Judy Wood's theory.. 9/11

[legion]

A whole body of very alternative ideas - Dr. Judy Wood - 

 

Most people do not understand the 9/11 attacks as well as they think they do.

Please study the evidence.

 

This table briefly summarizes and compares the various explanations that attempt to address the large body of empirical evidence from 9/11 (table from Dr. Judy Wood's presentation at the 2012 'Breakthrough Energy Movement' conference in Holland).

 

Source: http://drjudywood.com/ & http://vimeo.com/57923364

 

WTC7's destruction may have looked like a conventional controlled demolition, but the observed 'lathering up' process, the minimal seismic impact, and other pieces of empirical evidence from 9/11 conclusively show us that this was not the case. The truth is far more important than most people realize, including most 9/11 "truthers."

 

High Definition Clip of WTC1 Turning to Dust in Midair on 9/11 (Slow Motion)

 

Dr. Judy Wood, Ph.D | 9/11 Breakthrough Energy Technology 

 

 

IRREFUTABLE 'Introduction to the Evidence' 9/11 Video Series: 

 

WTC7 underwent a 'lathering up process" prior to its destruction, similar to WTC1. Large quantities of dust spontaneously poured from virtually the entire south face of the building for hours before it was finally destroyed. The office fires in WTC7 were contained to only a few floors. This dust / 'lather' is clearly not smoke from those small office fires. This process was captured on video, and a link to some of that video recording is included below. This is one of the many pieces of forensic evidence from 9/11 that are not explained by thermal or kinetic forces of any kind (e.g. airplanes, jet fuel, explosives, thermite, nuclear bombs).

WTC7 Lathering Up (Closeup) [at 9:10 into video]:

 

 

 

WTC7 Lathering Up (Timelapse):

 

 

WTC1 Lathering Up (Timelapse):

 

 

Even Richard Gage, the leader of 'Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth' (AE911Truth), admitted to me that thermite does not explain the evidence from 9/11, and that he has not studied the important Columbia University NYC seismographic data. He also lies to the public and censors the many pieces of evidence that thermite can't explain. I recorded his suspicious responses on video when I questioned him at a presentation in Peoria, IL.

Richard Gage Questioned at AE911Truth Presentation (4/12/2011) by Medical Student

 

 

 

Thermal and kinetic forces of any kind are not consistent with the large body of evidence from 9/11. Most evidence suggestive of explosives or thermite is testimonial in nature, such as witnesses "hearing explosions" or "seeing molten liquid". Testimonial evidence is the weakest form of evidence because people are often mistaken, biased, and/or repeating things they heard from others. Loud, explosive noises can be caused by many things, and it's very likely that items were independently exploding as the buildings were transformed to dust. Please also keep in mind that glowing objects or liquids do not directly imply hot or molten steel, as many objects glow or melt under lower stresses and temperatures. As for the small amount of empirical evidence for thermite, such as the study that allegedly found thermite in WTC dust samples, this could be explained by many common, logical things, which are discussed at these links:

Thermic Lances Used To Cut Steel Beams during WTC Ground Zero Cleanup | 9/11 Myths:

 

 

 

WTC Steel Columns Cut at Angles During 9/11 Ground Zero Cleanup | 9/11 Myths:

 

 

 

9/11 "Pull It" WTC Building Demolition via Pulling Cables | 9/11 Myths:

 

 

 

9/11 Ground Zero Molten Steel or Work Lights? | 9/11 Myths:

 

 

 

9/11 WTC Explosive Demolition is NOT Supported by the Evidence | 9/11 Myths:

 

 

 

Copper thermite is used for creating electric joints in building construction ('cadwelding'):

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exothermic_welding

 

Cad Weld - Copper Ground to Rebar:

 

 

 

Steven Jones proves primer paint, not thermite. 

 

Bentham Open Access Publishing Accepts Nonsense Manuscript for Dollars:

http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/.../nonsense-for-dollars/

 

Bentham Science Publishing Editors Quit After Fake Paper Accepted:

http://legacy.earlham.edu/.../06/bentham-editors-resign.html

 

No Thermite on 9/11?! | Thermite Does NOT Explain the Evidence!

 

 

 

Melting Aluminum In The Foundry:

http://www.metalwebnews.com/howto/furnace2/melting.html

 

Aluminum Glows:

http://drjudywood.com/articles/aluminum/Aluminum_Glows.html

 

Thermite and Glowing Liquid Aluminum (Section IV):

http://drjudywood.com/articles/why/why_indeed.html

 

Andrew Johnson's Evidence-Packed 'Thermite Free 9/11' page:

http://911thermitefree.blogspot.com

 

Please study the large and conclusive body of verifiable, physical evidence from 9/11, including the Columbia University NYC seismographic data, University of Alaska magnetometer data, United States Geological Survey (USGS) dust analysis, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) AVIRIS thermal imaging, NASA AVIRIS dust and iron (ferrous/ferric) spectrometer imaging, 7 total WTC buildings destroyed on 9/11, WTC1 & 2 steel turning to dust in midair, WTC1 'lathering up', WTC7 'lathering up', WTC2 falling dust trails, WTC1 & 2 minimal seismic impact, WTC7 minimal seismic impact, WTC lack of P-wave seismic signal, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) verified Hurricane Erin (category 3), WTC1 & 2 rapid speed of destruction, WTC1 & 2 top-down direction of destruction, WTC7 'free fall' destruction, disappearance of most of WTC4, vertical cylindrical holes in surrounding WTC buildings, relative lack of rubble compared to explosive controlled demolitions, lack of major damage to surrounding non-WTC buildings other than Bankers Trust, rapid spontaneous rusting of WTC metals, rapid spontaneous rusting of Bankers Trust metals, 1400+ 'toasted' and warped cars up to 1/2 mile away, numerous flipped cars, spontaneous 'weird' fires, ground zero fuming for years without high heat, truck loads of fresh dirt being hauled in and out of ground zero for years, numerous unharmed survivors in WTC stairwells, mostly undamaged WTC shopping mall, mostly undamaged PATH trains, mostly undamaged WTC 'Bathtub' foundation, presence of dust 'fuzzballs', strange round window holes, shriveled WTC steel beams, strangely curved steel beams, wavy steel beams, vertical axis 'rolling up' of steel beams, thinning of steel beams, holes in steel beams, Bankers Trust warped and shriveled metal beams, objects fusing with unburned paper, missing file cabinets, missing office machinery, missing office furniture, missing toilets, missing door knobs, lack of high heat, cool temperature of WTC dust, unburned paper, unburned clothing, unburned pedestrians, elevated levels of tritium, lack of ionizing radiation, glowing and molten materials, spontaneous explosion of Scott air tanks, numerous similarities between 'The Hutchison Effect' and phenomena observed at ground zero, and much more.

The large body of empirical evidence from 9/11 is overwhelmingly conclusive, because there is only one thing that can explain it all, and nothing else comes close. Only the general category of weapon technology known as 'directed energy weapons' (DEW) can explain all of the empirical evidence from 9/11, and it does so completely and irrefutably.

 

http://WhereDidTheTowersGo.com

 

http://DrJudyWood.com

 

http://CheckTheEvidence.com

 

So, there's something for a quiet night.. 

 

--------------------------

 

Whatever the method, never lose sight of the question of WHO and WHY..? 

 

It wasn't by the people that the MSM would have us believe.. 

 

Who could have orchestrated such a massive event..? 

 

And why.. 

 

It was to kickstart the War on Terror that has come full circle in a little over 20 years and turned into a War on Us. 

 

Look around you right now..  

 

[Screamingeagle]

 

 

i'm ready to drain the swamp

[Screamingeagle]

https://www.instagram.com/reel/C-WDntWOJbo/?igsh=MXVqaHFmbW9xNnY2cg==

[legion]

32 minutes ago, Screamingeagle said:

https://www.instagram.com/reel/C-WDntWOJbo/?igsh=MXVqaHFmbW9xNnY2cg==

 

Absolutely. 

Whether the planes were real or not - those Towers (3) were going down.. 

 

[legion]

14 hours ago, legion said:

It was to kickstart the War on Terror that has come full circle in a little over 20 years and turned into a War on Us. 

 

Look around you right now..  

 

"coincidence theory"   

(Short comedy piece) 

 

https://old.bitchute.com/video/AHQoLdWbHze9/ 

 

 

[Occulus5]

I was watching one of Mark Conlon's videos yesterday on his youtube channel where he's talking about the towers. I noticed in the comments someone said something about the technology being used for a long time, the person mentioned WW2 bombings and Hiroshima and other events. It's like the person was suggesting energy weapons have been around that far back. Have they?. May've been talking about holograms, but even though that's a new one on me and something I find hard to believe. Maybe this was some kind of ancient technology that they discovered and harnessed. Maybe the ancient Egyptians were using it.

Edited September 26, 2024 by Occulus5

[sock muppet]

On 9/11/2024 at 9:09 PM, legion said:

Whatever the method, never lose sight of the question of WHO and WHY..?

 

I think in this instance it is the HOW that will define the who/whom and the why, everyone that cares to question for the truth has a pretty good idea as to the whom behind this event, all that remains is the proof, and that will be found in the HOW,

 

36 minutes ago, Occulus5 said:

It's like the person was suggesting energy weapons have been around that far back

 

Energy weapons have been around since the dawn of time, just think of things exploding, same thing, what's different now is what was demonstrated to be a reality on 911, and that is the 'directed' nature of the weapon devised, and that can only be done with radiant energy, be it nuclear, emf, sonic or some other force yet to be disclosed in its nature,

 

42 minutes ago, Occulus5 said:

Maybe this was some kind of ancient technology that they discovered and harnessed. Maybe the ancient Egyptians were using it

 

I agree, please continue with this line of investigation, interestingly some of the mathematics involved with the dimensions of the Great Pyramid yields the speed of light in a vacuum as measured by modern science today, coincidence?,

 

[Talorgan]

David A Hughes ;

In this video presentation, I defend the work of Judy Wood, in particular her book Where Did The Towers Go? (2011).

 

https://dhughes.substack.com/p/in-defence-of-judy-wood

 

 

Edited January 21 by Talorgan

[SimonTV]

I do not agree with Dr Judy Wood on her ideas about nuclear and DEW weapons used. The evidence clearly points to a type controlled demolition using nano thermate. They likely coated the concrete reinforced floors in a type of nano thermate paint disguised as fire proofing. Then they took out all the column members using a similar nano thermate paint that was specifically put on to the joints. Then they exploded the building top down using remote computer detonation. The one building they started 5/6 way up for added effect but as all the remote detonators were independent that did not affect their ability to initiate their pulverisation of the upper floors. 

[peter]

On 9/26/2024 at 11:08 PM, sock muppet said:

Energy weapons have been around since the dawn of time, just think of things exploding, same thing, what's different now is what was demonstrated to be a reality on 911, and that is the 'directed' nature of the weapon devised, and that can only be done with radiant energy, be it nuclear, emf, sonic or some other force yet to be disclosed in its nature,

I watched a documentary on a directed microwave energy weapon it was on VHS and the experiment was purportedly carried out in 1986 somewhere in the US. There was a large lens with an entire factory behind it and a couple of miles away there stood a ten story ICBM. They did a standard countdown, 10 9 8 etc when the word fire was announced there was no sound no flash but the ICBM flew to pieces. So assuming that the doco was genuine it makes you wonder what they're capable of now 

Edited January 25 by peter