Rowan Heath Posted March 2 Share Posted March 2 How is it possible that David doesn't believe in global warming? Not man made, not such a great threat, not even happening, whatever exactly he believes about the subject. I've just finished his book on green politics from 1990, "It doesn't have to be this way." Icke clearly has a passion for environmentalism and a great deal of knowledge on the subject, so the fact that he says the things he says now about the climate just baffles me. I'm no ecologist, I'm no climate scientist, I'm not going to attempt to argue the scientific case for catastrophic, man-made global warming, I'm only going to say that the overwhelming majority of climate scientists say that it's man-made, and that the fact of the warming itself and it's catastrophic consequences are impossible to deny. I mean, has there really NOT been a massive increase in forrest fires? Have the polar ice-caps not receeded enormously over fifity-plus years? Are we not witnissing terrible floods and droughts and extreme threats to the global food supply, etc, etc, etc, whatever is causing them? How could catastrophic, man-made global warming not be an absolutely undeniable? How could all of those scientists be wrong? Aren't there grave and terrible ecological threats to all life on earth regardless of the cause? Is there anyone on here who agrees with the whole "climate hoax" thing who can answer these questions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Talorgan Posted March 2 Share Posted March 2 (edited) I think nuclear war is the biggest threat ( after all the previous nuclear atmospheric testing before) ,besides other rocks falling from the sky .. The climate has been changing always mainly due to Galactic --Solar changes and in conjunction to Gaia's changes to atmosphere ,I expect industry didn't help too much ! But the solutions offered by technocrats seem to be to mine more materials( been doing this a long time),send up more rockets ,litter the atmosphere with particles chem trails for decades ,and mess with the weather electromagnetically (+scaller) engineer continuous wars ( still at it !!) ,increase pollution/ synthetics etc The Club of Rome came up with idea of blaming us for climate change though as a long term strategy for global control it seems whereas alternative energy etc was suppressed . Real solutions are needed But CO2 is also good for plant growth greening the planet keeping biosphere intact So real changes need to work with Living Mother Earth not instead of it, That's the real spiritual endeavour here in matter too Edited March 2 by Talorgan 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts