Keir Rodney Starmer to warn the nation that 'things will only get worse' and worse and worse....

[Tinfoil Hat]

Starmer had the brass-neck to sit giggling about the petition in a TV interview. 

 

I'll do cartwheels if the info in @Katsika's post is a legitimate way to make the weasel laugh on the other side of his ugly face.

[LastOneLeftInTheCounty]

1 hour ago, Katsika said:

https://notonthebeeb.co.uk/so/4bPDYzs_3?cid=1fc5f0b1-a905-492d-80b2-94a041c4e3d9&region=a0a4a25c-37bb-4602-a3f2-250ce8f91a71

 

Recall of MPs Act 2015

Hello     The petition calling for a general election is flying at 2 million plus.   Alex replied to yesterday's newsletter, suggesting tackling each MP one by one triggering a by-election.     Hi Mark,   Although the petition to call a general election is getting attention, it seems to me that there is a similar but much better way to remove the sordid collection of Fabian Society Marxist saboteurs from office. There is no mechanism to force a general election by petition. But there is a mechanism to recall MPs by petition and force a by-election for each one of them.   As Labour (predictably) destroys the country on a daily basis, the number of citizens being oppressed and disadvantaged by their policies is becoming vast - the farmers, those with businesses, pensioners being frozen to death, those being taxed in every direction, drivers, those sick of the woke and Net Zero agendas, those fearful of WW3 etc. Every sitting MP who has supported policies which afflict, impoverish or endanger their constituents, often in direct contravention of their manifesto promises, can be recalled and removed from parliament under the Recall of MPs Act 2015   If the plan were mooted with enough circulation, action could be taken in every constituency. There is no need to wait for the next general election, by which time the damage done will be catastrophic. Maybe you can help disseminate this idea through your networks and those who are petitioning for a new general election.   Regards   Alex

Starlin is threatening everyone who signed the petition with rebranded ASBOs.

‘buuuurrggh’ 

 

F**k him! 

[Blencathra]

45 minutes ago, Tinfoil Hat said:

Starmer had the brass-neck to sit giggling about the petition in a TV interview. 

 

I'll do cartwheels if the info in @Katsika's post is a legitimate way to make the weasel laugh on the other side of his ugly face.

 

I hope the petition humiliates S. Fat chance I suppose. 

 

He is not a Leader, certainly a weasel!

[Katsika]

more from

"(I'd value any pro-input as the above does seem like a great idea if validated) 

 

However, I'm not sure if this is possible since apparently one of three precise conditions are needed to validate such a petition.

 

In the UK, constituents can recall their MP through a petition process under the Recall of MPs Act 2015.

 

A recall petition can only be triggered in three specific circumstances:

1. The MP is convicted of a criminal offence and receives a custodial sentence (including suspended sentences)

2. The MP is suspended from the House for at least 10 sitting days (or 14 calendar days)

3. The MP is convicted of providing false or misleading expense claims

 

If any of these conditions are met:

• The Speaker of the House informs the local Petition Officer

• The Petition Officer must open a recall petition

• The petition remains open for 6 weeks

• Designated signing places are set up in the constituency

• 10% of eligible constituents must sign for it to succeed

If successful:

• The MP loses their seat

• A by-election is triggered

• The recalled MP can stand in the by-election

Important notes:

• Constituents can't start a recall petition just because they're unhappy with their MP

• One of the three qualifying conditions must be met first

• The process must be officially initiated through parliamentary channels

• Regular polling station rules apply at signing places

 

Source

 

I'm not big on legalities, but I truly believe a petition of this size will create a wave that could be picked up and accelerated by the legacy media.

 

Many write in saying petitions are useless.

 

I disagree.

 

Independent of their ability to cause direct change, petitions assure the signers that they are not alone.

In this case, we now know nearly 2m of the British voting public are angry with Starmer and his destruction of all we value. This gives a huge confidence to the cause baring in mind 1.8m signatures represents approx 20% of the total votes labour gained in the last election.

 

In 2014 one of the petitions I was involved in was the protest against the Interpol arrest warrant for the parents of Ashya King. They had been forced to kidnap their own child to escape the fascist medical doctors who has threatened them with taking the boy into state care if the parents didn't bow to their designated treatment of radiation.

 

Cameron was silent until a petition started by the boy's 14 yr old neighbour went viral and Cowardly Cameron suddenly u-turned from his complicit silence, and claimed as if a long-term supporter, we need "an urgent outbreak of common sense."e

 

The anger of the people via the petition's accelerating number scared him.

 

Individual politicians care about votes.

 

Petitions can work, even if not creating all the change we want.

What harm does it do to add a signature?

 

 

[Blencathra]

32 minutes ago, Katsika said:

more from

"(I'd value any pro-input as the above does seem like a great idea if validated) 

 

However, I'm not sure if this is possible since apparently one of three precise conditions are needed to validate such a petition.

 

In the UK, constituents can recall their MP through a petition process under the Recall of MPs Act 2015.

 

A recall petition can only be triggered in three specific circumstances:

1. The MP is convicted of a criminal offence and receives a custodial sentence (including suspended sentences)

2. The MP is suspended from the House for at least 10 sitting days (or 14 calendar days)

3. The MP is convicted of providing false or misleading expense claims

 

If any of these conditions are met:

• The Speaker of the House informs the local Petition Officer

• The Petition Officer must open a recall petition

• The petition remains open for 6 weeks

• Designated signing places are set up in the constituency

• 10% of eligible constituents must sign for it to succeed

If successful:

• The MP loses their seat

• A by-election is triggered

• The recalled MP can stand in the by-election

Important notes:

• Constituents can't start a recall petition just because they're unhappy with their MP

• One of the three qualifying conditions must be met first

• The process must be officially initiated through parliamentary channels

• Regular polling station rules apply at signing places

 

Source

 

I'm not big on legalities, but I truly believe a petition of this size will create a wave that could be picked up and accelerated by the legacy media.

 

Many write in saying petitions are useless.

 

I disagree.

 

Independent of their ability to cause direct change, petitions assure the signers that they are not alone.

In this case, we now know nearly 2m of the British voting public are angry with Starmer and his destruction of all we value. This gives a huge confidence to the cause baring in mind 1.8m signatures represents approx 20% of the total votes labour gained in the last election.

 

In 2014 one of the petitions I was involved in was the protest against the Interpol arrest warrant for the parents of Ashya King. They had been forced to kidnap their own child to escape the fascist medical doctors who has threatened them with taking the boy into state care if the parents didn't bow to their designated treatment of radiation.

 

Cameron was silent until a petition started by the boy's 14 yr old neighbour went viral and Cowardly Cameron suddenly u-turned from his complicit silence, and claimed as if a long-term supporter, we need "an urgent outbreak of common sense."e

 

The anger of the people via the petition's accelerating number scared him.

 

Individual politicians care about votes.

 

Petitions can work, even if not creating all the change we want.

What harm does it do to add a signature?

 

 

 

According to the UK Parliament website, Labour only got 9,708,716 votes. Imagine if the petition gets ten million signatures by the weekend. S. new nickname could be 10 million Starmer.

[Fluke]

2 hours ago, Tinfoil Hat said:

Starmer had the brass-neck to sit giggling about the petition in a TV interview. 

 

I'll do cartwheels if the info in @Katsika's post is a legitimate way to make the weasel laugh on the other side of his ugly face.

Honestly he makes me so angry. Gives me the creeps with his nasally little voice. Evil horrible little slime.

[Fluke]

1 hour ago, LastOneLeftInTheCounty said:

Starlin is threatening everyone who signed the petition with rebranded ASBOs.

‘buuuurrggh’ 

 

F**k him! 

The sad thing is I don't know if this is humour or not

[Mr H]

36 minutes ago, Fluke said:

Honestly he makes me so angry. Gives me the creeps with his nasally little voice. Evil horrible little slime.

Takes an awful lot for me to genuinely despise someone.

 

I congratulate Keir on being one of few.

 

Even a thought or sight of that man makes me physically sick..

 

[Katsika]

11 minutes ago, Mr H said:

Even a thought or sight of that man makes me physically sick..

I feel the same about Kyriakos Myxomatosis 

[Mr H]

1 minute ago, Katsika said:

I feel the same about Kyriakos Myxomatosis 

I had Myxomatosis once. Dr gave me some cream for it

 

Yeah. What's up with these people?

 

Why can't they act like normal humans?

 

Too much to ask?

 

I wonder what kind of people their partners must be being attracted and living with IT.

[SoundOfSilence]

2 hours ago, Katsika said:

I'm not big on legalities, but I truly believe a petition of this size will create a wave that could be picked up and accelerated by the legacy media.

 

Many write in saying petitions are useless.

 

I disagree.

 

If it was a few years ago then I think you'd be right. The petition would apply political pressure on the government.

 

Now, I don't think they care.

 

The globalists are facing a massive backlash around the world. People are waking up and turning against them.

 

A lot of them realise that they face the prospect of incarceration. Or worse.

 

Child trafficking, Kung Flu clot shots, looting the public treasury and trying to bring in a global slave grid enforced through the Chinese social credit system and a digital currency.

 

At the moment they are desperately clinging on to power.

 

The big problem for us is that we are fighting evil. Not greed.

 

Evil wants to destroy.

 

So, when faced with the prospect of losing power and being punished for their crimes they will turn the chessboard over.

 

That is why there is suddenly a big push towards nuclear war with Russia. If they are going to lose, they will take everyone with them.

 

I am hearing that the idiots yanking Biden's strings want to supply Ukraine with nuclear weapons. The ATACMs lined up on Putin's border can be equipped with nuclear warheads.

 

To be clear, nothing I have written should be interpreted as discouraging people from signing the petition.

 

Go for it!

 

One big middle finger to evil.

[SoundOfSilence]

22 minutes ago, Mr H said:

Takes an awful lot for me to genuinely despise someone.

 

I congratulate Keir on being one of few.

 

Even a thought or sight of that man makes me physically sick..

 

Evil will do that.

[SoundOfSilence]

8 minutes ago, Mr H said:

 

I wonder what kind of people their partners must be being attracted and living with IT.

In the case of Macron it is a male that abused him while he was at school.

 

In the case of Obama there is also evidence to suggest Big Mike is a male.

[Blencathra]

Now 2,400,000! (7.40pm). 

Edited November 25, 2024 by Blencathra

[Tinfoil Hat]

It was the little maggot's sniggering that wound me up. His attitude to the public, as he smirkingly cooed in patronising tones that that's not how the system works.

 

I'm sensing he relishes his unpopularity, and wears it with pride.

 

I wonder how much damage he'll wreak before the public decides that the system needs dismantling then, and if democratic attempts merit mockery, other methods might be investigated.

[Fluke]

2 hours ago, Mr H said:

Even a thought or sight of that man makes me physically sick..

 

I'm glad you said that. If his voice comes on a sight of him when I'm eating, like seeing a slug, I am repelled. I genuinely believe there is an entity in that thing but that's a discussion for another topic. 

[NeoScota]

3 hours ago, Fluke said:

I'm glad you said that. If his voice comes on a sight of him when I'm eating, like seeing a slug, I am repelled. I genuinely believe there is an entity in that thing but that's a discussion for another topic. 

Slug is exactly the thing I get with him. I've seen a few bona fide psychopaths with that slug vibe, whether it's the way they look or talk or in the case of someone I know, the walk they walk  so chuffin slowly like they are in slow motion for real, yet manage to keep up with someone walking briskly beside them. Creepy things. 

 

A curious spectacle to behold, but then I agree they have some very weird entities attached/within them. Smiling vipers... They smile but their eyes are predatory and cold. 

[Fluke]

25 minutes ago, NeoScota said:

Slug is exactly the thing I get with him. I've seen a few bona fide psychopaths with that slug vibe, whether it's the way they look or talk or in the case of someone I know, the walk they walk  so chuffin slowly like they are in slow motion for real, yet manage to keep up with someone walking briskly beside them. Creepy things. 

 

A curious spectacle to behold, but then I agree they have some very weird entities attached/within them. Smiling vipers... They smile but their eyes are predatory and cold. 

And what repels slugs? Salt. What's used to protect against the demonic in ritual magic? Salt. 

[Katsika]

12 hours ago, SoundOfSilence said:

If it was a few years ago then I think you'd be right. The petition would apply political pressure on the government.

 

Now, I don't think they care.

Just for clarity, I am not the author of  "Many write in saying petitions are useless etc."

 

 

[Blencathra]

16 hours ago, Katsika said:

more from

"(I'd value any pro-input as the above does seem like a great idea if validated) 

 

However, I'm not sure if this is possible since apparently one of three precise conditions are needed to validate such a petition.

 

In the UK, constituents can recall their MP through a petition process under the Recall of MPs Act 2015.

 

A recall petition can only be triggered in three specific circumstances:

1. The MP is convicted of a criminal offence and receives a custodial sentence (including suspended sentences)

2. The MP is suspended from the House for at least 10 sitting days (or 14 calendar days)

3. The MP is convicted of providing false or misleading expense claims

 

If any of these conditions are met:

• The Speaker of the House informs the local Petition Officer

• The Petition Officer must open a recall petition

• The petition remains open for 6 weeks

• Designated signing places are set up in the constituency

• 10% of eligible constituents must sign for it to succeed

If successful:

• The MP loses their seat

• A by-election is triggered

• The recalled MP can stand in the by-election

Important notes:

• Constituents can't start a recall petition just because they're unhappy with their MP

• One of the three qualifying conditions must be met first

• The process must be officially initiated through parliamentary channels

• Regular polling station rules apply at signing places

 

Source

 

I'm not big on legalities, but I truly believe a petition of this size will create a wave that could be picked up and accelerated by the legacy media.

 

Many write in saying petitions are useless.

 

I disagree.

 

Independent of their ability to cause direct change, petitions assure the signers that they are not alone.

In this case, we now know nearly 2m of the British voting public are angry with Starmer and his destruction of all we value. This gives a huge confidence to the cause baring in mind 1.8m signatures represents approx 20% of the total votes labour gained in the last election.

 

In 2014 one of the petitions I was involved in was the protest against the Interpol arrest warrant for the parents of Ashya King. They had been forced to kidnap their own child to escape the fascist medical doctors who has threatened them with taking the boy into state care if the parents didn't bow to their designated treatment of radiation.

 

Cameron was silent until a petition started by the boy's 14 yr old neighbour went viral and Cowardly Cameron suddenly u-turned from his complicit silence, and claimed as if a long-term supporter, we need "an urgent outbreak of common sense."e

 

The anger of the people via the petition's accelerating number scared him.

 

Individual politicians care about votes.

 

Petitions can work, even if not creating all the change we want.

What harm does it do to add a signature?

 

 

The Recall Act should be used on Reeves, if the rumours of her falsifying her CV are true. But she would have to be convicted of fraud first and the courts are, as we are constantly told, under resourced. Pity S. could not fast-track this somehow??

 

What an absolute shambolic mess we are in.

Edited November 26, 2024 by Blencathra

[LastOneLeftInTheCounty]

14 hours ago, Fluke said:

The sad thing is I don't know if this is humour or not

‘B b b b b b buuurrrggh……

 

butting boney in beoples bockets b b b b b buuuuurgh’ 

[LastOneLeftInTheCounty]

Well taxing farmers is one part of the next big scam, another part is sending billions upon billions to china in exchange for cheap, replaceable renewable energy gear. This is starmers hallowed increase in trade with china (his communist buddies) 
 

We’ll see this in the coming years when farmers are forced to sell land to pay inheritance tax, which will be bought by companies with contracts with the state. Up goes the thousands of solar arrays or turbines. 
 

Putting money in chinas pockets 

[Mr H]

10 hours ago, LastOneLeftInTheCounty said:

Well taxing farmers is one part of the next big scam, another part is sending billions upon billions to china in exchange for cheap, replaceable renewable energy gear. This is starmers hallowed increase in trade with china (his communist buddies) 
 

We’ll see this in the coming years when farmers are forced to sell land to pay inheritance tax, which will be bought by companies with contracts with the state. Up goes the thousands of solar arrays or turbines. 
 

Putting money in chinas pockets 

I kinda get the impression China is just a puppet state for the American Globalists.

 

It was US money and minds that set up china to export inflation.

 

China essentially trades it's labour, intellect,goods and resources for US dollars and treasuries.

 

Us dollars are free to print and although it would be messy, the us could cancel the treasuries. China is just another place for the Globalists to do there ting, I don't think it's a real autonomous nation.

 

China are not the concern. It's the Globalists...imo

[Grumpy Grapes]

 

Edited November 26, 2024 by Grumpy Grapes

[SoundOfSilence]

15 hours ago, Blencathra said:

The Recall Act should be used on Reeves, if the rumours of her falsifying her CV are true. But she would have to be convicted of fraud first and the courts are, as we are constantly told, under resourced. Pity S. could not fast-track this somehow??

 

What an absolute shambolic mess we are in.

You are correct that falsifying a CV is fraud.

 

Unfortunately, the courts will be very unlikely to look at it.

 

The legal system is so corrupt now. Openly corrupt. They have passed the point of caring. A brown envelope will be slipped to some satanic paedophile judge worshipping at the altar of the World Economic Forum. The courts will circle the wagons. Either refusing to hear it or holding a show trial.