Texas Common Law Privacy… Billings v. Atkinson, 489 S.W.2d 858 (Tex. 1973)… Intrusion into one’s Private Activities in such a manner as to outrage or cause mental suffering, shame, or humiliation to a Person of ordinary sensibilities… A Legally enforceable Right of Privacy Id., at 860, quoting 62 Am.Jur.2d Privacy Sec. 4, (1972))

Gill v. Snow, 644 S.W.2d 222 (Tex. App. 1982) (“…Once information is made part of the Public Record, there can be no Liability for Publicizing it… Invasion of Privacy… Constitutes a Legal injury… Metal Anguish however is more than mere disappointment, anger, resentment or embarrassment, which is all that is supported by the Record in this Case…”)

Cain v. Hearst Corp., 878 S.W.2d 577 (Tex. 1994) (Overturned Gill v. Snow… “Rejecting False Light on the Grounds that Defamation covers most False Light… although actions for intentional infliction of emotional distress and invasion of Privacy compensate similar damages, there is no reason to refuse to recognize both Torts… The Burden of Proof in False Light is clear and convincing Evidence but only a preponderance of the Evidence in defamation… United States Supreme Court’s acceptance of False Light Invasion of Privacy so long as the Plaintiff proves that Defendant acted with Actual Malic…”)

Boyles v. Kerr, 806 S.W.2d 255 (Tex. App. 1991) (“… Mental Pain and Anguish, Future Mental Pain and Anguish, Punitive Damages” … Illegal Sex Tape i.e. Revenge Porn… “Gross Negligence on part of those who made and shared the Tape”… “Invasion of Privacy covers four Torts: (1) Invasion upon the Plaintiff’s Seclusion, Solitude, or Private Affairs; (2) Public Disclosure of embarrassing Private Facts about the Plaintiff; (3) Publicity which places the Plaintiff in a False Light in the Public Eye; (4) Appropriation, for the Defendant’s advantage, of the Plaintiff’s name or likeness” … “Hustler Magazine was found Liable for … Publishing a Stolen [Nude] Photograph … The Magazine was found to be Negligent in its Procedures because it had failed to verify if the Person shown in the Photograph had consented to the Publication… Invasion of Privacy can be achieved Negligently … Duty … depends on the Probability of injury”… Footnote #3 … “Sexual Relations are recognized Generally as strictly Private Matters”…)

Boyles v. Kerr, 855 S.W.2d 593 (Tex. 1993) (“We hold only that there is no General Duty not to Negligently inflict Emotional Distress. Our Decision does not affect that a Claimants Right to Recover Mental Anguish Damages caused by a Defendant’s breach of some other Legal Duty… Stuart v. Western Union… (1885) (Failure of Telegraph Company to timely deliver Death Message); … (Invasion of Privacy) … Witnessing a Serious or Fatal Accident… Direct Victim… Bystander… the Sole purpose of [Emotional Distress] Physical Manifestation Rule is to ensure the Genuineness of Claims… available action for intentional infliction of Emotional Distress…”)

RICO/Conspiracy

U.S. v. Robinson, 3:16-CR-261 (N.D. TX Conspiracy to Bribe or Reward an Agent of an Organization Receiving Federal Funds… 18 USC 371[18 USC 666(a)(1)(B)])

U.S. v. Lampkin, 3:19-cr-00121 (N.D. TX 2020) (18 USC 371 [18 USC 1952(a)(3)] Conspiracy to engage in Racketeering Enterprise)

U.S. v. Wiese, (N.D. TX 2020) (Same)

U.S. v. Moky Chueng, 3:20-CR-0071 (N.D. TX 2020) (18 USC 371 (42 USC 1320-76(b)(1)) Conspiracy to Solicit and Receive Illegal Kickbacks)

U.S. v. Vasquez, 3:19cr188 (N.D. TX 2021) (…Conspiracy with intent to Distribute Controlled Substance… 18 USC 371 [21 USC 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(c)])

U.S. v. Song, (N.D. TX 2018)(18 USC 371 Conspiracy to Violate the Travel Act)

Crotts v. Healy, 01-15-00076 (Tex. App. 2015) (DA and Assistant DA are not Entitled to Prosecutorial Immunity)

George v. Harris, H-10-3235 (…Prosecutorial Immunity can depend on Facts…)

Wooten v. Roach (5^th Cir. 2020)

Price v. Montgomery, 144 S.Ct. 2499 (2024) (Prosecutorial Immunity… has limits)

Houston v. Cotton, 171 S.W.3d 541 (Tex. 2005) (“Fraudulently receiving overtime… abusing her Authority… during the two Inspections”)

Kuykendal v. Grand Prarie, 257 S.W.3d 515 (Tex. App. 2008) (“By abusing his Authority, the hearing examiner exceeded his Jurisdiction”)

Dangerous Substances

Tex. Health and Safety Code Sec. 501.022 – Banned Hazardous Substances

US v. McGill, 24-mj-609 (W.D. NY 2024) (…the Fentanyl contained within them, are enough to Kill Hundreds of Thousands…)

Other

Tex. Health and Safety Code Sec. 444.03 – Kratom Laws

31 USC Sec. 5324(a)(3) and (d)(2) – Structure Transactions to avoid Reporting Requirements

18 USC Sec. 249(a)(2) and 2 – Hate Crimes

Edited May 14 by Angelicalist

Angelicalist · May 14

I Wrote this one about a Year ago, and I will add it in with the Others, but I have enough to go well, well, beyond all of what I had together before. And it will be like a Law Book.

Alrbright v. Oliver, 510 US 266 (1994) (“an arrest immediately produces a wrenching disruption of everyday life”)

Raich v. Gonzales, 500 F.3d 850 (9th Cir. 2007) (Elements of Necessity)

The Ultimate Exigent Circumstances, 5 Kan. J.L. & Pub. Pol’y 169, 175 (1996)

And Forgive Them Their Trespasses: Applying the Defense of Necessity to the Criminal Conduct of the News Gatherer, 103 Harv.L.Rev. 890, 893 (1990)

Beckstrand v. State (Tex. App. 2015) (Necessity and New Trial)

People v. Hubbard, 320 N.W2d 294 (Mich. App. 1982) (Duress Trespass)

Pottinger v. City of Miami, 810 F.Supp. 1551 (S.D. Fla. 1992) (Public Property Homeless Trespass as Punishment)

Semaire v. State, 612 S.W2d 528 (Tex. Crim. App. 1980) (Reasonable belief defending against unlawful…)

Medrano v. Allee, 347 F.Supp. 605 (S.D. TX 1972) citing Cantwell v. Connecticut.

Madden v. Women’s Health, 512 US 753 (1994) (Trespass Public Property and Protesting Abortions)

State v. Simmons, 2011 Ohio 6339 (Ohio App. 2011) (Pavlovian, in Law)

Boodt v. Borgess Medical, 756 N.W2d 78 (Mich. 2008) (Pavlovian, in Law)

Lee v. Waukegan, (N.D. Ill. 2012) (Pavlovian, in Law)

US v. Vasquez, 85 F.3d 59 (2nd Cir. 1996) (Pavlovian, in Law)

Causation and Malice

Best v. Taylor Mech. Works, 689 N.E2d 1057 (Ill. 1997) (Detailed)

Reynolds v. The Vill. of Creve Coeur, 2022 IL App (3d) 210260 (Ill. App. 2022)

US v. Streett, 434 F.Supp.3d 1125 (D.N.M. 2020) (Teenage Sexting is not Free Speech)

Bradley v. US, 19 C 903 (N.D. Ill. 2021) (More than 50% of the Proximate Cause)

Valencia ex. rel. Franco v. Lee, 316 F.3d 299 (2nd Cir. 2003) (Causation of Injury)

Kent v. Gulf State Utilities, 418 So.2d 493 (La. 1982) (Unreasonable Risk)

Home Ins. Co. v. American Home Products, 75 N.Y.2d 196 (N.Y. 1990) (Causation Damages)

US v. Torres-Miguel, 701 F.3d 165 (4th Cir. 2012) (Threatened use of Force)

US v. McNeal, 818 F.3d 141 (4th Cir. 2016) (Causation of Injury, Threatened use of Force)

Public Service v. Goldfarb, 53 N.Y.2d 392 (N.Y. 1981) (Intentional acts causing… injury)

Jones v. Preuit, 763 F.2d 1250 (11th Cir. 1985) (Wanton… as opposed to mere negligence)

Estate of Thomas v. Fayette County, 194 F.Supp.3d 358 (W.D. Pa. 2016) (Deliberate Indifference)

Rescap Liquidating v. HSBC, 524 B.R. 563 (Bankr. S.D.NY. 2015 (Indemnification Clause)

Anderson v. Eleventh, A123908 (Cal. App. 2010) (Negligence or Causation, Club and Rapper)

Robinson v. Robinson, 927 A.2d 364 (Conn. App. 2007) (Malice & Rap Artist)

Simmons v. State, 289 Ga. 773 (Ga. 2011) (Malice Murder & Man called “Bitch”)

State v. Perdue, 2007 Ohio 5728 (Ohio App. 2007) (Forced Sex)

State v. Richardson, 425 So.2d 1228 (La. 1983) (Forced Sex)

West v. State, 722 S.W2d 284 (Ark. 1987) (Prosecutrix)

People v. Adams, 243 Cal. Rptr. 580 (Cal. App. 1988) (Drugs and Bribes)

Hargraves v. State, 738 S.W2d 743 (Tex. App. 1987) (Concert, Rape, Dallas Police)

Green v. State, 05-06-00397-CR (Tex. App. 2008) (Rape and Murder Scene)

Provocation

Brown v. Houston ISD, 123 S.W3d 618 (Tex. App. 2003) (Rape by Officer)

Robertson v. State, 05-11-01594 (Tex. App. 2013)

Ogueri v. Texas Southern Univ., 01-10-00228 (Tex. App. 2011) (Waiver of Immunity)

Lewis v. Landry, (W.D. La. 2019) (Court must accept well pleaded facts as true)

Echendu v. Patterson, (5th Cir. 2011)

Fludd v. Mitchell, 181 F.Supp.3d 132 (D.D.C. 2016)

Maxwell v. Mesquite ISD, (NDTX 2021)

O’Donnell v. Diaz, (NDTX 2018)

Barton v. N. Am. Van Lines, (NDTX 2019)

Bull v. City of Rowlett, (NDTX 2019)

Doe v. Dallas ISD, 3:15cv3811 (NDTX 2016)

Hernandez v. Fort Bend ISD, (S.D. TX 2019) (off the bus)

TX DHS v. Okoli, 317 S.W3d 800 (Tex. App. 2010) (Tampering with Governmental Record)

Never Responding to Emails

In re: Parkland Health, 05-17-00670-cv (Tex. App. 2018)

Aruba Petroleum v. Parr ex rel. E.D., 05-14-01285 (Tex. App. 2017)

Akbar v. Interstate, 22-1598 (7th Cir. 2022) (Fair Housing)

Adams v. Boe, 1:19cv3048 (E.D. Wash. 2019) (Fair Housing)

Schanz v. Village Apartments, 998 F.Supp. 784 (E.D. Mich. 1998) (Fair Housing)

Murphy v. Shasta, (E.D. Cal. 2014) (eMail)

Taures v. Ala. Hous. Fin. Auth. (W.D. Wash 2017)

Munoz-Mendoza v. Pierce, 520 F.Supp. 180 (D. Mass. 1981)

Clifton Terrace v. United Tech., 728 F.Supp. 24 (D.D.C. 1990)

Mannai v. Fall River, (D. Mass. 2019) (eMail)

Brown v. New York, (W.D. NY 2020) (Never responded, or otherwise corrected problems)

Smith v. Rolling Plains, (N.D. TX 2021)

Anya v. Houston ISD, (S.D. TX 2016) (eMail)

Hopwood v. Texas, 861 F.Supp. 551 (W.D. TX 1994) (Court finds Elliot “had to have realized at a minimum…”)

In re: Facebook, 625 S.W3d 80 (Tex. 2021) (Never Responded & Rape)

Wei Oiu v. Bd. of Educ., 3:21-cv-00027 (E.D. Ky 2022)

Duchateau v. Camp. Dresser & Mckee, (11th Cir. 2013)

Harper v. Tyco, (D. Del. 2011)

Walker v. Clark County, (D. Nev. 2016)

Bardoudi v. Sec’y, (11th Cir. 2015)

Cromartie v. Julia Tutwiler Prison for Women, (11th Cir. 2022)

Taylor v. Fluor, (D. S.C. 2020)

Joseph v. Koh, (N.D. Cal. 2020) (Municipal Code provides procedures… eMails ignored in this case is not due process violation)

Revenge Porn, False Light

Godaddy v. Toups, 429 S.W3d 752 (Tex. App. 2014)

Ex Parte: Limberger, 01-21-00532-CR (Tex. App. 2023)

Ex Parte: Fairchild-Porche, 638 S.W3d 770 (Tex. App. 2021)

Davis v. State, 05-19-00625-CR (Tex. App. 2020)

Crapps v. State, 180 So.3d 1125 (Fla. App. 2015)

Carbajal v. State, 08-20-00069-CR (Tex. App. 2022) (Coerced)

Ex Parte: Lopez, 09-17-00393-CR (Tex. App. 2019)

Ex Parte: Jones, 625 S.W3d 118 (Tex. Crim. App. 2021)

Ex Parte: McGregor, 01-18-00346-CR (Tex. App. 2021)

Rauhauser v. McGibney, 508 S.W3d 377 (Tex. App. 2014)

United States v. Little, 21-CR-162-JFH (N.D. Okla. 2022)

Shakouri v. State, 05-09-00158-CR (Tex. App. 2010)

Taylor v. State, 03-19-00077 (Tex. App. 2021) (Threatens to disclose)

Boyd v. Patten, 11-cv-006 (N.D. Okla. 2014)

National Cable Television v. Broadcast Music, 772 F.Supp. 614 (D.D.C. 1991)

Judge v. Salts, 330 P.3d 126 (Utah App. 2014)

Savely v. MTv, 11-1021 (D.N.J. 2011)

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235 (D.C. Cir. 2002)

Gertz v. Welch, 418 US 323 (1974)

Johnson v. Sawyer, 47 F.3d 716 (5th Cir. 1995) (IRS Sued for False Light)

Bernstein v. NBC, 129 F.Supp. 817 (D.D.C. 1955)

United States v. Bosyk, 933 F.3d 319 (4th Cir. 2019) (Knowingly received illegal porn)

Doe v. MG Freesites, (N.D. Ala. 2022) (Civil Sex Trafficking Violation, Sec. 1595 of TVPRA)

Harris v. Henry, (W.D. TX 2022)

Doe (M.H.) v. G6 Hosp. (E.D. 2022)

Eckhart v. Fox News, (S.D.N.Y. 2021)

Doe v. Backpage, 817 F.3d 12 (1st Cir. 2016)

Cruz v. Maypa, 773 F.3d 138 (4th Cir. 2014)

H.S.P. v. J.K., 121 A.3d 849 (N.J. 2015)

Tex. Pen. Code Sec. 43.21 - Obscene Materials

Drug Induced Rape

21 USC Sec. 801 - Drug Induced Violence Act

US v. Groce, 891 F.3d 260 (7th Cir. 2018)

State v. Jennings, 14 Wash. App. 2d 779 (Wash App. 2020)

People v. Comacho, 5141080 (Cal. 2022) (Delirium)

Linn v. State, 929 N.W2d 717 (Iowa 2019)

Powell v. State, (Tex. App. 2021)

Knecht v. Gillman, 488 F.2d 1136 (8th Cir. 1973) (“Pavlovian Conditioning”, aversion Therapy)

Goldtschmidt v. State, 490 So.2d 123 (Fla. App. 1986) (same)

Miller v. Metzger, (D.Del. 2021) (Claim of Pavlovian Conditioning)

State v. George, 2018 NY Slip Op 942 (NY. App. Div. 2018) (Crack smoking, Sex Offenses, Pavlovian)

Ex Parte: Tully, 371 Appeal 2003-0835 (P.T.A.B. 2004) (Pavlovian Olfactory Learning)

Estate of ACN, 509 N.Y.S. 2d 966 (N.Y. Ct. 1986) (Pavlovian Response)

State v. Foster, (Or. 2011) (Pavlovian… to receive a reward)

Lindsay v. State, 606 So.2d 652 (Fla. App. 1992) (Pavlovian Conditioning)

Kate School v. Department of Health, 156 Cal. Rptr. 529 (Cal. App. 1979) (Pavlovian Conditioning Defined by Court)

US v. McKinney, 429 F.2d 1019 (5th Cir. 1970) (Pavlovian in 5th Cir., as applied to Law)

Wachholtz v. State, 296 S.W3d 855 (Tex. App. 2009) (Meth and a Shooting)

Engle v. State, (Tex. App. 2015) (Broadcasting Meth Rape Online)

Weaver v. Chappell, (E.D. Cal. 2021) (Rape, Murder and Detailed Schizophrenia Criteria)

State v. Contrearas, 674 P.2d 792 (Alaska App. 1983) (Rape & Pavlov)

US v. Kozminski, 821 F.2d 1186 (6th Cir. 1987) (Pavlov “Captivity Syndrome”)

Celikgogus v. Rumsfeld, (D.D.C. 2013) (Outrages on Personal Dignity)

Matter of Medina, 19 I&N Dec. 734 (B.I.A. 1988) (same)

Kadic v. Karadzic, 70 F.3d 232 (2nd Cir. 1996) (same, Jurisdiction)

State v. Foster, (Tex. App. 2014) (“Delivery involves an agreement with a Dealer, usually to sell, and doesn’t include possession with intent to Deliver, which is another charge.”)

RICO

US v. Pryba, 680 F.Supp. 790 (E.D. Va. 1988) (RICO, Obscene Materials… proceeds… interstate commerce)

Taylor v. Leadec, 4:18cv409 (E.D. Mo. 2019) (RICO, Blackmail and Coercion…”threats to reveal”)

US v. Zizzo, 120 F.3d 1338 (7th Cir. 1997) (RICO, Collection of unlawful debt)

In re: Beasley Broadcasting, (F.C.C. 2007) (FCC Refused a particular RICO case)

US v. Raniere, 384 F.Supp.3d 282 (E.D. NY 2019) (Threats to reveal)

US v. Vigil, 476 F.Supp.2d 1231 (D.N.M. 2007) (RICO and Hobbs Act)

US v. Ford, 1:22cr75 (M.D.N.C. 2022) (Controlled Substances RICO)

US v. Ruan, 56 F.4th 1291 (11th Cir. 2023) (Controlled Substance RICO)

Rogers v. Dupree, 799 S.E2d 1 (Ga. App. 2017) (Nude/Blackmail RICO)

US v. Velasques, 881 F.3d 314 (5th Cir. 2018) (Meth RICO)

US v. Vasquez, 899 F.3d 363 (5th Cir. 2018) (same)

US v. Portillo, 969 F.3d 144 (5th Cir 2020) (same)

US v. Forrester, 443 F.Supp.3d 885 (M.D. Tenn. 2020) (Gang is not a “Club”)

Us v. Frazier, 3:17cr130 (M.D. Tenn. 2020) (Same issue, Declared Prejudicial to call the Club or Gang a Gang in the Court Room)

US v. Houle, 237 F.3d 71 (1st Cir. 2000) (Joinder is not Prejudice, even if Codefendant is far more Violent)

US v. Saccoccia, 1 F.4th 64 (1st Cir. 2021) (Honeycutt Ruling and Forfeiture)

US v. Pungiture, 910 F.2d 1084 (3rd Cir. 1990) (Sec. 1962(a) makes it unlawful to invest income derived from Racketeering activity)

US v. Scarfo, 41 F.4th 136 (3rd Cir. 2022) (“Conspiring to participate in the affairs of an enterprise through a pattern of Racketeering activity”)

In re: Gas Reclaimation, 663 F.Supp. 1123 (S.D.N.Y. 1987) (Sec. 1962 & 1964 Requirements)

Harden v. Pfizer, 712 F.3d 60 (1st Cir. 2013) (Class Action RICO)

Enriqguez v. Johnson & Johnson, (N.J. Super. 2019) (Opioid Crisis RICO)

Shirk v. US, 773 F.3d 999 (9th Cir. 2014) (Jurisdiction)

US v. Saccoccia, 18 F.3d 795 (9th Cir. 1994) (International RICO)

US v. Luong, 393 F.3d 913 (9th Cir. 2004) (Sec. 1951 Hobbs Act)

People v. Javanovic, 700 NYS.2d 156 (NY. App. Div. 1999) (Snuff Film Hotel)

US v. Lambey, 974 F.2d 1389 (4th Cir. 1992) (Snuff Film Plan)

State v. Girard, 2003 Ohio 7178 (Ohio App. 2003) (Snuff Film Obscene)

People v. Felix, 18 Cal. Raptr.2d 113 (Cal. App. 1993) (Snuff Film Plan Admissible Evidence)

US v. DePew, 932 F.2d 324 (4th Cir. 1991) (Snuff Film Plan)

US v. Schmeltzer, 960 F.2d 405 (5th Cir. 1992) (Snuff Film in Testimony)

US v. Chapman, 60 F.3d 894 (1st Cir. 1995) (Snuff Film Plan)

Carl v. Hamann, (EDNY 2019) (RICO, Common Law Conspiracy, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Fraud, Trespass to Chattel, Unjust Enrichment, and Accounting, Concert)

Natara v. Carranza, (N.D. Ill. 2015) (RICO, Intentional Misrepresentation, Conversion, Civil Conspiracy, Concert)

The YMCA no longer has Shelter

Keister v. YMCA, 2013 NCBC 36 (N.C. Super. Ct. 2013)

Beard v. Strahr, 200 F.Supp. 766 (D.D.C. 1961)

State v. Powers, 163 Vt. 98 (Vt. 1994)

Whitt v. Deleu, 707 F.Supp. 1011 (W.D. Wis. 1989)

Wills v. State, 636 P.2d 372 (Okla. Crim. App. 1981)

Uranga v. Federated Publications, 138 Idaho 550 (Idaho 2003)

Martinez Report

Philips v. Carey, 638 F.2d 207 (10th Cir. 1981)

Fonesca v. Univ. Med. Ctr. (W.D. TX 2020)

In re: Florence, 377 S.W3d 837 (Tex. App. 2012) (Bob Davis)

Sec. 1985 or 1983 and Rule 15

Hobson v. Wilson, 76-1326 (D.D.C. 1979)

Hobson v. Brennan, 646 F.Supp. 884 (D.D.C. 1986)

Hobson v. Brennan, 637 F.Supp. 173 (D.D.C. 1986) (Out of Pocket 1983)

McDonald v. Salazar, (D.D.C. 2011) (3 Years to File)

Monroe v. Williams, 705 F.Supp. 621 (D.D.C. 1988) (3 Years to File)

Rodgers v. Harpers Ferry, 371 S.E2d 358 (W. Va. 1988) (Bivens are Personal Injury Cases)

Williams v. District of Columbia, 676 F.Supp. 329 (D.D.C. 1987) (Not following Hobson’s lead)

Pope v. Bond, 641 F.Supp. 489 (D.D.C. 1986) (Bivens sometimes look like Defamation Cases)

Chris v. Burnsville, 634 F.Supp. 634 (D. Minn. 1986) (“Wilson Principles”)

Kessel v. Schaff, 697 F.Supp. 1102 (D.S.D. 1987) (Statute of Limitations)

Cabrales v. Los Angeles, 644 F.Supp. 1352 (C.D. Cal. 1986) (“Wilson Principles”)

Lee v. US Bank, (Cal. App. 2016) (The general rule…)

Cohen v. FGX Int’l, Inc. (D.R.I. 2019) (Fed. Rule 15(c)(3))

Rae v. Klusak, 810 F.Supp. 983 (N.D. Ill. 1993) (Rule 15(c))

Feldman v. Am. Asset Fin., 534 B.R. 627 (E.D. Pa. 2015) (Applying 15(c) as Disjunctive Test)

BNSF Ry. Co. v. United Indus. Corp., (N.D. Ill. 2012) (Rule 15(c)(1)(B), not State Law, Applies)

Zhejiang Photovoltaic v. Chen, (Bankr. N.J. 2023) (Rule 15(c)(1)(B), “claims arising”)

In re: Dolfi, 605 B.R. 385 (Bankr. Pa. 2019) (Relation back, Rule 15(c)(1)(B) & 15(c)(1)(C))

Caldwell v. Parker Univ., (N.D. TX 2020) (Request for leave in Post Judgment Motion)

Wheeler v. Sayler, 982 N.W2d 573 (N.D. 2022) (Did not seek leave… However, the court did not reject the new filing or otherwise require compliance with the pre-filing order)

Jaser v. AT&T, 3:18cv3429 (N.D. TX 2019) (Requests and receives leave of the court under 15(a))

FRCP 15(a)(2): “The court should freely give leave when Justice so requires”

Van Elder v. Amalgamated Transit Union, 3:13cv2909 (N.D. TX 2014) (Must obtain leave of the court to sue by showing good cause)

BCC Merch Solutions v. Jet Pay, 3:12cv5185 (N.D. TX 2016) ([Rule 26] Leave of the court to sue by showing good cause)

US v. Cesario, 3:16cr60 (N.D. TX 2016) (Attorney may withdraw… only upon leave of the court)

Thomas v. St. Joseph Health, 5:20cv28 (N.D. TX 2022) (Rule 16(b)… Leave of the court, upon showing of good cause)

DNA

People v. Ige, No. FBA008198 (Cal. App. 2010) (MtDNA)

AI

Vehicle Intelligence v. Mercedes-Benz USA, (N.D. Ill. 2014) (“An example of the application of an Artificial Intelligence system is a backward-chaining process that searches a knowledge base for Rules to either verify or disprove that a patient has or doesn’t have the Flu.”)

DSM-IV & 5, and Rap and Sexual Harassment

In re: Commitment of Williams, (Tex. App. 2010) (Sexual Assault by threat; Predator Defined)

Ex Parte: Tennard, 960 S.W2d 57 (Tex. App. 1997) (Pimping the Victim & AAMD Mental Retardation)

Kamp v. Kijakazi, 21-35934 (9th Cir. 2023) (Marijuana use must be ruled out)

Duncan v. Metro Life Ins., 2:15cv626 (D. Utah 2016) (Schizoeffective)

People v. Morrow, G050581 (Cal. App. 2017) (Paraphilia)

Morales-Miranda v. Wilkie, 18-7298 (Vet. App. 2020) (Schizophreniform)

State v. Shields, 2890 Or. App. 44 (Or. App. 2017) (Stimulant Use Disorder)

People v. Lindsey, 1-15-2844 (Ill. App. 2017) (Sexually Violent Stimulant Use Disorder)

In re: L.A.C., 04-20-412 (Tex. App. 2021) (Stimulant Use Disorder, Continued use after Child removed)

Mays v. State, AP-77,055 (Tex. Crim. App. 2019) (Stimulant Use Disorder… not incompetent to be executed)

Brownlow v. State, AP-77068 (Tex. Crim. App. 2020) (Beta-III IQ Test)

Mulloy v. US, 937 F.Supp. 1001 (D. Mass. 1996) (7.7% of convicted Rapists reoffend within 3 Years)

State v. W. World, inc. (N.J. Super. App. Div. 2015) (Citations)

Doe v. Fayette Cnty. Children, 8-823 (W.D. Pa. 2010) (Access to the Victim)

United States v. Huntsberry, 956 F.3d 270 (5th Cir. 2020) (Aspiring Rapper)

Moore v. Cohen, (S.D. NY 2021) (Judge Defamed by Sacha Noam Baron Cohen)

US v. Benjamin, (S.D. TX 2021) (“Defendant is a Rapper of sorts”)

Westmoreland v. Williams, 665 S.E2d 30 (Ga. App. 2008) (“Rapper for Cash Money”)

State v. Byars, (Tenn. Crim. App. 2017) (National Gang Beef over Rick Ross the Rapper)

F.K. v. S.C., 481 Mass. 325 (Mass. 2019)

United States v. Deleon, 428 F.Supp.3d 841 (D.N.M. 2019) (Blood in Blood out Gang)

People v. Murillo, 238 Cal. App.4th 1122 (Cal. App. 2015) (Threatening Victim with Rap Song being released)

Holcomb v. Commonwealth, 58 Va. App. 339 (Va. App. 2011) (History of Defendant and Victim)

State v. Davis, (Ohio App. 2010) (Threat… range of statements or conduct… impart a feeling of apprehension)

Scott v. Pizza Hut, 92 F.Supp.2d 1320 (M.D. Fla. 2000) (Rape Rap song at Work)

Bell v. Itawamba, 799 F.3d 379 (5th Cir. 2015) (Wanted his speech to be heard by Community/School)

Batiste v. Davis, (S.D. TX 2017) (Threatening after having shot someone else)

US v. White, 810 F.3d 212 (4th Cir. 2016) (Personally Therapeutic, not outwardly Threatening)

People v. Virto, (Cal. App. 2015) (Intimidating)

Gerald v. Locksley, 849 F.Supp.2d 1190 (D.N.M. 2011) (Single incident of Rape meets Title VII Liability, example given from Pizza Hut where Manager regularly plays Music and then sends her to serve aggressive customers)

People v. Mitchell, 2 Cal. Raptr.3d 49 (Cal. App. 2003) (Rape Trauma Syndrome, Rap Lyrics, Street Gang)

US v. Lockhart, 844 F.3d 501 (5th Cir. 2016) (Gang Unit Testimony)

Robinson v. Jacksonville Shipyards, 760 F.Supp. 1486 (M.D. Fla. 1991) (Nude/Explicit photos must be 1st Amendment Expression of the Business)

Johnson v. McAdams, 4:16cv60 (N.D. Miss. 2016) (“Calling him a Bitch”)

Burns v. Burns, S.W2d 821 (Tex. App. 1934) (“Called him a Bitch”)

Fuller v. Tenn. Dep’t of Corr., (W.D. Tenn. 2018) (same)

Jackson v. Stolworthy, 17-cv-420(S.D. Ill. 2017) (same)

In re: Int’l Harvest, 367 NLRB No. 31 (N.L.R.B. 2018) (same)

Luster v. Ill. Dep’t of Corr., 652 F.3d 726 (7th Cir. 2011) (same)

Walker v. Stone, (N.D. Ind. 2022) (same)

Kelley v. Conco. Cos., 196 Cal. App. 4th 191 (Cal. App. 2011) (same)

State v. Francis, (Iowa App. 2004) (same, after Sexual Assault)

Jackson v. O’Brien, (W.D. Pa. 2020) (same, PREA)

Taylor v. Byers, (M.D. Tenn. 2022) (same)

People v. White, (Cal. App. 2017) (same)

Trowell v. Upstate, 9:16cv0639 (N.D. NY 2016) (same, gloved finger in anus, called him a Bitch)

Spearman v. Ford Motor Co., 231 F.3d 1080 (7th Cir. 2000) (same and compared him to Drag Queen)

Henderson v. Labor Finders, (E.D. Va. 2013) (same, “Bitch” means Woman or Faggot, Tranny, etc.)

Hamm v. Weyauwega Milk, 199 F.Supp.2d 415 (D. Mass. 2002) (same, cites Spearman)

Howell v. North Central College, 320 F.Supp.2d 717 (N.D. Ill. 2004) (same, Citations)

Ellsworth v. Pot Luck Enterprises, 624 F.Supp.2d 868 (M.D. Tenn. 2009) (Size of Penis)

Lum v. Consol. Edison Co. of NY, No. 2022-00725 (NY App. Div. 2022)(same)

Blanck v. Meyer, 14-cv-136 (W.D. Wis. 2014) (Citations for same)

Newton v. United States Recycling, 00-cv-5466(E.D. Pa. 2001) (same)

Pirie v. Conley Group, (S.D. Iowa 2004) (same)

Jones v. Pate Rehab, 3:14cv2218 (N.D. TX 2016) (same)

Scribner v. Waffle House, 14 F.Supp.2d 873 (N.D. TX 1998) (Breast Size)

Carballo v. Log Cabin Smoke House, 399 F.Supp.2d 715 (M.D. La. 2005) (same)

Bombalski v. Lanxess Corp., 13-01653 (W.D. Pa. 2014) (same)

Erving v. Dall. Hous. Auth., 3:16cv1091 (N.D. TX 2018) (same)

Prince v. Madison Square Garden, 427 F.Supp.2d 372 (S.D. NY 2006) (same)

Fala v. The Perrier Group of America, 99-cv-3319 (E.D. Pa. 2000) (same)

Dallas v. Gala Resources, 2009 NY Slip Op 30079 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2009) (same)

Questionnaires

Klein v. O’Neal, 705 F.Supp.2d 632 (N.D. TX 2010) (Class Action)

Emerson Elec. v. Johnson, 601 S.W3d 813 (Tex. App. 2018) (Who filled out Questionnaire)

Williams v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 8:12cv699 (M.D. Fla. 2013)

Pope v. Colvin, C-12-05503 (N.D. Cal. 2014)

Marrero v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec. (E.D. NY 2020)

Van Horn v. Heckler, 717 F.2d 1196 (8th Cir. 1983)

Zhang v. Berryhill, (W.D. NY 2018)

Kodimer v. San Diego, (S.D. Cal. 2011)

Clark v. Virginia, 880 F.Supp. 430 (E.D. Va. 1995)

Cummings v. State, AP-76,923 (Tex. App. 2014) (Jury Questionnaire)

Fratta v. State, AP-76,188 (Tex. App. 2011) (same)

Lowenfield v. Butler, 843 F.2d 183 (5th Cir. 1988)

Ayestas v. Davis, 933 F.3d 384 (5th Cir. 2019)

Rumbaugh v. Procunier, 753 F.2d 395 (5th Cir. 1985)

Hall v. Quarterman, 534 F.3d 365 (5th Cir. 2008) (Retardation Questionnaire)

Zapata v. Colvin, (N.D. TX 2014) (Mental and Multiple Impairments)

Lay v. Colvin, (N.D. TX 2014) (same)

Ex Parte: Bastien, (P.T.A.B. 2015)

Ex Parte: Kwok, (P.T.A.B. 2012)

King v. People, S. Ct. Crim. 2015-0113 (V.I. 2017)

Dunbar v. City of Hous., 557 S.W3d 745 (Tex. App. 2018) (Firefighter Questionnaire)

Kunselman v. Unemployment Comp., 444 C.D. 2012 (Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 2013) (Unemployment)

Gary v. USAA, 229 F.Supp.3d 365 (D. Md. 2017) (Health/Life Insurance)

Battiest v. State, 06-19-00094-CR (Tex. App. 2019) (Suitability for Polygraph)

Larimore v. Employees Retirement, 208 S.W3d 511 (Tex. App. 2006) (CAT Scan)

Tennell v. State, 01-17-00571-CR (Tex. App. 2020) (Bookin Questionnaire)

Hunter v. State, 243 S.W3d 664 (Tex. Crim. 2007) (Job Questionnaire)

Lowe v. Hernandez, 2-06-132-cv (Tex. App. 2007)

Brown v. ATX, 3:11cv3340 (N.D. TX 2013) (ADA)

Horne v. Colvin, (N.D. TX 2013)

Habeas and Sanctions

McBride v. Sharpe, 25 F.3d 962 (11th Cir. 1994)

Marijuana in Religion

Guam v. Guerrero, 290 F.3d 1210 (9th Cir. 2002) (Rastafarian)

Olsen v. DEA, 878 F.2d 1458 (D.C. Cir. 1989) (Rastafarian, Mandamus)

State v. Pederson, 679 N.W2d 368 (Minn. App. 2004) (Kannabosm)

State v. Cordingley, 302 P.3d 730 (Idaho App. 2013)

State v. Sunderland, 168 P.3d 526 (Haw. 2007)

Cutter v. Wilkinson, 544 US 709 (2005)

Gallagher v. Austin PD,

Kerr v. New Orleans PD,

State v. Mooney,

US v. Leary,

Hearing Request

Bill Salter v. Brenton, 486 F.Supp.2d 1314 (S.D. Ala. 2007) citing Cumulus v. Clear Channel, 304 F.3d 1167 (11th Cir. 2002)

Conversion

Zadesmaeil v. Holder, 07-75139 (9th Cir. 2012)

Jian v. Sessions, (5th Cir. 2018)

Toufighi v. Mukasey, 538 F.3d 988 (9th Cir. 2007)

Coles v. Cate, (E.D. Cal. 2011)

Taslimi v. Holder, 590 F.3d 988 (9th Cir. 2010)

Xiao v. Holder, 09-60150 (5th Cir. 2010)

US v. Ballard,

Church of the Holy Trinity

Pre-Trial

McGuire v. Davis, 2:17cv171 (NDTX 2020) (Pre-Trial Bond hearing, Right to Confront Witness)

Martinez v. Anderson County, (E.D. TX 2023) (Class Action for Pre-Trial Release Conditions)

Villareal v. Loredo, 44 F.4th 363 (5th Cir. 2022) (is a law discriminatory as applied)

Henriquez v. Farmers Branch, (NDTX 2022)

Williams v. Johnson City, (NDTX 2022)

Lehman v. Guinn, (W.D. La. 2022)

O’Handley v. Padilla, 579 F.Supp.3d 1163 (N.D. Cal. 2022)

Tex. Code of Crim. Proc. Sec. 16.01 - Examining Trial and 39.01

“The accused in any Felony case shall have a right to Examining Trial before Indictment”

Ex Parte: Emerson, (Tex. App. 2020) (Denial of Habeas appeal)

In re: Notter, (Tex. App. 2018) (Counsel filed Motion for Examining Trial)

In re: Pedley, (Tex. App. 2022) (Indictment removes Right to Examining Trial)

Knapp Commission

United States v. Archer, 486 F.2d 670 (2nd Cir. 1973)

In re: Neagle, 39 F. 833 (N.D. Cal. 1889) (Marshals)

28 USC Sec. 88 - Washington DC

Baldwin County v. Brown, 466 US 147 (1984)

Gelboim v. BOA, 135 S.Ct. 897 (2015)

28 USC Sec. 1361 - Mandamus

28 USC Sec. 509B - Human Rights Laws

Northup v. Bell, (E.D. TX 2012)

Kaehu v. Haw. Dist. Court, (D. Haw. 2022) (Removal to Federal Court)

Angelicalist · May 15

I literally have EVERY FEDERAL AGENCY IN AMERICA Watching me, because I Started out by getting Hollywood's Attention in 2010, like all the Celebrities, then from there all the People in DC and New York, like the Media, Started noticing me. And so now Everyone on the News Channels and Everything know who I am.

And I get like Targeted Ads for like VPNs and Things, the most recent one was an "Encrypted Messages" App where it was saying like if You send out a Message that says "I have Plenty of Money for Tonight" and it was like a Sign over his Head, where sometimes it even seems like they were Hiring People based on me, like they are making Commercials with People they think look like me and Things. And I understand like Market Research, but they aren't supposed to Unmask People and Things when going through the Data.

My thought Process is, "I called in the Feds, there is no Reason anyone should be able to get away with doing anything Illegal with my Data", EVERY FEDERAL AGENCY IN AMERICA is Watching me, I called them in, and I have Talked to many of them in Person, they have come to ask me like the Meaning of some of my Emails and Things.

So I am going to FORCE the Feds to do their Jobs, because until I did Research in the FastCase System, I thought the Feds had to Bring a RICO Case. I can Bring a RICO Case, they don't have to Bring the RICO. So I am doing a RICO, and this is becoming such a big Deal that at some Point this will be the Reason some People Vote for this or that Politician, and People will be seeing me as like a version of Edward Snowden that is a lot Cooler, and doesn't have to Flee the Country, because I don't Break Laws, if I did these Federal Agents would Arrest me.

But I just wanted to mention that, because I'm not sure some People understand. If they are Illegally Stalking me, or Cyberstalking me, and using my Data Illegally, I don't Care if the Feds aren't willing to Arrest these People. In the Case Jewel v. NSA, 673 F.3d 902 (9th Cir. 2011) he Proved that the Federal Government was doing illegal Wiretaps, and they said that basically like "Proving that this is happening isn't the same as bringing a Case with Real Evidence that You were harmed, or even part of this" so they said he Proved it was Happening, and I can Prove I am being Harmed. If the Federal Agencies won't Arrest the Criminals, I won't just be RICOing the Criminals, I will be RICOing THEM.

Angelicalist · May 16

Coercion in Texas Case Law

Jimenez v. State, NUMBER 13-13-00062-CR (Tex. App. Jul 31, 2014) (Even if we were to construe6this argument as urging no evidence of coercion which is an element of the charged offense, see id., and which is precisely defined by statute, see id.§1.07(9)(D)such an argument would not be meritorious. Thompson testified that Jimenez called her on the same day she was subpoenaed to testify at his criminal trial and told her to get out of the house. Thompson testified that, after the phone call, she left the house and hid from the police. A juror could have reasonably concluded from this testimony that Jimenez's phone call was an implicit threat "to expose [Thompson] to hatred, contempt, or ridicule."7See id.(defining "coercion") see also Landers v. State, No. 10-11-00408-CR, 2012 WL 3799212, at *3 (Tex. App. Waco Aug. 30, 2012) (mem. op.) (noting that the statutory definition of "coercion" requires an "actual or implicit threat"),rev'd on other grounds,402 S.W.3d 252 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). In particular, the jury could have reasonably found that, by telling Thompson to leave the house under those circumstances, Jimenez implied to Thompson that if she did not do as he ordered, she would be exposed to contempt of court for refusing to obey a subpoena. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 24.05 (West, Westlaw through 2013 3d C.S.) ("If a witness refuses to obey a subpoena, he may be fined at the discretion of the court, as follows: In a felony case, not exceeding five hundred dollars . . . .") see also id.art. 24.011(b) (West, Westlaw through 2013 3d C.S.) (referring to "penalties for contempt provided by this chapter"). The jury could also have reasonably inferred from this evidence that Jimenez harbored an intent to influence Thompson. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 36.05(a). To the extent that there was conflicting evidence regarding any of these elements, the jury was entitled to disbelieve it. See Lancon v. State,253 S.W.3d 699, 707 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) ("Because the jury is the sole judge of a witness's credibility, and the weight to be given the testimony, it may choose to believe some testimony and disbelieve other testimony.").)

Whiteside v. State, 29 S.W.2d 399, 115 Tex. Cr. 274 (Tex. Crim. App. 1930) (The theory upon which the court dealt with the subject was, in substance, that if the appellant, with malice aforethought, by threatening words and gestures terrorized and frightened the deceased and caused her to have a well-grounded apprehension that her life was then in danger)

Landers v. State, No. 10-11-00408-CR (Tex. App. Aug 30, 2012) (Each time Landers attempted to discredit A.M. or called her a liar in front of others certainly could be considered not only a threat but also as attempts to in fact "expose [A.M.] to hatred, contempt, or ridicule...." TEX. PEN. CODE ANN. § 1.07 (a)(9)(D).)

Angelicalist · May 17

Lil Wayne is about to be next after P. Diddy's Trial.

In this Video, Lil Wayne was Younger and is asked "What would You say to someone who wants to be Famous?" and he says "I would say You don't want to be famous, because You'll run into these Motherfucking Diddy Boppers, I call them Ass-tronauts, You don't want to run into a Motherfucker like THAT."

And when he said it he was Genuinely likely Warning Everyone about P. Diddy, but now, we can assume that he has been a Victim of P. Diddy, and in my Experience he has a lot of pent up Rage, and he wants to be the "Diddy Bopper" and "Ass-tronaut" now.

He wants to be the one that You run into when You become Famous, and he wants to TRY to Beat You into the Ground.

Lil Wayne is one of the BIGGEST CYBERSTALKERS ON EARTH, from what I have seen I would say the DEA has actually Recruited him like Elvis.

I sued the DEA and Lil Wayne Started Cyberstalking me.

So now that P. Diddy is going down, and R. Kelly went down, Lil Wayne needs to be next. He can not be allowed to Continue the Bullshit he is pulling.

And Lil Wayne has actually gone around and gotten Radio Stations to do this, it's now part of a Large Network of Cyberstalking.

And it seems like the Feds are AFRAID of him, they down want to go after him because Trump Pardoned him, THAT'S RIGHT Lil Wayne should ALREADY BE IN PRISON RIGHT NOW, he is LUCKY to be in the Free World, and he is abusing that by Cyberstalking People. And it's all Gay Shit he does, he's very Gay, Lil Wayne is completely Obsessed with Penises. He is maybe even Gayer than P. Diddy I would say.

I call what is going on "Gayngs".

Then comes P. Diddy. So between R. Kelly and P. Diddy, there was kind of an Anti-#MeToo Thing that happened. You might remember #MeToo and the Bombshell Movie, this was about like Television and Movie Producers Preying on their Talent Pools, but it was supposed to Theoretically include the potential Taco Bell Worker or something, or QT, whose Manager has a Crush on her and does Things that make her Feel completely uncomfortable and Everything. Here are some examples of the kinds of Situations:

Lockard v. Pizza Hut, Inc., 162 F.3d 1062, (10th Cir. 1998);

Scott v. Pizza Hut of America, Inc., 92 F. Supp. 2d 1320 (M.D. Fla. 2000)

So during that Time there was a False Story about a Lacrosse Team, and Rolling Stone the Magazine Published an Article Written about Rape Problems on a Campus, and it turned out either like all the Names of the Rapists were just made up and these People didn’t exist, or they had lied about the Students and use their Real Names, I can’t remember which. But as that was Happening there was a big Talk about “Rape Culture” as it was being called, and like Lil John the Rapper that says like “What?!?… Yeaya!!” was like one of the ones accused of being kind of an example of this, or his Music was promoting in on Campus or something to that effect. When I was Discovered that this “Campus Rape Culture” among like College Athletes, was not exactly Real as had been Described in the Article, it led to Court Cases with Rulings that actually Talk about this series of Events. It Reads similar to Cases about “Super Predators” that Hillary Clinton was Talking about, when You look at those Cases it is about how the Kids being accused of being “Super Predators” don’t seem to be that. But both these Terms “Rape Culture” and “Super Predator” can be applied, just not to College Students. It’s R. Kelly and P. Diddy, maybe Lil John himself and not just something he is influencing, Lil Wayne Openly in his Songs is like a Sex Offender Rapper, he Talks about like “Take the Baby out the Crib, and Rape the House Wives”, and like “Stop Crying about him, Bitch Chill” and “We Warned the Place” and “Fuck Your Feelings” which is meant to get like a Rape Victim to Feel like her being Raped is an Attack on her Husband or Boyfriend and not her. In the Song Mona Lisa he Talks about how You can get like a Drug Addicted Rape Victim to Rob someone who doesn’t know. It’s kind of like Forensic Files when someone is Cheating on someone else and Kills them, but this is about like a Drug Dealer imagining he is part of an Affair, instead of being a Rapists.

So I’ll get into the Law and a bit of the Psychology now so Everyone can see this for themselves, we don’t need to like Speculate based on Song Lyrics. There are kind of 2 Main Points, being using Drugs to get Victims Close, and the Problems surrounding Carnal Knowledge. To best Illustrate we can Talk about the Gay Community, and a lot of this Rape and Gay stuff is all connected because until Recently it was basically Illegal to be Gay anywhere except inside a Prison. So the Gay People for like 200-300 Years or more, were mixing with the Prison Culture, and it has kind of exploded into the Gay Scene. But Gay People often use Meth, and they say Things like “It makes Everyone Beautiful” which itself is a kind of Clear indicator of the Problem. These People get on Meth and Start Sucking Dicks in a Bathroom, or anywhere out of sight in Public they can find. The way People get caught like in Bathrooms like George Michael or the Anti-Gay Preacher who got caught at the Airport. And a lot of it is Drug Fueled, it’s possible some of it is just purely desire, but a lot of it is Drug Fueled. Now, to get to the Carnal Knowledge Point, which is about like “Why don’t Rape Victims Report?” Because most Rapes go unreported, and we actually know why. If You Report a Rape You have to Relive the Rape by Talking about it, You are then Labeled as kind of “Used” or “Damaged Goods”, it’s like announcing to the World “I have Baggage” and it could cause Divorce and Things, and this is probably best Illustrated by continuing with kind of exposing some of the Gay Community. So some Guys become Gay like sitting around with Other Guys, and they are Smoking Meth, maybe just 2 Best Friends even, and they get all Horny from the Meth, it’s an Effect of many Stimulants, and there is even a designation in the DSM, which is a Medical Book that lists all known Mental Diagnosis, called “Sexually Aggressive Stimulant Use Disorder”, and it’s even been called “Pavlovian” in a Court Case where someone alleged that he absolutely can’t Help himself and he like has to Fuck or Rape something when he gets a hit of Crack. But that’s not even the whole Problem. So now, imagine You are like a 20 Year Old Male, You’ve had a few Girlfriends and maybe You’ve been Told You should Try Porn or something, and most Male Porn Jobs are like Gay Porn stuff, like a Male Prostitute, for example if You went online Posting Pictures of Your Body and Your Dick and had maybe like a Male OnlyFans page, I would say Your Best Chances are 50/50 that any given Fan is going to be a Male, and that goes up to like 100 to 1 when we are Talking about Paying Customers. So say You are a 20 Year Old Male, and You are offered say like $1,000,000 but the Contract is that You have to Live on a Production Set for a Week, and You have to allow any Man who is designated to Penetrate You, Fuck You in the Ass. And You have to look like You like it, or You’re not getting Paid. This is done to Men and Women Every Day, and they aren’t getting $1,000,000, they are going to a Drug Dealer in a Time of Need as they get Physically Sick from not having the Meth or Fentanyl or whatever, saying like “I just need a Taste” and they get Horny and sometimes already have a Plan for Raping You, like “Got You where they wanted You.”. But just so Everyone can follow, let’s say You are offered $1,000,000. And You do it. But You didn’t know Your Asshole was going to Stretch and Bleed, and even when it did You thought “This will Heal and it will go back to normal”, and You go to the People that Paid You to Talk about it because Your Friends and Parents would t understand. This is the same Reason the Rape Victim goes back to the Rapist, they may even seem like Friends or Boyfriend and Girlfriend. This gets back to the Forensic Files Point, where now the Drug Dealer might Feel like he’s in a Relationship with his Female Rape Victim, and Start giving her Orders, and Rules, and She is stuck because if She doesn’t Listen She’ll get Sick, so She has to Play along with his Imaginary Relationship he thinks he is in. Based on a kind of Isolation Created by being exposed not just to Carnal Knowledge, but being like “Ruined”. This is what Grooming is all about, lowering someone’s Standards. We can imagine that most Women will like have Sex with Boys they Date as Children and maybe the Boy doesn’t even have to do too much, but he at least has to like impress her, and get her into “The Mood” or whatever, and spend a lot of Time with her. Then later they might have Sex with People that “Court” them we could say, like the Dating Scene and Everything, and Eventually She Plans on Probably getting Married. Grooming is about Tearing apart those Hopes and Dreams all tied up in that, and being instead the one who is going to “Teach her” how it Works. It is sometimes even not Treated like it’s a Crime, there are People who act like it’s “Sometimes You gotta do Things You don’t want to do. Shouldn’t have gotten Addicted to Meth, this is what Happens” just completely Victim Blaming and Shaming, as if She is to Blame for not having Self-Control and Ending up in the Room with a Predator.

So that is how a lot of the Rape is Happening, and it goes even more into Carnal Knowledge because People who think like P. Diddy don’t just like having Pussy, it’s not even about Pussy for him, he’s Probably 100% Gay if Kim Porter’s Book is True, but even just based on what we know about the Freak-Offs. P. Diddy likes Hiring Male Prostitutes, and he’s doing like a Donkey Show. But in the Spanish Donkey Shows the Woman already has a Loose Pussy, She maybe had a lot of Children, or Otherwise Worked her way up to being able to Fit a Donkey’s Dick inside of her, what P. Diddy likes is kind of finding unsuspecting Victims and Watching them take Dicks that are too Big for them. That’s the Issue with the Freak Offs, this kind of Rape Cult. Sometime the Victims even get excited to see the Next Victim, because they have been Fooled into thinking Rape is Power.

And this brings us to how we Identify these Pedophiles. It’s not about Adrenochrome, it’s about Fresh Meat and Innocence, they want to take someone’s Innocence. And usually it happened to them First, and they see it as “How Sex Works”, they actually imagine they know more about Sex then the Next Person because they went through this.

Milo Yiannopoulos Was Raped as a Child, and says it wasn’t Rape because he liked it.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-39037244.amp

Alanis Morissette Was Raped as a Child, and says it wasn’t Rape because she liked it.

https://amp.theguardian.com/music/2021/sep/13/alanis-morissette-says-she-was-victim-of-multiple-statutory-rapes-as-a-teenager

Lil Wayne Was Raped as a Child, and says it wasn’t Rape because he liked it.

https://andscape.com/features/lil-wayne-carter-v-is-triumph-over-trauma-abuse-suicide-attempt-jail-time-lawsuits-natural-disaster/

These are Celebrities that are Openly Talking about Pedarasty. And it’s being ignored because they are the Super Predators and the Rape Culture, but because it’s not 20 Year Old Straight White Guys no one wants to Ruin their Careers. And the FBI and Everyone charging P. Diddy know that Lil Wayne is a Rapist, but they just got him to Start Paying Taxes so they don’t want to get into it yet. This is probably enough to Start, but I’m Far from finished with adding info to this Thread.

The Entire Rap World is infected, Fat Joe called it a “Gay Mafia” then took that back kind of by saying that was a Statement to Empower Gay People. But P. Diddy is one of those Executives in a Suit he was Talking about. But it’s all coming out now with the P. Diddy Trial.

Angelicalist · May 18

Abbie Hoffman says “Hippies are Fags” in 1967

https://youtu.be/UtKI0DsD_CU?si=qvYTRY8R-AZQ8Svv

Angelicalist · June 17

Definitions

Tex. Pen. Code Sec. 1.07 (This is where Coercion and Things are defined)

Tex. Pen. Code Sec. 49.01 – Intoxication and Alcoholic Beverages Offenses (Guevara v. State, 152 S.W.3d 45 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004) is an example)

Tex. Pen. Code Sec. 71.02 – Engaging in Organized Criminal Activity

50 USC Sec. 1801 – Definitions

18 USC Sec. 2510 – Definitions

5 USC Sec. 701 – Application; Definitions

18 USC 1961 – Definitions

Bell v. Twombly, 127 S.Ct. 1955 (2007)

Cyberstalking

18 USC Sec. 1028(a)(7) – Knowingly Transfers, Possesses, or uses, without lawful authority, a means of identification of another Person, with the intent to commit, or to aid or abet, or in connection with, any unlawful activity that constitutes a Violation of Federal Law, or that constitutes a Felony under any applicable State or Local Law

18 USC Sec. 371 – Conspiracy to Commit Offense or to Defraud the United States

18 USC Sec. 1349 – Attempt and Conspiracy

18 USC Sec. 2261A(2)(B) – Stalking – Causes, attempts to cause, or would be reasonably expected to cause substantial emotional distress to a person described in Clause (i), (ii), (iii) of Paragraph (1)(A)

18 USC Sec. 1343 – Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud

47 USC Sec. 227 – Restrictions on the Use of Telephone Equipment

47 USC Sec. 222 – Privacy of Customer Information

18 USC Sec. 1039 – Fraud and Related Activity in Connection with Obtaining Confidential Phone Records of a Covered Entity

18 USC Sec. 2511 – Electronic Communications Privacy Act

18 USC Sec. 2701 – Unlawful Access to Stored Communications

18 USC Sec. 2510 – Definitions

18 USC Sec. 2710 – Wrongful Disclosure of Video Tape Rentals or Sales Records

50 USC Sec. 1806 – Use of Information (Minimization Requirements, etc)

5 USC Sec. 701 – Application; Definitions

18 USC Sec. 2712 – Civil Actions Against the United States