Jump to content

Did Montblanc make pens for the Nazi empire? Photographic evidence for you to consider.


octoplex

Recommended Posts

It's well known that Volkswagen built and ran the Nazi concentration camps; and that Hugo Boss made the Nazi uniforms; but these photographs appear to evidence Montblanc making designer-pens for the Nazis:

 

post-50293-0386479001288095108.jpg.9152762ea7b6be56e52f22c9ec165c1d.jpg

 

post-50293-0420701001288095129.jpg.5dc898ed1f21f03b4c4008cebf89bf7c.jpg

 

post-50293-0526727001288095171.jpg.6b96718ac3bc103268a16b0a40e8d4a8.jpg

 

post-50293-0769808001288095216.jpg.02dccd4dcb3d9843465e973ad1b2ad27.jpg

 

Despite its French-sounding name, Montblanc is a German company. Some allege that the founder(s) of Montblanc pens were, Jewish. But, then, so was Hitler (his grandfather was Jewish).  In other words: being Jewish and being a Nazi are not mutually exclusive.

 

We also witness, more recently, how people like George Soros are both Jewish and Nazis at the same time. Soros, of course, notoriously worked with the literal Nazis to steal property from the Jews as they were sent to the camps. Naturally, defenders of George Soros claim he was only 14 years old at the time. Well, that's an odd moral-perspective, because we 'jailed' Jamie Bulger's killers and they were only 10 years old.

 

Soros is still walking around out there.

 

Did Montblanc collaborate with the Nazis?

Often the point is made that Montblanc could not have collaborated with the Nazis, because the founder(s) of the company were Jewish. However, we know that many Jews collaborated with the Nazis. Hitler being the most glaring example. Soros being a near-second.

 

So, to return to the Nazi pen in the photographs. These photos were posted on a handwriting forum, where some commentators (who seemed suspiciously like Montblanc's marketing department) dismissed the pen as a 'fake'.

 

Can anyone here on the forum offer their perspective? My opinion is that this is a very elaborate piece of metalwork, requiring industrial machine-tools to create. Why go to all this trouble for a 'fake'? And what customer was the intended market for this elaborate 'fake'?

 

The Mystery Deepens

The idea that this pen is a 'fake' must presuppose that someone went to the enormous expense of creating this item, to sell it to... who? The Nazi memorabilia collector who also likes Montblanc pens? This seems like a ridiculously tiny demographic to target.

 

Nobody on the handwriting forum asks further questions about the pen; they just attack the poster. Someone on the handwriting forum (Montblanc marketing?) describes the pen as "a shoddy piece of bent flat metal" which it clearly is not.

 

Why are the commentators so keen to dismiss the pen without further enquiry?

 

I suspect that what we have here is the genuine article, and evidence of another company that has attempted to conceal its Nazi history.

 

What do you feel?

 

LEGAL NOTICE:

Some of the photographs and illustrations posted here may have been used without permission from any copyright holder(s) who assert ownership of them. Our right to reproduce these images for critique and architectural analysis is legally protected under the terms of 'Fair Use' enshrined in United States law (17 U.S.C. § 107) and similar law in the UK. Fair Use permits the reproduction of a copyrighted work in order to criticize or comment upon it. Additionally, all images are posted here in order to serve the public interest, and not for personal profit.

Edited by octoplex
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, octoplex said:

It's well known that Volkswagen built and ran the Nazi concentration camps; and that Hugo Boss made the Nazi uniforms; but these photographs appear to evidence Montblanc making designer-pens for the Nazis:

 

post-50293-0386479001288095108.jpg.9152762ea7b6be56e52f22c9ec165c1d.jpg

 

post-50293-0420701001288095129.jpg.5dc898ed1f21f03b4c4008cebf89bf7c.jpg

 

post-50293-0526727001288095171.jpg.6b96718ac3bc103268a16b0a40e8d4a8.jpg

 

post-50293-0769808001288095216.jpg.02dccd4dcb3d9843465e973ad1b2ad27.jpg

 

Despite its French-sounding name, Montblanc is a German company. Some allege that the founder(s) of Montblanc pens were, Jewish. But, then, so was Hitler (his grandfather was Jewish).  In other words: being Jewish and being a Nazi are not mutually exclusive.

 

We also witness, more recently, how people like George Soros are both Jewish and Nazis at the same time. Soros, of course, notoriously worked with the literal Nazis to steal property from the Jews as they were sent to the camps. Naturally, defenders of George Soros claim he was only 14 years old at the time. Well, that's an odd moral-perspective, because we 'jailed' Jamie Bulger's killers and they were only 10 years old.

 

Soros is still walking around out there.

 

Did Montblanc collaborate with the Nazis?

Often the point is made that Montblanc could not have collaborated with the Nazis, because the founder(s) of the company were Jewish. However, we know that many Jews collaborated with the Nazis. Hitler being the most glaring example. Soros being a near-second.

 

So, to return to the Nazi pen in the photographs. These photos were posted on a handwriting forum, where some commentators (who seemed suspiciously like Montblanc's marketing department) dismissed the pen as a 'fake'.

 

Can anyone here on the forum offer their perspective? My opinion is that this is a very elaborate piece of metalwork, requiring industrial machine-tools to create. Why go to all this trouble for a 'fake'? And what customer was the intended market for this elaborate 'fake'?

 

The Mystery Deepens

The idea that this pen is a 'fake' must presuppose that someone went to the enormous expense of creating this item, to sell it to... who? The Nazi memorabilia collector who also likes Montblanc pens? This seems like a ridiculously tiny demographic to target.

 

Nobody on the handwriting forum asks further questions about the pen; they just attack the poster. Someone on the handwriting forum (Montblanc marketing?) describes the pen as "a shoddy piece of bent flat metal" which it clearly is not.

 

Why are the commentators so keen to dismiss the pen without further enquiry?

Montblanc made it or theyeybto

I suspect that what we have here is the genuine article, and evidence of another company that has attempted to conceal its Nazi history.

 

What do you feel?

 

LEGAL NOTICE:

Some of the photographs and illustrations posted here may have been used without permission from any copyright holder(s) who assert ownership of them. Our right to reproduce these images for critique and architectural analysis is legally protected under the terms of 'Fair Use' enshrined in United States law (17 U.S.C. § 107) and similar law in the UK. Fair Use permits the reproduction of a copyrighted work in order to criticize or comment upon it. Additionaomomhow badllymclesonwas tblanc,, all imsairukmondagand most woes are posted here in order to serve the public interest, and not for personal profit.

I don't know anything about montblanc pens, but if the Nazis told you to make something, you made it or they took your company off you, at the least.

 

Allowing that, just about all German companies were involved willingly or otherwise and most would like to distance themselves from it for obvious reasons

In fairness to the montblancs, ,in 1933 it was far from clear how bad they would end up being

Edited by lobster
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, lobster said:

In fairness to the montblancs, ,in 1933 it was far from clear how bad they would end up being

 

By 10th May, 1933, the Nazis were burning books "written by Jews, political opponents, and liberal intellectuals". By July of the same year inscribed on the Montblanc pens,  the Nazis wrote into law the "involuntary sterilization of people with physical and mental disabilities or mental illness, Roma (Gypsies)... and Black people." [Source: Holocaust Encyclopedia]

 

The Montblanc pen company were apparently on-board with the Nazis in 1933, and profiting from the Nazi's crimes against humanity.

 

The problem with the idea that. "if the Nazis told you to make something, you made it or they took your company off you, at the least." Is that it rationalizes all actions taken by a company at the behest of evil. In other words, it is the Nuremberg Defense.

 

Most normal, kind humans would not work for the Nazis; whatever the personal cost.

 

The Hidden Meanings of 'Fashion'

Do the Nazi-entanglements orbiting Montblanc pens mean that these pens are, today, flaunted by some of those with in insider-knowledge of the occult (hidden) meaning of this type of pen? We know that Freemasons (pedophiles) use various symbols about-their-person to signal to other Freemason-pedophiles that they are part of the pedophile-'club'. What other 'fashion' accessories do these groups use to signal to each other?

 

Should there be a long-term-cost to German companies which tried to genocide humanity? Should they be allowed to continue to exist?

 

A human-being that tries to kill another human may face the death-penalty. What should be done with companies like Volkswagen, Hugo Boss, and others, that tried to murder all of humanity? These companies ran the holocaust. Why are they still permitted to trade?

Edited by octoplex
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...